260
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Arctic energy image: hydrocarbon aesthetics of progress and form

Pages 130-143 | Received 21 Dec 2015, Accepted 11 Apr 2016, Published online: 10 Jun 2016

References

  • Adorno, T., & Horkeimer, M. (1979). Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.
  • Anderson, A. (2009). After the ice: Life, death, and geopolitics in 38 the new arctic. Washington, DC: Smithsonian.
  • Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Baudrillard, J. (1995). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Baumgarten, A. (1750). Aesthetica, cited in Seel, M. 2005. Aesthetics of appearing. (John Farrell, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Beck, U. ([1986]1992). Risk society. London: Sage.
  • Berger, J. (1979). Ways of seeing. New York: Penguin.
  • Bookman, S. (2012). Feeling cosmopolitan. In D. Spencer, K. Walby, & A. Hunt (Eds.), Emotions matter (pp. 240–259). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1982). Distinction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Budd, M. (2008). Aesthetic essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of network society. London: Blackwell.
  • Chevreul, M. (1839). The principles of harmony and contrast of colors, cited in G. Olsson. (2009). The visible and the invisible: Color contrast phenomena in space, KTH.
  • Coote, J., & Shelton, A. eds. (1994). Anthropology of art and aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Firth, R. (1994). Art and anthropology. In J. Coote & A. Shelton (Eds.), Anthropology of art and aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Fraser, N. (1989 ). Unruly practices: Power, discourse and gender in contemporary social theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Gereffi, G., & Korzeniewicz, M. (1993). Commodity chains and global capitalism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interest. New York: Beacon Press.
  • Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse coalitions. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. London: Blackwell.
  • Harvey, D. (1990). Condition of post-modernity. London: Blackwell.
  • Huber, M. (2015). Oil for life. In H. Appel, A. Mason, & M. Watts (Eds.), Subterranean estates: Lifeworlds of oil and gas (pp. 31–44). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Mason, A. (in review). Empathy for the graph. Anthropology Today.
  • Mason, A. (2015). Inside the energy salon: Installation and illusions of finality. Journal of Business Anthropology, 4(1), 36–53
  • Mauss, M. (1925 [2011]). The gift. Eastford: Martino Books.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (2009). Cited in G. Olsson. (2009). The visible and the invisible: Color contrast phenomena in space, KTH.
  • NRC (National Research Council). (1984). Thinking about energy. In P. Stern & E. Aronson (Eds.), Energy use: The human dimension (pp. 14–31). New York: Freeman & Company.
  • Pine, J., & Gilmore, J. (1999). The experience economy. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Rebentisch, J. (2012). Aesthetics of installation art. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
  • Seel, M. (2005). Aesthetics of appearing. (John Farrell, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Shklovsky, V. (1926). Art as technique, in Russian Formalist Criticism: Four essays, 1965. (Lemon and Reis, Trans.). University of Nebraska Press.
  • Sloterdijk, P. (1982). Critique of cynical reason. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Smil, V. (2000). Energy in the twentieth century: Resources, conversions, costs, uses, and consequences. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment, 25, 21–51. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.25.1.21
  • Thrift, N. (2009). Non-representational theory. London: Routledge.
  • Veblen, T. (1912 [1994]). The theory of the leisure class. Mineola: Dover.
  • Weber, M. (1918). Science as a vocation. Originally a speech at Munich University, 1918, published in 1919 by Duncker & Humblodt. In H.H. Gerth and C. Mills (1946), translated and edited, From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology (129–156). New York: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.