1,981
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research

How various material resources facilitate science identity work for girls in a research apprenticeship program

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 254-264 | Received 11 Jun 2019, Accepted 01 Dec 2019, Published online: 16 Dec 2019

References

  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11‐year‐old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639. doi:10.1002/sce.20399
  • Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). “Balancing acts”: Elementary school girls’ negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science. Science Education, 96(6), 967–989. doi:10.1002/sce.21031
  • Barab, S., & Hay, K. (2001). Doing science at the elbows of experts: Issues related to the science apprenticeship camp. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(1), 70–102. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200101)38:1<70::AID-TEA5>3.3.CO;2-C
  • Barron, B., Martin, C., Takeuchi, L., & Fithian, R. (2009). Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 55–77. doi:10.1162/ijlm.2009.0021
  • Bell, P., Tzou, C., Bricker, L., & Baines, A. (2012). Learning in diversities of structures of social practice: Accounting for how, why and where people learn science. Human Development, 55(5-6), 269–284. doi:10.1159/000345315
  • Brotman, J. S., & Moore, F. M. (2008). Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(9), 971–1002. doi:10.1002/tea.20241
  • Burgin, S. R., McConnell, W. J., & Flowers, I. I. I., A. M. (2015). “I actually contributed to their research”: The influence of an abbreviated summer apprenticeship program in science and engineering for diverse high-school learners. International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 411–445. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.989292
  • Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 37–75. doi:10.3102/0002831212458142
  • Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., & Rivet, A. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103. doi:10.3102/0002831207308641
  • Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform‐based physics: Girls' access, participation, and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392–414. doi:10.1002/tea.20006
  • Carsten Conner, L. D., Perin, S. M., & Pettit, E. (2018). Tacit knowledge and girls’ notions about a field science community of practice. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 8(2), 164–177. doi:10.1080/21548455.2017.1421798
  • Carter, G., Westbrook, S., & Thompkins, C. (1999). Examining science tools as mediators of students’ learning about circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 89–105. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1<89::AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-7
  • Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw‐a‐scientist test. Science Education, 67(2), 255–265. doi:10.1002/sce.3730670213
  • Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 49. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Finson, K. D. (2002). Drawing a scientist: What we do and do not know after fifty years of drawings. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 335–345. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x
  • Hamza, K., & Wickman, P. O. (2009). Beyond explanations: What else do students need to understand science? Science Education, 93(6), 1026–1049. doi:10.1002/sce.20343
  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
  • Holland, D., Lachiotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
  • Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. doi:10.1002/sce.20173
  • Jaber, L., & Hammer, D. (2016). Learning to feel like a scientist. Science Education, 100(2), 189–220. doi:10.1002/sce.21202
  • Jakobsson, A., & Davidsson, E. (2012). Using sociocultural frameworks to understand the significance of interactions at science and technology centers and museums. In E. Davidsson & A. Jakobsson (Eds.). Understanding interactions at science centers and museums (pp. 3–21). Rotterdam, NL: Sense Publishers.
  • Jones, M. G., Brader-Araje, L., Carboni, L., Carter, G., Rua, M., Banilower, E., & Hatch, H. (2000). Tool time: Gender and students’ use of tools, control, and authority. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 760–783. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200010)37:8<760::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-V
  • Kapon, S. (2016). Doing research in school: Physics inquiry in the zone of proximal development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1172–1197. doi:10.1002/tea.21325
  • Larsen, J. N., Anisimov, O. A., Constable, A., Hollowed, A. B., Maynard, N., Prestrud, P., … Stone, J. M. R. (2014). Polar regions. In V. R. Barros, C. B. Field, D. J. Dokken, M. D. Mastrandrea, K. J. Mach, T. E. Bilir, … L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: Regional aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1567–1612). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lave, E., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lee, C. (2017). Expanding visions of how people learn: The centrality of identity repertoires. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 517–524. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1336022
  • Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.41.9.954
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high-school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363–381. doi:10.1080/09500690500277664
  • Mogk, D. W., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Learning in the field: Synthesis of research on thinking and learning in the geosciences. Geological Society of America Special Papers, 486(0), 131–163.
  • Nasir, N., & Cooks, J. (2009). Becoming a hurdler: How learning settings afford identities. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(1), 41–61. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1492.2009.01027.x
  • Nasir, N. I. S., & Hand, V. (2008). From the court to the classroom: Opportunities for engagement, learning, and identity in basketball and classroom mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17(2), 143–179. doi:10.1080/10508400801986108
  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  • National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report
  • Parker, L. H., & Rennie, L. J. (2002). Teachers' implementation of gender-inclusive instructional strategies in single-sex and mixed-sex science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 881–897. doi:10.1080/09500690110078860
  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST). (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, Report to the President, Executive Office of the President. February 2012, 103 pp. Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf
  • Randolph, J. (2005). Free-Marginal Multirater Kappa (multirater _free): An alternative to Fleiss’ Fixed-Marginal Multirater Kappa. Paper presented at the Joensuu Learning and Instruction Symposium, Joensuu, Finland.
  • Riedinger, K., & McGinnis, J. R. (2017). An investigation of the role of learning conversations in youth’s authoring of science identities during an informal science camp. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(1), 76–102. doi:10.1080/21548455.2016.1173741
  • Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235–256. doi:10.1002/tea.20326
  • Tzou, C., Scalone, G., & Bell, P. (2010). The role of environmental narratives and social positioning in how place gets constructed for and by youth: Implications for environmental science education for social justice. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(1), 105–119. doi:10.1080/10665680903489338
  • Van Horne, K., & Bell, P. (2017). Youth disciplinary identification during participation in contemporary project-based science investigations in school. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26(3), 437–476. doi:10.1080/10508406.2017.1330689
  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Watkins, J., Coffey, J. E., Redish, E. F., & Cooke, T. J. (2012). Disciplinary authenticity: Enriching the reforms of introductory physics courses for life-science students. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 8(1), 72–85.
  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.