RELATIONAL LISTENING, LISTENING BARRIERS, AND LISTENING FACILITATION IN FINNISH ADMINISTRATIVE CARE ORDER PREPARATION HEARINGS

References

• Ala-Kortesmaa, S. (2015). Professional listening in the legal context. Acta Universitatis Tamperensis 2101. Tampere University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, L. (2010). A dialogic approach to interpersonal and family communication. In D. Carbaugh & B. Powell (Eds.), Distinctive qualities in communication research (pp. 13–31). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beall, M. (2010). Perspectives on intercultural listening. In A. Wolvin (Ed.), Listening and human communication in the 21st Century (pp. 225–238). Wiley & Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bodie, G. (2011). The Active-Empathic Listening Scale (AELS): Conceptualization and evidence of validity within the interpersonal domain. Communication Quarterly, 59(3), 277–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2011.583495
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, J. (2018). Listening: Attitudes, principles, and skills (6th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burgoon, J., & Hale, J. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational messages. Communication Monographs, 51(3), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758409390195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, K., Poso, T., & Skivenes, M. (Eds.). (2017). Child welfare removals by the state: A cross-country analysis of decision-making systems. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Child Welfare Act. (2007). 417 (Finl.) https://www.finlex.fi/en/laki/kaannokset/2007/en20070417
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C., Fraser, J., & Waters, D. (2019). Establishing a framework for listening to children in healthcare. Journal of Child Health Care. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493519872078
   Google Scholar
• Dillard, J., Solomon, D., & Palmer, M. (1999). Structuring the concept of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 66(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enroos, R., Korpinen, J., & Poso, T. (2021). ‘Informed Consent’ revisited: A conceptual exercise with a focus on decision-making in child welfare. European Journal of Social Work, 24(5), 852–863. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1901658
   Google Scholar
• Eronen, T., Korpinen, J., & Poso, T. (2020). Social workers as relational actors: Descriptions of care order preparations in Finland, Nordic Social Work Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2020.1811137
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, K. (2014). Empathic listening as an expression of interpersonal affection. International Journal of Listening, 28(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2014.861293
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K., & Cooper, P. (2000). Making connections. Readings in relational communication. Roxbury Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hargie, O. (2016). Skilled interpersonal communication. Research, theory and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Helavirta, S., Laakso, R., & Poso, T. (2014). Huostaanoton kuva suomalaisen tutkimuksen valossa [The image of taking a child into care in the light of Finnish research]. Janus, 22(3), 288–298. https://journal.fi/janus/article/view/51216/15674
   Google Scholar
• Imhof, M. (2010). What is going on in the mind of the listener? The cognitive psychology of listening. In A. Wolvin (Ed.), Listening and human communication in the 21st Century (pp. 98–126). Wiley & Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. (2011). Supportive listening. International Journal of Listening, 25(1–2), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2011.536475
   Google Scholar
• Keaton, S., Bodie, G., & Keyron, R. (2015). Relational listening goals influence how people report talking about problems. Communication Quarterly, 63(4), 480–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463373.2015.1062407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonne, B., Harries, M., Featherstone, B., & Gray, M. (2016). Working ethically in child protection. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, C., & Boddy, J. (2017). Co-operation or system coercion? Children coming into the care system under voluntary arrangements. https://www.basw.co.uk/resources/cooperation-or-coercion-children-coming-care-system-under-voluntary-arrangements
   Google Scholar
• Mayan, M. (2009). Essentials of qualitative inquiry. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poso, T., & Huhtanen, R. (2017). Removals of CHILDren in Finland: A mix of voluntary and involuntary decisions. In K. Burns, T. Pösö, & M. Skivenes (Eds.), Child welfare removals by the state: A cross-country analysis of decision-making systems (pp. 18–39). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, M., & Borisoff, D. (1997). Listening in everyday life: A personal and professional approach. University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• Valikoski, T.-R., Poso, T., & Huhtanen, R. (2020). Kuulemistilaisuus institutionaalisena vuorovaikutuksena lapsen huostaanoton valmisteluprosessissa [Administrative hearings as institutional communication]. Janus, 28(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.30668/janus.89056
   Google Scholar
• Valikoski, T.-R., Saranpää, T., Paulanto, T., & Kulmakorpi, T. (2017). Todistajankuulustelukokemus vuorovaikutustilanteena oikeudenmukaisuuden näkökulmasta [Witness hearing experience as an interactional situation from the perspective of Justice]. Oikeus, 46(3), 310–328.
   Google Scholar
• Viljanmaa, A. (2020). Professionelle Zuhörkompetenz und Zuhörfilter beim Dialogdolmetschen [Professional listening competence and listening filters of dialogue interpreters]. Frank & Timme GmbH Verlag für wissenschaftliche Literatur.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H., & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wilmot, W. (1995). Relational communication. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Wolvin, A. (2010). Listening engagement: Intersecting theoretical perspectives. In A. Wolvin (Ed.), Listening and human communication in the 21st century (pp. 7–30). Wiley & Blackwell.
   Google Scholar