Teaching questioning fosters adolescent curiosity: Analyzing impact through multiple-group structural equation modeling

References

• Acock, A. C. (2013). Discovering structural equation modeling using Stata 13 (Revised ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391–405. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley, M. (2007). Being and feeling interested: Transient state, mood and disposition. In P. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotions and education (pp. 147–163). Burlington, MA: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M. (2012). Students’ interest and engagement in classroom activities. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 283–302). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., Buckley, S., & Chan, J. (2009). Interest and efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning: Does the task make a difference? In M. Wosnitza, A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: From global to local perspectives (pp. 207–227). Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe & Huber.
   Google Scholar
• Aitken, J. E., & Neer, M. R. (1991). Variables associated with question-asking in the college classroom. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., Behnagh, R., Duffy, M., Harley, J., & Trevors, G. (2012). Metacognition and self-regulated learning in student-centered leaning environments. In D. Jonassen & S. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 171–197). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R., Harley, J., Trevors, G., Duffy, M., Feyzi-Behnagh, R., Bouchet, F., & Landis, R. (2013). Using trace data to examine the complex roles of cognitive, metacognitive, and emotional self-regulatory processes during learning with multi-agent systems International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 427–449). Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baehr, J. (2013). Educating for intellectual virtues: From theory to practice. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 47(2), 248–262. doi: 10.1111/1467-9752.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baehr, J. (2015). Cultivating good minds: A philosophical & practical guide to educating for intellectual virtues. Philadelphia, PA: Character Lab
   Google Scholar
• Baltes, P. B., Resse, H. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1988). Introduction to research methods: Life-span developmental psychology. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206–1222. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01791.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaly, H. (2006). Teaching intellectual virtues: Applying virtue epistemology in the classroom. Teaching Philosophy, 29(3), 191–222. doi: 10.5840/teachphil200629333
   Google Scholar
• Begus, K., & Southgate, V. (2012). Infant pointing serves an interrogative function. Developmental Science, 15(5), 611–617. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01160.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergin, D. A. (1999). Influences on classroom interest. Educational Psychologist, 34(2), 87–98.
   Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Biggers, M. (2018). Questioning questions: Elementary teachers’ adaptations of investigation questions across the inquiry continuum. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 1–28. doi: 10.1007/s11165-016-9556-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, P. C., Kempler, T. M., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 475–488). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with MPlus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Card, N. (2016). July 26 and 27). Methodological issues in measuring the development of character. Paper presented at the Invited paper for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine Workshop on Defining and Measuring Character and Character Education. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_173494.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521–549. doi: 10.1080/09500690110095249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Kayalvizhi, G. (2005). What do pupils think of open science investigations? A study of Singaporean primary 6 pupils. Educational Research, 47(1), 107–126. doi: 10.1080/0013188042000337596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2008). Students' questions: A potential resource for teaching and learning science. Studies in Science Education, 44(1), 1–39. doi: 10.1080/03057260701828101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouinard, M. M. (2007). Children's questions: A mechanism for cognitive development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 72(1), 1–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conference Board. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers' perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st century U.S. Workforce. Retrieved from www.p.21.org
   Google Scholar
• Daly, J. A., Kreiser, P. O., & Roghaar, L. A. (1994). Question‐asking comfort: Explorations of the demography of communication in the eighth grade classroom. Communication Education, 43(1), 27–41. doi: 10.1080/03634529409378959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckworth, A. L., & Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44(4), 237–251. doi: 10.3102/0013189X15584327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Endsley, R. C., Hutcherson, M. A., Garner, A. P., & Martin, M. J. (1979). Interrelationships among selected maternal behaviors, authoritarianism, and preschool children's verbal and nonverbal curiosity. Child Development, 50(2), 331–339. doi: 10.2307/1129407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, S. (2011). Children's need to know: Curiosity in schools. Harvard Educational Review, 81(4), 625–645. doi: 10.17763/haer.81.4.h054131316473115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, S. (2015). The hungry mind: The origins of curiosity in childhood. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Estabrook, R. (2016). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Grossnickle, E. M. (2016). Disentangling curiosity: Dimensionality, definitions, and distinctions from interest in educational contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 28(1), 23–60. doi: 10.1007/s10648-014-9294-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. L. (2012). Trusting what you're told: How children learn from others. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2000). Motivating the academically unmotivated: A critical issue for the 21st century. Review of Educational Research, 70(2), 151–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S., Renninger, K. A., & Krapp, A. (2004). Interest, a motivational variable that combines affective and cognitive functioning. In D. Dai, and R. J. Sternberg (Eds). Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 89–115). London: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacs, S. (1930). Intellectual growth in young children. Oxford: Harcourt, Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Kashdan, T. B., & Fincham, F. D. (2004). Facilitating curiosity: A social and self‐regulatory perspective for scientifically based interventions (pp. 482–503). Positive Psychology in Practice. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, S. M., Ali, R., & Gebing, T. (1998). Beyond the sponge model: Encouraging students' questioning skills in abnormal psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 25(4), 270–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1989). Effects of self-questioning training on college students' comprehension of lectures. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(4), 366–381. doi: 10.1016/0361-476X(89)90022-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 111–126. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep2701_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338–368. doi: 10.3102/00028312031002338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Bowers, E. P., & Geldhof, G. J. (2015). Positive youth development and relational developmental systems. In W. F. Overton & P. C. Molenaar (Eds.), Theory and method. Volume 1 of the handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th ed., pp. 607–651). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Litman, J. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition & Emotion, 19(6), 793–814. doi: 10.1080/02699930541000101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marbach‐Ad, G., & Sokolove, P. G. (2000). Can undergraduate biology students learn to ask higher level questions? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 854–870. doi: 10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<854::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markey, A., & Loewenstein, G. (2014). Curiosity. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink-Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 228–245). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. C., Horton, R., Igo, B. L., & Switzer, D. M. (2009). K-12 science and mathematics teachers’ beliefs about and use of inquiry in the classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(3), 575–596. doi: 10.1007/s10763-007-9122-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, S. T. (2004). Improving design sensitivity through intervention-sensitive measures. American Journal of Evaluation, 25(3), 321–334.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, S. G., & Bulbulian, K. N. (1976). The effects of contrasting styles of adult-child interaction on children's curiosity. Developmental Psychology, 12(2), 171. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.12.2.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., &., & Muthén, B. O., (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for School Engagement. (2006). Quantifying school engagement: Research report. Retrieved from http://schoolengagement.org/
   Google Scholar
• National Center for School Engagement. (2009). Peer victimization in schools: A set of quantitative and qualitative studies of the connections among peer victimization, school engagement, truancy, school achievement, and other outcomes. Retrieved from www.schoolengagement.org
   Google Scholar
• Niemivirta, M., & Tapola, A. (2007). Self-efficacy, interest, and task performance: Within-task changes, mutual relationships, and predictive effects. Zeitschrift Für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21(3/4), 241–250. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.21.3.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2006). Moral competence and character strengths among adolescents: The development and validation of the values in action inventory of strengths for youth. Journal of Adolescence, 29(6), 891–909. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastorelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Rola, J., Rozsa, S., & Bandura, A. (2001). The structure of children's perceived self-efficacy: A cross-national study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 87. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.17.2.87
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, R. A. (1978). Effects of anxiety, curiosity, and perceived instructor threat on student verbal behavior in the college classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(3), 388–395. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.70.3.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putwain, D., Sander, P., & Larkin, D. (2013). Academic self‐efficacy in study‐related skills and behaviours: Relations with learning‐related emotions and academic success. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 633–650. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2012.02084.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchhart, R. (2015). Creating cultures of thinking: The 8 forces we must master to truly transform our schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson-Cimpian, J. P. (2014). Inaccurate estimation of disparities due to mischievous responders: Several suggestions to assess conclusions. Educational Researcher, 43(4), 171–185. doi: 10.3102/0013189X14534297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rop, C. J. (2002). The meaning of student inquiry questions: A teacher's beliefs and responses. International Journal of Science Education, 24(7), 717–736. doi: 10.1080/09500690110095294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rop, C. J. (2003). Spontaneous inquiry questions in high school chemistry classrooms: Perceptions of a group of motivated learners. International Journal of Science Education, 25(1), 13–33. doi: 10.1080/09500690210126496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221. doi: 10.2307/1170607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, D., & Santana, L. (2011). Make just one change: Teach students to ask their own questions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2013). Toward a social psychology of assimilation: Self-determination theory in cognitive development and education. In B. W. Sokol, F. M. E. Grouzet, & U. Muller (Eds.), Self-regulation and autonomy: Social and developmental dimensions of human conduct (pp. 191–207). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders-Stewart, K., Gyles, P., Shore, B., & Bracewell, R. (2015). Student outcomes in inquiry: Students’ perspectives. Learning Environments Research, 18(2), 289–311. doi: 10.1007/s10984-015-9185-2
   Google Scholar
• Saunders-Stewart, K. S., Gyles, P. D., & Shore, B. M. (2012). Student outcomes in inquiry instruction a literature-derived inventory. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(1), 5–31. doi: 10.1177/1932202X11429860
   Google Scholar
• Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 177–199. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0903_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, J., & Schaffner, R. J. (2016). Factorial and construct validity of a new instrument for the assessment of reading motivation. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 221–237. doi: 10.1002/rrq.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 219–235). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J. (2006). Exploring the psychology of interest. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Interesting things and curious people: Exploration and engagement as transient states and enduring strengths. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(5), 785–797. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00210.x
   Google Scholar
• Southgate, V., Van Maanen, C., & Csibra, G. (2007). Infant pointing: Communication to cooperate or communication to learn? Child Development, 78(3), 735–740. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01028.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StataCorp. (2018). Stata 15.1 [computer software]. College Station, TX: StataCorp.
   Google Scholar
• Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tizard, B., & Hughes, M. (1984). Young children learning: Talking and thinking at home and at school. London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process: Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, T. (2008). The global achievement gap: Why even our best schools don't teach the new survival skills our children need- and what we can do about it. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, L. (2015a). What is inquisitiveness. American Philosophical Quarterly, 52(3), 273–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, L. (2015b). Why should we educate for inquisitiveness? In J. Baehr (Ed.), Intellectual virtues and education: Essays in applied virtues epistemology (pp. 50–65). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, L. (2018). Educating for good questioning: A tool for intellectual virtues education. Acta Analytica, 33, 353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. R., Kraft, M. A., Finn, A. S., Martin, R. E., Duckworth, A. L., Gabrieli, C. F., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2016). Promise and paradox: Measuring students’ non-cognitive skills and the impact of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(1), 148–170. doi: 10.3102/0162373715597298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, R., & Pearson, J. C. (1994). Antecedent and consequent conditions of student questioning: An analysis of classroom discourse across the university. Communication Education, 43(4), 299–311. doi: 10.1080/03634529409378988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Prediction-observation-explanation. Probing Understanding, 4. Great Britain: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolters, C. A., & Taylor, D. J. (2012). A self-regulated learning perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 635–651). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Pike, E. O. (1972). Effects of modeling and reinforcement on the acquisition and generalization of question-asking behavior. Child Development, 43(3), 892–907. doi: 10.2307/1127640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar