Modelling creep and recovery response of asphalt binders using generalized burgers model

References

• AASHTO TP70 2012. Standard test method for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer. Washington, DC: American Association of State Transport and Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Bari, J., and M. Witczak. 2007. New predictive models for viscosity and complex shear modulus of asphalt binders: For use with mechanistic-Empirical Pavement design guide. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2001 (1):9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Angelo, J. A. 2009. The relationship of the MSCR test to rutting. Road Materials and Pavement Design 10 (Sup 1):61–80. Taylor & Francis Group,
   Google Scholar
• Dealy, J., and D. Plazek. 2009. “Time-Temperature Superposition- A Users Guide.” Rheology Bulletin 78 (2):16–31.
   Google Scholar
• Dubois, E., D. Y. Mehta, and A. Nolan. 2014. Correlation between multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) results and polymer modification of binder. Construction and Building Materials 65:184–90. Elsevier Ltd,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hafeez, I., and M. Ahmed. 2014. Creep compliance : A parameter to predict rut performance of asphalt binders and mixtures. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 39 (8):5971–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajikarimi, P., M. Rahi, and F. Moghadas Nejad. 2015. Comparing different rutting specification parameters using high temperature characteristics of rubber-modified asphalt binders. Road Materials and Pavement Design 16 (4):751–66. Taylor & Francis,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masad, E., C. W. Huang, G. Airey, and A. Muliana. 2008. Nonlinear viscoelastic analysis of unaged and aged asphalt binders. Construction and Building Materials 22 (11):2170–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masad, E., N. Somadevan, H. U. Bahia, and S. Kose. 2001. Modeling and experimental measurements of strain distribution in asphalt mixes. Journal of Transportation Engineering 127 (6):477–85. American Society of Civil Engineers,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, D. S. 1988. Time-temperature superposition and physical aging in amorphous polymers. Polymer Engineering and Science 28 (20):1313–7. Wiley-Blackwell,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murali Krishnan, J., and K. Rajagopal. 2003. Review of the uses and modeling of bitumen from ancient to modern times. Applied Mechanics Reviews 56 (2):149.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. W., and Y. R. Kim. 2001. Fitting prony-Series Viscoelastic models with power-Law Presmoothing. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 13 (1):26–32. American Society of Civil Engineers,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saboo, N., and P. Kumar. 2016. Analysis of different test methods for quantifying rutting susceptibility of asphalt binders. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 28 (7):04016024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, B., N. Saboo, and P. Kumar. 2016. Modelling the complex modulus strain relationship of asphalt binders. Petroleum Science and Technology 34 (13):1137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vikram, D., and N. Saboo. 2017. Effective technique to estimate cross model parameters. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 29 (11):04017203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J. L., Z. Zhang, A. K. Schlarb, and K. Friedrich. 2006. On the characterization of tensile creep resistance of polyamide 66 nanocomposites. Part II: Modeling and prediction of long-term performance. Polymer 47 (19):6745–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusoff, N. I. M., M. T. Shaw, and G. D. Airey. 2011. Modelling the linear viscoelastic rheological properties of bituminous binders. Construction and Building Materials 25 (5):2171–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, T., J. Yan, J. Masuda, and T. Kuriyagawa. 2009. Investigation on the viscoelasticity of optical glass in ultraprecision lens molding process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 209 (9):4484–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar