513
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Climate services in a rapidly changing environment: an evaluation of the Sea Ice for Walrus Outlook (SIWO)

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, &
Pages 206-227 | Received 06 Jul 2023, Accepted 17 Nov 2023, Published online: 05 Dec 2023

References

  • Abdel-Fattah, D., Trainor, S., Kettle, N., & Mahoney, A. (2022). Sea ice hazard data needs for search and rescue in Utqiaġvik, Alaska. In P. A. Berkman, A. N. Vylegzhanin, O. R. Young, D. A. Balton, & O. R. Øvretveit (Eds.), Building common interests in the Arctic ocean with global inclusion (pp. 297–320). Springer.
  • Alessa, L., Kliskey, A., Gamble, J., Fidel, M., Beaujean, G., & Gosz, J. (2016). The role of indigenous science and local knowledge in integrated observing systems: Moving toward adaptive capacity indices and early warning systems. Sustainability Science, 11, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-015-0295-7
  • Argyle, E., Gourley, J., Flamig, Z., Hansen, T., & Manross, K. (2017). Toward a user-centered design of a weather forecasting decisions support tool. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0031.1
  • Baxter, J., & Eyles, J. (1997). Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: Establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4), 505–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-2754.1997.00505.x
  • Bessembinder, J., Terrando, M., Hewitt, C., Garrett, N., Kotova, L., Buonocore, M., & Broenland, R. (2019). Need for a common typology of climate services. Climate Services, 16, 100135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2019.100135
  • Boon, E., Wright, S., Biesbroek, R., Goosen, H., & Ludwig, F. (2022). Successful climate services for adaptation: What we know, don’t know and need to know. Climate Services, 27(100314), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100314
  • Braem, N. M., Mikow, E. H., Godduhn, A. R., Kostick, M. L., Koster, D. S., & Retherford, B. (2017). Chukchi Sea and Norton Sound Observation Network: Harvest and use of Wild Resources in 9 Communities in Arctic Alaska, 2012–2014. Retrieved from Fairbanks, AK.
  • Buizer, J., Jacobs, K., & Cash, D. (2016). Making short-term climate forecasts useful: Linking science and action. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(17), 4597–4602. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900518107
  • Cash, D., Clark, W., Alcock, F., Dickson, N., Eckley, N., Guston, D., … Mitchell, R. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8086–8091. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
  • Cochran, P., Huntington, O., Pungowiyi, C., Tom, S., Chapin, F., Huntington, H., … Trainor, S. (2013). Indigenous frameworks for observing and responding to climate change in Alaska. Climatic Change, 120, 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0735-2
  • Colavito, M., Trainor, S., Kettle, N., & York, A. (2019). Making the transition from science delivery to jnowledge coproduction in boundary spanning: A case study of the Alaska Fire Science Consortium. Weather Climate and Society, 11, 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0009.1
  • Cvitanovic, C., Shellock, R., Mackay, M., van Putten, E., Karcher, D., Dickey-Collas, M., & Ballesteros, M. (2021). Strategies for building and managing ‘trust’ to enable knowledge exchange at the interface of environmental science and policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 123, 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.05.020
  • Dilling, L., Lackstrom, K., Haywood, B., Dow, K., Lemos, M. C., Berggren, J., & Kalafatis, S. (2015). What stakeholder needs tell us about enabling adaptive capacity: The intersection of context and information provision across regions in the United States. Weather, Climate, and Society, 5–17.
  • Dilling, L., & Lemos, M. (2011). Creating usable science: Opportunities and constraints for climate knowledge use and their implications for science policy. Global Environmental Change, 21, 680–689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
  • Eicken, H., Kaufman, M., Krupnik, I., Pulsifer, P., Apangalook, L., Apangalook, P., … Leavitt, J. (2014). A framework and database for community sea ice observations in a changing Arctic: An alaskan prototype for multiple users. Polar Geography, 37, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2013.873090
  • Erickson, K., & Mustonen, T. (2022). Increased prevalence of open water during winter in the Bering Sea: Cultural consequences in Unalakleet, Alaska 2022. Oceanography, 35(3-4), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2022.135
  • Fazey, I., Bunse, L., Msika, J., Pinke, M., Preedy, K., Evely, A., … Reed, M. (2014). Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research. Global Environmental Change, 25, 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.12.012
  • Fidel, M., Kliskey, A., Alessa, L., & Sutton, O. (2014). Walrus harvest locations reflect adaptation: A contribution from a community-based observation network in the Bering Sea. Polar Geography, 37(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2013.879613
  • Gadamus, L. (2013). Linkages between human health and ocean health: A participatory climate change vulnerability assessment for marine mammal harvesters. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 72, 20715. https://doi.org/10.3402/ijch.v72i0.20715
  • Gerlak, A., Guido, Z., Vaughn, C., Roundtree, V., Greene, C., Liverman, D., … Baethgen, W. (2018). Building a framework for process-oriented evaluation of regional climate outlook forums. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 20, 225–239.
  • Hauser, D., Glenn, R., Lindley, E., Pikok, K., Herringa, K., Jones, J., … Eicken, H. (2023). Nunaaqqit Savaqatigivlugich - working with communities: Evolving collaborations around an Alaska Arctic observatory and knowledge Hub. Arctic Science, 9, 635–656.
  • Heim, R., & Schreck, M. (2017). NWS Alaska Sea Ice Program: Operations, customer support & challenges. Paper presented at the American Meteorological Society, Seattle, Washington.
  • Holen, D. (2020). NOAA/Sea Grant regional integration: final report. Anchorage, AK: Alaska Sea Grant. 12p. www.repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/38533.
  • Hudson, H. (2015). Connecting Alaskans: Telecommunications in Alaska from telegraph to broadband. University of Alaska Press.
  • Huntington, H., Binder, R., Comeau Sr, R., Holm, L., Metcalf, V., Oshima, T., … Zdor, E. (2020). Crossroads of continents and modern boundaries: An introduction to Inuit and Chukchi experiences in the Bering Strait, Beaufort Sea and Baffin Bay. Water, 12, 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12061808
  • Jacobs, K., & Street, R. (2020). The next generation of climate services. Climate Services, 20, 100199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2020.100199
  • Jung, T., Gordon, N., Bauer, P., Bromwich, D., Chevallier, M., Day, J., … Yang, Q. (2016). Advancing polar prediction capabilities on daily to seasonal time scales. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97, 1631–1647. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00246.1
  • Kalafatis, S., Neosh, J., Libarkin, J., Whyte, K., & Caldwell, C. (2019a). Experiential learning processes informing climate change decision support. Weather, Climate, & Society, 11, 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-19-0002.1
  • Kalafatis, S., Whyte, K., Libarkin, J., & Caldwell, C. (2019b). Ensuring climate services serve society: Examining tribes’ collaborations with climate scientists using a capability approach. Climatic Change, 157, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02429-2
  • Kapsch, M., Eicken, H., & Robards, M. (2009). Sea ice distribution and ice use by indigenous walrus hunters on St. Lawrence island, Alaska. In I. Krupnik (Ed.), SIKU: Knowing our ice (pp. 115–144). Springer.
  • Kettle, N., Abdel-Fattah, D., Mahoney, A., Eicken, H., Brigham, L., & Jones, J. (2019). Linking Arctic system science research to decision maker needs: Co-producing sea ice decision support tools in Utqiaġvik, Alaska. Polar Geography, 43(2–3), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2019.1707318
  • Kettle, N., Trainor, S., & Loring, P. (2017). Conceptualizing the science-practice interface: Lessons from a collaborative network on the front-line of climate change. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00033
  • Knol, M., Arbo, P., Duske, P., Gerland, S., Lamers, M., Pavlova, O., … Tronstad, S. (2018). Making the Arctic predictable: The changing information infrastructure of Arctic weather and sea ice services. Polar Geography, 41(4), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2018.1522382
  • Krupnik, I., & Ray, G. (2007). Pacific Walruses, indigenous hunters, and climate change: Bridging scientific and indigenous knowledge. Deep Sea Research Part II.
  • Lackstrom, K., Kettle, N., Haywood, B., & Dow, K. (2014). Climate-sensitive decisions and time frames: A cross-sectoral analysis of information pathways in the Carolinas. Weather, Climate, and Society, 6(2), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00030.1
  • Lamers, M., Duske, P., & van Bets, L. (2018). Understanding user needs: A practice-based approach to exploring the role of weather and sea ice services in European Arctic expedition cruising. Polar Geography, 41(4), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2018.1513959
  • Lemos, M., Kirchhoff, C., & Ramprasad, V. (2012). Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nature Climate Change, 2, 789–794. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1614
  • Lovecraft, A., Meek, C., & Eicken, J. (2013). Connecting scientific observations to stakeholder needs in sea ice social-environmental systems: The institutional geography of northern Alaska. Polar Geography, 36(1–2), 105–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2012.733893
  • Maldonado, J., Bennett, T., Chief, K., Cochran, P., Cozzetto, K., Gough, B., … Voggesser, G. (2016). Engagement with indigenous peoples and honoring traditional knowledge systems. Climatic Change, 135, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1535-7
  • Maudlin, L., McNeal, K., Dinon-Adridge, H., Davis, C., Boyles, R., & Atkins, R. (2020). Website usability differences between males and females: An eye-tracking evaluation of a climate decision support system. Weather Climate and Society, 12, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0127.1
  • McNie, E. C. (2013). Delivering climate services: Organizational strategies and approaches for producing climate-science information. Weather, Climate, and Society, 5(1), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00034.1
  • Meadow, A., Ferguson, D., Guido, Z., Horangic, A., Owen, G., & Wall, T. (2015). Moving toward the deliberate co-production of climate science knowledge. Weather Climate and Society, 7(2), 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00050.1
  • Meadow, A., Guido, Z., Crimmins, M., & McLeod, J. (2016). From principles to action: Applying the National Research Council’s principles for effective decision support to the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s watch office. Climate Services, 1, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2016.02.002
  • Metcalf, V., & Robards, M. (2008). Sustaining a healthy human-walrus relationship in a dynamic environment: Challenges for comanagement. Ecological Applications, 18, S148–S156. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0642.1
  • Moser, S. C. (2009). Making a difference on the ground: The challenge of demonstrating the effectiveness of decision support. Climatic Change, 95, 11–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-008-9539-1
  • Moss, R., Scarlett, P., Kenney, M., Kunreuther, H., Lempert, R., Manning, J., … Patton, L. (Eds.). (2014). Ch. 26: Decision support: Connecting science, risk perceptions, and decisions. U.S. Global Research Program.
  • NRC. (2005). Thinking strategically: The appropriate use of metrics for the climate change science program. The National Academies Press.
  • NRC. (2009). Informing decisions in a changing climate. The National. Academies Press.
  • NSHC. (2022). Village COVID-19 Travel Resolutions. nortonsoundhealth.org/village-covid-19-travel-resolutions/.
  • Oakley, N., & Baudert, B. (2016). Establishing best practices to improve usefulness and usability of web interfaces providing atmospheric data. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97(2), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00121.1
  • Oh, C. (1996). Linking social science information to policy-making. Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Oozeva, C., Noongwook, C., Noongwook, G., Alowa, C., & Krupnik, I. (2004). Watching Ice and weather Our Way/ Akulki, Tapghaghmii, Mangtaaquli, Sunqaanga, Igor Krupnik. Sikumengllu Eslamengllu Esghapalleghput. Washington, DC: Arctic Studies Center, Smithsonian Institution. 208p.
  • Parris, A., Garfin, G., Dow, K., Meyer, R., & Close, S. (Eds.). (2016). Climate in context. Wiley & Sons.
  • Pletnikoff, K., Poe, A., Murphy, K., Holman, A., Heffner, L., Holen, D., … Beck, C. (2017). Promoting coastal resilience and adaptation: A synthesis from four regional workshops in the Alaskan Arctic. Anchorage Alaska.
  • Pulsifer, P., Godøy, Ø, Friddell, J., Parsons, M., Vincent, W., de Bruin, T., … Huck, J. (2014). Towards an international polar data coordination network. Data Science Journal, 13, PDA94–PDA102. https://doi.org/10.2481/dsj.IFPDA-16
  • Quintão, C., & Andrade, P. (2020). How to improve the validity and reliability of a case study approach. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 9(2), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.32674/jise.v9i2.2026
  • Raymond-Yakoubian, J., Khokhlov, Y., & Yarzutkina, A. (2014). Indigenous knowledge and use of Bering Strait region: Ocean currents. Kawerak Inc.
  • Raymond-Yakoubian, J., & Zdor, E. (2020). Sociocultural features of the Bering Strait Region. In O. Young, P. Berkman, & A. Vylegzhanin (Eds.), Governing Arctic seas: Regional lessons from the Bering Strait and Barents Sea. Informed decisionmaking for sustainability (pp. 74–94). Springer.
  • Reo, N., Whyte, K., McGregor, D., Smith, M., & Jenkins, J. (2017). Factors that support indigenous involvement in multi-actor environmental stewardship. AlterNative, 13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180117701028
  • Riley, R. (2021). An evaluation of the utility of a decision-maker-driven climate hazard assessment tool. Weather Climate and Society, 13, 147–157. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-20-0019.1
  • Rolph, R., Mahoney, A., Walsh, J., & Loring, P. (2018). Impacts of a lengthening open water season on Alaskan coastal communities: Deriving locally relevant indices from large-scale datasets and community observations. The Cryosphere, 12, 1779–1790. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-1779-2018
  • Sheffield, G., & George, C. (2021). Diet and prey: Balaena mysticetu: Biology and human interactions. In C. George, & J. Thewissen (Eds.), The bowhead whale (pp. 429–455). Academic Press.
  • Sheffield Guy, L., Duffy-Anderson, J., Matarese, A., Mordy, C., Napp, J., & Stabeno, P. (2014). Understanding climate control of fisheries recruitment in the eastern Bering Sea: Long-term measurements and process studies. Oceanography, 27(4), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.89
  • Simonee, N., Alooloo, J., Carter, N., Ljubicic, G., & Dawson, J. (2021). Sila qanuippa? (how’s the weather?): integrating Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit and environmental forecasting products to support travel safety around Pond Inlet, Nunavut, in a changing climate. Weather, Climate, & Society, 13, 933–962.
  • Slats, R., Oliver, C., Bahnke, R., Bell, H., Miller, A., Pungowiyi, D., … Oxereok, C. (2019). Voices from the front lines of a changing Bering Sea: An indigenous perspective for the 2019 Arctic report card. In J. A. Richter-Menge, M. Druckenmiller, & M. Jefferies (Eds.), Arctic report card 2019 (pp. 88–94). NOAA.
  • Swart, R., de Bruin, K., Dhenain, S., Dubois, G., Groot, A., & von der Forst, E. (2017). Developing climate information portals with users: Promises and pitfalls. Climate Services, 6, 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2017.06.008
  • Tall, A., Coulibaly, J., & Diop, M. (2018). Do climate services make a difference? A review of evaluation methodologies and practices to assess the value of climate information services for farmers: Implications for Africa. Climate Services, 11, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2018.06.001
  • Thoman, R., Bhatt, U., Bieniek, P., Brettschneider, B., Brubaker, M., Danielson, S. L., … Walsh, J. (2020). The record low Bering Sea ice extent in 2018: Context, impacts and an assessment of the role of anthropogenic climate change. BAMS, S53–S58.
  • Thoman, R., Dawson, J., Liggett, D., Lamars, M., Stewart, E., Ljubicic, G., … Hoke, W. (2017). Understanding the creation and use of polar weather and climate information. BAMS, 98(1), ES3–ES5. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0195.1
  • US Census Bureau. (2020). 2020 Census Data. Retrieved from census.gov.
  • VanderMoen, K., Wall, T., & Daudert, B. (2019). A call for the evaluation of web-based climate data and analysis tools. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0006.1
  • Vaughan, C., & Dessai, S. (2014). Climate services for society: Origins, institutional arrangements, and design elements for an evaluation framework. WIREs Climate Change, 5(5), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.290
  • Vaughan, C., Dessai, S., & Hewitt, C. (2018). Surveying climate services: What can we learn from a bird’s-eye view? Climate Services, 10, 373–395.
  • Vaughan, C., Hansen, J., Roudier, P., Watkiss, P., & Carr, E. (2019). Evaluating agricultural weather and climate services in Africa: Evidence, methods, and a learning agenda. WIREs Climate Change, 19(10), e586. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.586
  • Vaughan, C., Muth, M., & Brown, D. (2019). Evaluation of regional climate services: Learning from seasonal-scale examples across the Americas. Climate Services, 15, 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2019.100104
  • Visscher, K., Stegmaier, P., Damm, A., Hamakeer-Taylor, R., Harjanne, A., & Giordano, R. (2020). Matching supply and demand: A typology of climate services. Climate Services, 17(100136), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2019.100136
  • Vogel, J., Letson, D., & Herrick, C. (2017). A framework for climate services evaluation and its application to the Caribbean agrometeorological initiative. Climate Services, 6, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2017.07.003
  • Wall, T., Meadow, A., & Horganic, A. (2017). Developing evaluation indicators to improve the process of coproducing usable climate science. Weather, Climate, and Society, 9, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0008.1
  • Warner, D., Moonsammy, S., & Joseph, J. (2022). Factors that influence the use of climate information services for agriculture: A systematic review. Climate Services, 28, 100336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2022.100336
  • Weichselgartner, J., & Arheimer, B. (2019). Evolving climate services into knowledge-action systems. Weather Climate and Society, 11, 385–399. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-18-0087.1
  • Williams, P., Alessa, L., Abatzoglou, J., Kliskey, A., Witmer, F., Lee, O., … Venema, R. (2018). Community-based observing networks and systems in the Arctic: Human perceptions of environmental change and instrument-derived data. Regional Environmental Change, 18, 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1220-7
  • Wond, T. (2017). Trust matters: Distrust in an external evaluation of a public sector program. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(5), 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2015.1126732
  • Yin, R. (2011). Applications of case study research (3rd ed.). Sage.
  • Yua, E., Raymond-Yakoubian, J., Daniel, R., & Behe, C. (2022). A framework for co-production of knowledge in the context of Arctic research. Negeqlikacaarni kangingnaulriani ayuqenrilnguut piyaraitgun kangingnauryararkat. Ecology and Society, 1, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-12960-270134
  • Zdor, E. (2021). Collaboration between indigenous and research communities in the Bering Strait region. Études Inuit Studies, 45(1–2), 341–364. https://doi.org/10.7202/1090321ar