References
- Association of American Colleges and Universities (AAC&U). (2009). Quantitative literacy VALUE rubric. Retrieved from https://www.aacu.org/value/rubrics/quantitative-literacy.
- Bailey, C. M. (2000). A quantitative approach to introductory geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 48(4), 413–418. doi:https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-48.4.413
- Campbell, K., Overeem, I., & Berlin, M. (2013). Taking it to the streets: The case for modeling in the geosciences undergraduate curriculum. Computers & Geosciences, 53, 123–128. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.09.006
- Crespi, E., Elrick, M., Kapp, J., Mayer, M., Schmitz, M., Steinberg, R., … Zimmerman, S. (2012). Teaching about geochronology: Absolute (Numerical) ages. Retrieved from: https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/time/geochronology.html.
- Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2010). Pedagogical practices and instructional change of physics faculty. American Journal of Physics, 78 (10), 1056–1063. doi:https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3446763
- Davis, J. C. (2002). Statistics and data analysis in geology (3rd ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Eddy, S. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2014). Getting under the hood: How and for whom does increasing course structure work?. Cbe—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 453–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-03-0050
- Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355–385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<355::AID-TEA1010>3.0.CO;2-M
- Egger, A. E., Bruckner, M. Z., Birnbaum, S. A., & Gilbert, L. (2019). Facilitating the development of effective interdisciplinary curricular materials. In: D. Gosselin, A. Egger, J. Taber (Eds.), Interdisciplinary teaching about earth and the environment for a sustainable future. (pp.45–68). AESS interdisciplinary environmental studies and sciences series. Berlin: Springer.
- Elrod, S. (2014). Quantitative reasoning: The next across the curriculum movement. Peer Review, 16(3), 4–8.
- Feinstein, N. W., Allen, S., & Jenkins, E. (2013). Outside the pipeline: Reimagining science education for nonscientists. Science, 314, 340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230855
- Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
- Gosselin, D. C., Manduca, C. A., Bralower, T., & Egger, A. E. (2019). Preparing students to address societally relevant challenges in the geosciences: The InTeGrate approach. In D. Gosselin, A. Egger, J. Taber (Eds.), Interdisciplinary teaching about earth and the environment for a sustainable future. (pp. 3–23 ). AESS interdisciplinary environmental studies and sciences series. Springer, Berlin.
- Haak, D. C., HilleRisLambers, J., Pitre, E., & Freeman, S. (2011). Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science, 332(6034), 1213–1216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204820
- Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
- Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. H. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Physics Education Research, 3(2), 020102.
- Hoisch, T. D., & Bowie, J. I. (2010). Assessing factors that influence the recruitment of majors from introductory geology classes at Northern Arizona University. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(3), 166–176. doi:https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3544297
- Kastens, K. A., & Krumhansl, R. (2017). Identifying curriculum design patterns as a strategy for focusing geoscience education research: A proof of concept based on teaching and learning with geoscience data. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 373–392. doi:https://doi.org/10.5408/16-217.1
- Kastens, K. A., & Manduca, C. A. (2017). Leveraging the power of a community of practice to improve teaching and learning about the Earth. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(6), 14–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1398997
- Kastens, K., & Turnin, M. (2010). Earth science puzzles. National Science Teachers Association.
- Kastens, K., Mara, V., & Turrin, M. (2018). InTeGrate evaluation report: IAI responses spanning the entire InTeGrate project (2012-2016). Unpublished report.
- Kuenzi, J. J. (2008). Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Background, federal policy, and legislative action. Congressional Research Service Reports, 35. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.edu/crsdocs/35.
- Loudin, M. (2004). Where in the world will we find our future geoscientists? One employer’s perspective. Eos Transactions AGU, 85(47), Abstract ED31B-0748.
- Macdonald, R. H., & Bailey, C. M. (2000). Integrating the teaching of quantitative skills across the geology curriculum in a department. Journal of Geoscience Education, 48(4), 482–−486. doi:https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-48.4.482
- Macdonald, R. H., Manduca, C. A., Mogk, D. W., & Tewksbury, B. J. (2005). Teaching methods in undergraduate geoscience courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge Survey of U.S. faculty. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(3), 237–252. doi:https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.3.237
- Macdonald, R. H., Srogi, L., & Stracher, G. B. (2000). Building the quantitative skills of students in geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 48(4), 409–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-48.4.409
- Madison, B. L., & Steen, L. A. (2004). Quantitative literacy: Why literacy matters for schools and colleges. Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines.
- Manduca, C. A. (2007). Improving instruction in mineralogy, petrology, and geochemistry–Lessons from research on learning. Elements, 3(2), 95–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.3.2.95
- Manduca, C. A., Baer, E. M., Hancock, G., Macdonald, R. H., Patterson, S., Savina, M. E., & Wenner, J. M. (2008). Making undergraduate geoscience quantitative. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 89 (16), 149–−150. doi:https://doi.org/10.1029/2008EO160001
- Manduca, C. A., Iverson, E. R., Luxenberg, M., Macdonald, R. H., McConnell, D. A., Mogk, D. W., & Tewksbury, B. J. (2017). Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development. Science Advances, 3(2), e1600193. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600193
- McConnell, D. A., Steer, D. N., & Owens, K. D. (2003). Assessment and active learning strategies for introductory geology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(2), 205–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-51.2.205
- McConnell, D. A., Steer, D. N., Owens, K. D., & Knight, C. D. (2005). How students think: Implications for learning in introductory geoscience courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 462–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.5408/McConnell_v53p462
- Mogk, D. (2007). Teaching, mineralogy, petrology, and geochemistry–New directions at the intersection of research about the Earth and research on learning. Elements, 3(2), 93–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.3.2.93
- Mosher, S., Bralower, T., Huntoon, J., Lea, P., McConnell, D., Miller, K., … White, L. (2014). Future of undergraduate geoscience education: Summary report for summit on future of undergraduate geoscience education.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2016). Committee on barriers and opportunities in completing 2-Year and 4-Year STEM degrees. In S. Malcom & M. Feder (Eds.), Barriers and opportunities for 2-Year and 4-Year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support diverse student pathways. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- Olson, S., & Riordan, D. G. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the President. Executive Office of the President.
- Richardson, R.M., & McCallum, W.G. (2003). The third R in literacy. In B. Madison & L. Steen (Eds.), Quantitative literacy: Why literacy matters for schools and colleges.Princeton, NJ: National Council on Education and the Disciplines. http://www.maa.org/ql/pgs99_106.pdf.
- Riihimaki, C., & Viskupic, K. (this issue). Motivators and inhibitors to change: Why and how do geoscience faculty modify their course content and teaching methods. Journal of Geoscience Education. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1628590
- Schmitz, M., & Viskupic, K. (2014). “Zirchron” virtual zircon analysis App. Retrieved from: https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/petrology/teaching_examples/95296.html.
- Singer, S., & Smith, K. A. (2013). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 468–471. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20030
- Steen, L. A. (2001). Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation. http://www.maa.org/ql/mathanddemocracy.html.
- Steen, L. A. (2004). Achieving quantitative literacy: An urgent challenge for higher education. Washington DC: Mathematical Association of America.
- Teasdale, R., Viskupic, K., Bartley, J. K., McConnell, D., Manduca, C., Bruckner, M., … Iverson, E. (2017). A multidimensional assessment of reformed teaching practice in geoscience classrooms. Geosphere, 13(2), 608–627. doi:https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01479.1
- Viskupic, K., Egger, A. E., McFadden, R. R., & Schmitz, M. (this issue). How well do undergraduate geoscience programs help students develop 21st century workforce skills? Journal of Geoscience Education.
- Viskupic, K., Ryker, K., Teasdale, R., Manduca, C., Iverson, E., Farthing, D., … McFadden, R. (2019). Classroom observations indicate the positive impacts of discipline-based professional development. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(2), 201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00015-w
- Wenner, J. W., & Baer, E. M. (2015). The Math You Need, When You Need It (TMYN): Leveling the playing field. Numeracy, 8(2), 5. doi:https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.8.2.5
- Wenner, J. W., Baer, E. M., Manduca, C. A., MacDonald, R. H., Patterson, S., & Savina, M. (2009). The case for infusing quantitative literacy into introductory geoscience courses. Numeracy, 2(1). doi:https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.2.1.4
- Wirth, K. R. (2007). Teaching for deeper understanding and lifelong learning. Elements, 3(2), 107–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.2113/gselements.3.2.107
- Yuretich, R. F., Khan, S. A., Leckie, R. M., & Clement, J. J. (2001). Active-learning methods to improve student performance and scientific interest in a large introductory oceanography course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(2), 111–119. doi:https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-49.2.111