Welfare of broiler chickens in Brazilian free-range versus intensive indoor production systems

References

• ABNT. (2015). Avicultura: Produção, abate, processamento e identificação do frango caipira, colonial ou capoeira. ABNT NBR, 16389, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• ABPA. (2016). Protocolo de bem-estar para frangos de corte. Retrieved August 31, 2018, from http://www.abpa-br.org.
   Google Scholar
• ABPA. (2021). Annual Report 2021. Retrieved May 5, 2021, from http://www.abpa-br.org/mercacos/#relatorios.
   Google Scholar
• Appleby, M. C., Mench, J. A., & Hughes, B. O. (2004). Poultry behaviour and welfare (eds). London, UK: CAB Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, R. M. (1996). Willingness-to-pay measures of public support for farm animal welfare legislation. Veterinary Record, 139(13), 320–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessei, W. (2006). Welfare in broilers: A review. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 62(3), 455–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bessei, W. (2018). Impact of animal welfare on worldwide poultry production. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 74(2), 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boissy, A., Manteuffel, G., Jensen, M. B., Moe, R. O., Spruijt, B., Keeling, L. K., Aubert, A. (2007). Assessment of positive emotions in animals to improve their welfare. Physiology & Behavior, 92, 375–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasil (1999). Ofício Circular DOI/DIPOA n.007/99 de 19 de maio de 1999. Normatização e comercialização de frango caipira ou frango colonial, também denominado “frango tipo ou estilo caipira” ou “tipo ou estilo colonial”. Retrieved from http://dados2.agrodefesa.go.gov.br/adicionaisproprios/protocolo/arquivos/218993.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. (2012). Ofício Circular DOI/DIPOA n.012/12 de 01 de fevereiro de 2012. Alteração do Ofício Circular 007/1999 de 15 de maio de 1999, com redução da idade de abate disciplinada. Retrieved August 25, 2018, from http://www.agricultura.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• Broiler Chickens, H. S. 2011. J. WebsterEd., Management and welfare of farm animals. 338–364. UFAW Farm Handbook. 5th. Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno, L. D. G., & Macari, M. (2002). Ingestão da água: Mecanismos regulatórios. In M. Macari, R. L. Furlan, & E. Gonzales (Eds.), Fisiologia aviária aplicada a frangos de corte (pp. 201–208). Jaboticabal: FUNEP/UNESP.
   Google Scholar
• Buijs, S., Keeling, L., Rettenbacher, S., Van Poucke, E., & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2009). Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poultry Science, 88(8), 1536–1543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, A. (2004). Infectious disease: Morbidity and mortality. In C. Weeks & A. Butterworth (Eds.), Measuring and auditing broiler welfare (pp. 61–70). CABI Publishing. Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. L. M., Hinch, G. N., Downing, J. A., & Lee, C. (2016a). Outdoor stocking density in free-range laying hens: Effects on behaviour and welfare. Animal, 1–10. doi:10.1017/S1751731116002342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. L. M., Hinch, G. N., Downing, J. A., & Lee, C. (2016b). Fear and coping styles of outdoor-preferring, moderate-outdoor and indoor-preferring free-range laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 185, 73–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B., Stewart, G. B., Panzone, L. A., Kyriazakis, I., & Frewer, L. J. (2017). Citizens, consumers and farm animal welfare: A meta-analysis of willingness-to-pay studies. Food Policy, 68, 112–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawkins, M. S., & Layton, L. (2012). Breeding for better welfare: Genetic goals for broiler chickens and their parents. Animal Welfare, 21(2), 147–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, I. C., Van Harn, J., & Gunnink, H. (2014). Wet litter not only induces footpad dermatitis but also reduces overall welfare, technical performance, and carcass yield in broiler chickens. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23(1), 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, L. M. (2020). Slow and steady wins the race: The behaviour and welfare of commercial faster growing broiler breeds compared to a commercial slower growing breed. Plos One, 6, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. (2010). Scientific opinion on the influence of genetic parameters on the welfare and resistance to stress of commercial broilers. EFSA Journal, 8(7), 1–82.
   Google Scholar
• Eleroğlu, H., Yildirim, A., Duman, M., & Şekeroğlu, A. (2015). The welfare of slow growing broiler genotypes reared in organic system. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 27(5), 454–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPAGRI (2020). Agroindústria de frango mantém família rural no campo. Retrieved July 5, 2021, from https://www.epagri.sc.gov.br/index.php/2020/03/03/agroindustria-de-frango-permite-familia-rural-permanecer-no-campo/.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2000). The Welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Health e consumer protection directorate-General. Report for the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• European Union Concil Directive 2007/43/EC. (2007). Laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production. The council of the European union. Official Journal of the European Union, 19–28. L 182.
   Google Scholar
• European Union Special Eurobarometer 442. (2015). Attitudes of Europeans towards Animal Welfare Report EN. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/COMMFrontOffice/PublicOpinion.
   Google Scholar
• Federici, J. F., Vanderhasselt, R., Sans, E. C. O., Tuyttens, F. A. M., Souza, A. P. O., & Molento, C. F. M. (2016). Assessment of broiler chicken welfare in southern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 18(1), 133–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haslam, S. M., Knowles, T. G., Brown, S. N., Wilkins, L. J., Kestin, S. C., Warriss, P. D., & Nicol, C. J. (2007). Factors affecting the prevalence of foot pad dermatitis, hock burn and breast burn in broiler chicken. British Poultry Science, 48(3), 264–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBGE. (2021). Pesquisa trimestral de abate de animais. Retrieved July 5, 2021, from https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/economicas/agricultura-e-pecuaria/9203-pesquisas-trimestrais-do-abate-de-animais.html?=&t=resultados
   Google Scholar
• INMET. (2019). Retrieved October 8, 2019, from www.inmet.gov.br.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. B. (1993). Reduction of the domestic chick’s fear of human beings by regular handling and related treatments. Animal Behaviour, 46(5), 991–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima, A. M. C., & Nããs, I. A. (2005). Evaluating two systems of poultry production: Conventional and free-range. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 7(4), 215–220.
   Google Scholar
• Lima, V. A., & Silva, I. J. O. (2019). Aves. In J. Hartung, M. Paranhos da Costa, & C. Perez (Eds.), O bem-estar animal o Brasil e na Alemanha: Responsabilidade e sensibilidade (pp. 117–127). Graftec Gráfica e Editora Ltda. São Paulo.
   Google Scholar
• Lymbery, P. (2004). A global perspective on broiler welfare standards. In C. Weeks & A. Butterworth (Eds.), Measuring and auditing broiler welfare (pp. 257:265). CABI Publishing. Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• MAPA. (2014). Instrução Normativa Nº 17, de 18 de junho de 2014. Regulamento Técnico Para Os Sistemas Orgânicos De Produção. 1:22. Retrieved June 20, 2019 from https://www.gov.br/agricultura/pt-br/assuntos/sustentabilidade/organicos/legislacao/portugues/instrucao-normativa-no-17-de-18-de-junho-de-2014.pdf/view
   Google Scholar
• Mellor, D. J. (2014). Positive animal welfare states and reference standards for welfare assessment. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 63(1), 17–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meluzzi, A., & Sirri, F. (2009). Welfare of broiler chickens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci, 8(1), 161–173.
   Google Scholar
• Muri, K., Stubsjøen, S. M., Vasdal, G., Moe, R. O., & Granquist, E. G. (2019). Associations between qualitative behaviour assessments and measures of leg health, fear and mortality in Norwegian broiler chicken flocks. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 211, 47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazareno, A. C., Pandorfi, H., Guiselini, C., Vigoderis, R. B., & Pedrosa, E. M. R. (2011). Animal welfare in different housing systems of broiler production. Engenharia Agrícola, 31(1), 13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol, C. J., Caplen, G., Edgar, J., & Browne, W. J. (2009). Associations between welfare indicators and environmental choice in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 78(2), 413–424.
   Google Scholar
• OIE. 2019. Animal welfare and broiler chicken production systems. Terrestrial Animal Health Code. Chap.7.10. Retrieved from. http://www.oie.int/index.php?id=169&L=0&htmfile=chapitre_aw_broiler_chicken.htm
   Google Scholar
• Oliva, F. (2017). Frango caipira: O novo produto gourmet do Brasil. Revista Avicultura Industrial, 6(108), 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. (2019). O caipira de volta a Mesa. Revista Avicultura Industrial, 4(110), 30–33.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, I. C., Weeks, C. A., Wilson, L. R. M., & Nicol, C. J. (2016). Consumer perceptions of free-range laying hen welfare. British Food Journal, 118(8), 1999–2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved October 21, 2019, from https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• RSPCA. (2017). RSCPA Welfare standards for meat chickens.
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, K. S., Benincasa, N. C., Silva, I. J. O., & Lobos, C. M. V. (2020). The challenges of animal welfare in modern Brazilian poultry farming. J Anim Behav Biometeorol, 8(2), 131–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchéz-Casanova, R., Samiento-Franco, L., Phillips, C. J. C., & Zulkifli, I. (2020). Do free-range systems have potential to improve broiler welfare in the topics? World’s Poultry Science Journal, 1–16. doi:10.1080/00439339.2020.1707389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sans, E. C. O., Federici, J. F., Dahlke, F., & Molento, C. F. M. (2014). Evaluation of free-range broilers using the Welfare Quality® Protocol. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 16(3), 297–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwin, C. M. (2010). The welfare and ethical assessment of housing for egg production. In I. J. H. Duncan & P. Hawkins (Eds.), The welfare of domestic fowl and other captive birds (pp. 241:258). Springer. New York.
   Google Scholar
• SIMEPAR. (2019). Retrieved October 8, 2019, from http://www.simepar.br.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, A. P. O., Sans, E. C. O., Müller, B. R., & Molento, C. F. M. (2015). Broiler chicken welfare assessment in GLOBALGAP® certified and non-certified farms in Brazil. Animal Welfare, 24(1), 45–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, A. P. O., Soriano, V. S., Schnaider, M. A., Rucinque, D. S., & Molento, C. F. M. (2018). Development and refinement of three animal-based broiler chicken welfare indicators. Animal Welfare, 27(3), 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadig, L. M., Rodenburg, T. B., Ampe, B., Reubens, B., & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2017). Effect of free-range access, shelter type and weather conditions on free-range use and welfare of slow-growing broiler chickens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 192, 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuyttens, F., Heyndrickx, M., De Boeck, M., Moreels, A., Van Nuffel, A., Van Poucke, E., … Lens, L. (2008). Broiler chicken health, welfare and fluctuating asymmetry in organic versus conventional production system. Livestock Science, 113(2–3), 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuyttens, F., Vanhonacker, F., & Verbeke, W. (2014). Broiler production in Flanders, Belgium: Current situation and producers’ opinion about animal welfare. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 70(2), 343–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Weerd, H. A., Keatinge, R., & Roderick, S. (2009). A review of key health-related welfare issues in organic poultry production. World’s Poultry Science Journal, 65(4), 649–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderhasselt, R. F., Buijs, S., Sprenger, M., Goethals, K., Willemsem, H., Duchateau, L., & Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2013). Dehydration indicators for broiler chickens at slaughter. Poultry Science, 92(3), 612–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanderhasselt, R. F., Goethals, K., Buijs, S., Federici, J. F., Sans, E. C. O., Molento, C. F. M., … Tuyttens, F. A. M. (2014). Performance of an animal-based test of thirst in commercial broiler chicken farms. Poultry Science, 93(6), 1327–1336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhonacker, F., Tuyttens, F. A. M., & Verbeke, W. (2016). Belgian citizens’ and broiler producers’ perceptions of broiler chicken welfare in Belgium versus Brazil. Poultry Science, 95(7), 1555–1563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasdal, G., Moe, R. O., de Jong, I. C., & Granquist, E. G. (2017). The relationship between measures of fear of humans and lameness in broiler chickens flocks. Animal, 1–6. doi:10.1017/S1751731117001434
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, K. H., Shi, S. R., Dou, T. C., & Sun, H. U. (2009). Effect of a free-range raising system on growth performance, carcass yield, and meat quality of slow-growing chicken. Poultry Science, 88(10), 2219–2223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welfare Quality®. (2009). Welfare quality assessment protocol for poultry (broilers, laying hens). Lelystad, Netherlands: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wemelsfelder, F. (2007). How animals communicate quality of life: The qualitative assessment of behaviour. Animal Welfare, 16(S), 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Wemelsfelder, F., Hunter, T. E. A., Mendl, M. T., & Lawrence, A. B. (2001). Assessing the ‘whole animal’: A free choice profiling approach. Animal Behabiour, 62(2), 209–200. doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1741
   Google Scholar
• Whates, C. M. (2004). Air hygiene. In C. Weeks & A. Butterworth (Eds.), Measuring and auditing broiler welfare (pp. 117–132). London, UK: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zeltner, E., & Hirt, H. (2003). Effect of artificial structuring on the use of laying hen runs in free-range system. British Poultry Science, 44(4), 533–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar