Association between femininity and women voters political trust in Pakistan

References

• Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five countries (pp. 3). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. H., & Kaase, M. (1979). Political action (pp. 381–447). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bellucci, P., Memoli, V., & Sanders, D. (2012). The determinants of democracy satisfaction in Europe. Citizens and the European Polity: Mass Attitudes Towards the European and National Polities (pp. 9–28). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602339.003.0002
   Google Scholar
• Carli, L. L. (2001). Gender and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 725–741. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, E. R., & Sabik, N. J. (2010). Associations between femininity and women’s political behavior during midlife. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 508–520. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2010.01600.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, E. R., & Zucker, A. N. (2007). Black and white women’s perspectives on femininity. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 13(1), 1–9. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.13.1.1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Connell, R. (2005). Masculinities. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J. (2013). Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies. Washington, DC: Cq Press, A Division of Congressional Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457. doi:10.1017/S0007123400008309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity (Cambridge). Polity, 53(83), 245–260.
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, M. J. (1998). The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review, 92(4), 791–808. doi:10.2307/2586304
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy: Americans’ beliefs about how government should work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hollows, J. (2000). Feminism, femininity and popular culture. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isran, S., & Isran, M. A. (2013). Low female labour participation in Pakistan: Causes and consequences. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 33(1), 163–178.
   Google Scholar
• Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Oakland, UK: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. K., Murphy, S. E., Zewdie, S., & Reichard, R. J. (2008). The strong, sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106(1), 39–60. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazmi, S. W., & Quran, H. (2005). Role of education in globalization: A case for Pakistan. SAARC Journal of Human Resource Development, 1(1), 90–107.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H. D., & Fuchs, D. (Eds.) (1995). Citizens and the state. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (2000). Familiarity, confidence, trust: Problems and alternatives. Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations, 6, 94–107.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H. (1974). Political issues and trust in government: 1964–1970. American Political Science Review, 68(3), 951–972. doi:10.2307/1959140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H., & Listhaug, O. (1990). Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 357–386. doi:10.1017/S0007123400005883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in public institutions. Disaffected Democracies. What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic government. Oxford, UK: OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Noteboom, B. (2002). Forms of trust. Trust; Forms, Foundations, Functions, Failures and Figures, Cheltenham, Northampton, 36–54. Cheltenham, UK: Northampton
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88–127. doi:10.1086/210268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Bourg, C. (2004). Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, B. A., & Yoder, J. D. (2004). Gender differences in leader emergence persist even for dominant women: An updated confirmation of role congruity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(3), 187–193. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P., & Goldhammer, A. (2008). Counter-democracy: Politics in an age of distrust (Vol. 7). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, D. R., Segal, M. W., & Booth, B. (1999). Gender and sexual orientation diversity in modern military forces: Cross-national patterns. Katzenstein/Reppy, 1999, 225–250.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, A. B. (1997). The problem оf trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seyd, B. (2015). How do citizens evaluate public officials? The role of performance and expectations on political trust. Political Studies, 63(S1), 73–90. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh, S. (2009). Problems of Pakistani Women” lecture delivered on 14 May 2009 at Institute of Policy Studies. Retrieved from http://www.ips.org.pk/sggi-working-group-on-women-a-legislation-holds-its-2nd-meeting/.
   Google Scholar
• Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2006). Political disaffection in contemporary democracies: Social capital, institutions and politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP, Human Development Report (2013). Human Development Report 2013. The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2294673.
   Google Scholar
• Weatherford, M. S. (1992). Measuring political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 86(1), 149–166. doi:10.2307/1964021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf, H. (2013). The evolving role of women in Pakistani politics. Retreived from https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/164192/c832356e4ede2cff568363e27bb152b0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zakar, M. Z. (2014). Strengthening women’s political participation and leadership for effective democratic governance in Pakistan: A baseline research study. Retreived from https://www.sfcg.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Strengthening-Womens-Political-Leadership-in-Pakistan.pdf.
   Google Scholar