Integrating polar research into undergraduate curricula using computational guided inquiry

References

• Bellanca, J. A., & Brandt, R. (Eds.). (2010). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree Press.
   Google Scholar
• Apedoe, X. S., Walker, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2006). Integrating inquiry-based learning into undergraduate geology. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(3), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-54.3.414
   Google Scholar
• Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP) (2019). AMAP Climate Change Update 2019: An Update to Key Findings of Snow, Water, Ice and Permafrost in the Arctic (SWIPA) 2017. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Battista, M. T. (1999). Fifth graders’ enumeration of cubes of 3D arrays: Conceptual progress in an inquiry-based classroom. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(4), 417–448. https://doi.org/10.2307/749708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford, D. (2016). Does climate literacy matter? A case study of US students’ level of concern about anthropogenic global warming. Journal of Geography, 115(5), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2015.1105851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bowers, J., Nickerson, S., & Kenehan, G. (2002). Using technology to teach concepts of speed. In B. Litwiller & G. Bright (Eds.), Making sense of fractions, ratios, and proportions (pp. 176–187). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
   Google Scholar
• Caspari, A., Kuhlthau, C. C., & Maniotes, L. (2007). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Drennan, J., & Hyde, A. (2008). Controlling response shift bias: The use of the retrospective pre-test design in the evaluation of a master’s programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(6), 699–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930701773026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwein, A. L., Hartley, L. M., Donovan, S., & Billick, I. (2014). Using rich context and data exploration to improve engagement with climate data and data literacy: Bringing a field station into the college classroom. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-034
   Google Scholar
• Fortmann, L., Beaudoin, J., Rajbhandari, I., Wright, A., Neshyba, S., & Rowe, P. (2019). Teaching Modules for Estimating Climate Change Impacts in Economics Courses using Computational Guided Inquiry. Journal of Economic Education, (2), 51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goessling, H. F., Jung, T., Klebe, S., Baeseman, J., Bauer, P., Chen, P., Chevallier, M., Dole, R., Gordon, N., Ruti, P., Bradley, A., Bromwich, D. H., Casati, B., Chechin, D., Day, J. J., Massonnet, F., Mills, B., Renfrew, I., Smith, G., & Tatusko, R. (2016). Paving the way for the year of polar prediction. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 97(4), ES85–ES88. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00270.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grissom, A. N., Czajka, C. D., & McConnell, D. A. (2015). Revisions of physical geology laboratory courses to increase the level of inquiry: Implications for teaching and learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 63(4), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.5408/14-050.1
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. C., & Cutler, M. J. & Schaefer, A. P. (2012). Public knowledge about polar regions increases while concerns remain unchanged. (Issue Brief No. 42). Carsey Institute. University of New Hampshire.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, G. S., & Dailey, P. R. (1979). Response-shift bias: A source of contamination of self-report measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(2), 144–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.64.2.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2013). Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Stocker, T.F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., … Midgley, P.M. (eds.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kennicutt, M. C., Chown, S. L., Cassano, J. J., Liggett, D., Massom, R., Peck, L. S., Rintoul, S. R., Storey, J. W. V., Vaughan, D. G., Wilson, T. J., & Sutherland, W. J. (2014). Polar research: six priorities for Antarctic science. Nature News, 512(7512), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/512023a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, O. K., & Kasmer, L. (2009). Prediction as an instructional strategy. Journal of Mathematics Education and Leadership, 11(1), 33–38.
   Google Scholar
• Klatt, J., & Taylor-Powell, E. (2005 Synthesis of literature relative to the retrospective pretest design [Paper presentation].Presentation to the 2005 Joint CES/AEA Conference, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. E., & Lewis, J. E. (2008). Seeking effectiveness and equity in a large college chemistry course: An HLM investigation of peer‐led guided inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(7), 794–811. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, K. H., Buendia, G., Kim, O. K., Cordero, F., & Kasmer, L. (2010). The role of prediction in the teaching and learning of mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(5), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207391003605239
   Google Scholar
• Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, L. P., & Crow, M. L. (2014). Do Active-Learning Strategies Improve Students’ Critical Thinking?. Higher Education Studies, 4(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v4n2p77
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2009). Miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools (6th ed.). Foundation for Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, A. N., BurnSilver, S., Chapin, F. S., Fondahl, G., Graybill, J., Keil, K., Nilsson, A. E., Riedlsperger, R., & Schweitzer, P. (2016). Arctic sustainability research: Toward a new agenda. Polar Geography, 39(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/1088937X.2016.1217095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate?. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 57(4), 247–262. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). (2009). Climate Literacy: The Essential Principles of Climate Science.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, G. C., Russell, C. B., & Wink, D. J. (2008). Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science. Nature Chemical Biology, 4(10), 577–580. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio1008-577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2018). Understanding by design (pp. 15–18). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).-849-E-Learn.
   Google Scholar
• Windschitl, M. (2008). What is inquiry? A framework for thinking about authentic scientific practice in the classroom. In J. Luft, R. L. Bell & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting (pp. 1–20). National Science Teachers Association Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, X., Kaplan, M. R., & Cane, M. A. (2018). The interconnected global climate system—A review of tropical–polar teleconnections. Journal of Climate, 31(15), 5765–5792. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0637.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar