Investigating the Relationship between Learning Style and Metacognitive Listening Awareness

REFERENCES

• Anderson, N. J. (2002). The role of metacognition in second language teaching and learning. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Bada, E., & Okan, Z. (2000). Students’ language learning preferences. Tesl-Ej, 4(3), 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Biehler, R., & Snowman, J. (1993). Psychology applied to teaching. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Birjandi, P., & Rahimi, A. H. (2012). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on the listening performance of EFL students. International Journal of Linguistics, 4, 495–517. doi:10.5296/ijl.v4i2.1707
   Google Scholar
• Bozorgian, H. (2012). Metacognitive instruction does improve listening comprehension. ISRN Education, 1–6. doi:10.5402/2012/734085
   Google Scholar
• Bozorgian, H. (2014). The role of metacognition in the development of EFL learners’ listening skill. International Journal of Listening, 28(3), 149–161. doi:10.1080/10904018.2013.861303
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K., & Doolan, L. S. (2006). Learning styles and higher education: No adult left behind. In R. R. Sims & S. J. Sims (Eds.), Learning styles and learning: A key to meeting the accountability demands in education (pp. 163–174). New York, NY: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (2004). Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 1(1), 14–26.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. Y. K. (2005). Intuitive-analysis style and EFL listening strategies. ARECLS E-Journal, Annual Review of Education, Communication and Language Sciences, 2, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chou, M. (2015). English language education in formal and cram school contexts: An analysis of listening strategy and learning style. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 3–13. E-pub ahead of print
   Google Scholar
• Chou, M. (2016). A task-based language teaching approach to developing metacognitive strategies for listening comprehension. International Journal of Listening, 1–20. doi:10.1080/10904018.2015.1098542
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D., & Macaro, E. (Eds.). (2007). Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D., Oxford, R. L., & Chi, J. C. (2002). Learning style survey: Assessing your own learning styles. Minneapolis, MN: Centre for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2011). Metacognitive instruction for helping less-skilled listeners. ELT Journal, 65, 408–416. doi:10.1093/elt/ccq073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2015). Metacognition in L2 listening: Clarifying instructional theory and practice. TESOL Quarterly, 49(4), 883–892. doi:10.1002/tesq.258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decapua, A., & Wintergerst, A. C. (2005). Assessing and validating a learning styles instrument. System, 33, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1972). Practical approaches to individualizing instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrman, M. E. (2008). Personality and good language learners. In C. Griffiths (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners (pp. 61–72). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31, 313–330. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00045-9
   Google Scholar
• Elk, C. K. (2014). Beyond mere listening comprehension: Using TED talks and metacognitive activities to encourage awareness of errors. International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching, 3(2), 215–246.
   Google Scholar
• Gardener, H. (1999). Cognitive style: Implications for the classroom. Pivot, 7(3), 13–15.
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2000). A cognitive perspective on language learners’ listening comprehension problems. System, 28, 55–75. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00060-3
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC Journal, 39, 188–213. doi:10.1177/0033688208092184
   Google Scholar
• Goh, C. C. M., & Hu, G. (2013). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23, 255–274. doi:10.1080/09658416.2013.769558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, Elsevier, 34, 165–182.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Santos, D., & Francis-Brophy, E. (2014). Teacher beliefs about listening in a foreign language. Teaching and Teacher Education, Elsevier, 40, 44–60. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.01.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Santos, D., & Vanderplank, R. (2008). Listening comprehension and strategy use: A longitudinal exploration. System, 36, 52–68. doi:10.1016/j.system.2007.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregorc, A. F. (1996). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership, 36, 234–236.
   Google Scholar
• Hatch, E., & Farhady, H. (1983). Research design and statistics. London, UK: Newburry House.
   Google Scholar
• Ismail, N. M., & Tawalbeh, T. I. (2015). Effectiveness of a metacognitive reading strategies program for improving low achieving EFL readers. International Education Studies, 8(1), 71–87.
   Google Scholar
• Kummin, S., & Rahman, S. (2010). The relationship between the use of metacognitive strategies and achievement in English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 145–150. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.021
   Google Scholar
• Latifi, M., Tavakoli, M., & Dabaghi, A. (2014). The effect of metacognitive instruction on improving listening comprehension ability of intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 3(6), 21–33. doi:10.5861/ijrsll.2014.679
   Google Scholar
• Liyanage, I., & Bartlett, B. (2013). Personality types and languages learning strategies: Chameleons changing colours. System, 41, 598–608. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2014). A diary study focusing on listening and speaking: The evolving interaction of learning styles and learning strategies in a motivated, advanced ESL learner. System, 43, 101–113. doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioli, G. H. (1996). The good, the bad and the ugly: Learning preferences in EFL. English Teaching Forum, 34(2), 32–37.
   Google Scholar
• Mareschal, C. (2007). Student perceptions of a self-regulatory approach to second language listening comprehension development ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, B. (2000). Theories of second language learning. London, England: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Movahed, R. (2014). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on listening performance, metaconitive awareness and listening anxiety of beginner Iranian EFL students. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 88–99. doi:10.5539/ijel.v4n2p88
   Google Scholar
• Nunan, D. (1999). Second language teaching & learning. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2002). Language learning strategies in a nutshell: Update and ESL suggestions. In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching (pp. 124–132). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Oxford, England: GALA.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2013). Individual differences. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Routledge encyclopaedia of second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 302–307). London, England: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L., Lavine, R. Z., & Crookall, D. (1991). Language learning strategies, the communicative approach, and their classroom implications. Foreign Language Annals., 22(1), 29–39. doi:10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb03139.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Puchta, H. (1999). Creating a learning culture to which students want to belong: The application of neuro-linguistic programming to language teaching. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 259–266). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2012). Metacognitive strategies awareness and success in learning English as a foreign language: An overview. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 73–81. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.019
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi, M., & Katal, M. (2013). The impact of metacognitive instruction on EFL learners’ listening comprehension and oral language proficiency. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills (JTLS), 5(2), 69–90.
   Google Scholar
• Rahimirad, M., & Shams, M. R. (2014). The effect of activating metacognitive strategies on the listening performance and metacognitive awareness of EFL students. The International Journal of Listening, 28, 162–176. doi:10.1080/10904018.2014.902315
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J. (1995). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 87–103. doi:10.2307/3586356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J. (1998). Affect in the classroom: Problems, politics and pragmatics. In J. Arnold (Ed.), Affect in language learning (pp. 297–306). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. (1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (Eds.). (2010). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics (4th ed.). London, England: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley, D. S., Schutz, P. A., Glanz, R. S., & Weinstein, C. E. (1992). Self-regulated learning: The interactive influence of metacognitive awareness and goal-setting. The Journal of Experimental Education, 60, 293–306. doi:10.1080/00220973.1992.9943867
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost, M. (2002). Teaching and researching listening. London, England: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. (1975). What the good language learner can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–45. doi:10.2307/3586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. (2011). The study of cognitive process in the second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 2, 117–131. doi:10.1093/applin/2.2.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Funes, M. (2015). Exploring the potential of second/foreign language writing for language learning: The effects of task factors and learner variables. Journal of Second Language Writing, Elsevier, 28, 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahragard, R., & Mallahi, O. (2014). Relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ language learning styles, writing proficiency and self-assessment. International Conference on Current Trends in ELT, Procedia-Social and Behavioural Sciences, 98, 1611–1620. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.585
   Google Scholar
• Sen, H. S. (2009). The relationship between the use of metacognitive strategies and reading comprehension. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, Elsevier, 1, 2301–2305. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.404
   Google Scholar
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, 431–449. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
   Google Scholar
• Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. OUP, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soureshjani, K. H., & Naseri, N. (2012). Perceptual learning-style preferences of Iranian EFL learners in relation to their proficiency level. American Journal of Linguistics, 1(4), 70–74. doi:10.5923/j.linguistics.20120104.01
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, R., & Ganschow, L. (2001). Aptitude for learning a foreign language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 21, 90–112. doi:10.1017/S026719050100006X
   Google Scholar
• Temur, T., Kargin, T., Bayar, S. A., & Bayar, V. (2010). Metacognitive awareness of grades 6, 7 and 8 students in reading process. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, Elsevier, 2, 4193–4199. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.663
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2003). Orchestrating strategy use: Toward a model of the skilled second language listener. Language Learning, 53, 463–496. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L. (2005). Relationships among motivation orientations, metacognitive awareness and proficiency in L2 listening. Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 70–89. doi:10.1093/applin/amh039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The Metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431–462. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.00373.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. (1999). An introduction to “Metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning”: Beyond the basics. System, 27(4), 435–441. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(99)00043-3
   Google Scholar
• Wenden, A. L. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics, 23, 32–55. doi:10.1093/applin/23.1.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willing, K. (1993). Learning styles in adult migrant education. Sydney, Australia: NSW Adult Migrant Education Service.
   Google Scholar
• Yuksel, I., & Yuksel, I. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences, Elsevier, 31, 894–898. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164
   Google Scholar