Ontology-based approach for identifying the credibility domain in social Big Data

References

• Alasiry, A. M. 2015. Named entity recognition and classification in search queries. University of London: Birkbeck. Retrieved from http://bbktheses.da.ulcc.ac.uk/id/eprint/154. Available from Google Scholar.
   Google Scholar
• Albanese, M. 2013. Measuring trust in big data. Algorithms and architectures for parallel processing, R. Aversa, J. Kołodziej, J. Zhang, F. Amato, and G. Fortino. eds.., Vol. 8286. 241–48. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, A., R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian (2008). Influence and correlation in social networks. Paper presented at the KDD 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, M., A. Arratia, and R. Xuriguera. 2014. Forecasting with twitter data. ACM Transactions Intelligent Systems Technological 5 (1):1–24. doi:10.1145/2542182.2542190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asharaf, S., and Z. Alessandro (2015). Generating and visualizing topic hierarchies from microblogs: An iterative latent Dirichlet allocation approach. Paper presented at the 2015 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, X., and X. Zhou. 2011. Development of ontology-based information system using formal concept analysis and association rules. In Advances in computer science, intelligent system and environment, ed. D. Jin D, S. Lin, 121–26. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan, R., and S. Kambhampati (2011). SourceRank: Relevance and trust assessment for deep web sources based on inter-source agreement. Paper presented at the International World Wide Web Conference Committee (IW3C2), Hyderabad, India.
   Google Scholar
• BBC Ontologies. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.bbc.co.uk/ontologies
   Google Scholar
• Bello-Orgaz, G., J. J. Jung, and D. Camacho. 2016. Social big data: Recent achievements and new challenges. Information Fusion 28:45–59. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2015.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlanga, R., M. J. Aramburu, D. M. Llidó, and L. García-Moya. 2014. Towards a semantic data infrastructure for social business intelligence. In New trends in databases and information systems, ed. B. Catania. et al. 319–27. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Blei, D. M., A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (Jan):993–1022.
   Google Scholar
• Bontcheva, K., and D. Rout. 2012. Making sense of social media streams through semantics: A survey. In Semantic Web ed. Andreas Hotho. IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, S., and C. Pahl. 2007. Developing domain ontologies for course content. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Calvanese, D., M. Giese, P. Haase, I. Horrocks, T. Hubauer, Y. Ioannidis, … J. Klüwer. 2013. Optique: OBDA solution for big data the semantic web: ESWC 2013 satellite events, 293–95. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carrasco, R. D., S. Oliveira, A. D. P. Lisboa Filho, J., and A. Moreira. 2014. Ontology supported system for searching evidence of wild animals trafficking in social network posts. Revista Brasileira de Computação Aplicada 6 (1):16–31. doi:10.5335/rbca.2014.3140.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, E., F. K. Hussain, and T. S. Dillon (2005). CCCI metrics for the measurement of quality of e-Service. Paper presented at the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT’05), France.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., R. H. Chiang, and V. C. Storey. 2012. Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Quarterly 36 (4):1165–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., S. Mao, Y. Zhang, and V. M. Leung. 2014. Open issues and outlook big data, 81–89. Springer: International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., H. Chen, A. Gorkhali, Y. Lu, Y. Ma, and L. Li. 2016. Big data analytics and big data science: A survey. Journal of Management Analytics 3 (1):1–42. doi:10.1080/23270012.2016.1141332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. M., and W. R. Hersh. 2005. A survey of current work in biomedical text mining. Briefings Bioinformatics 6 (1):57–71. doi:10.1093/bib/6.1.57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuesta, C., M. Martínez-Prieto, and J. Fernández. 2013. Towards an architecture for managing big semantic data in real-time. Software architecture, I. K. Drira. ed.., Vol. 7957. 45–53. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cuzzocrea, A., L. Bellatreche, and I.-Y. Song (2013). Data warehousing and OLAP over big data: Current challenges and future research directions. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Sixteenth International Workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP, San Francisco, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• De Choudhury, M., Y. Lin, H. Sundaram, K. Candan, L. Xie, and A. Kelliher (2010). How does the data sampling strategy impact the discovery of information diffusion in social media? Paper presented at The Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Gantz, J., and D. Reinsel. (2010). The digital universe decade – Are you ready? Retrieved from http://www.emc.com/collateral/analyst-reports/idc-digital-universe-are-you-ready.pdf
   Google Scholar
• García-Moya, L., S. Kudama, M. Aramburu, and R. Berlanga. 2013. Storing and analysing voice of the market data in the corporate data warehouse. Information Systems Frontiers 15 (3):331–49. doi:10.1007/s10796-012-9400-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D., and A. L. Stevens. 1983. Mental models. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Ghahremanlou, L., W. Sherchan, and J. A. Thom. 2014. Geotagging Twitter messages in crisis management. The Computer Journal (bxu034). 58, 1937–1954.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, T. R. (1993, 1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specification. Paper presented at the Knowledge Acquisition. 10.1006/knac.1993.1008
   Google Scholar
• Gruhl, D., R. Guha, D. Liben-Nowell, and A. Tomkins (2004). Information diffusion through blogspace. Paper presented at the 13th International World Wide Web Conference(WWW’04), New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Harpring, P. 2010. Introduction to controlled vocabularies: Terminology for art, architecture and other cultural works: USA: Getty Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hitzler, P., and J. K. 2013. Linked data, big data, and the 4th paradigm. Semantic Web 4 (3):233–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, T. (1999). Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, A., C. Nicolle, and A. Roxin. 2013. Automatic ontology-based user profile learning from heterogeneous web resources in a big data context. Proceedings VLDB Endow 6 (12):1428–33. doi:10.14778/2536274.2536330.
   Google Scholar
• IBM. (2015). Big data and analytics. Retrieved from http://www-01.ibm.com/software/data/bigdata/what-is-big-data.html
   Google Scholar
• IBM Acquires AlchemyAPI. 2015. Enhancing Watson’s deep learning capabilities. Retrieved 18 May, 2015, from https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/46205.wss.
   Google Scholar
• Iwanaga, I. S. M., N. The-Minh, T. Kawamura, H. Nakagawa, Y. Tahara, and A. Ohsuga (2011, 2011/11/08/10). Building an earthquake evacuation ontology from Twitter. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, D., G. Chen, B. C. Ooi, K. L. Tan, and S. Wu. 2014. epiC: An extensible and scalable system for processing big data. In PVLDB, ed. H. V. Jagadish, Aoying Zhou, 541–52. United States: Very Large Data Base Endowment Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., and M. Haenlein. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons 53 (1):59–68. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leake, D. B., A. G. Maguitman, and A. J. Cañas. 2002. 2002 Assessing conceptual similarity to support concept mapping, Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, May 14-16, 2002. The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leng, J., and P. Jiang. 2016. A deep learning approach for relationship extraction from interaction context in social manufacturing paradigm. Knowledge-Based Systems 100:188–99. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2016.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., H. Wang, Z. Zhang, A. Sun, and Z. Ma (2016). Topic modeling for short texts with auxiliary word embeddings. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval .
   Google Scholar
• Liben-Nowell, D., and J. Kleiberg. 2008. Tracing information flow on a global scale using internet chain-letter data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (12):4633–38. doi:10.1073/pnas.0708471105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, E.-P., H. Chen, and G. Chen. 2013. Business intelligence and analytics: Research directions. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 3 (4):1–10. doi:10.1145/2407740.2407741.
   Google Scholar
• Louati, A., J. El Haddad, and S. Pinson. 2014. A distributed decision making and propagation approach for trust-based service discovery in social networks. Group decision and negotiation. A process-oriented view, P. Zaraté, G. Kersten, and J. Hernández. eds.., Vol. 180. 262–69. New York, United States: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Maalej, M., A. Mtibaa, and F. Gargouri. 2014. Ontology-based context-aware social networks. New trends in databases and information systems, B. Catania, T. Cerquitelli, S. Chiusano, G. Guerrini, M. Kämpf, A. Kemper, B. Novikov, T. Palpanas, J. Pokorný, and A. Vakali. eds.., Vol. 241. 287–95.  New York, United States: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Manyika, J., M. Chui, B. Brown, J. Bughin, R. Dobbs, C. Roxburgh, and A. H. Byers. 2011. Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. In McKinsey Global Institute. New York, United States: McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved From (https://\al-mckinsey/our-insights/big-data-the-next-frontier-for-innovation)
   Google Scholar
• Michelson, M., and S. A. Macskassy (2010, 2010). Discovering users’ topics of interest on twitter: A first look. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Analytics for Noisy Unstructured Text Data.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, S., S. Prodanovic, M. F. Elahi, and Z. Bogart. 2010. Population and enrichment of event ontology using Twitter. In Information management SPIM, eds. C. Nicoletta, C. Khalid, M. Bente, M. Joseph, O. Jan, P. Stelios, R. Mike, T. Daniel, 2010, 31. Paris, France: European Language Resources Association.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, L. G. 2014. A topic model approach to measuring interdisciplinarity at the National Science Foundation. Scientometrics 100 (3):741–54. nlp-Algorithms behind the Alchemy API for concept and keywords extraction - Stack Overflow. doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1319-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik, I., T. Tanaka, H. Ohashi, and C. Wuhui (2013, 2013/06/27/July 2 2013). Big data infrastructure for active situation awareness on social network services. Paper presented at the 2013 IEEE International Congress on Big Data.
   Google Scholar
• Peñas, A., F. Verdejo, J. Gonzalo, et al. 2001, 2001. Corpus-based terminology extraction applied to information access. Lancaster, UK: University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language (UCREL).
   Google Scholar
• Quercia, D., H. Askham, and J. Crowcroft (2012). TweetLDA: Supervised topic classification and link prediction in Twitter. Paper presented at the 4th Annual ACM Web Science Conference, Evanston, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, J. (2003, 2003). Using tf-idf to determine word relevance in document queries. Paper presented at the proceedings of the First Instructional Conference on Machine Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, K. (2013, 2013). Novel models and architectures for distributed semantic data management. Paper presented at the SEMAPRO 2013, The Seventh International Conference on Advances in Semantic Processing.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzo, G., and R. Troncy (2011). Nerd: Evaluating named entity recognition tools in the web of data. Paper presented at the Workshop on Web Scale Knowledge Extraction (WEKEX11).
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. 2004. Understanding inverse document frequency: On theoretical arguments for IDF. Journal of Documentation 60 (5):503–20. doi:10.1108/00220410410560582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, S. E., and K. S. Jones. 1976. Relevance weighting of search terms. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 27 (3):129–46. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha, B., and D. Srivastava (2014, 2014/03/31/April 4 2014). Data quality: The other face of Big Data. Paper presented at the IEEE 30th International Conference on Data Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Saif, H., Y. He, and H. Alani (2011). Semantic smoothing for Twitter sentiment analysis. Paper presented at the 10th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2011), Bonn, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Saif, H., Y. He, and H. Alani. 2012. Semantic sentiment analysis of Twitter. The semantic web – ISWC 2012, P. Cudré-Mauroux, J. Heflin, E. Sirin, T. Tudorache, J. Euzenat, M. Hauswirth, J. Parreira, J. Hendler, G. Schreiber, A. Bernstein, and E. Blomqvist. eds.., Vol. 7649. 508–24. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Salathé, M., D. Vu, S. Khandelwal, and D. Hunter. 2013. The dynamics of health behavior sentiments on a large online social network. EPJ Data Science 2 (1). doi: 10.1140/epjds16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shroff, G., L. Dey, and P. Agarwal. 2013. Socio-business intelligence using big data. In Technical trends, ed. S. S. Agrawal, Tamilnadu. India: Computer Society of India Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, R. (2001). What is an ontology? Retrieved from http://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~stevensr/onto/node3.html
   Google Scholar
• Sun, E., I. Rosenn, C. Marlow, and T. Lento (2009). Gesundheit! modeling contagion through Facebook news feed. Paper presented at the ICWSM 2009, San Jose, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Tess, P. A. 2013. The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior 29 (5):A60–A68. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turian, J. 2013. Using AlchemyAPI for enterprise-grade text analysis. Denver, CO, USA: AlchemyAPI.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, A. H. (2010, 2010/07/26/28). Don’t follow me: Spam detection in Twitter. Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Security and Cryptography.
   Google Scholar
• Weng, J., E.-P. Lim, J. Jiang, and Q. He (2010). Twitterrank: Finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers. Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search And Data Mining.
   Google Scholar
• What are the algorithms behind AlchemyAPI?, ed. Steve Herschleb. California, United States: Quora. Retrieved From: https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-algorithms-behind-AlchemyAPI
   Google Scholar
• Wright, A. 2008. Searching the deep web. In Commmunications of ACM, ed. Andrew A. Chien, United States: Association for Computing Machinery (ACM).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., B. Hu, J. Chen, and P. Moore. 2013. Ontology-based context modeling for emotion recognition in an intelligent web. World Wide Web 16 (4):497–513. doi:10.1007/s11280-012-0181-5.
   Google Scholar