Visitors’ Self-Reported Knowledge and Attitudes about an Animal-Free Exhibit on Animal Welfare

References

• Ambrose, E. (2019, March 25). Spring fest offers interactive fun for the entire community. Purdue University agriculture news. Retrieved from https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2019/Q2/spring-fest-offers-interactive-family-fun-for-the-entire-community.html
   Google Scholar
• Bir, C., Davis, M., Widmar, N., Zuelly, S., & Erasmus, M. (2019). Perceptions of animal welfare with a special focus on turkeys. Frontiers in Veterinary Science Animal Behavior and Welfare, 6, 413–429.
   Google Scholar
• Bizjak, B., Knezevic, M., & Cvetreznik, S. (2010). Attitude change towards guests with disabilities: Reflections from tourism students. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 842–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., & Goodboy, A. K. (2010). Transformational leadership in the classroom: The development and validation of the student intellectual stimulation scale. Communication Reports, 23(2), 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkan, S., Goodboy, A. K., & Griffin, D. J. (2011). Teacher leadership and intellectual stimulation: Improving students‘ approaches to studying through intrinsic motivation. Communication Research Reports, 28(4), 337–346.
   Google Scholar
• Byrd, E., Widmar, N., & Fulton, J. (2017). Of fur, feather, and fin: Human’s use and concern for non-human species. Animals, 7(12), 22.
   Google Scholar
• Capper, J. L., & Yancey, J. W. (2015). Communicating animal science to the general public. Animal Frontiers, 5, 28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, G. J. (2010). Educating the public: Information or persuasion? Information or Persuasion? Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 37(1), 74–82.
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, A., Jamieson, J., Raubenheimer, D., & McGreevy, P. (2019). Applying the behavioural change wheel to encourage higher welfare food choices. Animals, 9(8), 524–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornish, A., Raubenheimer, D., & McGreevy, P. (2016). What we know about the public’s level of concern for farm animal welfare in food production in developed countries. Animals, 6(11), 74–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donath, J. (2014). Our evolving super-networks. In J. Donath (Ed.), The social machine: Designs for living online (pp. 129–130). Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, J. W. (1995). Attitudes towards animals: Species ratings. Society & Animals, 3, 139–150.
   Google Scholar
• Erasmus, M. (2018a, August). Animal well-being: Cattle. Retrieved from http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/AS/AS-664-W.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erasmus, M. (2018b, September). Animal well-being: Poultry. Retrieved from http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/AS/AS-645-W.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Erasmus, M. (2018c, October). Animal well-being: Horses. Retrieved from http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/AS/AS-648-W.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erasmus, M. (2018d, November). Animal well-being: Pigs. Retrieved from https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/AS/AS-649-W.PDF
   Google Scholar
• Erasmus, M. (2019a, April). Sheep well-being basics. Retrieved from https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/as/as-656-w.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erasmus, M. (2019b, December). Animal well-being: Goats. Retrieved from https://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/AS/AS-658-W.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Erasmus, M. (2020, January). For all ages informational brochures. Retrieved from https://ag.purdue.edu/ansc/erasmus/forkids/
   Google Scholar
• Erian, I., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2017). Public understanding and attitudes towards meat chicken production and relations to consumption. Animals, 7(12), E20.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, J. H., Storksdieck, M., & Dierking, L. D. (2007). Investigating public science interest and understanding: Evidence for the importance of free-choice learning. Public Understanding of Science, 16(4), 455–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feher, E., & Rice, K. (1985). Development of scientific concepts through the use of interactive exhibits in a museum. Curator: The Museum Journal, 28(1), 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández, G., & Benlloch, M. (2000). Interactive exhibits: How visitors respond. Museum International, 52(4), 53–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, D., Weary, D. M., Pajor, E. A., & Milligan, B. N. (1997). A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal Welfare, 6, 187–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hötzel, M. J., Cardoso, C. S., Roslindo, A., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. (2017). Citizens‘ views on the practices of zero-grazing and cow-calf separation in the dairy industry: Does providing information increase acceptability? Journal of Dairy Science, 100(5), 4150–4160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., & Erasmus, M. (2019a, December). Animal well-being: Dogs. Retrieved from https://extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/AS/AS-659-w.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., & Erasmus, M. (2019b, December). Animal well-being: Cats. Retrieved from https://mdc.itap.purdue.edu/item.asp?Item_Number=AS-660-W
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, J., Reiss, M. J., Allen, D., Asher, L., Wathes, C. M., & Abeyesinghe, S. M. (2012). Measuring the success of a farm animal welfare education event. Animal Welfare, 21(1), 65–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, W., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2016). Perceived learning in three MOOCs targeting attitudinal change. Education Media International, 53(3), 168–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, S., & Barnett, L. (2015). Justifying attitudes toward animal use : A qualitative study of people’s views and beliefs. Anthrozoös, 21(1), 31–42.
   Google Scholar
• Laflin, S. L., & Anderson, D. E. (2010). State fairs: A means of exposing america’s youth to the veterinary profession. Online Journal of Rural Research & Policy, 5(7), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Loizzo, J., Conner, N. W., Janning, E., & Rollins, J. (2016). Informal science engagement via extension exhibits : A pilot evaluation of adult state fairgoers’ experiences, attitudes, and learning at raising Nebraska. Journal of Applied Communications, 130, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Loizzo, J., Watson, S. L., & Watson, W. R. (2018). Examining instructor and learner experiences and attitude change in a journalism for social change massive open online course: A mixed-methods case study. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator, 73(4), 392–409.
   Google Scholar
• Mack, J. L. (2019, August, 19). Indiana state fair attendance reaches nearly 879k, up slightly from 2018 IndyStar. Retrieved from https://www.indystar.com/story/news/local/indianapolis/2019/08/19/indiana-state-fair-attendance-up-slightly-2019/2049096001/
   Google Scholar
• Maniaci, M., & Rogge, R. (2014). Conducting research on the internet. In H. Reis & C. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 443–470). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2009). Multimedia principle. In R. Mayer (Ed.), Multimedia learning (2nd ed., pp. 239–240). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mckendree, M. G. S., Croney, C. C., & Widmar, N. J. O. (2014). Effects of demographic factors and information sources on United States consumer perceptions of animal welfare. Journal of Animal Science, 92(7), 3161–3173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millman, S. T. (2009). Animal welfare - scientific approaches to the issues. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 12(2), 88–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. J., Croney, C. C., & Widmar, N. J. O. (2016). Exploring relationships between ethical consumption, lifestyle choices, and social responsibility. Advances in Applied Sociology, 6(5), 199–216.
   Google Scholar
• Nicoll, K., Trifone, C. G, & Samuels, W. E. (2008). An in-class, humane education program can improve young students’ attitudes towards animals. Society and Animals, 16(1), 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prickett, R. W., Norwood, F. B., & Lusk, J. L. (2010). Consumer preferences for farm animal welfare: Results from a telephonesurvey of US households. Animal Welfare, 19, 335–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, L. J., Evans, R. S., Mayne, F. E., & Rennie, S. J. (2010). Factors affecting the use and outcomes of interactive science exhibits in community settings. Visitor Studies, 13(2), 222–237.
   Google Scholar
• Rollins, J., & Watson, S. L. (2017). A salamander tale: Effective exhibits and attitude change. Journal of Extension, 55:3RIB2. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1146366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushen, J., Butterworth, A., & Swanson, J. C. (2011). Animal behavior and well-being symposium: Farm animal welfare assurance: Science and application. Journal of Animal Science, 89, 1219–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, E. B., Fraser, D., & Weary, D. M. (2015). Public attitudes to housing systems for pregnant pigs. PLoS One, 10(11), e0141878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., & Tuyttens, F. (2007). Segmentation based on consumers’ perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare. The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 15, 91–107.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., Van Poucke, E., & Tuyttens, F. (2008). Do citizens and farmers interpret the concept of farm animal welfare differently? Livestock Science, 116(1–3), 126–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura, B. A., von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., Wittman, H., & Weary, D. M. (2016). What difference does a visit make? Changes in animal welfare perceptions after interested citizens tour a dairy farm. PLoS One, 11(5), e0154733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, S., Watson, W., & Tay, L. (2018a). The development and validation of the attitudinal learning inventory (ALI): A measure of attitudinal learning and instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(6), 1601–1617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, S. L., Watson, W. R., Yu, J. H., Caskurlu, S., Janakiraman, S., & Fiock, H. (2018b). Attitudinal learning and its relation to gender, age, ethnicity, enrollment purpose, and most impactful learning activity in a science of happiness MOOC. International Journal of Learning Technology, 13(4), 306–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, W. R., Kim, W., & Watson, S. L. (2016). Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an animal behavior and welfare MOOC. Computers & Education, 96, 83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar