Towards the Measurement of EFL Listening Beliefs with Item Response Theory Methods

REFERENCES

• Aitken, K.G. (1978). Measuring listening comprehension. In English as a Second Language. TEAL Occasional Papers, Vol. 2 (ERIC Document No. ED 155945). Vancouver, Canada: British Columbia Association of Teachers of English as an Additional Language.
   Google Scholar
• Bacon, S. M. (1992). The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. The Modern Language Journal, 76(2), 160–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahrani, T. (2011). How EFL teachers can use TV news to boost listening comprehension and speaking proficiency in their classes. Studies in Literature and Language, 2(3), 51–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychology, 28(2), 117–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bembenutty, H. (2007). Self-regulation of learning and academic delay of gratification: Gender and ethnic differences among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 586–616.
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D. (2009). Evaluating listening theory: Development and illustration of five criteria. The International Journal of Listening, 25, 81–103.
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. D., & Worthington, D. L. (2010). Revisiting the listening styles profile (LSP-16): A confirmatory factor analytic approach to scale validation and reliability estimation. The International Journal of Listening, 24, 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Brinton, D., & Gaskill, W. (1978). Using news broadcasts in the ESL/EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 12(4), 403–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. Bollen & J. Long ( Eds.), Testing structural equation models ( pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G., Tatsuoka, K., Kostin, I., and Phelps, M. (1997). The sub-skills of listening: Rule-space analysis of a multiple-choice test of second language listening comprehension. In A. Huhta, V. Kohonen, L. Kurki-Suonio, & S. Luoma ( Eds.), Current developments and alternatives in language assessment. Tampere, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G., & Tatsuoka, K. (1998). Application of the rule-space procedure to language testing: Examining attributes of a free response listening test. Language Testing, 15(2), 119–157.
   Google Scholar
• Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. Y., & Shen, M. C. (2010). The effects of beliefs about language learning and learning strategy use of junior high school EFL learners in remote districts. Research in Higher Education Journal, 8, 1–8. Retrieved from http://www.aabri.com/rhej.html
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, C. S., & Dunkel, P. (1992). The effects of speech modification, prior knowledge and listening proficiency on EFL lecture learning. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 345–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 151–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunkel, P. (1991). Listening in the native and second/foreign language: Towards an integration of research and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 431–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16, 5–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31(3), 313–330.
   Google Scholar
• Elkhafaifi, H. (2005). Listening comprehension and anxiety in the Arabic language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 89(2), 206–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, M. (1980). We all make the same mistakes: a comparative study of native and nonnative errors in taking dictation. In J.W. Oller, Jr., & K. Perkins ( Eds.), Research in language testing ( pp. 187–194). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garver, M. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (1999). Logistics research methods: Employing structural equation modeling to test for construct validity. Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), 33–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, A. (2011). “I prefer not text”: Developing Japanese learners’ communicative competence with authentic materials. Language Learning, 61(3), 786–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). A study of students’ metacognitive beliefs about foreign language study and their impact on learning. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 296–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French. Language Learning, 58(4), 747–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2011). Exploring the relationship between listening development and strategy use. Language Teaching Research, 15(4), 435– 456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruba, P. (1997). The role of videomedia in listening assessment. System, 35(3), 335–345.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Haroutunian-Gordon, S. (2011). Plato’s philosophy of listening. Educational Theory, 61(2), 125–139.
   Google Scholar
• Hayati, A. M., & Mohmedi, F. (2010). The effect of films with and without subtitles on listening comprehension of EFL intermediate students. International Journal of Instructional Media, 37(3), 301–313.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, P. W., & Rosenbaum, P. R. (1986). Conditional association and unidimensionality in monotone latent variable models. The Annals of Statistics, 14(4), 1523–1543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E. K. (1988). The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students. Modern Language Journal, 72, 283–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27, 557–576.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. S. (2004, July). Item response models and their use in measuring food insecurity and hunger. NAS Committee on National Statistics Workshop on the Measurement of Food Insecurity and Hunger, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kissau, S. (2006). Gender differences in second language motivation: An investigation of micro- and macro-level influences. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 73–96.
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, R. (2002). Writing in early adolescence: A review of the role of self-efficacy beliefs. Educational Psychology Review, 14(2), 173–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Mahfouz, S. M., & Ihmeideh, F. M. (2009). Attitudes of Jordanian university students towards using online chat discourse with native speakers of English for improving their language proficiency. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 22(3), 207–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, R. C., Fitzmaurice, S. F., Bunta, F., & Balasubramanian, C. (2002). The effects of nonnative accents on listening comprehension: Implications for ESL assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 173–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDevitt, T. M. (1990). Mothers’ and children’s beliefs about listening. Child Study Journal, 20(2).
   Google Scholar
• McDevitt, T. M., Spivey, N., Sheehan, E. P., Lennon, R., & Story, R. (1990). Children’s beliefs about listening: Is it enough to be still and quiet? Child Development, 61, 713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, D. J., & Rubin, J. ( Eds.). (1995). A guide for the teaching of second language listening. San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mousavi, S. A., & Iravani, H. (2012). The effect of authentic versus non-authentic aural materials on EFL learners’ listening comprehension. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(1), 21–27.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. ( Ed.). (2003). Practical English language teaching. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Omaggio-Hadley, A. (1993). Teaching language in context (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Park, G. P. (2010). Investigation into learning strategies used by effective and less effective EFL learners in Korea. Asian Social Science, 6(8), 3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. (1983). Listening comprehension: approach, design, procedure. TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), 219–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking: From theory to practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 17.
   Google Scholar
• Seigel, J. (2011). Readers respond: Thoughts on L2 listening pedagogy. ELT Journal, 65(3), 318–321.
   Google Scholar
• Selamat, S., & Sidhu, G. K. (2011). Student perception of metacognitive strategy use in lecture listening comprehension. Language Education in Asia, 2(2), 185–198.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, K. (2005). Development of a listening strategy intervention program for adult learners of Japanese. The International Journal of Listening, 19, 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sersen, W. J. (2011). Use of authentic-speech technique for teaching sound recognition to EFL students. U.S.-China Education Review, 8(4), 492–498.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, H. F. (2005). An investigation of cognitive operations on L2 listening comprehension performance: An exploratory study. The International Journal of Listening, 19, 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Shang, H. F. (2008). Listening strategy use and linguistic patterns in listening comprehension by EFL learners. The International Journal of Listening, 22, 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. M., Schumacker, R. E., & Bush, J. M. (1998). Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model. Journal of Outcome Measurement, 2, 66–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Snow, B. G., & Perkins, K. (1979). The teaching of listening comprehension and communication activities. TESOL Quarterly, 13(1), 51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. M. (1981). Learning to listen to English. TESOL Quarterly, 15(1), 41–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teng, H. C., & Chan, C. Y. (2008, June). An investigation of metacognitive strategies used by EFL listeners. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Association for Language Awareness. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.ezproxy.uwplatt.edu/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, I., & Rubin, J. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve listening comprehension? Foreign Language Annals, 29(3), 331–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2002). “It was nice to see that our predictions were right”: Developing metacognition in L2 listening comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(4), 555–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2006). Second language listening: Listening ability or language proficiency? The Modern Language Journal, 90(1), 6–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weir, C. J. (1993). Understanding and developing language tests. Upper Suddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, N. D. (1999). The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System, 27, 515–535.
   Google Scholar
• Zhong, Q. (2010). The effect of Chinese ESL learners’ beliefs on their autonomous learning. SiSAL Journal, 1(3), 212–225.
   Google Scholar