Regulatory approaches to oil spill response in Norway and Russia

References

• Activities Regulations, 2010, Regulations as of 29 April 2010 relating to conducting petroleum activities. The Petroleum Safety Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Majed, A.A., Adebayo, A.R., and Hossain, M.E., 2012, A sustainable approach to controlling oil spills. Journal of Environmental Management, 113, pp. 213–227. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrianov, V., 2014, Marazm prombezopasnosti (Insanity of the industrial safety). Oil and Gas Vertical, 1, pp. 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Arctic Council, 2009, Arctic Marine Shipping Assessment 2009 Report. Arctic Council, April 2009, Second printing.
   Google Scholar
• Arctic Offshore Oil And Gas Guidelines White Paper No. 5, 2012, The Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines in Greenland and the Russian Federation, Vermont Law School Institute for Energy and Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Aven, T., 2012. The risk concept – Historical and recent development trends. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 99, pp. 33–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babenko, M., 2013, Osvoenie Arktiki – ugroza dlya ekologii regiona? (Is the development of the Arctic a threat to the environment of the region?). Safety of Fuel and Energy Complex, 2, pp. 114–115.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, L., and Varghese, G., 2012, Designing capability for offshore response – a consultant perspective. Proceedings of the SPE/APPEA International Conference on HSE in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Perth, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Belkina, N.S., 2013, Choosing oil spill response method to protect sensitive coastal areas in the Russian Arctic. Proceedings of the SPE Arctic and Extreme Environments & Exhibition, Moscow, Russia, October 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Belkina, N.S., Sarkova, O.M., Jensen, S., and Stetjuha, P., 2014, Regulatory policies for use of oil dispersants in the Barents Sea. Polar Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerkemo, O.K., 2003, Contingency regulations and oil spill preparedness in Norwegian Arctic areas. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2003(1), pp. 1203–1206.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J., 2007, Principles Based Regulations: Risks Challenges and Opportunities (London: London School of Economics and Political Science).
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, H., Purnell, K., Law, R.J., and Kirby, M.F., 2007, The use of chemical dispersants to combat oil spills at sea: A review of practice and research needs in Europe. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 54(7), pp. 827–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernoplekov, A., and Kram, A., 2005, Development of the regulatory base for unconventional OSR technologies in Russia. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2005(1), pp. 399–401. 10.7901/2169-3358-2005-1-399
   Google Scholar
• Chernoplekov, A.N., 2002, Struktura i sostav planov likvidacii avarijnih razlivov nefti (The structure and content of oil spill response plans). Life Safety, 4, pp. 28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Chernoplekov, A.N., 2013, Russia moves towards goal-setting safety regulations. The Security and Safety of Fuel and Energy Complex Facilities, 1(3), pp. 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Chernoplekov, A.N., and Cox, T., 2003, Risk-based principles for oil spill response system design. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2003, pp. 63–68.
   Google Scholar
• CNIIMF (Russian Maritime Institute), 2005, Pravila primeneniya dispergentov dlja likvidacii razlivov nefti (Regulations on Oil Spill Dispersants Application) STO 318.4.02-2005 (Moscow: CNIIMF).
   Google Scholar
• DNV, 2010, OLF/NOFO – Summary of differences between offshore drilling regulations in Norway and U.S. DNV Report 2010-1220.
   Google Scholar
• DNV GL, 2014, DNV GL: The Arctic – The next risk frontier. Available from: http://www.dnvgl.com/technology-innovation/strategic-projects/arctic/resources.aspx [Accessed 16 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Donskoy, S., 2014, Nedropolzovanie i ekologicheskya bezopasnost (Use of subsoil resources and environmental safety). Safety of Fuel and Energy Complex, 1, pp. 78–82.
   Google Scholar
• Emercom (The Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defence, Emergencies and Elimination of Consequences of Natural Disasters), 2004, Prikaz ob utverždenii pravil razrabotki i soglasovaniya planov po predupreždeniu i likvidatsii razlivov nefti i nefteproduktov na teriitorii RF (On approval of regulations for development, submitting and approval of plans on oil and petroleum product spills prevention and response on the territory of the Russian Federation). Decree No. 621 as of 28 December 2004 (Moscow: EMERCOM).
   Google Scholar
• Ermida, G., 2014, Strategic decisions of international oil companies: Arctic versus other regions. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2(3), pp. 265–272.
   Google Scholar
• FAMRT (The Federal Agency of Maritime and River Transport of the Russian Federation), 2008, On ensuring the minimum area of possible oil spill spreading during loading/unloading operations and bunkering. Instruction No. DD-27\1484 as of 26 February 2008 (Moscow: FAMRT).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law, 1992, O nedrah (On Subsoil Resources). Federal Law No. 2395-1 as of 21 February1992 (Moscow: The State Duma of the Russian Federation).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law, 1995a, O kontinentalnom shelfe Rossijskoj Federacii (On the Continental Shelf of the Russian Federation). Federal Law No. 187-FZ as of 30 November 1995 (Moscow: The State Duma of the Russian Federation).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law, 1995b, Ob ekologicheskoj ekspertize (On Environmental Review). Federal Law No. 174-FZ as of 23 November 1995 (Moscow: The State Duma of the Russian Federation).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law, 1998, O vnutrennih morskih vodah, territorialnom more i priležaschei zone Rossijskoj Federacii (On Inland Sea Waters, Territorial Sea and Adjacent Zone of the Russian Federation). Federal Law No. 155-FZ as of 31 July 1998 (Moscow: the State Duma of the Russian Federation).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law, 2002, O zaschite okryžajuschej sredi (On Environmental Protection). Federal Law No. 7-FZ as of 10 January 2002 (Moscow: The State Duma of the Russian Federation).
   Google Scholar
• Federal Law, 2012, Ob izmeneniyah v federalnih zakonah ‘O kontinentalnom shelfe Rossijskoj Federacii’ i ‘O vnutrennih morskih vodah, territorialnom more i priležaschei zone Rossijskoj Federacii’ (On Amendments to the Federal Laws ‘On the Continental Shelf of the Russian Federation’ and ‘On Inland Sea Waters, Territorial Sea and Adjacent Zone of the Russian Federation’). Federal Law No. 287-FZ as of 30 December 2012 (Moscow: The State Duma of the Russian Federation).
   Google Scholar
• Force, R., Davies, M., and Force, J.S., 2011, Deepwater horizon: Removal costs, civil damages, crimes, civil penalties, and state remedies in oil spill cases. Tulane Law Review, 85(4), pp. 889–982.
   Google Scholar
• Framework Regulations, 2010, Regulations as of 12 February 2010 relating to health, safety and the environment in the petroleum activities and at certain onshore facilities. The Petroleum Safety Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoneim, G.A., 2013, International collaboration required for consistency; hybrid, prescriptive, goal-based approach may ensure safety goals are met. Available from: http://www.drillingcontractor.org/arctic-regulations-overview-flexibility-cooperation-needed-25514 [Accessed 23 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Glibko, O.Y., 2008, Methodological basis for assessment of environmental damage caused by oil pollution in the Arctic: Analysis and improvement. Oil and Gas of the Arctic Shelf Proceedings, 1, pp. 50–53.
   Google Scholar
• Goskomrybolovstvo (The Russian State Fishery Committee), 1999, O rybohozjajstvennih normativah (On Fishery Norms). Order No. 96 as of 28 April 1999 (Moscow: Goskomrybolovstvo).
   Google Scholar
• Government, 1994, Soglashenie meždu Pravitel’stvom RF i Pravitel’stvom Korolevstva Norvegja o sotrudničestve v bor’be s zagryazneniem neftju v Barencevom more (The Agreement between the Government of the RF and the Government of the Kingdom of Norway on Cooperation in Combating Emergency Spills in the Barents Sea). Order No. 545 as of 24 May 1994. Moscow: Government of Russia.
   Google Scholar
• Government, 2000, O neotložnih merah po predupreždeniju i likvidacii avarijnih razlivov nefti i nefteproduktov (On Immediate Actions on Oil Spill Prevention and Response). Decree No. 613 as of 21 August 2000 (Moscow: Government of the Russian Federation).
   Google Scholar
• Government, 2002, O poryadke organizacii meropriyatij po predupreždeniju i likvidacii razlivov nefti i nefteproduktov na territorii Rossijskoj Federacii (On Organization of Preparedness to Spills of Oil and Oil Products in the Russian Federation). Decree No. 240 as of 15 April 2002 (Moscow: Government of the Russian Federation).
   Google Scholar
• Government of Norway, 2011, Treaty with Russia on maritime delimitation and cooperation in the Barents Sea and the Arctic Ocean. Available from: http://www.regjeringen.no/en/dep/ud/documents/propositions-and-reports/reports-to-thestorting/2011–2012/meld-st-7–20112012–2/5/3.html?id=697761 [Accessed 3 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Guidelines, 2012, Guidelines regarding the Management Regulations as of 20 December 2012. The Petroleum Safety Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Harsem,Ø., Eide, A., and Heen, K., 2011, Factors influencing future oil and gas prospects in the Arctic. Energy Policy, 39(12), pp. 8037–8045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasle, J.R., Kjellen, U., and Haugerud, O., 2009, Decision on oil and gas exploration in an Arctic area: Case study from the Norwegian Barents Sea. Safety Science, 47, pp. 832–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassler, B., 2010, Global regimes, regional adaptation: Environmental safety in Baltic Sea oil transportation. Maritime Policy and Management, 37(5), pp. 489–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirokawa, K.H., 2010, Disasters and ecosystem services deprivation: From Cuyahoga to the Deepwater Horizon. Albany Law Review, 74(1), pp. 543–561.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, T., 2014, The role of regulatory frameworks and state regulation in optimising the extraction of petroleum resources: A study of Australia and Norway. The Extractive Industries and Society, 1(1), pp. 48–58.
   Google Scholar
• IMO (International Maritime Organization), 2014, International Convention on Oil Pollution Preparedness, Response and Cooperation (OPRC). Available from: http://www.imo.org/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/International-Convention-on-Oil-Pollution-Preparedness,-Response-and-Co-operation-%28OPRC%29.aspx [Accessed 15 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• In Situ Burning In Ice-Affected Waters, 2013, Status of Regulations in Arctic and Sub-Arctic Countries, Final report 7.2.1. Report from Joint Industry Programme to present status of regulations related to in situ burning in Arctic and sub-Arctic countries.
   Google Scholar
• Intsok (Russian-Norwegian Oil and Gas Industry Cooperation in the High North), 2013, Logistics and transport – Report. Available from: http://www.intsok.ru/index.php?id=2526 [Accessed 1 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Ipieca (The Global Oil and Gas Industry Association for Environmental and Social Issues), 2007, Guide to tiered preparedness and response. Final report.
   Google Scholar
• Ipieca (The Global Oil and Gas Industry Association for Environmental and Social Issues), 2013, Oil spill risk assessment and response planning for offshore installations. Final report.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, M., 2011, Oil spill emergency preparedness in the Russian Arctic: A study of the Murmansk region. Polar Research, 30, 7285. 10.3402/polar.v30i0.7285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova, M., and Sydnes, A. K., 2010, Interorganizational coordination in oil spill emergency response: A case study of the Murmansk region of Northwest Russia. Polar Geography, 33(3), pp. 139–164.
   Google Scholar
• Ischenko, A., 2007, Environmental safety is a priority. Oil of Russia, 4. Available from: http://www.oilru.com/or/33/638/ [Accessed 21 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, H.V., Andersen, J.H., and Gyltnes, S.L., 2011, Oil spill response technology development through industry commitments – The Norwegian way. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2011(1), pp. 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Jødestøl, K.A., Fredheim, B., Hoell, E.E., Wakili, S., Vinnem, J.E., Myhrvold, A.U., Hasle, J.R., and Ytterborg, G., 2001, Achieving an industry standard in the assessment of environmental risk: Oil spill risk management and the Mira Method. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2001(1), pp. 155–165.
   Google Scholar
• Lesikhina, N., Rudaya, I., Kireeva, A., Krivonos, O., and Kobets, E., 2007, Offshore Oil and Gas Development in Northwest Russia: Consequences and Implications (Murmansk: Bellona).
   Google Scholar
• Ly, J.M., 2001, Oil spill response training and exercises in Norway: Are we prepared? International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2001(1), pp. 617–622.
   Google Scholar
• Ly, J.M., and Bjerkemo, O.K., 2011, Prevention, preparedness, and response to shipping incidents in the Barents Sea. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2011(1), pp. abs228.
   Google Scholar
• Management Regulations, 2010, Regulations as of 29 April 2010 relating to management and the duty to provide information in the petroleum activities and at certain onshore facilities. The Petroleum Safety Authority.
   Google Scholar
• May, J., 2002, Social regulation. In Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, Lester Salamon (Ed), pp. 156–185 (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• May, J., 2003, Performance-based regulation and regulatory regimes. Paper prepared for the Global Policy Summit on the Role of Performance-based Building Regulations in Addressing Societal Expectations, International Policy, and Local Needs. National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, November 3–5, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• May, J., 2007, Regulatory regimes and accountability. Regulation & Governance, 1, pp. 8–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry Of Transport, 2009, Prikaz ob utverždenii položenijiya o funkcionalnoj podsisteme organizacii rabot po predupreždeniju i likvidacii razlivov nefti i nefteproduktov v more s sudov i ob’ektov nezavisimo ot ih vedomstvennoi i nacionalnoi prinadležnosti (On Approval of Regulations of a Functional Subsystem for Operational Actions on Prevention and Response to Oil Spill at Sea from Vessels or Facilities regardless their Ownership or Nationality). Decree No. 53 as of 6 April 2009 (Moscow: Ministry of Transport).
   Google Scholar
• Mnr (Ministry of Natural Resources of Russian Federation), 2003, Prikaz ob utverždenii ukazanij po opredeleniju nižnego urovnya razliva nefti i nefteproduktov dlya otneseniya avarijnogo razliva k chrezvichajnoj situacii (On Approval of Instructions on the Definition of the Lower Level of Oil and Oil Product Spills for the Classification of Oil Spill as an Emergency Situation). Decree No. 156 as of 3 March 2003 (Moscow: MNR).
   Google Scholar
• Moe, A., Fjærtoft, D., and ØVerland, I., 2011, Space and timing: Why was the Barents Sea delimitation dispute resolved in 2010? Polar Geography, 34(3), pp. 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Natvig, K., 1997, The environmental authorities’ handling of the petroleum industry's oil pollution preparedness in Norway. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 1997(1), pp. 895–898.
   Google Scholar
• NORSOK, 2010, NORSOK Standard Z-013 Risk and Emergency Preparedness Analysis, Edition 3, October 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Olf (The Norwegian Oil and Gas Association), 2012, Deepwater horizon. Lessons learned and follow-up, Report 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Palnikov, K.G., 2012, Organizaciya predupreždeniya i likvidacii razlivov nefti i nefteproduktov v more i na vnutrennih vodnih putyah Rossijskoj Federacii (Organization of preparedness and response to spills of oil and oil products at sea and in internal waters of the Russian Federation). Transport Security and Technologies, 1(28), pp. 132–133.
   Google Scholar
• Pame (Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment), 2014, Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Guidelines. Systems Safety Management and Safety Culture. Avoiding Major Disasters in Arctic Offshore Oil and Gas Operations, Arctic Council, March 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlenko, V.I., and Gluhareva, E.K., 2008, Problems of the cooperation between the Arctic states in oil spill response in the Arctic. Oil and Gas of the Arctic Shelf Proceedings, 1, pp. 69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C.H., Rice, S.D., Short, J.W., Esler, D., Bodkin, J.L., and Ballachey, B.E., 2003, Long-term ecosystem response to the Exxon Valdez oil spill. Science, 302(5653), pp. 2082–2086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petroleum Safety Authority, 2010, From prescription to performance in petroleum supervision. Available from: http://www.ptil.no/news/from-prescription-to-performance-in-petroleum-supervision-article6696–878.html [Accessed 15 March 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Pietri, D., Soule, A.B., Kershner, J., Soles, P., and Sullivan, M., 2008, The Arctic shipping and environmental management agreement: A regime for marine pollution. Coastal Management, 36(5), pp. 508–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prozorovsky, V., 2011, The shelf needs protection, Oil of Russia, 1. Available from: http://www.oilru.com/or/46/966/ [Accessed 21 May 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Reason, J., 1997, Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Rosrybolovstvo (The Russian Federal Agency of Fishery Resources), 2010, Ob utverždenii normativov kačestva vod vodnih obektov rybohozjajstvennogo značeniya, v tom čisle normativov predel’no dopustimih koncentrcij vrednih veščestv v vodah vodnih ob’ektov rybohozjajstvennogo značeniya (On Approval of Water Quality Norms for Fishery Water Bodies Including MPC of Harmful Substances in Fishery Water Bodies). Order No. 20 as of 18 January 2010 (Moscow: Rosrybolovstvo).
   Google Scholar
• Rostechnadzor (The Federal Service for Ecological, Technological, and Nuclear Oversight of Russia), 2013, Federalnie normi i pravila v oblasti promishlennoy bezopasnosti ‘Pravila bezopasnosti v neftyanoi promishlennosti’ (Federal Norms and Rules for Industrial Safety ‘Safety Rules in the Oil and Gas Industry’) (Moscow: Rostechnadzor).
   Google Scholar
• Rødal, J., Jørgensen, K.L., and Skeie, G.M., 2003, Implementation and maintenance of a risk based dynamic oil spill response regime with an Internet and GIS interface for the Norwegian Shelf. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2003(1), pp. 491–496.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkova, O.M., Belkina, N.S., Kovalenko, K.V., and O’Conell, K., 2010, Improvement of the Emergency Oil Spill Response System under Arctic Conditions for Protection of Sensitive Coastal Areas (Case Study: The Barents Sea). Murmansk: UNEP/GEF Project Russian Federation – Support to the National Programme of Action for the Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment/Nefco.
   Google Scholar
• Schenkman, L., 2010, Gulf oil spill. Three historic blowouts. Science, 328(5979), pp. 675.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, C.W., 2012, Offshore exploration in the Arctic: Can shell's oil-spill response plans keep up? Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(5), pp. a194–a199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sea Consulting Group, 2013, Dispersants use in ice-affected waters: status of regulations and outreach opportunities. Joint Industry Programme Oil Spill Response in the Arctic and Ice-covered Waters. Summary Report.
   Google Scholar
• Short, J., and Murray, S., 2011, A frozen hell. Nature Publishing Group, 472(7342), p. 162.
   Google Scholar
• Sklet, S., 2006, Safety barriers: Definition, classification, and performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19(5), pp. 494–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogdalen, J.E., Utne, I.B., and Vinnem, J.E., 2011, Developing safety indicators for preventing offshore oil and gas deepwater drilling blowouts. Safety Science, 49(2011), pp. 1187–1199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirnov, D., 2014, Kak borotca s neftyanimi razlivami? (How to combat oil spills?). Safety of Fuel and Energy Complex, 1, pp. 84–89.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., 2011, The deepwater horizon disaster: an examination of the spill's impact on the gap in international regulation of oil pollution from fixed platforms. Emory International Law Review, 25, pp. 1477–1516.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., and Ashcroft, P.A., 2010, Analysis of environmental and economic damages from British Petroleum's Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Albany Law Review, 74(1), pp. 563–585.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolov, V., 2012, Princip zagryaznitel platit (The polluter pay principle). The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia. Development strategies, 3, pp. 53–56.
   Google Scholar
• Stokke, K., and Rødal, J., 2001, Risk-based oil spill emergency preparedness on the Norwegian Continental Shelf. International Oil Spill Conference Proceedings, 2001(1), pp. 345–347.
   Google Scholar
• Stortinget (The Norwegian Parlament), 2013, Tilleggsmelding til Meld. St. 36 (2012–2013). Nye muligheter for Nord-Norge – åpning av Barentshavet sørøst for petroleumsvirksomhet (New Opportunities for the Northern Norway – Opening of the Barents Sea South-East). Available from: https://www.stortinget.no/no/Saker-og-publikasjoner/Saker/Sak/?p=57617 [Accessed 15 May 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Sydnes, A.K., and Sydnes, M., 2011, Oil spill emergency response in Norway: Coordinating interorganizational complexity. Polar Geography, 34(4), pp. 299–329.
   Google Scholar
• Sydnes, A.K., and Sydnes, M., 2012, Norwegian-Russian cooperation on oil spill response in the Barents Sea. Marine Policy, 39(2013), pp. 257–264.
   Google Scholar
• Tugolukov, E., 2011, More bez pyaten (The sea without spots), The fuel and energy complex of Russia. Development Strategies, 5(2011), pp. 36–37.
   Google Scholar
• Venchikova, V., 2012, Priroda v zakone (Nature in Law), The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia. Development Strategies, 3(2012), pp. 39–42.
   Google Scholar
• Vik, A.M., 2003, New Norwegian policy on use of dispersants. Proceedings of International Oil Spill Conference, Vancouver, Canada, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Vinnem, J.E., 2011, Evaluation of offshore emergency preparedness in view of rare accidents. Safety Science, 49(2), pp. 178–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vodyannik, I., 2012, Neobhodimii instrument (The necessary tool). The Fuel and Energy Complex of Russia. Development strategies, 3(2012), pp. 43–44.
   Google Scholar
• Zagvozdkin, V., 2008, Environmental safety comes first. Oil of Russia, 1(2008). Available from: http://www.oilru.com/or/34/655/ [Accessed 15 May 2014].
   Google Scholar