Early educators’ perspective and experience using pedagogical documentation to support individualizing for children with disabilities in inclusive settings

References

• Barton, E., Lawrence, K., & Deurloo, F. (2011). Individualizing interventions for young children with autism in preschool. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 42, 1205–1217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-011-1195-z
   Google Scholar
• Barton, E., & Smith, B. J. (2015). Advancing high-quality preschool inclusion: A discussion and recommendations for the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(2), 68–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415583048
   Google Scholar
• Bath, C. (2012). I can’t read it; I don’t know’: Young children’s participation in the pedagogical documentation of English early childhood education and care settings. International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(2), 190–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2012.715242
   Google Scholar
• Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2007). Inclusionary education in Italy: A literature review and call for more empirical research. Remedial and Special Education, 28(2), 80–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280020701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, T. (2001). Reactions to visiting the infant-toddler and preschool centers in Reggio Emilia, Italy. Early Childhood Research & Practice: An Internet Journal on the Development, Care, and Education of Young Children, 3(1), 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Bjartveit, C., Carston, S. C., Baxter, J., Hart, J., & Greenidge, C. (2019). The living wall: Implementing and interpreting pedagogical documentation in specialized ELCC settings. Journal of Childhood Studies, 44(2), 28–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.18357/jcs441201919058
   Google Scholar
• Blaiklock, K. E. (2008). A critique of the use of learning stories to assess the learning dispositions of young children. N.Z. Research in ECE Journal, 11, 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick, J. T., & Hong, S. B. (2011). Introducing the cycle of inquiry system: A reflective inquiry practice for early childhood teacher development. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 13(2),1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Buldu, M. (2010). Making learning visible in kindergarten classrooms: Pedagogical documentation as a formative assessment technique. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(7), 1439–1449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buysse, V., & Hollingsworth, H. L. (2009). Program quality and early childhood inclusion: Recommendations for professional development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29(2), 119–128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A., & Moss, P. (2011). Listening to young children: The mosaic approach. London, England: NCB.
   Google Scholar
• Cooney, M. H., & Buchanan, M. (2001). Documentation: Making assessment visible. Young Exceptional Children, 4(3), 10–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/109625060100400302
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G., & Moss, P. (2005). Ethics and politics in early childhood education. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Postmodern perspectives. London, UK: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daugherty, S., Grisham-Brown, J., & Hemmeter, M. L. (2001). The effects of embedded skill instruction on the acquisition of target and nontarget skills in preschoolers with developmental delays. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21(4), 213–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/027112140102100402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, J. N., McDonnell, A. P., & Heathfield, L. T. (2005). Enhancing emergent literacy skills in inclusive preschools for young children with visual impairments. Young Exceptional Children, 9(1), 20–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/109625060500900103
   Google Scholar
• Dennis, L. R., & Horn, E. (2011). Strategies for supporting early literacy development. Young Exceptional Children, 14(3), 29–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250611420553
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, S. (2007). Member checking with older women: A framework for negotiating meaning. Healthcare for Women International, 28(10), 888–908. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330701615325
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (Eds.). (1998). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach—Advanced reflections. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (2012). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach in transformation. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Emilson, A., & Samuelsson, I. P. (2014). Documentation and communication in Swedish preschools. Early Years, 34(2), 175–187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2014.880664
   Google Scholar
• Fleet, A., Patterson, C., & Robertson, J. (2006). Insights: Behind early childhood pedagogical documentation. Castle Hill, NSW: Pademelon.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, G., & Fyfe, B. (1998). Design, documentation, and discourse: A theory of negotiated learning. In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education (2nd ed.) pp. 239–260. Greenwich, CT: Ablex Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, G., & Hall, E. (2005). Wondering with children: The importance of observation in early education. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 7(2):187–202.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, L., & Hanlin, M.F. (1993). A preliminary evaluation of learning within developmentally appropriate early learning setting.Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 13, 308–327.
   Google Scholar
• Fukkink, R. G., & Tavecchio, L. W. C. (2010). Effects of video interaction guidance on early childhood teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1652–1659. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillis, M. C. (2011). Birth-Kindergarten licensure graduates’ perceptions of their current practices and preservice preparation relative to individualization strategies for young children ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://media.proquest.com/media/pq/classic/doc/2595843581/fmt/ai/rep/NPDF?_s=s2ZuMkgsk3uGfTlCPeHb9vP64FQ%3D
   Google Scholar
• Government of Quebec Learn Quebec. (2013). The preschool education program. Retrieved from http://www.learnquebec.ca/export/sites/learn/en/content/curriculum_elem/kinder/documents/Mandate.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grisham-Brown, J., Schuster, J. W., Hemmeter, M. L., & Collins, B. C. (2000). Using an embedding strategy to teach preschoolers with significant disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 10(2/3), 139–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016688130297
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 163–194). London, England: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, P.L., Reffel, J.M., Rice, C., Peterson, S., & Venn, M.L. (2005). Instructional modifications used by national board -certified teachers. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth 49(2), 47–54.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, E., & Banerjee, R. (2009). Understanding curriculum modifications and embedded learning opportunities in the context of supporting all children’s success. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 40(4), 406–415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0026)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, E., Lieber, J., Li, S., Sandall, S., & Schwartz, I. (2000). Supporting young children’s IEP goals in inclusive settings through embedded learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(4), 208–223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/027112140002000402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, E., Lieber, J., Sandall, S. R., Schwartz, I. S., & Wolery, R. A. (2002). Classroom models of individualized instruction. In Widening the circle, including children with disabilities in preschool programs (pp. 46–60). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horn, E., Lieber, J., Sandall, S. R., Schwartz, I. S., & Wolery, R. A. (2002). Classroom models of individualized instruction. Widening the circle, including children with disabilities in preschool programs. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004, P.L. 108-446 § 118 Stat. 2647.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L., & Galbraith, J. (2006). Making the social visible within inclusive classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 21(1), 5–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02568540609594575
   Google Scholar
• Ledford, J., & Wolery, M. (2013). Peer modeling of academic and social behaviors during small group direct instruction Exceptional Children, 79(4), 439–458.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 163–188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. (2007). Toward formative assessment: The use of pedagogical documentation in early elementary classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22(2), 232–242. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaguzzi, L. (1998). History, ideas, and basic philosophy. In C. P. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach, advanced reflections (2nd ed., pp. 49–198). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• McBride, B.J., & Schwartz, I.S. (2003). Effects of teaching early interventionist to use discreet trials during ongoing classroom activities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 23(1), 5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mulhall, A. (2003). In the field: Notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), 306–313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02514.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, R., & Cochran, M. (Eds.). (2007). International encyclopedia of early childhood education, Volumes I-IV. West Port, Connecticut: Praeger Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Nurse, A. (2001). A question of inclusion. In L. Abbott & C. Nutbrown (Eds.), Experiencing Reggio Emilia: Implications for preschool education (pp. 62 -71). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nutbrown, C., & Clough, P. (2004). Inclusion and exclusion in the early years: Conversations with European educators. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19(3), 301–315. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0885625042000262479
   Google Scholar
• Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education. (2019). 40th Annual report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities act (IDEA). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/reports/annual/osep/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Purdue, K. (2009). Barriers to and facilitators of inclusion for children with disabilities in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(2), 133–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2009.10.2.133
   Google Scholar
• Rafferty, Y., & Griffin, W. (2005). Benefits and risks of reverse inclusion for preschoolers with and without disabilities: Perspectives of parents and providers. Journal of Early Intervention, 27(3), 173–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510502700305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, C. (2004). The relationship between documentation and assessment. Innovations in early childhood: The International Reggio Exchange, 11, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Rinaldi, C. (2006). In dialogue with Reggio Emilia: Listening, researching, and learning. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sewell, T.J., Collins, B.C., Hemmeter, M.L., & Schuster, J.W. (1998). Using simultaneous prompting within an activity-based format to teach dressing skills to preschoolers with developmental delays. Journal of Early Intervention, 21(2), 132–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Softchalk, LLC. (2015). E-Learning authoring software. Richmond, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Suárez, S. C., & Daniels, K. J. (2009). Listening for competence through documentation assessing children with language delays using digital video. Remedial and Special Education, 30(3), 177–190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932508315649
   Google Scholar
• Turner, T., & Wilson, D. (2010). Reflections on documentation: A discussion with thought leaders from Reggio Emilia. Theory Into Practice, 49(1), 5–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840903435493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Department of Health and Human Services. (2013). National survey of early care and education. Washington, DC: USDHHS.
   Google Scholar
• Vakil, S., Freeman, R., & Swim, T. (2003). The Reggio Emilia approach to inclusive early childhood programs. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30(3), 187–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022022107610
   Google Scholar
• Wolery, M., Holcombe-Ligone, A., Brookfield, J., Huffman, K., Schroeder, Martin, C. G., . . . Werts, M. G. (1993). The extent and nature of preschool mainstreaming: A survey of general early educators. Journal of Special Education, 27, 222–234.
   Google Scholar
• Wolery, M., Anthony, L., Caldwell, N. K., Snyder, E. D., & Morgante, J. D. (2002). Embedding and distributing constant time delay in circle time and transitions. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22(1), 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar