Increasing accessibility and inclusion in undergraduate geology labs through scenario-based TA training

References

• Atchison, C., & Feig, A. D. (2011). Theoretical perspectives on constructing experience through alternative field-based learning environments for students with mobility impairments. Qualitative Inquiry in Geoscience Education Research, 474, 11–21. doi:10.1130/2011.2474(02
   Google Scholar
• Atchison, C., & Martinez-Frias, J. (2012). Inclusive geoscience instruction. Nature Geoscience, 5(6), 366. doi:10.1038/ngeo1487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atchison, C. L., & Libarkin, J. C. (2013). Fostering accessibility in geoscience training programs. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 94(44), 400–401. doi:10.1130/9780813724744
   Google Scholar
• Beard, C., & Wilson, J. P. (2002). The power of experiential learning: A handbook for trainers and educators. London, UK: ERIC.
   Google Scholar
• Belch, H. A. (2004). Retention and students with disabilities. Journal of College Student Retention, 6(1), 3–22. doi:10.2190/MC5A-DHRV-1GHM-N0CD
   Google Scholar
• Bitting, K. S., Teasdale, R., & Ryker, K. (2017). Applying the geoscience education research strength of evidence pyramid: Developing a rubric to characterize existing geoscience teaching assistant training studies. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 519–530. doi:10.5408/16-228.1
   Google Scholar
• Carabajal, I. G. (2017). Understanding field-based accessibility from the perspective of geoscience departments (Master of Science thesis). Univeristy of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Carabajal, I. G., Marshall, A. M., & Atchison, C. L. (2017). A synthesis of instructional strategies in geoscience education literature that address barriers to inclusion for students with disabilities. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 531–541. doi:10.5408/16-211.1
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J.-M., Buonora, P., Stevens, L., & Kwon, C. (2016). Strategies to recruit and retain students in physical sciences and mathematics on a diverse college campus. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(3), 14–22.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947–967. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00053-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, M., Anderson, K., & Forrest, E. (1997). Creating accessible introductory geology field trips. Journal of Geosciences Education, 45(1), 4–9. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-45.1.4
   Google Scholar
• Curry, C. (2003). Universal design: Accessibility for all learners. Educational Leadership, 61(2), 55–60. doi: 10.1.1.483.7152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotger, S. (2011). Exploring and developing graduate teaching assistants' pedagogies via lesson study. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(2), 157–169. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.507304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Errington, E. P. (2003). Developing scenario-based learning: Practical insights for tertiary educators. Wellington, New Zealand: Dunmore Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, T., Healey, M., & Harrison, M. (2004). Fieldwork and disabled students: discourses of exclusion and inclusion. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 28(2), 255–280. doi:10.1080/0309826042000242495
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, T., & Murray, J. (2018). How does it feel? The affective domain and undergraduate student perception of fieldwork set in a broad pedagogical perspective. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 5(2), 45–74.ppdoi:10.18543/tjhe-5(2)-2018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212. doi:10.5465/amle.2005.17268566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, D. A. (2014). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, A., Murray, C., & Dallas, B. (2013). University faculty attitudes toward disability and inclusive instruction: comparing two institutions. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 26(3), 221–232.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, A. R., & Murray, C. (2011). Measuring university faculty attitudes toward disability: Willingness to accommodate and adopt Universal Design principles. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34(1), 43–56.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. R., Anderson, D. W., & Skolnick, B. D. (1987). Faculty attitude toward accommodations for college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Focus, 3(1), 46–52.
   Google Scholar
• McCune, P. (2001). What do disabilities have to do with diversity? About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 6(2), 5–12. doi:10.1177/108648220100600203
   Google Scholar
• McManus, D. A. (2002). Developing a Teaching Assistant Preparation Program in the School of Oceanography, University of Washington. Journal of Geoscience Education, 50(2), 158–168. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-50.2.158
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011 (NSF 11-309). ERIC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2013). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2013 (NSF 13-304). ERIC Clearinghouse, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J. (1976). Faculty attitudes toward handicapped students. Rehabilitation Literature, 37(7), 194–197.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neal, C., Wright, M., Cook, C., Perorazio, T., & Purkiss, J. (2007). The impact of teaching assistants on student retention in the sciences: Lessons for TA training. Journal of College Science Teaching, 36(5), 24–29.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society, 28(7), 1024–1026. doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.818773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olkin, R. (2002). Could you hold the door for me? Including disability in diversity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2), 130–137. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.130
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ouellett, M. L. (2004). Faculty development and universal instructional design. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37(2), 135–144. doi:10.1080/10665680490453977
   Google Scholar
• Pliner, S. M., & Johnson, J. R. (2004). Historical, theoretical, and foundational principles of universal instructional design in higher education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 37(2), 105–113. doi:10.1080/10665680490453913
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, S., & Gartin, B. C. (2003). Attitudes of University Faculty toward accommodations to students with disabilites. The Journal for Vocational Special Needs Education, 25(2/3), 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Schade, W. R., & Bartholomew, R. B. (1980). Analysis of geology teaching assistant reaction to a training program utilizing video-taped teaching episodes AU - Schade, Wayne R. Journal of Geological Education, 28(2), 96–102. [Mismatch] doi:10.5408/0022-1368-28.2.96
   Google Scholar
• Seymour, E., Hewitt, N. M., & Friend, C. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences (Vol. 12). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2006). The social model of disability. The Disability Studies Reader, 2, 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, R. A. (2011). Employing universal design for instruction. New Directions for Student Services, 2011(134), 21–33. doi:10.1002/ss.392
   Google Scholar
• Silver, P., Bourke, A., & Strehorn, K. C. (1998). Universal Instructional Design in Higher Education: An approach for inclusion. Equity & Excellence in Education, 31(2), 47–51. doi:10.1080/1066568980310206
   Google Scholar