A Task-based Language Teaching Approach to Developing Metacognitive Strategies for Listening Comprehension

References

• Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bygate, M. (1999). Task as context for the framing, reframing and unframing of language. System, 27, 33–48. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(98)00048-7
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, M., & Sheen, Y. (2014). Task-based language learning and teaching: An action-research study. Language Teaching Research. doi:10.1177/1362168814547037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-S., & Read, J. (2006). The effects of listening support on the listening performance of EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 375–397. doi:10.2307/40264527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudron, C., Doughty, C., & Kim, Y. (2005). A task-based needs analysis of a tertiary Korean as a foreign language program. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 225–261). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Tsai, Y. (2012). Research on English teaching and learning: Taiwan (2004–2009). Language Teaching, 45, 180–201. doi:10.1017/S0261444811000577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, M.-H. (2011). The influence of learner strategies on oral presentations: A comparison between group and individual performance. English for Specific Purposes, 30, 272–285. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2011.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, M.-H. (2013). Strategy use for reading English for general and specific academic purposes in testing and nontesting contexts. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 175–197. doi:10.1002/rrq.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, M.-H. (2015). The influence of topics on listening strategy use for English for Academic Purposes. English Language Teaching, 8, 44–54. doi:10.5539/elt.v8n2p44
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. (2007). Coming to terms with language learner strategies: Surveying the experts. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies (pp. 29–45). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4, 193–220. doi:10.1177/136216880000400302
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8, 19–45.
   Google Scholar
• Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 299–323. doi:10.1017/S0272263100015047
   Google Scholar
• Fotos, S. (1993). Consciousness-raising and noticing through focus on form: Grammar task performance versus formal instruction. Applied Linguistics, 14, 385–407. doi:10.1093/applin/14.4.385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2011). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 61, 189–220. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00646.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. M. (1998). How ESL learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2, 124–147. doi:10.1177/136216889800200203
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. M. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30, 185–206. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00004-0
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2007). Designing Year 12 strategy training in listening and writing: From theory to practice. Language Learning Journal, 35, 153–173. doi:10.1080/09571730701599203
   Google Scholar
• Iimura, H. (2007). The listening process: Effects of question types and repetition. Language Education & Technology, 44, 75–85.
   Google Scholar
• Imhof, M. (2001). How to listening more effectively: Self-monitoring strategies in listening. International Journal of Listening, 15, 2–19. doi:10.1080/10904018.2001.10499042
   Google Scholar
• International English Language Testing System (IELTS) (2015). What’s in the test? – Listening. Retrieved from http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams/ielts/whats-in-the-test/
   Google Scholar
• Jurkovič, V. (2010). Language learner strategies and linguistic competence as factors affecting achievement test scores in English for Specific Purposes. TESOL Journal, 1, 449–469. doi:10.5054/tj.2010.234765
   Google Scholar
• Language Testing and Training Center (LTTC) (2015). General English Proficiency Test (GEPT) – CEFR alignment. Retrieved from https://www.lttc.ntu.edu.tw/E_LTTC/E_GEPT/alignment.htm
   Google Scholar
• Levine, T. R., & Hullett, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 612–625. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00828.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1993). Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. In G. Crookes & S. Gass (Eds.), Tasks in a pedagogical context: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–54). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, T., & Mendelsohn, D. (2010). Listening. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), An introduction to applied linguistics (2nd ed., pp. 180–196). London, England: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Macaro, E., Graham, S., & Vanderplank, R. (2007). A review of listening strategies: Focus on sources of knowledge and on success. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies (pp. 165–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nation, P., & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL listening and speaking. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, J. (2001). Options for vocabulary learning through communication tasks. ELT Journal, 55, 30–37. doi:10.1093/elt/55.1.30
   Google Scholar
• Norris, J. M. (2011). Tasked-based teaching and testing. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 578–594). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., & Küpper, L. (1989). Listening comprehension strategies in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 10, 418–437. doi:10.1093/applin/10.4.418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osada, N. (2001). What strategy do less proficient learners employ in listening comprehension? A reappraisal of bottom-up and top-down processing. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5, 73–90.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (5th ed.). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahimirad, M., & Shams, M. R. (2014). The effect of activating metacognitive strategies on the listening performance and metacognitive awareness of EFL students. International Journal of Listening, 28, 162–176. doi:10.1080/10904018.2014.902315
   Google Scholar
• Ridgway, T. (2000). Listening strategies – I beg your pardon? ELT Journal, 54, 179–185. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.179
   Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2011). Teaching and researching listening (2nd ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J., Chamot, A. U., Harris, V., & Anderson, N. J. (2007). Intervening in the use of strategies. In A. D. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies (pp. 141–160). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai, H. (2009). Effect of repetition of exposure and proficiency level in L2 listening tests. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 360–372. doi:10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00179.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuda, V. (2001). Guiding relationships between form and meaning during task performance: The role of the teacher. In M. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing (pp. 119–140). London, England: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Seo, K. (2005). Development of a listening strategy intervention program for adult learners of Japanese. International Journal of Listening, 19, 63–78. doi:10.1080/10904018.2005.10499075
   Google Scholar
• Shintani, N. (2011). A comparative study of the effects of input-based and production-based instruction on vocabulary acquisition by young EFL learners. Language Teaching Research, 15, 137–158. doi:10.1177/1362168810388692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (1996). A framework for the implementation of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 17, 38–62. doi:10.1093/applin/17.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (2003). Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36, 1–14. doi:10.1017/S026144480200188X
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P., Bei, X.Li, Q., & Wang, Z. (2012). The task is not enough: Processing approaches to task-based performance. Language Teaching Research, 16, 170–187. doi:10.1177/1362168811428414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1, 185–211. doi:10.1177/136216889700100302
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 387–409. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210. doi:10.1017/S0261444807004338
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2011). Teaching and testing listening comprehension. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 365–594). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., Mareschal, C. J., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431–462. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470–497. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widdowson, H. (1998). Skills, abilities, and contexts of reality. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 18, 323–333. doi:10.1017/S0267190500003615
   Google Scholar
• Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, England: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Yeldham, M., & Gruba, P. (2014). Toward an instructional approach to developing interactive second language listening. Language Teaching Research, 18, 33–53. doi:10.1177/1362168813505395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, X., & Borg, S. (2014). Task-based learning and teaching in China: Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 18, 205–221. doi:10.1177/1362168813505941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar