Asynchronous student engagement in analysis of climate data achieves learning objectives related to climate change understanding, statistical competence, and climate anxiety

References

• Bader, N. E., Soule, D., Castendyk, D., Meixner, T. (2016). Students, meet data. https://arizona.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/students-meet-data
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, A. P. K., Petcovic, H. L., & Cassidy, D. P. (2019). Development and validation of the anthropogenic climate change dissenter inventory. Environmental Education Research, 25(6), 867–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1250150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2015). Counteracting the politicization of science. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 745–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, C. A., & Gross, L. J. (2003). Training ecologists to think with uncertainty in mind. Ecology, 84(6), 1412–1414. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2003)084[1412:TETTWU2.0.CO;2]
   Google Scholar
• Carey, C. C., & Gougis, R. D. (2017). Simulation modeling of lakes in undergraduate and graduate classrooms increases comprehension of climate change concepts and experience with computational tools. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9644-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinn, C. A., Barzilai, S., & Golan Duncan, R. (2021). Education for a “post-truth” world: New directions for research and practice. Educational Researcher, 50(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20940683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Swim, J., Bonnes, M., Steg, L., Whitmarsh, L., & Carrico, A. (2016). Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist, 71(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. M., Caballero, M. D., Ebert-May, D., Fata-Hartley, C. L., Jardeleza, S. E., Krajcik, J. S., Laverty, J. T., Matz, R. L., Posey, L. A., & Underwood, S. M. (2015). Challenge faculty to transform STEM learning. Science (New York, N.Y.), 350(6258), 281–282. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darner, R. (2019). How can educators confront science denial? Educational Researcher, 48(4), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X19849415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingler, A., & Darner, R. (2020, October 13–16). Does climate change anxiety influence zoo visitor experience? North American Association for Environmental Education Annual Conference [Paper presentation].North American Association for Environmental Education 2020 Annual Conference, Virtual.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, U. K. H., Hogan, J. L., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). Reminders and repetition of misinformation: Helping or hindering its retraction? Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101809
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwein, A. L., Hartley, L. M., Donovan, S., & Billick, I. (2014). Using rich context and data exploration to improve engagement with climate data and data literacy: Bringing a field station into the college classroom. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 578–586. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-034
   Google Scholar
• Florides, G. A., & Christodoulides, P. (2009). Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences. Environment International, 35(2), 390–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2008.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, J., Delmas, R., Chance, B., & Ooms, A. (2006). Assessment resource tools for improving statistical thinking. Retrieved 1 April 2020 from https://www.causeweb.org/cause/archive/artist/articles/AERA_2003.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the united States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412438225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. P., & Mourad, T. (2018). The growing importance of data literacy in life science education. American Journal of Botany, 105(12), 1953–1956. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1195
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gougis, R. D., Stomberg, J. F., O’Hare, A. T., O’Reilly, C. M., Bader, N. E., Meixner, T., & Carey, C. C. (2017). Post-secondary science students’ explanations of randomness and variation and implications for science learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(6), 1039–1056. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9737-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, R. (2010). Statistics and the modern student. International Statistical Review = Revue Internationale de Statistique, 78(2), 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greengrove, C., Lichtenwalner, S., Palevsky, H., Pfeiffer-Herbert, A., Severmann, S., Soule, D., Murphy, S., Smith, L., & Yarincik, K. (2020). Using authentic data from NSF’s ocean observatories initiative in undergraduate teaching. Oceanography, 33(1), 62–73. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26897836 https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2020.103
   Google Scholar
• Haladyna, T. M., Downing, S. M., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2002). A review of multiple-choice item-writing guidelines for classroom assessment. Applied Measurement in Education, 15(3), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1503_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampton, S. E., Jones, M. B., Wasser, L. A., Schildhauer, M. P., Supp, S. R., Brun, J., Hernandez, R. R., Boettiger, C., Collins, S. L., Gross, L. J., Fernández, D. S., Budden, A., White, E. P., Teal, T. K., Labou, S. G., & Aukema, J. E. (2017). Skills and knowledge for data-intensive environmental research. Bioscience, 67(6), 546–557.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hampton, S. E., Strasser, C. A., Tewksbury, J. J., Gram, W. K., Budden, A. E., Batcheller, A. L., Duke, C. S., & Porter, J. H. (2013). Big data and the future of ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(3), 156–162. https://doi.org/10.1890/120103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D., & Bord, A. (2001). Learning about global issues: Why most educators only make things worse. Environmental Education Research, 7(4), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620120081287
   Google Scholar
• Kjelvik, M. K., & Schultheis, E. H. (2019). Getting messy with authentic data: Exploring the potential of using data from scientific research to support student data literacy. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 18(2), es2. es2. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-02-0023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klug, J. L., Carey, C. C., Richardson, D. C., & Darner Gougis, R. (2017). Analysis of high‐frequency and long‐term data in undergraduate ecology classes improves quantitative literacy. Ecosphere, 8(3), e01733. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.1733
   Google Scholar
• LaDue, N. D., Ackerman, J. R., Blaum, D., & Shipley, T. F. (2021). Assessing water literacy: Undergraduate student conceptions of groundwater and surface water flow. Water, 13(5), 622. https://www.mdpi.com/1014042 https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050622
   Google Scholar
• McNemar, Q. (1947). Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages. Psychometrika, 12(2), 153–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02295996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, A. (2020). Children of the climate crisis a generation of kids faces a more dangerous world as they come of age in the era of eco-anxiety. Rolling Stone.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, C. M., Gougis, R. D., Klug, J. L., Carey, C. C. (2017). Using large data sets for open-ended inquiry in undergraduate science classrooms. https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article-abstract/67/12/1052/4582209
   Google Scholar
• Pihkala, P. (2017). Environmental education after sustainability: Hope in the midst of tragedy. Global Discourse, 7(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1300412
   Google Scholar
• Prayoga, T., & Abraham, J. (2017). A psychological model explaining why we love or hate statistics. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.08.013
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, C. T. (2011). The method of scientific discovery in Peirce’s philosophy: Deduction, induction, and abduction. Logica Universalis, 5(1), 127–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-011-0026-5
   Google Scholar
• Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking clearly about correlations and causation: Graphical causal models for observational data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629
   Google Scholar
• Rosenau, J. (2012). Science denial: A guide for scientists. Trends in Microbiology, 20(12), 567–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2012.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumsey, D. J. (2002). Statistical literacy as a goal for introductory statistics courses. Journal of Statistics Education: An International Journal on the Teaching and Learning of Statistics, 10(3), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2002.11910678
   Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G. M., Kienhues, D., & Hofer, B. K. (2014). Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: Epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist, 49(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.916216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soule, D., Darner, R., O’Reilly, C. M., & Bader, N. E. (2018). EDDIE modules are effective learning tools for developing quantitative literacy and seismological understanding. Journal of Geoscience Education, 66(2), 97–108. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10899995.2018.1411708
   Google Scholar
• Stern, P. C. (2012). Fear and hope in climate messages. Nature Climate Change. https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate1610
   Google Scholar
• Thank, I., & Sinatra, G. M. (2022). Supporting climate change understanding with novel data, estimation instruction, and epistemic prompts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 910–927.
   Google Scholar
• Woodbury, Z. (2019). Climate trauma: Toward a new taxonomy of trauma. Ecopsychology, 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2018.0021
   Google Scholar
• Yu, C. H. (1994). Abduction? Deduction? Induction? Is there a logic of exploratory data analysis? ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED376173
   Google Scholar
• Zummo, L., Gargroetzi, E., & Garcia, A. (2020). Youth voice on climate change: Using factor analysis to understand the intersection of science, politics, and emotion. Environmental Education Research, 26(8), 1207–1226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1771288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar