Cultural-Historical Activity Theory: Exploring a Theory to Inform Practice and Research

REFERENCES

• Blackler, F. (1992). Formative contexts and activity systems: Postmodern approaches to the management of change. In M. Reed & M. D. Hughes (Eds.), Rethinking the organization: New directions in organizational theory and analysis (pp. 273–294). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S. (1999). Managing experts and competing through innovation: An activity theoretical analysis. Organization, 6(1), 5–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackler, F., Crump, N., & McDonald, S. (2000). Organizing processes in complex activity networks. Organization, 7(2), 277–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, H. (2007). The communicative creation of policy knowledge: A structurating activity approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University, Phoenix.
   Google Scholar
• Canary, H. (2010). Structurating activity theory: An integrative approach to policy knowledge. Communication Theory, 20(1), 21–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canary, H., & McPhee, R. (2008). The mediation of policy knowledge: An interpretive analysis of intersecting activity systems. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, E. (1996). Tamed by a rose: Computers as tools in human activity. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness (pp. 175–198). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1990). Learning, working and imagining: Twelve studies in activity theory. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999a). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on Activity Theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999b). Communication, discourse, and activity. Communication Review, 3(1–2), 165–185.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999c). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing, 9(1–2), 63–93.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (1999d). Innovative learning in work teams: Analyzing cycles of knowledge creation in practice. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 377–406). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2000). From individual action to collective activity and back: Developmental work research as an interventionist methodology. In P. Luff, J. Hindmarsh, & C. Heath (Eds.), Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and information system design (pp. 150–166). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity-theoretical perspective. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Escalante, V. (1996). Mundane tool or object of affection? The rise and fall of the postal buddy. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 325–374). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fire, N. (2009). A contextual perspective of traditional Native American distance online learning in a Tribal college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Fire, N., & Casstevens, W. J. (2013). The use of cultural historical activity theory (CHAT) within a constructivist learning environment to develop core competencies in social work. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33(1), 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, K. A. (2001). Cultural-historical activity theory as practice theory: Illuminating the development of a conflict-monitoring network. Communication Theory, 11(1), 56–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foot, K. A. (2013). Analyzing evolving social work practices via cultural-historical activity theory: Examples from the HUSK Project. Paper presented at the Workshop of the HUSK Work Group on Evidence-informed Human Service Practice, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, K. A., & Groleau, C. (2011). Contradictions, transitions, and materiality in organizing processes: An activity theory perspective. First Monday, 16(6). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3479/2983.
   Google Scholar
• Groleau, C., Demers, C., Lalancette, M., & Barros, M. (2012). From hand drawings to computer visuals: Confronting situated and institutionalized practices in an architecture firm. Organization Science, 23(3), 651–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groleau, C., & Mayère, A. (2009). Médecins avec ou sans frontière: Contradiction et transformation des pratiques professionnelles. Sciences de la Société, 76(102–119).
   Google Scholar
• Holland, D., & Reeves, J. R. (1996). Activity theory and the view from somewhere. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 257–281). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Network on Social Work Practice Research. (2013). The Helsinki Statement on Social Work Practice Research. Retrieved from http://blogs.helsinki.fi/practice-research-conference-2012/files/2013/06/Helsinki-Statement-Final-June-2013.doc-pdf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(1), 61–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julkunen, I. (2011). Knowledge-production processes in practice research: Outcomes and critical elements. Social Work & Society, 9(1), 60–75.
   Google Scholar
• Julkunen, I. (2013). Critical examination of the research in practice and the development of social services in HUSK: A practice research perspective. Paper presented at the Workshop of the HUSK Work Group on Evidence-informed Human Service Practice, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V. (1996). Computer-mediated activity: Functional organs in social and developmental contexts. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness (pp. 103–116). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B. (2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness (pp. 17–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lektorsky, V. A. (1984). Subject, object, cognition. Moscow: Progress.
   Google Scholar
• Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Marthinsen, E., & Julkunen, I. (Eds.). (2012). Practice research in Nordic social work: Knowledge production in transition. London, UK: Whiting & Birch.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics of the National Association of Social Workers. Retrieved from http://www.socialworkers.org/pubs/code/.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W., & Lee, Y. (2007). Vygotsky's neglected legacy: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Research, 77(2), 186–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salisbury International Forum. (2009). The Salisbury Statement on Practice Research. Retrieved from http://www.socsci.soton.ac.uk/spring/salisbury/The_Salisbury_Statement_on_practice_research_May_2009.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. (1995). Objectivity and rationality. In W. Natter, T. R. Schatzki, & J. P. Jones III (Eds.), Objectivity and its other (pp. 137–160). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Sundet, R. (2010). Therapeutic collaboration and formalized feedback: Using perspectives from Vygotsky and Bakhtin to shed light on practices in a family therapy unit. Clinical Child Pscyhology and Psychiatry, 15(1), 81–95.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaara, E., & Whittington, R. (2012). Strategy-as-practice: Taking social practices seriously. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 285–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Cranach, M. (1988). Panel discussion: Activity–action–operation. In M. Hildebrand-Nilshon & G. Ruckriem (Eds.), Activity theory in movement—Discussions and controversies. Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Activity Theory. West Berlin, Germany: System Druck.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models, representation, and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yliruka, L., & Karvinen-Niinikoski, S. (2013). How can we enhance productivity in social work? Dynamically reflective structures, dialogic leadership and the development of transformative expertise. Journal of Social Work Practice: Psychotherapeutic Approaches in Health, Welfare and the Community, 27(2), 191–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar