A behind-the-scenes perspective on the key components of drug court: A narrative analysis

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J., & Taxman, F. (2004). Looking inside the “black box” of drug court treatment services using direct observation. Journal of Drug Issues, 34, 195–217. doi:10.1177/002204260403400109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey, S. M., Finigan, M. W., & Pukstas, K. (2008). Exploring the key components of drug courts: A comparative study of 18 adult drug courts on practices, outcomes, and costs. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, M., & Geiger, B. (2011). What “works” in drug court: A bottom-up female participants’ perspective. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 21, 752–765. doi:10.1080/10911359.2011.615678
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R. (2013). African American participants’ views on racial disparities in drug court outcomes. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 13(2), 143–162. doi:10.1080/1533256X.2013.784689
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R., & Nordberg, A. (2016). Comparing and contrasting white and African American participants’ lived experiences in drug court. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 14(2), 100–119. doi:10.1080/15377938.2015.1117999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R., & Nordberg, A. (2017a). A phenomenological and grounded theory study of women’s experiences in drug court: Informing practice through a gendered lens. Women & Criminal Justice, 27(5), 327–340. doi:10.1080/08974454.2016.1256255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R., Nordberg, A., & Dibley, A. R. (2017b). Improving graduation rates for African Americans in drug court: Importance of human relationships and barriers to gaining and sustaining employment. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 1–15. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1080/15332640.2017.1381661
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R., Nordberg, A., & Gallagher, J. M. (2018). Participants’ views on the strengths and limitations of drug court: Recommendations to enhance assessment and treatment of mental illnesses. Social Work in Mental Health, 16(4), 436–450. doi:10.1080/15332985.2017.1419536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R., Nordberg, A., & Kennard, T. (2015). A qualitative study assessing the effectiveness of the key components of drug court. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 33(1), 64–81. doi:10.1080/07347324.2015.982453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, J. R., Nordberg, A., & Lefebvre, E. (2017c). Improving graduation rates in drug court: A qualitative study of participants’ lived experiences. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 17(4), 468–484. doi:10.1177/1748895816682578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. S. (1994). Miami’s treatment drug court for felony defendants: Some implications of assessment findings. The Prison Journal, 74(2), 110–166. doi:10.1177/0032855594074002002
   Google Scholar
• Goldkamp, J. S., White, M. D., & Robinson, J. B. (2001). Do drug courts work? Getting inside the drug court black box. Journal of Drug Issues, 31(1), 27–72. doi:10.1177/002204260103100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, C., & Kushner, J. N. (2008). Quality improvement for drug courts: Evidence-based practices. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hiller, M., Belenko, S., Taxman, F., Young, D., Perdoni, M., & Saum, C. (2010). Measuring drug court structure and operations: Key components and beyond. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(9), 933–950. doi:10.1177/0093854810373727
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist, C. H., Krebs, C. P., & Lattimore, P. K. (2006). Sanctions and rewards in drug court programs: Implementation, perceived efficacy, and decision making. Journal of Drug Issues, 36(1), 119–146. doi:10.1177/002204260603600106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2005). Are drug courts effective? A meta- analytic review. Journal of Community Corrections, 15, 5–28.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. B. (2012). Behavior modification 101 for drug courts: Making the most of incentives and sanctions. Alexandria, VA: National Drug Court Institute.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson, C. M., & Sauder, M. (2013). Logics in action: Managing institutional complexity in a drug court. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 165–196. doi:10.1177/0001839213486447
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, O., Wilson, D. B., Eggers, A., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2012). Assessing the effectiveness of drug courts on recidivism: A meta-analytic review of traditional and non-traditional drug courts. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(1), 60–71. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Association of Drug Court Professionals [NADCP]. (2004). Defining drug courts: The key components. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/205621.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nolan, J. L. (2001). Reinventing justice: The American drug court movement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Padgett, D. K. (2016). Qualitative methods in social work research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. D., Bloom, H., & Hereema, M. (2007). Mental health courts: Decriminalizing the mentally ill. Toronto, Canada: Irwin Law.
   Google Scholar
• Slinger, E., & Roesch, R. (2010). Problem-solving courts in Canada: A review and a call for empirically-based evaluation methods. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 33(4), 258–264. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2010.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA]. (2018). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2017 national survey on drug use and health (HHS Publication No. SMA 18-5068, NSDUH Series H- 53). Rockville, MD: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2005). Adult drug courts: Evidence indicates recidivism reductions and mixed results for other outcomes (No. GAO-05-219). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (1996). Law in a therapeutic key: Developments in therapeutic jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. B., Mitchell, O., & MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2(4), 459–487. doi:10.1007/s11292-006-9019-4
   Google Scholar
• Wolfer, L. (2006). Graduates speak: A qualitative exploration of drug court graduates’ views of the strengths and weaknesses of the program. Contemporary Drug Problems, 33(2), 303–320. doi:10.1177/009145090603300206
   Google Scholar
• Wolfer, L., & Roberts, J. C. (2008). A theoretical exploration of a drug court program based on client experiences. Contemporary Drug Problems, 35(2–3), 481–507. doi:10.1177/009145090803500213
   Google Scholar