Dis-integrating mathematics and science in early childhood methods courses: Encouraging discrete content-area proficiency

References

• Academic Term. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_Term
   Google Scholar
• Adams, P. E., & Krockover, G. H. (1997). Concerns and perceptions of beginning secondary science and mathematics teachers. Science Education, 81(1), 29–50. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L. (2005). How do elementary teachers compensate for incomplete science content knowledge? Research in Science Education, 35(2–3), 245–268. doi:10.1007/s11165-005-3176-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide. American Educator, 29(1), 14–17, 20–22, 43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G. W. (1990). The subject matter preparation of teachers. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1992). Report from the NSF/SSMA wingspread Conference: A network for integrated science and mathematics teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 92(6), 340–342. doi:10.1111/ssm.1992.92.issue-6
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C. A., & Borko, H. (1992). Becoming a mathematics teacher. In D. A. Grows (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, M. (1989 /2008). Mathematics: Assessing understanding [DVD]. United States: ETA/Cuisenaire.
   Google Scholar
• Caine, R., & Caine, G. (1997). Unleashing the power of perceptual change: The promise of brain based teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Cardetti, F., & Truxaw, M. P. (2014). Toward improving the mathematics preparation of elementary pre-service teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 114(1), 1–9. doi:10.1111/ssm.2014.114.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Charles, R. I. (2005). Big ideas and understandings as the foundation for elementary and middle school mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Education Leadership, 7(13), 9–24.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, R., & Lind, K. K. (2007). Math & science for young children (5th ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Thomas Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Chazan, D., & Sandow, D. (2011). “Why did you do that?” Reasoning in algebra classrooms. Mathematics Teacher, 104(6), 460–464.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A., & Keller, J. D. (2009). Exploring science and mathematics in a child’s world. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, M., & Yeh, C. (2008). Creative arithmetic: Exploring alternative methods. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(6), 367–368.
   Google Scholar
• Frykholm, J. A. (1996). Pre-service teachers in mathematics: Struggling with the Standards. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(6), 665–681. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(96)00010-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frykholm, J. M., & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction: Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127–141. doi:10.1111/ssm.2005.105.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Frykholm, J. M., & Meyer, M. R. (2002). Is it science? Is it mathematics? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(9), 502–508.
   Google Scholar
• Gerde, H. K., Schachter, R. E., & Wasik, B. A. (2013). Using the scientific method to guide learning: An integrated approach to early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41, 315–323. doi:10.1007/s10643-013-0579-4
   Google Scholar
• Greenfield, D. B., Jirout, J., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: A programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education & Development, 20, 238–264. doi:10.1080/10409280802595441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (1991). Number sense as situated knowing in a conceptual domain. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(3), 170–218. doi:10.2307/749074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammrich, P. L. (1997). Teaching for excellence in K-8 science education: Using Project 2061 benchmarks for more effective science instruction. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(3), 222–232. doi:10.1177/0022487197048003007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. (1997). Minds of our own [DVD]. United States: Producer.
   Google Scholar
• Herschbach, D. R. (2011). The STEM initiative: Constraints and challenges. Journal of STEM Teacher Education, 48(1), 96–122.
   Google Scholar
• Huillet, D. (2009). Mathematics for teaching: An anthropological approach and its use in teacher training. For the Learning of Mathematics, 29(3), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, O. F. (2010). Developing teachers’ knowledge of students as learners of mathematics through structured interviews. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 141–154. doi:10.1007/s10857-009-9129-9
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I., Lake, V. E., & Dagli, U. (2005). Integration of science and mathematics methods and pre-service teachers’ understanding of constructivism. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 25, 165–172. doi:10.1080/1090102050250209
   Google Scholar
• Kahan, J., Cooper, D., & Bethea, K. (2003). The role of mathematics teachers’ content knowledge in their teaching: A Framework for research applied to a study of student teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(3), 223–252. doi:10.1023/A:1025175812582
   Google Scholar
• Kalchman, M., Moss, J., & Case, R. (2001). Psychological models for the development of understanding: Rational numbers and functions. In S. M. Carver, & D. Klahr (Eds.), Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress (pp. 1–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2001). Pre-school teachers’ content knowledge in science: Their understanding of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by 369 children’s questions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9(3), 165–179. doi:10.1080/09669760120086929
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L. G., & Chard, S. C. (1989). Engaging children’s minds: The project approach. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, K. E., Booth, J. L., & Newton, K. T. (2012). Learning algebra from worked examples. Mathematics Teacher, 107(7), 535–540.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. L. (1997). Integrated, interdisciplinary, or thematic instruction? Is this a question or is it questionable semantics? School Science and Mathematics, 97(2), 57–58. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17342.x
   Google Scholar
• Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J., & Czerniak, C. (2000). Assessing teachers’ beliefs about their science teaching context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(3), 123–145. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200003)37:3<275::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDuffie, A. R., & Morrison, J. A. (2008). Learning about data display: Mathematics and science inquiry. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(6), 375–382.
   Google Scholar
• Moomaw, S., Carr, V., Boat, M., & Barnett, D. (2010). Preschoolers number sense. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16(6), 332–340.
   Google Scholar
• Moomaw, S., & Davis, J. A. (2010). STEM comes to preschool. Young Children, 65(5), 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards of school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prairie, A. P. (2005). Inquiry into math, science, and technology for teaching young children. Clifton Park, NY: Thomas Delmar Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Regents of the University of California. (2007). FOSS™ Fabric (2nd ed.). Nashua, NH: Delta Education.
   Google Scholar
• Saçkes, M., Flevares, L. M., Gonya, J., & Trundle, K. C. (2012). Pre-service early childhood teachers’ sense of efficacy for integrating mathematics and science: Impact of a methods course. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 33, 349–364. doi:10.1080/10901027.2012.732666
   Google Scholar
• Schifter, D. (1996). A constructivist perspective: On teaching and learning mathematics. The Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 492–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–23. doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solis, A. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge: What matters most in the professional learning of content teachers in classrooms with diverse student populations. Retrieved from www.idra.org/IDRA_Newsletter/August_2009_Actionable_Knowledge/Pedagogical_Content_Knowledge/
   Google Scholar
• Stinson, K., Harkness, S. S., Meyer, H., & Stallworth, J. (2009). Mathematics and science integration: Models and Characterizations. School Science and Mathematics, 109(3), 153–161. doi:10.1111/ssm.2009.109.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Wearne, D., Hiebert, J., & Campbell, P. (1994). Place value addition and subtraction. Arithmetic Teacher, 41(5), 272–275.
   Google Scholar
• Whitenack, J. W., Knipping, N., Loesing, J., Kim, O., & Beetsma, A. (2002). Starting off the school year with opportunities for all: Supporting first graders’ development of number sense. Teaching Children Mathematics, 9(1), 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Whitin, D. J., & Whitin, P. (2003). Talk counts: Discussing graphs with young children. Teaching Children Mathematics, 10, 142–149.
   Google Scholar
• Zangori, L., Forbes, C., & Biggers, M. (2012). This is inquiry right?: Strategies for effectively adapting elementary science lessons. Science and Children, 50(1), 48–53.
   Google Scholar