Factor Structure of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale

REFERENCES

• Aadahl, M., & Jorgensen, T. (2003). Validation of a new self-report instrument for measuring physical activity. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 35, 1196–1202. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000074446.02192.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1978). The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 33(4), 344–358. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.33.4.344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 307–337). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bernier, M., & Avard, J. (1986). Self-efficacy, outcome, and attrition in a weight reduction program. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 10(3), 319–338. doi:10.1007/BF01173469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, S., Barry, D., & Petry, N. M. (2012). Predictors of weight loss success. Exercise vs. dietary self-efficacy and treatment attendance. Appetite, 58, 695–698. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control. (2012). Vital signs. More people walk to get better health ( Publication No. CS233690-B). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80(1), 219–251. doi:10.1111/jopy.2012.80.issue-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8(3), 430–457. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0803_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everett, B., Salamonson, Y., & Davidson, P. M. (2009). Bandura’s exercise self-efficacy scale: Validation in an Australian cardiac rehabilitation setting. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 824–829. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., & Wegener, D. T. (2014). Exploring causal and noncausal hypotheses in nonexperimental data. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (2nd ed., pp. 504–533). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flegal, K. M., Carroll, M. D., Ogden, C. L., & Curtin, L. R. (2010). Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. Journal of American Medical Association, 303(3), 235–241. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, E. S., Ajani, U. A., Croft, J. B., Critchley, J. A., Labarthe, D. R., Kottke, T. E., … Capewell, S. (2007). Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980–2000. New England Journal of Medicine, 356, 2388–2398. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa053935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hankonen, N., Absetz, P., Ghisletta, P., Renner, B., & Uutela, A. (2010). Gender differences in social cognitive determinants of exercise adoption. Psychology & Health, 25, 55–69. doi:10.1080/08870440902736972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191–205. doi:10.1177/1094428104263675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L., Motl, R., McAuley, E., & Konopack, J. (2007). Influence of self-efficacy on the functional relationship between ratings of perceived exertion and exercise intensity. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 27, 303–308. doi:10.1097/01.HCR.0000291298.70517.7e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2010). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 19.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, J., Rothman, A. J., Baldwin, A. S., & Jeffery, R. W. (2006). The impact of self-efficacy on behavior change and weight change among overweight participants in a weight loss trial. Health Psychology, 25(3), 282–291. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.3.282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of fit in structural equation modeling. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary psychometrics: A festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275–340). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 11(3), 320–341. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H. W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A. J. S., & Trautwein, U. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students’ evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(3), 439–476. doi:10.1080/10705510903008220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, E. (1992). The role of efficacy cognitions in the prediction of exercise behavior in middle-aged adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15(1), 65–88. doi:10.1007/BF00848378
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, E., & Blissmer, B. (2000). Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 28(2), 85–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McAuley, E., Mailey, E. L., Mullen, S. P., Szabo, A. N., Wójcicki, T. R., White, S. M., … Kramer, A. F. (2011a). Growth trajectories of exercise self-efficacy in older adults: Influence of measures and initial status. Health Psychology, 30(1), 75–83. doi:10.1037/a0021567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, E., & Mihalko, S. (1998). Measuring exercise related self-efficacy. In J. Duda (Ed.), Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 371–390). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
   Google Scholar
• McAuley, E., Poag, K., Gleason, A., & Wraith, S. (1990). Attrition from exercise programs: Attributional and affective perspectives. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(6), 591–602.
   Google Scholar
• McAuley, E., Talbot, H., & Martinez, S. (1999). Manipulating self-efficacy in the exercise environment in women: Influences on affective responses. Health Psychology, 18(3), 288–294. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.18.3.288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley, E., White, S. M., Mailey, E. L., & Wojcicki, T. R. (2011b). Exercise related self-efficacy. In G. Tenenbaum, R. Eklund, & A. Kamata (Eds.), Measurement in sport and exercise psychology (pp. 239–249). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J. S., Arens, A. K., & Marsh, H. W. (in press). A bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling framework for the identification of distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality. Structural Equation Modeling.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, A. J. S., Marsh, H. W., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Exploratory structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 395–436). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Morizot, J., Ainsworth, A. T., & Reise, S. P. (2007). Toward modern psychometrics. Application of item response theory models in personality research. In R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 407–423). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, N. D., Martin, J. J., Ntoumanis, N., Celimli, S., & Bartholomew, K. J. (2014). Exploratory bifactor analysis in sport, exercise, and performance psychology: A substantive-methodological synergy. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 3(4), 258–272. doi:10.1037/spy0000015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47(5), 667–696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, B., & Jenkins, L. (2000). Testing the reliability and validity of the self-efficacy for exercise scale. Nursing Research, 49, 154–159. doi:10.1097/00006199-200005000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovniak, L., Anderson, E., Winett, R., & Stephens, R. (2002). Social cognitive determinants of physical activity in young adults: A prospective structural equation analysis. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 24, 149–156. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2402_12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, Y., Jang, H., & Pender, N. J. (2001). Psychometric evaluation of the exercise self-efficacy scale among Korean adults with chronic diseases. Research in Nursing & Health, 24, 68–76. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-240X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobal, J., & Stunkard, A. J. (1989). Socioeconomic status and obesity: A review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 105(2), 260–275. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.2.260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. L., Watts, A. S., Anderson, R. A., & Little, T. D. (2013). Common fallacies in quantitative research methodology. In T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods in psychology (Vol. 2; pp. 718–758). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, R. S., Gould, D., & Jackson, A. (1979). Expectations and performance: Empirical test of Bandura’s self-efficacy theory. Journal of Sport Psychology, 1, 320–331.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, R. S., Hughes, H. H., Critelli, J. W., England, R., & Jackson, A. (1984). Effects of preexisting and manipulated self-efficacy on weight loss in a self-control program. Journal of Research in Personality, 18, 352–358. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(84)90019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar