References
- Amin, T. G. (2009). Conceptual metaphor meets conceptual change. Human Development, 52(3), 165–197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1159/000213891
- Ault, C. R. (1998). Criteria of excellence for geological inquiry: The necessity of ambiguity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802)35:2<189::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-O
- Basten, T. (2013). Wie lassen sich klimageographische Inhalte im Geographieunterricht schülerorientiert vermitteln? – Ergebnisse einer didaktischen Rekonstruktion der Passatzirkulation [How to teach Climatical issues in a student-centered way – Results of an educational reconstruction of the trade wind system]. GuiD (Journal of Geography Education), 41(4), 153–172.
- Beilock, S. L., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesture changes thought by grounding it in action. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1605–1610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610385353
- Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2007). Using conceptual metaphor and functional grammar to explore how language used in physics affects student learning. Physical Review Education Research, 3(1), 1–16.
- Brookes, D. T., & Etkina, E. (2015). The importance of language in students’ reasoning about heat in thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5-6), 759–779. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025246
- Cavadas, B., & Aboim, S. (2021). Using PhET™ interactive simulation plate tectonics for initial teacher education. Geoscience Communication, 4(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-4-43-2021
- Clark, S. K., & Libarkin, J. C. (2011). Designing a mixed-methods research instrument and scoring rubric to investigate individuals’ conceptions of plate tectonics. In A. Feig & A. Stokes (Eds.), Qualitative Inquiry in Geoscience Education Research. Geological Society of America Special Paper 474 (pp. 81–96). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1130/2011.2474(07)
- Clark, S. K., Libarkin, J. C., Kortz, K. M., & Jordan, S. C. (2011). Alternative conceptions of plate tectonics held by nonscience undergraduates. Journal of Geoscience Education, 59(4), 251–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3651696
- Conrad, D. (2014). Erfahrungsbasiertes Verstehen geowissenschaftlicher Phänomene: Eine didaktische Rekonstruktion des Systems Plattentektonik. [Experience based understanding of geoscience phenomena: Educational Reconstruction of the system of plate tectonics]. Bayreuth. Retrieved October 13, 2020, from https://epub.uni-bayreuth.de//id/eprint/1716
- Conrad, D. (2016). Wie können Plattenbewegungen verständlich unterrichtet werden? Zentrale Ergebnisse einer didaktischen Rekonstruktion der Bewegung von Lithosphärenplatten [How can plate movements be taught in an understandable way? Central results of an educational reconstruction of the motion of tectonic plates. ZGD (Journal of Geography Education), 44(2), 25–49.
- Conrad, D., Basten, T., & Felzmann, D. (2014). Verstehen auf der Grundlage von Erfahrungen: Wie mithilfe der Theorie des erfahrungsbasierten Verstehens typische Lernschwierigkeiten in geowissenschaftlichen Kontexten interpretiert und prognostiziert werden können [Understanding based on experiences: How typical learning barriers within Geoscience contexts can be interpreted and prognosticated by theory of experientialism]. ZGD (Journal of Geography Education), 42(3), 147–177.
- Cheek, K. A. (2010). A summary and analysis of twenty-seven years of geoscience conceptions research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 58(3), 122–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3544294
- DeSutter, D., & Stieff, M. (2017). Teaching students to think spatially through embodied actions: Design principles for learning environments in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 1–20.
- Dolphin, G., & Benoit, W. (2016). Students’ mental model development during historically contextualized inquiry: How the ‘Tectonic Plate’ metaphor impeded the process. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 276–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1140247
- Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649–672. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750606
- Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(8), 334–339. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01698-3
- Felzmann, D. (2013). Didaktische Rekonstruktion des Themas. Gletscher und Eiszeiten" für den Geographieunterricht [Educational reconstruction of the topics “glaciers and ice ages” for geography education]. Didaktisches Zentrum Oldenburg.
- Felzmann, D. (2014). Using metaphorical models for describing glaciers. International Journal of Science Education, 36(16), 2795–2824. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.936328
- Felzmann, D. (2017). Students’ conceptions of glaciers and ice ages: Applying the model of educational reconstruction to improve learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(3), 322–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/16-158.1
- Frisch, W., & Meschede, M. (2011). Plattentektonik, Kontinentalverschiebung und Gebirgsbildung [Plate tectonics, continental drift and mountain building]. WBG.
- Gattis, M. (2001). Reading pictures: Constraints on mapping conceptual and spatial schemas. In M. Gattis (Ed.), Spatial schemas in abstract thought (pp. 223–245). MIT Press.
- Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift. Child Development, 59(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1130388
- Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.393
- Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(83)90002-6
- Goldwater, M. B., Gentner, D., LaDue, N., & Libarkin, J. (2021). Analogy generation in science experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 45(9), e13036. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13036
- Gould, S. J. (1987). Time’s arrow—Time’s cycle: Myth and metaphor in the discovery of geological time. Harvard University Press.
- Grady, J. E. (2005). Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 35–56). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137004109_2
- Gross, J. (2007). Biologie verstehen: Wirkungen außerschulischer Lernangebote [Effects of outdoor learning opportunities]. Beiträge zur Didaktischen Rekonstruktion [Contributions to the model of educational reconstruction]. Band 16. Oldenburg.
- Grotzinger, J., Jordan, T. H., Press, F., & Siever, R. (2008). Understanding Earth/Allgemeine Geologie. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
- Harrison, A. G., & De Jong, O. (2005). Exploring the use of multiple analogical models when teaching and learning chemical equilibrium. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(10), 1135–1159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20090
- Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. (2006). Teaching and learning with analogies—friend or foe. In P. Aubusson, A. Harrison, & D. Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 11–24). Springer.
- Hemmer, I., & Hemmer, M. (2010). Interesse von Schülerinnen und Schülern an geowissenschaftlichen Themen und Arbeitsweisen –Zur Bedeutung der Kontexte [Interest of students in geoscientific topics and working methods - On the importance of contexts]. In M. Hemmer, & I. Hemmer (Eds.), Schülerinteresse an Themen, Regionen und Arbeitsweisen des Geographieunterrichts. Ergebnisse der empirischen Forschung und deren Konsequenzen für die Unterrichtspraxis [Student interest in topics, regions, and working methods in geography education. Results of empirical research and their consequences for teaching] (pp. 223–238). Weingarten.
- Herrera, J., & Riggs, E. (2013). Relating gesture and speech: An analysis of students’ conceptions about geological sedimentary processes. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 1979–2003. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.775609
- Hofstadter, D. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition. In D. Gentner, K. Holvoak, & B. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 499–538). The MIT Press/Bradford Book.
- Höink, T., Jellinek, A. M., & Lenardic, A. (2011). Viscous coupling at the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 12(10), 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GC003698
- Hubenthal, M. (2018). Exploring undergraduates’ conceptions of elasticity, within a plate tectonics context, before and after experience with rock’s elastic behavior. Journal of Geoscience Education, 66(4), 261–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2018.1493964
- Jaimes, P., Libarkin, J. C., & Conrad, D. (2020). College Student Conceptions about Changes to Earth and Life over Time. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(3), ar35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.19-01-0008
- Jeppsson, F., Haglund, J., & Amin, T. G. (2015). Varying use of conceptual metaphors across levels of expertise in thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 37, 780–805.
- psson, F., Haglund, J., Amin, T. G., & Strömdahl, H. (2013). Exploring the use of conceptual metaphors in solving problems on entropy. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(1), 70–120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2012.691926
- Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. University of Chicago Press.
- Kattmann, U. (2007). Didaktische Rekonstruktion – eine praktische Theorie [Educational Reconstruction – a practical theory]. In D. Krüger, I. Parchmann, & H. Schecker (Eds.), Methoden in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung [Methods in Natural Science Education Research] (pp. 93–104). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68166-3_9
- Kattmann, U., Duit, R., Gropengießer, H., & Komorek, M. (1997). Das Modell der Didaktischen Rekonstruktion—Ein Rahmen für naturwissenschaftsdidaktische Forschung und Entwicklung. [The model of educational reconstruction—A frame for science education research and development]. Zeitschrift Für Didaktik Der Naturwissenschaften, 3(3), 3–18.
- Kious, W. J., & Tilling, R. I. (1996a). Historical perspectives. In U.S. Geological Survey (Ed.), This dynamic earth: The story of plate tectonics. General Interest Publication. Retrieved October 13, 2020, from https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/historical.html
- Kious, W. J., & Tilling, R. I. (1996b). Some unanswered questions. In U.S. Geological Survey (Ed.), This dynamic earth: The story of plate tectonics. General Interest Publication. Retrieved October 13, 2020, from http://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/dynamic/unanswered.html
- Kortz, K. M., Clark, S. K., Gray, K., Smay, J. J., Viveiros, B., & Steer, D. (2011). Counting tectonic plates: A mixed-methods study of college student conceptions of plates and boundaries. In A. Feig & A. Stokes (Eds.) Qualitative inquiry in geoscience education research. Geological Society of America Special Paper 474 (pp. 171–188). Geological Society of America. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1130/2011.2474(12)
- Krüger, D., & Riemeier, T. (2014). Die qualitative Inhaltsanalyse – eine Methode zur Auswertung von Interviews [Qualitative Content Analysis –an instrument for analyzing interviews]. In D. Krüger, I. Parchmann, & H. Schecker (Eds.), Methoden in der naturwissenschaftsdidaktischen Forschung [Methods in natural science education research] (pp. 133–146). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37827-0_1
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. Basic Books.
- Libarkin, J. C., Anderson, S., Dahl, J., Beilfuss, M., Boone, W., & Kurdziel, J. (2005). Qualitative analysis of College students’ ideas about geologic time, Earth’s interior, and Earth’s crust. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.1.17
- Libarkin, J. C., Kurdziel, J. P., & Anderson, S. W. (2007). College student conceptions of geological time and the disconnect between ordering and scale. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(5), 413–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-55.5.413
- Lin, H.-S., Shiau, B.-R., & Lawrenz, F. (1996). The effectiveness of teaching science with pictorial analogies. Research in Science Education, 26(4), 495–511. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357457
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publishing.
- Marsch, S., Elster, M., & Krüger, D. (2007). „Mein Gehirn nimmt auf, was mir wichtig ist. “– Eine Untersuchung zu Schülervorstellungen und Metaphern über das Lernen [“My brain picks up, what important is form me” – A study about students’ conceptions and metaphors about learning]. In H. Vogt, D. Krüger, A. Upmeier zu Belzen, M. Wilde, & K. Bätz (Eds.), Erkenntnisweg Biologiedidaktik [Path of knowledge biological education] (pp. 21–45). Universitätsdruckerei.
- McDonald, S., Bateman, K., Gall, H., Tanis-Ozcelik, A., Webb, A., & Furman, T. (2019). Mapping the increasing sophistication of students’ understandings of plate tectonics: A learning progressions approach. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2018.1550972
- Merriam, S. B. (2002). Introduction to qualitative research. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), Qualitative Research in Practice (pp. 3–17). Jossey-Bass.
- Mills, R., Tomas, L., & Lewthwaite, B. (2017). Junior secondary school students’ conceptions about plate tectonics. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 26(4), 297–310. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2016.1262511
- Mills, R., Tomas, L., & Lewthwaite, B. (2019). The impact of student-constructed animation on middle school students’ learning about plate tectonics. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9755-z
- Niebert, K. (2010). Den Klimawandel verstehen. Eine didaktische Rekonstruktion der globalen Erwärmung [Understanding Climate Change. Educational reconstruction of global warming]. Didaktisches Zentrum Oldenburg.
- Niebert, K., & Gropengießer, H. (2014). Understanding the greenhouse effect by embodiment–analysing and using students’ and scientists’ conceptual resources. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 277–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.763298
- Niebert, K., Gropengießer, H., & Riemeier, T. (2013). The Hidden Hand that shapes conceptual understanding. In C.-Y. Tsui & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in biological education (pp. 293–310). Springer. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-
- Niebert, K., Marsch, S., & Treagust, D. (2012). Understanding needs embodiment: A theory-guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, 96(5), 849–877. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21026
- Orgill, M., & Bodner, G. M. (2006). An analysis of the effectiveness of analogy use in college‐level biochemistry textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1040–1060. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20129
- Riemeier, T., & Gropengießer, H. (2008). On the roots of difficulties in learning about cell division - process-based analysis of students’ conceptual development in teaching experiments. International Journal of Science Education, 30(7), 923–939. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701294716
- Reinfried, S. (2007). Educational reconstruction – A key to progress in geoscience teaching and learning. GuiD (Journal of Geography Education), 3(4), 232–243.
- Rivet, A. E., & Kastens, K. A. (2012). Developing a construct‐based assessment to examine students’ analogical reasoning around physical models in Earth Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 713–743. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21029
- Rottman, B., Gentner, D., & Goldwater, M. B. (2012). Causal systems categories: Differences in novice and expert categorization of causal phenomena. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 919–932.
- Sibley, D. (2009). A cognitive framework for reasoning with scientific models. Journal of Geoscience Education, 57(4), 255–263. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/1.3559672
- Smith, G. A., & Bermea, S. B. (2012). Using students’ sketches to recognize alternative conceptions about plate tectonics persisting from prior instruction. Journal of Geoscience Education, 60(4), 350–359. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5408/11-251.1
- Smith, L. A., & Gentner, D. (2012). Using spatial analogy to facilitate graph learning. In C. Stachniss, K. Schill, & D. Uttal (Eds.), Proceedings of the Spatial cognition VIII: International Conference, Spatial Cognition 2012, Kloster Seeon, Germany, August 31–September 3, 2012 (pp. 196–209). Springer.
- Schmitt, R. (2010). Metaphernanalyse [Metaphor analysis]. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie [Handbook of qualitative research in psychology] (pp. 676–691). Springer.
- Tarbuck, E., & Lutgens, F. (2009). Introduction to physical geology/Allgemeine Geologie. München.
- Treagust, D., Harrison, A. G., & Venville, G. J. (1996). Using an analogical teaching approach to engender conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069960180206
- Treagust, D., & Duit, R. (2015). On the significance of conceptual metaphors in teaching and learning science: Commentary on Lancor; Niebert and Gropengiesser; and Fuchs. International Journal of Science Education, 37(5–6), 958–965. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025312
- Turner, R. M. (1989). A schema-based model of adaptive problem solving. [Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology]. Georgia Tech Library. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/9156
- Vergara-Díaz, C., Bustamante, K., Pinto, L., & Cofré, H. (2020). Exploring Chilean seventh grade students’ conceptions of Earth dynamics before and after model-and inquiry-based instruction. Journal of Geoscience Education, 68(4), 360–370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2020.1725406
- Vollmer, G. (1986). Was können wir wissen? Die Erkenntnisse der Natur [What can we know? The knowledge of nature]. Hirzel.
- Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(4), 625–636. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196322
- Witzel, A., & Reiter, H. (2012). The problem-centered interview. SAGE Publications Ltd.
- Wunderle, M. S. (2007). Investigating in-service educators’ and undergraduates’ mental tectonic models [MS Thesis]. Ohio University.