Efficient Greek Calculation of Variable Annuity Portfolios for Dynamic Hedging: A Two-Level Metamodeling Approach

References

• Alam, F. M., K. R. McNaught, and T. J. Ringrose. 2004. A comparison of experimental designs in the development of a neural network simulation metamodel. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 12(7): 559–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankenman, B., B. L. Nelson, and J. Staum. 2010. Stochastic kriging for simulation metamodeling. Operations Research 58(2): 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacinello, A. R., P. Millossovich, and A. Montealegre. 2014. The valuation of GMWB variable annuities under alternative fund distributions and policyholder behaviours. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2014: 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, R. 1994. Metamodeling: a state of the art review. In Winter Simulation Conference Proceedings, edited by J. D. Tew, S. Manivannan, D. A. Sadowski, and A. F. Seila, pp. 237–244. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, D., and H. Ha. 2013. A least-squares Monte Carlo approach to the calculation of capital requirements. Department of Risk Management and Insurance, Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, D., A. Kling, and J. Russ. 2008. A universal pricing framework for guaranteed minimum benefits in variable annuities. ASTIN Bulletin 38(2): 621–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, A., P. Forsyth, and G. Labahn. 2009. Valuing the guaranteed minimum death benefit clause with partial withdrawals. Applied Matehmatical Finance 16(6): 451–496.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., and N. R. Draper. 2007. Response Surfaces, Mixtures, and Ridge Analyses. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero, W., R. Giraldo, and J. Mateu. 2013. A universal kriging approach for spatial functional data. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 27(7): 1553–1563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnell, R. 2012. lhs: Latin Hypercube Samples. R package version 0.10. Vienna: R Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cressie, N. 1993. Statistics for Spatial Data. Rev. ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Das, R. N. 2014. Robust Response Surfaces, Regression, and Positive Data Analyses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, L. W. 1996. The Simulation Metamodel. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, G. 2011. Data Clustering in C++: An Object-Oriented Approach. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, G. 2013. Application of data clustering and machine learning in variable annuity valuation. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 53(3): 795–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan, G. 2015. A multi-asset Monte Carlo simulation model for the valuation of variable annuities. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, edited by L. Yilmaz, W. K. V. Chan, I. Moon, T. M. K. Roeder, C. Macal, and M. D. Rossetti, pp. 3162–3163. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Gan, G., and X. S. Lin. 2015. Valuation of large variable annuity portfolios under nested simulation: A functional data approach. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 62(1): 138–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, H., and E. Shiu. 2003. Pricing lookback options and dynamic guarantees. North American Actuarial Journal 7(1): 48–67.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., M. Milevsky, and T. Salisbury. 2014. Optimal initiation of a GLWB in a variable annuity: No arbitrage approach. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 56: 102–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaaks, E., and R. Srivastava. 1990. An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. 2009. Kriging metamodeling in simulation: A review. European Journal of Operational Research 192(3): 707–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, J. P. C. 1975. A comment on Blanning’s “metamodel for sensitivity analysis: The regression metamodel in simulation.” Interfaces 5(3): 21–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou, S. G., and H. Wang. 2004. Option pricing under a double exponential jump diffusion model. Management Science 50(9): 1178–1192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liefvendahl, M., and R. Stocki. 2006. A study on algorithms for optimization of Latin hypercubes. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 136(9): 3231–3247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X. S., K. S. Tan, and H. L. Yang. 2009. Pricing annuity guarantees under a regime-switching model. North American Actuarial Journal 13: 316–338.
   Google Scholar
• Loeppky, J. L., J. Sacks, and W. J. Welch. 2009. Choosing the sample size of a computer experiment: A practical guide. Technometrics 51(4): 366–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. C. 1976. Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics 3(1): 125–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milevsky, M., and S. Posner. 2001. The titanic option: Valuation of the guaranteed minimum death benefit in variable annuities and mutual funds. Journal of Risk and Insurance 68(1): 93–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minasny, B., and A. B. McBratney. 2006. A conditioned latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Computers & Geosciences 32(9): 1378–1388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, H., A. Dean, and T. Santner. 2011. Algorithms for generating maximin latin hypercube and orthogonal designs. Journal of Statistical Theory and Practice 5(1): 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, A. C.-Y., and J. S.-H. Li. 2013. Pricing and hedging variable annuity guarantees with multiasset stochastic investment models. North American Actuarial Journal 17(1): 41–62.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C., and S. Man. 2008. Nested stochastic pricing: The time has come. Product Matters! – Society of Actuaries 71: 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Roudier, P. 2011. clhs: a R Package for Conditioned Latin Hypercube Sampling. Vienna: R Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Viana, F. 2013. Things you wanted to know about the Latin hypercube design and were afraid to ask. In 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, pp. 1–9. Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., L. Liu, T. Long, and L. Peng. 2012. A novel algorithm of maximin latin hypercube design using successive local enumeration. Engineering Optimization 44(5): 551–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar