Exploring the Effect of Metacognitive Strategy Instruction on Metacognitive Awareness and Listening Performance Through a Process-Based Approach

References

• Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED463659.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baleghizadeh, S., & Rahimi, A. H. (2011). The relationship among listening performance, metacognitive strategy use and motivation from a self-determination theory perspective. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1, 61–67. doi:10.4304/tpls.1.1.61-67
   Google Scholar
• Bozorgian, H. (2012). Metacognitive instruction does improve listening comprehension. ISRN Education, 1–6. doi:10.5402/2012/734085
   Google Scholar
• Bozorgian, H. (2014). The role of metacognition in the development of EFL learners’ listening skill. International Journal of Listening, 28, 149–161. doi:10.1080/10904018.2013.861303
   Google Scholar
• Brown, A. L. (1978). Knowing when, where, and how to remember: A problem of metacognition. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 77–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A., & Küpper, L. (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 22(1), 13–22. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb03138.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C., & Huang, C. T. (2011, October 28). Raising EFL college students’ metacognitive awareness about listening. Paper presented at the NYS TESOL 41st Annual Conference, Melville, NY.
   Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, R. (Ed.). (2007). Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eastman, J. K. (1991). Learning to listen and comprehend: The beginning stages. System, 19, 179–187. doi:10.1016/0346-251X(91)90042-N
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–236). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003066X.34.10.906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (1998). How learners with different listening abilities use comprehension strategies and tactics. Language Teaching Research, 2, 124–147. doi:10.1177/136216889800200203
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2002). Learners’ self-reports on comprehension and learning strategies for listening. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 45–68.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39, 188–213. doi:10.1177/0033688208092184
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2010). Listening as process: Learning activities for self-appraisal and self-regulation. In N. Harwood (Ed.), English language teaching materials (pp. 179–206). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C., & Hu, G. W. (2013). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23, 1–20. doi:10.1080/09658416.2013.769558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young students. ELT Journal, 60, 222–232. doi:10.1093/elt/ccl002
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34, 165–182. doi:10.1016/j.system.2005.11.001
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, T. (1997). Life in the slow lane: Observations of a limited L2 listener. System, 25, 385–398. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00030-4
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, T. (2011). Academic listening in the 21st century: Reviewing a decade of research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10, 79–88. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mareschal, C. (2007). Student perceptions of a self-regulatory approach to second language listening comprehension development ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn, D. (1995). Applying learning strategies in the second/foreign language listening comprehension lesson. In D. Mendelsohn & J. Rubin (Eds.), A guide for the teaching of second language listening (pp. 132–150). San Diego, CA: Dominie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. W. (2001). Skills and strategies for proficient listening. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 87–101). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive listening strategies awareness in learning English as a foreign language: A comparison between university and high-school students. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 82–89. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.020
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2013). The impact of metacognitive instruction on EFL learners’ listening comprehension and oral language proficiency. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 5, 69–90.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and speaking from theory to practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ross. (1997). An introspective analysis of student inferencing on a second language listening test. In G. Kasper & E. Kellerman (Eds.), Communication strategies: Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 216–237). London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Saslow, J., & Ascher, A. (2006). Summit 1: Complete assessment package. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, 431–449. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2002). It was nice to see that our predictions were right: Developing metacognition in L2 listening comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 58, 555–575. doi:10.3138/cmlr.58.4.555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463–496. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learning to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3–25. doi:10.1017/S0267190504000017
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26, 70–89. doi:10.1093/applin/amh039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2007). Recent developments in second and foreign language listening comprehension research. Language Teaching, 40, 191–210. doi:10.1017/S0261444807004338
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodatari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire (MALQ): Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431–462. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, H. M. (2010). Teaching L2 students how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study. Language Learning, 60, 470–497. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-6893-0
   Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19, 515–537. doi:10.1093/applin/19.4.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. L. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics, 23, 32–55. doi:10.1093/applin/23.1.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Y. (2012). Metacognition and self-regulated learning (SRL) for Chinese EFL listening development ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
   Google Scholar