Design and impact of the national workshop for early career geoscience faculty

References

• Adams, A. S., Steiner, A. L., & Wiedinmyer, C. (2016). The Earth Science Women’s Network (ESWN): Community-driven mentoring for women in the atmospheric sciences. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97(3), 345–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, J. (2000). Social practice theory and mathematics teacher education: A conversation between theory and practice. Nordic Studies in Mathematic Education, 8, 31–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrose, S., Bridges, M., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M., & Norman, M. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• American Mathematical Association of Two-Year Colleges (AMATYC). (2019). AMATYC Project ACCCESS. Retrieved from https://amatyc.site-ym.com/general/custom.asp?page=acccess.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E., Campa, H., III, Pfund, C., Gillian-Daniel, D. L., Mathieu, R., & Stoddart, J. (2009). Preparing STEM doctoral students for future faculty careers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 117, 83–95. doi:10.1002/tl.346
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. A., Chakraverty, D., Columbus, L., Feig, A. L., Jenks, W. S., Pilarz, M., … Wesemann, J. L. (2014). Cottrell scholars collaborative new faculty workshop: Professional development for new chemistry faculty and initial assessment of its efficacy. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(11), 1874–1881. doi:10.1021/ed500547n
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, A. L., & Cox, M. D. (2009). The impact of faculty learning communities on teaching and learning. Learning Communities Journal, 1(1), 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Beane, R. (2019). Active learning via earth science posters. In the Trenches: The News Magazine of the National Association of Geoscience Teachers, 9, 10–12.
   Google Scholar
• Bernard, R. E., & Cooperdock, E. H. G. (2018). No progress on diversity in 40 years. Nature Geoscience, 11(5), 292–295. doi:10.1038/s41561-018-0116-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, C. H., Taylor, E., & Gillmore, G. M. (2013). Inside the undergraduate teaching experience: The University of Washington’s growth in faculty teaching study. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boice, R. (1991a). New faculty as teachers. The Journal of Higher Education, 62(2), 150–173. doi:10.2307/1982143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boice, R. (1991b). Quick starters: New faculty who succeed. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 48, 111–121. doi:10.1002/tl.37219914810
   Google Scholar
• Boice, R. (2000). Advice for New Faculty Members: Nihil Nimus. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33(8), 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003
   Google Scholar
• Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1998). Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 191–206. doi:10.1080/03075079812331380384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancaccio-Taras, L., Gull, K. A., & Ratti, C. (2016). The Science Teaching Fellows Program: A model for online faculty development of early career scientists interested in teaching. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(3), 333–338. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v17i3.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chasteen, S., Chattergoon, R., Prather, E., & Hilborn, R. (2016). Evaluation methodology and results for the New Faculty Workshops. 2016 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings, 72–75. https://www.compadre.org/per/items/detail.cfm?ID=14196. doi:10.1119/perc.2016.pr.013
   Google Scholar
• Chism, N. V. N., & Szabo, B. (1996). Who uses faculty development services? In L. Richlin (Ed.), To improve the academy, Vol 15 (pp. 115–128). Stillwater, OK: New Foruns Press and the Professional and Organizational Development Network in Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X028002004
   Google Scholar
• Columbia University. (2016). Guide to best practices in faculty mentoring https://provost.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/content/MentoringBestPractices.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Condon, W., Iverson, E. R., Manduca, C. A., Rutz, C., & Willett, G. (2016). Faculty development and student learning: assessing the connections. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. D. (2002). Achieving teaching and learning excellence through faculty learning communities. Essays on Teaching Excellence, 14(4), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. D. (2013). The impact of communities of practice in support of early-career academics. International Journal for Academic Development, 18(1), 18–30. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2011.599600
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. M. (2016). How many profs of color are there in the geosciences? Retrieved from http://www.robynmdahl.com/blog/2016/11/3/how-many-profs-of-color-are-there-in-the-geosciences.
   Google Scholar
• Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (1996). Educating for competence in professional practice. Instructional Science, 24(6), 411–437. doi:10.1007/BF00125578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’Alba, G., & Sandberg, J. (2006). Unveiling professional development: A critical review of stage models. Review of Educational Research, 76(3), 338–412. doi:10.3102/00346543076003383
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derting, T. L., & Ebert-May, D. (2010). Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: Positive relationships with long-term student achievement. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 462–472. doi:10.1187/cbe.10-02-0011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duguid, P. (2005). The Art of Knowing”: Social and tacit dimensions of knowledge and the limits of the community of practice. The Information Society, 21(2), 109–118. doi:10.1080/01972240590925311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, P. L., Hao, Y., Markiewicz, C., & Iverson, E. (2019). Faculty change agents as adult learners: The power of situated learning. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 43(8), 539–555. doi:10.1080/10668926.2018.1507848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote, K. E. (2010). Creating a community of support for graduate students and early career academics. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 34(1), 7–19. doi:10.1080/03098260902954087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallian, J. A., Higgins, A., Hudelson, M., Jacobsen, J., Lefcourt, T., & Stevens, T. C. (2000). Project NExT. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 47(2), 218–220.
   Google Scholar
• Hake, R. (1998). Interactive-engagement vs. traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64–74.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, C. (2008). Promoting instructional change in new faculty: An evaluation of the physics and astronomy new faculty workshop. American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 179–187. doi:10.1119/1.2820393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, C. (2013). Evaluation of the physics and astronomy new faculty workshops. In The Role of Scientific Societies in STEM Faculty Workshops: A Report of the May 3, 2012 Meeting of the Council of Scientific Society Presidents (pp. 79–82). College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers. https://www.aapt.org/Conferences/newfaculty/upload/STEM_REPORT-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, A. (2013). Project NExT: A Program of the Mathematical Association of America. In The Role of Scientific Societies in STEM Faculty Workshops: A Report of the May 3, 2012 Meeting of the Council of Scientific Society Presidents (pp. 56–62). College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers. https://www.aapt.org/Conferences/newfaculty/upload/STEM_REPORT-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hilborn, R. C. (2013). Meeting overview. In The Role of Scientific Societies in STEM Faculty Workshops: A Report of the May 3, 2012 Meeting of the Council of Scientific Society Presidents (pp. 4–17). College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers. https://www.aapt.org/Conferences/newfaculty/upload/STEM_REPORT-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hilborn, R. C. (2017). Physics and Astronomy New Faculty Workshops: 20 years of workshops and 2000 faculty. American Physical Society Abstracts for March Meeting 2017, abstract id. H53.001. http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2017.MAR.H53.1
   Google Scholar
• Hill, L. B., Savoy, J. N., Austin, A. E., & Bantawa, B. (2019). The impact of multi-institutional STEM reform networks on member institutions: A case study of CIRTL. Innovative Higher Education, 44(3), 187–202. doi:10.1007/s10755-019-9461-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. A., O'Connell, S., Frey, C., & Ongley, L. (2008). Gender imbalance in US geoscience. Nature Geoscience, 1(2), 79–82. https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo113. doi:10.1038/ngeo113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kezar, A., Gehrke, S., & Bernstein-Sierra, S. (2018). Communities of transformation: Creating changes to deeply entrenched issues. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(6), 832–864. doi:10.1080/00221546.2018.1441108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krane, K. S. (2013). Workshops for New Faculty in Physics and Astronomy. In The Role of Scientific Societies in STEM Faculty Workshops: A Report of the May 3, 2012 Meeting of the Council of Scientific Society Presidents (pp. 70–77). College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers. https://www.aapt.org/Conferences/newfaculty/upload/STEM_REPORT-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leckie, R. M., & St. John, K. (2019). Your tenure package. Retreived from https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/earlycareer/tenure/package.html.
   Google Scholar
• Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K.E., Mundry, S., Love, N., & Hewson, P. W. (2009). Professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, R. H., Beane, R. J., Allen-King, R. M., Iverson, E. R., Manduca, C. A., Mogk, D. W., …, Yuretich, R. F. (2013). On the Cutting Edge workshops and web resources for early career geoscience faculty. In The Role of Scientific Societies in STEM Faculty Workshops: A Report of the May 3, 2012 Meeting of the Council of Scientific Society Presidents (p. 46–55). College Park, MD: American Association of Physics Teachers.
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, R. H., Manduca, C. A., Mogk, D. W., & Tewksbury, B. J. (2005). Teaching methods in undergraduate geoscience courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge Survey of U.S. faculty. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(3), 237–252. doi:10.5408/1089-9995-53.3.237
   Google Scholar
• MacPhee, D., & Canetto, S. S. (2015). Women in academic atmospheric sciences. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 96, 59–67. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00215.1
   Google Scholar
• Manduca, C. A., Iverson, E. R., Luxenberg, M., Macdonald, R. H., McConnell, D. A., Mogk, D. M., & Tewksbury, B. J. (2017). Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development. Science Advances, 3(2), e1600193. doi:10.1126/sciadv.1600193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manduca, C. A., Mogk, D. W., Tewksbury, B., Macdonald, R. H., Fox, S. P., Iverson, E. R., … Bruckner, M. (2010). SPORE: Science prize for online resources in education: On the Cutting Edge: Teaching help for geoscience faculty. Science, 327(5969), 1095–1096. doi:10.1126/science.1183028
   Google Scholar
• Manduca, C.A. (2017). Surveying the landscape of professional development research: Suggestions for new perspectives in design and research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 416–422. doi:10.5408/17-281.1
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, D. A., Chapman, L., Czajka, C. D., Jones, J. P., Ryker, K. D., & Wiggen, J. (2017). Instructional utility and learning efficacy of common active learning strategies. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(4), 604–625. doi:10.5408/17-249.1
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J., & Star, C. (2006). Designing the future of learning through a community of practice of teachers of first year courses at an Australian university. Paper presented at the Proceedings of The First International LAMS Conference 2006: Designing the Future of Learning, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/9853
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ormand, C., Macdonald, H., & Manduca, C. (2006). Managing your career: New “On the Cutting Edge” resources for graduate students, post-doctoral fellows, and early career faculty. Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs, 38(7), 141.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, M. T., Trujillo, G., Seidel, S. B., Harrison, C. D., Farrar, K. M., Benton, H. P., … Tanner, K. D. (2018). Collectively improving our teaching: Attempting biology department-wide professional development in scientific teaching. CBE-Life Science Education, 18(1), ar2.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P., & Zusho, A. (2007). Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 731–810). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, L., Lee, C., Simon, B., & Guzdial, M. (2017). Preparing tomorrow’s faculty to address challenges in teaching computer science. Communications of the ACM, 60(5), 25–27. doi:10.1145/3068791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Executive Office of the President.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–109. doi:10.3102/0013189X029001004
   Google Scholar
• Remmik, M., Karm, M., Haamer, A., & Lepp, L. (2011). Early-career academics’ learning in academic communities. International Journal for Academic Development, 16(3), 187–199. doi:10.1080/1360144X.2011.596702
   Google Scholar
• Richlin, L., & Essington, A. (2004). Overview of faculty learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 97, 25–39. doi:10.1002/tl.130
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Solem, M. N., Foote, K. E., & Monk, J. J. (2009). Aspiring academics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• St. John, K., & Leckie, R. M. (2019). Preparing yourself for the tenure process. Retrieved from https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/earlycareer/tenure/preparing.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stains, M., Pilarz, M., & Chakraverty, D. (2015). Short and long-term impacts of the Cottrell Scholars Collaborative New Faculty Workshop. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(9), 1466–1476. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, A. M., & Smith, G. A. (2016). Communities of practice as agents of future faculty development. New Forums Press, 30(2), 59–67.
   Google Scholar
• Viskupic, K., Ryker, K., Teasdale, R., Manduca, C. A., Iverson, E., Farthing, D., … McFadden, R. (2019). Classroom observations indicate the positive impacts of discipline-based professional development. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(2), 201–228. doi:. doi:10.1007/s41979-019-00015-w
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, R., & Feig, A. L. (2017). The Cottrell Scholars Collaborative New Faculty Workshop: Early lessons for change in teaching. In R. Waterman & A. Feig (Eds.) Educational and Outreach Projects from the Cottrell Scholars Collaborative Professional Development and Outreach Volume 2, ACS Symposium Series 1259 (pp. 23–34). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739. doi:10.3102/0034654308330970
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2015). Introduction to communities of practice: A brief overview of the concept and its uses. Retrieved from https://wenger-trayner.com/introduction-to-communities-of-practice/.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (1998). Backward Design. In Understanding by design (pp. 13–34). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. E. (2019). Percentage of female faculty working within geoscience research fields. American Geosciences Institute Data Brief 2019-001. Retrieved from https://www.americangeosciences.org/geoscience-currents/percentage-female-faculty-working-within-geoscience-research-fields.
   Google Scholar
• Zellers, D. F., Howard, V. M., & Barcic, M. A. (2008). Faculty mentoring programs: Reenvisioning rather than reinventing the wheel. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 552–588. doi:10.3102/0034654308320966
   Google Scholar