One size never fits all: Teachers’ responses to standardized curriculum materials and implications for early childhood teacher educators

References

• Achinstein, B., & Ogawa, R. T. (2006). (In)fidelity: What the resistance of new teachers reveals about professional principles and prescriptive educational policies. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 30–63. doi:10.17763/haer.76.1.e14543458r811864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258–267. doi:10.3102/0013189X07306523
   Google Scholar
• Bauml, M. (2015). Beginning primary teachers’ experiences with curriculum guides and pacing calendars for math and science instruction. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 29(3), 390–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, B. (2011). The dilemma of scripted instruction: Comparing teacher autonomy, fidelity, and resistance in the Froebelian Kindergarten, Montessori, direct instruction, and Success for All. Teachers College Record, 113(3), 395–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: “Educational triage” and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268. doi:10.3102/00028312042002231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Certo, J. L. (2006). Beginning teacher concerns in an accountability-based testing environment. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 20(4), 331–349. doi:10.1080/02568540609594571
   Google Scholar
• Copple, C., & Bredekamp, S. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
   Google Scholar
• Copple, C., Bredekamp, S., Koralek, D., & Charner, K. (2014). Developmentally appropriate practice: Focus on children in first, second, and third grades. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Crocco, M. S., & Costigan, A. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512–535. doi:10.1177/0042085907304964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Knowledge for teaching: What do we know? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & D. J. McINtyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (3rd ed., pp. 1316–1323). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. (2000). Teachers’ responses to Success for All: How beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 775–799. doi:10.3102/00028312037003775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. (2014, August 21). A back-to-school conversation with teachers and school leaders. Smartblogs. Retrieved from http://smartblogs.com/education/2014/08/21/listening-to-teachers-on-testing
   Google Scholar
• Elkind, D. (2007). The hurried child: Growing up too fast too soon (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foegen, A., Jiban, C., & Deno, S. (2007). Progress monitoring measures in mathematics: A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 121–139. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T. (2011). Preservice elementary teachers’ adaptation of science curriculum materials for inquiry-based elementary science. Science Education, 95(5), 927–955. doi:10.1002/sce.v95.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, L. S. (2007). Embracing pedagogical multiplicity: Examining two teachers’ instructional responses to the changing expectations for Kindergarten in U.S. public schools. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21(4), 378–399. doi:10.1080/02568540709594602
   Google Scholar
• Grau, E. (2008). Teaching and learning in a post-DAP world. Early Education & Development, 19(3), 441–447. doi:10.1080/10409280802065411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griess, C. J., & Keat, J. B. (2014). Practice what we preach: Differentiating instruction and assessment in a higher education classroom as a model of effective pedagogy for early childhood teacher education candidates. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(1), 98–109. doi:10.1080/10901027.2013.874381
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, J. A. (2002). A special section on personalized instruction accountability shovedown: Resisting the standards movement in early childhood education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(6), 457–462. doi:10.1177/003172170208300611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatch, J. A. (2006). Early childhood qualitative research. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, J. E., & Chiodo, J. J. (2009). Social studies is being taught in the elementary school: A contrarian view. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 33(2), 235–261.
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, A. (2000). Standardized testing and its victims. Education Week, 20(4), 46–47, 60.
   Google Scholar
• Mathison, S., & Freeman, M. (2003). Constraining elementary teachers’ work: Dilemmas and paradoxes created by state mandated testing. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(34). doi:10.14507/epaa.v11n34.2003
   Google Scholar
• Meidl, T. D., & Meidl, C. (2011). Curriculum integration and adaptation: Individualizing pedagogy for linguistically and culturally diverse students. Current Issues in Education, 14(1), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ogawa, R. T., Sandholtz, J. H., Martinez-Flores, M., & Scribner, S. P. (2003). The substantive and symbolic consequences of a district’s standards-based curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 147–176. doi:10.3102/00028312040001147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D., & Rangel, V. S. (2011). High stakes accountability and policy implementation: Teacher decision making in bilingual classrooms in Texas. Educational Policy, 25(4), 614–647. doi:10.1177/0895904810374848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perie, M., Marion, S., & Gong, B. (2009). Moving toward a comprehensive assessment system: A framework for considering interim assessments. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 5–13. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2009.00149.x
   Google Scholar
• Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246. doi:10.3102/00346543075002211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. (1983). Autonomy and obligation: The remote control of teaching. In L. S. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 484–503). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, K. (2006). Teacher identity and agency in school worlds: Beyond the all-good/all-bad discourse on accountability-explicit curriculum policies. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 119–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00350.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valli, L., & Buese, D. (2007). The changing roles of teachers in an era of high-stakes accountability. American Educational Research Journal, 44(3), 519–558. doi:10.3102/0002831207306859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernez, G., & Goldhaber, D. (2006). Implementing comprehensive school reform models. In D. K. Aladjem & K. M. Borman (Eds.), Examining comprehensive school reform (pp. 179–218). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Ticha, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 85–120. doi:10.1177/00224669070410020401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills, J. S., & Sandholtz, J. H. (2009). Constrained professionalism: Dilemmas of teaching in the face of test-based accountability. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1065–1114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. M., & Tabachnick, B. R. (1981). Are the effects of university teacher education “washed out” by school experience? Journal of Teacher Education, 32(3), 7–11. doi:10.1177/002248718103200302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar