Chemical analyses of shale gas and conventional natural gas

References

• Alalayah, W. M. 2018. Shale gas as a promising unconventional natural gas resource. Energy Education Science and Technology Part A 36:133–8.
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge, J. T., J. L. Catlett, M. L. Smith, and N. R. Buan. 2016. Methods for detecting microbial methane production and consumption by gas chromatography. Bio Protocol 6:e1779.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Sasi, B. O., and A. Demirbas. 2016. Removal of sulfur from sulfur-bearing natural gas to produce clean jet fuel. Petroleum Science and Technology 34:1550–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balat, M. 2005. World natural gas (NG) reserves, NG production and consumption trends and future appearance. Energy Sources 27:921–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, P., T. C. Kinnaman, and M. Wu. 2013. Estimating willingness to pay for river amenities and safety measures associated with shale gas extraction. Eastern Economic Journal 39:28–44.
   Google Scholar
• Demirbas, A. 2002. Fuel properties of hydrogen, liquefied petroleum gas, and compressed natural gas for transportation. Energy Sources 24:601–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas, A. 2006. The importance of natural gas as a world fuel. Energy Sources Part B 1:413–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas, A., H. Alidrisi, and M. A. Balubaid. 2015. API gravity, sulfur content and desulfurization of crude oil. Petroleum Science and Technology 33:93–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas, A., M. Rehan, B. O. Al-Sasi, and A. S. Nizami. 2016. Evaluation of natural gas hydrates as a future methane source. Petroleum Science and Technology 34:1204–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirbas, A., S. Acar, B. Y. Horasan, and W. M. Alalayah. 2018. Analysis of petroleum coke from low grade oily sludge of refinery. Petroleum Science and Technology 36:904–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, D., Y. Wang, X. Li, C. Zou, Q. Guan, C. Zhang, J. Huang, S. Wang, H. Wang, and H. Liu. 2016. Breakthrough and prospect of shale gas exploration and development in China. Natural Gas Industry B 3:12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, X. F., D. F. Hu, Y. P. Li, Z. H. Wei, X. F. Wei, and Z. J. Liu. 2017a. Geological factors controlling shale gas enrichment and high production in Fuling shale gas field. Petroleum Exploration and Development 44:513–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X., Q. Yan, and A. Wang. 2017b. Assessment of methods for forecasting shale gas supply in China based on economic considerations. Energies 10:1745–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, G. P., A. O’Gradya, and D. E. Packham. 2015. Energy technology assessment of shale gas ‘fracking’– A UK perspective. Energy Procedia 75:2764–71.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, R.W., R. Santoro, and A. Ingraffea. 2011. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Climatic Change 106:679–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacoby, H. D., F. M. O’Sullivan, and S. Paltsev. 2012. The influence of shale gas on US energy and environmental policy. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy 1:37–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melikoglu, M. 2014. Shale gas: Analysis of its role in the global energy market. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 37:460–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, G. E. 2014. The economics of energy security. Annual Review of Resource Economics 6:155–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A. L., S. Mitchell, and E. A. Casman. 2013. Surface water withdrawals for Marcellus Shale gas development: performance of alternative regulatory approaches in the Upper Ohio River Basin. Environmental Science & Technology 47:4918–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicot, J. P., and B. R. Scanion. 2012. Water use for shale-gas production in Texas, US. Environmental Science & Technology 46:3580–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmstead, S. M., L. A. Muehlenbachs, J. S. Shih, Z. Chu, and A. Krupnick. 2013. Shale gas development impacts on surface water quality in Pennsylvania. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 110:4962–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborn, S. G., A. Vengosh, N. R. Warner, and R. B. Jackson. 2011. Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 108:8172–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozsen, H., C. Sensogut, and A. Demirbas. 2008. Determination of some combustion characteristics of 24 lignite samples. Energy Sources Part A 30:420–8.
   Google Scholar
• Papoulias, D. M., and A. L. Velaso. 2013. Histopathological analysis of fish from Acorn Fork Creek, Kentucky, exposed to hydraulic fracturing fluid releases. Southeastern Naturalist 12:92–111.
   Google Scholar
• Speight, J. G. 2016. Handbook of Hydraulic Fracturing. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Vengosh, A., R. B. Jackson, N. Warner, T. H. Darrah, and A. Kondash. 2014. A critical review of the risks to water resources from unconventional shale gas development and hydraulic fracturing in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology 48:8334–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yunna, W., and Y. Yisheng. 2014. The competition situation analysis of shale gas industry in China: Applying Porter's five forces and scenario model. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews 40:798–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuas, O. and H. Budiman. 2016. Flow rate of carrier gas affecting the key parameters of GC-TCD for CO2, C3H8, and CO analysis: An experimental investigation. Journal of Teknologi Indonesia 39:59–68.
   Google Scholar
• Zuas, O. and M. R. Mulyana. 2017. Qualitative simultaneous identification of permanent and hydrocarbon gases by GC-TCD using column coupling method. French-Ukrainian Journal of Chemistry 5:35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar