References
- Akiha, K., Brigham, E., Couch, B., Lewin, J., Stains, M., Stetzer, M., Vinson, E., & Smith, M. (2018). What types of instructional shifts do students experience? Investigating active learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math classes across key transition points from middle school to university level. Frontiers in Education, 2(68), 1–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2017.00068
- Bathgate, M., Aragon, O., Cavanagh, A., Waterhouse, J., Frederick, J., & Graham, M. (2019). Perceived supports and evidence-based teaching in college STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0166-3
- Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. Atlanta, GA.
- Borrego, M., Froyd, J., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of awareness and adoption rates in U.S. engineering departments. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(3), 185–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2010.tb01056.x
- Bradforth, S. E., Miller, E. R., Dichtel, W. R., Leibovich, A. K., Feig, A. L., Martin, J. D., Bjorkman, K. S., Schultz, Z. D., & Smith, T. L. (2015). University learning: Improve undergraduate science education. Nature, 523(7560), 282–284. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/523282a
- Brownell, S. E., Tanner, K. D. (2012). Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: Lack of training, time, incentives, and.tensions with professional identity? CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(4), 339–346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-09-0163
- Chasteen, S., Pepper, R., Pollock, S., & Katherine, P. (2012). But does it last? Sustaining a research-based curriculum in upper-division electricity & magnetism. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413, 139–42. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680014
- Cooper, M., & Klymkowsky, M. (2016). March). Organic Chemistry, Life, the Universe & Everything (OCLUE). In Abstracts of Papers of The American Chemical Society (Vol. 251). American Chemical Society.
- Couch, B. A., Wood, W. B., & Knight, J. K. (2015). The Molecular Biology Capstone Assessment: A Concept Assessment for Upper Division Molecular Biology Students, 14, 1–11.
- Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2008, October 13–14). Barriers and promises in STEM reform. Commissioned paper for National Academies of Science Workshop on Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in STEM Undergraduate Education, Washington, DC.
- DeLozier, S. J., & Rhodes, M. G. (2017). Flipped classrooms: A review of key ideas and recommendations for practice. Educational Psychology Review, 29(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9356-9
- Derting, T. L., Ebert-May, D., Henkel, T. P., Middlemis Maher, J., Arnold, B., & Passmore, H. (2016). Assessing faculty professional development in STEM higher education: Sustainability of outcomes. Science Advances, 2(3), e1501422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501422
- Eagan, K., Stolzenberg, E. B., Lozano, J. B., Aragon, M. C., Ramirez Suchard, M., & Hurtado, S. (2014). Undergraduate teaching faculty: The 2013-2014 HERI faculty survey. Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.
- Egger, A. E., Viskupic, K., & Iverson, E. R. (2019). Results of the National Geoscience Faculty Survey (2004–2016)National Association of Geoscience Teachers. 82p.
- Elliot, S. L. (2015). From the Editor-in-Chief: The next phase of discipline-based education research is here. ! Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 16(2), 123–124.
- Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in Science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
- Gehrke, S., & Kezar, A. (2017). The roles of STEM faculty communities of practice in institutional and departmental reform in higher education. American Educational Research Journal, 54(5), 803–833. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217706736
- Gess-Newsome, J., Southerland, S. A., Johnston, A., & Woodbury, S. (2003). Educational reform, personal practical theories, and dissatisfaction: The anatomy of change in college science teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 731–767. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312040003731
- Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A.-B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science (New York, N.Y.), 341(6153), 1455–1456. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240487
- Granger, E. M., Bevis, T. H., Saka, Y., Southerland, S. A., Sampson, V., & Tate, R. L. (2012). The efficacy of student-centered instruction in supporting science learning. Science (New York, N.Y.)), 338(6103), 105–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223709
- Hazari, Z., Potvin, G., Tai, R. H., & Almarode, J. (2010). For the love of learning science: Connecting learning orientation and career productivity in physics and chemistry. Physical Review Special Topics, 6(010107), 1–9.
- Hein, S. M. (2012). Positive impacts using POGIL in organic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(7), 860–864. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/ed100217v
- Henderson, C., Beach, A., & Finkelstein, N. (2011). Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(8), 952–984. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20439
- Henderson, C., Connolly, M., Dolan, E. L., Finkelstein, N., Franklin, S., Malcom, S., Rasmussen, C., Redd, K., & St. John, K. (2017). Towards the STEM DBER Alliance: Why we need a discipline-based STEM education research community. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0076-1
- Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. (2007). Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of individual and situational characteristics. Physical Review Special Topics, 3(02102), 1–14.
- Henderson, C., & Dancy, M. (2009). Impact of physics education research on the teaching of introductory quantitative physics in the United States. Physical Review Special Topics, 5(2), 1–9.
- Henderson, C., Dancy, M., & Niewiadomska-Bugaj, M. (2012). Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process?. Physical Review Special Topics, 8(020104), 1–15.
- Hoekstra, A., & Mollborn, S. (2012). How clicker use facilitates existing pedagogical practices in higher education: Data from interdisciplinary research on student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(3), 303–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2011.568493
- Hogan, A. H., Krumper, J., McNeil, L. E., & Crimmins, M. T. (2016). Advancing evidence-based teaching in gateway science courses through a mentor-apprentice model. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century (pp. 77–89). Purdue University Press.
- Honaker, J., King, G., & Blackwell, M. (2011). Amelia II: A program for missing data. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(7), 1–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i07
- Hunsu, N. J., Adesope, O., & Bayly, D. J. (2016). A meta-analysis of the effects of audience response systems (clicker-based technologies) on cognition and affect. Computers & Education, 94, 102–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.013
- Imai, K., King, G., Lau, O. (2007). Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software. http://GKing.harvard.edu/zelig
- Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research (2016). Carnegie Classifications 2015 public data file. http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/downloads/CCIHE2015-PublicDataFile.xlsx (October 1, 2016).
- Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research (2018). The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education.
- Karabulut-Ilgu, A., Jaramillo Cherrez, N., & Jahren, C. T. (2018). A systematic review of research on the flipped learning method in engineering education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(3), 398–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12548
- Kezar, A., Gehrke, S., & Elrod, S. (2015). Implicit theories of change as a barrier to change on college campuses: An examination of STEM reform. The Review of Higher Education, 38(4), 479–506. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2015.0026
- Landrum, R., Viskupic, K., Shadle, S., & Bullock, D. (2017). Assessing the STEM landscape: The Current Instructional Climate Survey and the Evidence-Based Instructional Practices Adoption scale. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 25–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0092-1
- Lund, T., Pilarz, M., Velasco, J., Chakraverty, D., Rosploch, K., Undersander, M., & Stains, M. (2015). The best of both worlds: Building on the COPUS and RTOP observation protocols to easily and reliably measure various levels of reformed instructional practice. CBE Life Sciences Education, 14, 1–12.
- Macdonald, H., Manduca, C., Mogk, D., & Tewksbury, B. (2005). Teaching methods in undergraduate geoscience courses: Results of the 2004 On the Cutting Edge Survey of U.S. Faculty. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(3), 237–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.3.237
- Manduca, C. A., Iverson El, R., Luxenberg, M., Macdonald, R. H., McConnell, D. A., Mogk, D. W., & Tewksbury, B. J. (2017). Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development. Science Advances, 3(2), e1600193–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600193
- Manduca, C. (2008). October 13–14). Working with the discipline – developing a supportive environment for education. Commissioned paper for National Academies of Science Workshop on Linking Evidence and Promising Practices in STEM Undergraduate Education, Washington, DC.
- Matz, R. L., Fata-Hartley, C. L., Posey, L. A., Laverty, J. T., Underwood, S. M., Carmel, J. H., Herrington, D. G., Stowe, R. L., Caballero, M. D., Ebert-May, D., & Cooper, M. M. (2018). Evaluating the extent of a large-scale transformation in gateway science courses. Science Advances, 4(10), eaau0554–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau0554
- Miller, E., Fairweather, J. S., Slakey, L., Smith, T., & King, T. (2017). Catalyzing institutional transformation: Insights from the AAU STEM initiative. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(5), 36–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2017.1366810
- Miller, C. J., & Metz, M. J. (2014). A comparison of professional-level faculty and student perceptions of active learning: Its current use, effectiveness, and barriers. Advances in Physiology Education, 38(3), 246–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00014.2014
- Mitten, C., & Ross, D. (2018). Sustaining a commitment to teaching in a research-intensive university: what we learn from award-winning faculty. Studies in Higher Education, 43(8), 1348–1361. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2016.1255880
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2011). Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s science and technology talent at the crossroads. The National Academies Press.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016). Barriers and opportunities for 2-year and 4-year STEM degrees: Systemic change to support students’ diverse pathways (S. Malcom, & M. Feder (Eds.), The National Academies Press.
- National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018). Indicators for monitoring undergraduate STEM education. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17226/24943.
- National Research Council (2012). Discipline-based education research: Understanding and improving learning in undergraduate science and engineering. (S. Singer, N. R. Nielsen, & H. A. Schweingruber (Eds.) The National Academies Press.
- National Research Council (2015). Reaching students: What research says about effective instruction in undergraduate science and engineering. The National Academies Press.
- O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002
- On the Cutting Edge. (n.d.). On the cutting edge: Strong undergraduate geoscience teaching. https://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/index.html
- Pelletreau, K. N., Knight, J. K., Lemons, P. P., McCourt, J. S., Merrill, J. E., Nehm, R. H., Prevost, L. B., Urban-Lurain, M., & Smith, M. K. (2018). A faculty professional development model that improves student learning, encourages active-learning instructional practices, and works for faculty at multiple institutions. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(2), es5. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-12-0260
- President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012). Engage to excel: Producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/pcast-engage-to-excel-final_2-25-12.pdf.
- R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
- Revelle, W. (2018). psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
- Seymour, E., & De Welde, K. (2016). Why doesn’t knowing change anything? Constraints and resistance, leverage and sustainability. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century (pp. 462–484). Purdue University Press.
- Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Taking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press.
- Shadle, S., Marker, A., & Earl, B. (2017). Faculty drivers and barriers: Laying the groundwork for undergraduate STEM education reform in academic departments. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0062-7
- Smith, M. K. (2018). Publishing activities improves undergraduate biology education. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(11), 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny099
- Stains, M., Harshman, J., Barker, M. K., Chasteen, S. V., Cole, R., DeChenne-Peters, S. E., Eagan, M. K., Esson, J. M., Knight, J. K., Laski, F. A., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Lee, C. J., Lo, S. M., McDonnell, L. M., McKay, T. A., Michelotti, N., Musgrove, A., Palmer, M. S., Plank, K. M., … Young, A. M. (2018). Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities. Science (New York, N.Y.), 359(6383), 1468–1470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8892
- Tagg, J. (2012). Why does the faculty resist change?. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 44(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.2012.635987
- Teasdale, R., Viskupic, K., Bartley, J., McConnell, D., Manduca, C., Bruckner, M., Farthing, D., & Iverson, E. (2017). A multidimensional assessment of reformed teaching practice in geoscience classrooms. Geosphere, 13(2), 608–627. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1130/GES01479.1
- Tomkin, J., Beilstein, S., Morphew, J., & Herman, G. (2019). Evidence that communities of practice are associated with active learning in large STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0154-z
- Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (2004). Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 409–424. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-004-0007-9
- Viskupic, K., Ryker, K., Teasdale, R., Manduca, C., Iverson, E., Farthing, D., Bruckner, M. Z., & McFadden, R. (2019). Classroom observations indicate the positive impacts of discipline-based professional development. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2(2), 201–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-019-00015-w
- Walter, E. M., Beach, A. L., Henderson, C., & Williams, C. T. (2015). Describing instructional practice and climate: Two new instruments. In G. Weaver, W. Burgess, A. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming Institutions: Undergraduate STEM Education for the 21st Century. Purdue University Press.
- Weaver, G. (2016). Why now is the time for institution-level thinking in STEM higher education. In G. C. Weaver, W. D. Burgess, A. L. Childress, & L. Slakey (Eds.), Transforming institutions: Undergraduate STEM education for the 21st century (pp. 3–10). Purdue University Press.
- Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag.
- Wieman, C., Perkins, K., & Gilbert, S. (2010). Transforming science education at large research universities: A case study in progress. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 42(2), 6–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380903563035