Too Close to Eat? Solidarity with Animals, Animal Welfare and Antibiotic Use

References

• Amiot, C. E., & Bastian, B. (2017). Solidarity with animals: Assessing a relevant dimension of social identification with animals. PloS One, 12(1), e0168184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, C. S., Chan, N. N., & Singh, L. (2019). A comparison study of meat eaters and non-meat eaters on mind attribution and moral disengagement of animals. Appetite, 136, 80–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Radke, H. R. (2012). Don’t mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 247–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, F., Dorsel, C., Garnett, E., Aveyard, P., & Jebb, S. A. (2018). Interventions targeting conscious determinants of human behaviour to reduce the demand for meat: a systematic review with qualitative comparative analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity,15(1), 1–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bilewicz, M., Imhoff, R., & Drogosz, M. (2011). The humanity of what we eat: Conceptions of human uniqueness among vegetarians and omnivores. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(2), 201–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaitey, A., & Minegishi, K. (2020). Who are farm animal welfare conscious consumers? British Food Journal, 122(12), 3779–3796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambell, R. (1965). Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive livestock husbandry systems. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, C. J., Szejda, K., Deshpande, V., Parekh, N., & Tse, B. (2019). A survey of consumer perceptions of plant-based and clean meat in the USA, India, and China. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 3, 11.
   Google Scholar
• Butterfield, M. E., Hill, S. E., & Lord, C. G. (2012). Mangy mutt or furry friend? Anthropomorphism promotes animal welfare. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 957–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cembalo, L., Caracciolo, F., Lombardi, A., Del Giudice, T., Grunert, K. G., & Cicia, G. (2016). Determinants of individual attitudes toward animal welfare-friendly food products. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, 29(2), 237–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chattopadhyay, M. K. (2014). Use of antibiotics as feed additives: A burning question. Frontiers in Microbiology, 5, 334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Backer, C. J., & Hudders, L. (2015). Meat morals: Relationship between meat consumption consumer attitudes towards human and animal welfare and moral behavior. Meat Science, 99, 68–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Agricultural Organization. Antimicrobial resistance: What is it? Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/antimicrobial-resistance/background/what-is-it/en/ [Accessed January 23, 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Frey, U. J., & Pirscher, F. (2018). Willingness to pay and moral stance: The case of farm animal welfare in Germany. PloS One, 13(8), e0202193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, E., Hartmann, M., &  Klink-Lehmann, J. (2017). Public acceptance of antibiotic use in livestock production in Canada and Germany. Proc. Syst. Dyn. Food Netw., 424–437.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, G. C., & Makatouni, A. (2002). Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal, 104(3/4/5), 287–299.
   Google Scholar
• Haverstock, K., & Forgays, D. K. (2012). To eat or not to eat. A comparison of current and former animal product limiters. Appetite, 58(3), 1030–1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayley, A., Zinkiewicz, L., & Hardiman, K. (2015). Values, attitudes, and frequency of meat consumption. Predicting meat-reduced diet in Australians. Appetite, 84, 98–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuer, N. (2014). Exploring European students’ meat consumption behavior: A survey-based analysis of the relationships between various explanatory variables and meat consumption (Master’s thesis).
   Google Scholar
• Landers, T. F., Cohen, B., Wittum, T. E., & Larson, E. L. (2012). A review of antibiotic use in food animals: Perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Reports, 127(1), 4–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, C. W., Van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B., … Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. A., Sneddon, J. N., Daly, T. M., Schwartz, S. H., Soutar, G. N., & Louviere, J. J. (2019). Testing and extending Schwartz refined value theory using a best–worst scaling approach. Assessment, 26(2), 166–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M., & Sirelius, M. (2001). Food choice ideologies: The modern manifestations of normative and humanist views of the world. Appetite, 37(3), 175–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindeman, M., & Väänänen, M. (2000). Measurement of ethical food choice motives. Appetite, 34(1), 55–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, M. J., Thottathil, S. E., & Newman, T. B. (2015). Antibiotics overuse in animal agriculture: A call to action for health care providers. American Journal of Public Health, 105(12), 2409–2410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miele, M., & Evans, A. (2010). When foods become animals: Ruminations on ethics and responsibility in care-full practices of consumption. Ethics, Place and Environment, 13(2), 171–190.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC). Report: US pigs consume nearly as many antibiotics as people do. Retrieved fromJanuary23, 2019. http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2018/06/report-us-pigs-consume-nearly-many-antibiotics-people-do
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C., Phu, D. H., Van, N. T. B., Truong, B. D., Kiet, B. T., Vo, H. B., … Carrique-Mas, J. J. (2019). High resolution monitoring of antimicrobial consumption in Vietnamese small-scale chicken farms highlights discrepancies between study metrics. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, 174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plous, S. (1993). Psychological mechanisms in the human use of animals. Journal of Social Issues, 49(1), 11–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, J., Franks, B., & von Keyserlingk, M. A. (2018). ‘More than a feeling’: An empirical investigation of hedonistic accounts of animal welfare. PloS One, 13(3), 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H. (2015). Underlying differences between conscientious omnivores and vegetarians in the evaluation of meat and animals. Appetite, 87, 251–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothgerber, H., & Mican, F. (2014). Childhood pet ownership, attachment to pets, and subsequent meat avoidance. The mediating role of empathy toward animals. Appetite, 79, 11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, M. B., & Heine, S. J. (2012). Too close to home. Factors predicting meat avoidance. Appetite, 59(1), 47–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, K., & Garrett, K. (2009). Non-therapeutic use of antibiotics in animal agriculture, corresponding resistance rates, and what can be done about it. Retrieved from [April/28/2021] https://www.cgdev.org/article/non-therapeutic-use-antibiotics-animal-agriculture-corresponding-resistance-rates-and-what
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speksnijder, D. C., Mevius, D. J., Bruschke, C. J. M., & Wagenaar, J. A. (2015). Reduction of veterinary antimicrobial use in the Netherlands. The Dutch success model. Zoonoses and Public Health, 62, 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(5), 322–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, K. P., Lee, S. L., & Chao, M. M. (2013). Saving Mr. nature: Anthropomorphism enhances connectedness to and protectiveness toward nature. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 514–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, E. F., Bury, S. M., Louis, W. R., Amiot, C. E., Molenberghs, P., Crane, M. F., & Decety, J. (2019). Vegetarian, vegan, activist, radical: Using latent profile analysis to examine different forms of support for animal welfare. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(6), 836–857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau - U.S. Census Bureau Quickfacts: Wisconsin. Retrieved from: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/wi ( Accessed April 15, 2019).
   Google Scholar
• Wang, F., & Basso, F. (2019). “Animals are friends, not food”: Anthropomorphism leads to less favorable attitudes toward meat consumption by inducing feelings of anticipatory guilt. Appetite, 138, 153–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunes, M. C., Teixeira, D. L., von Keyserlingk, M. A., & Hötzel, M. J. (2019). Is gene editing an acceptable alternative to castration in pigs? PloS One, 14(6), e0218176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingg, A., & Siegrist, M. (2012). People’s willingness to eat meat from animals vaccinated against epidemics. Food Policy, 37(3), 226–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar