Method of Winsorized Moments for Robust Fitting of Truncated and Censored Lognormal Distributions

References

• Beirlant, J., Y. Goegebeur, J. Teugels, and J. Segers. 2004. Statistics of extremes: Theory and applications. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Blostein, M., and T. Miljkovic. 2019. On modeling left-truncated loss data using mixtures of distributions. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 85:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2018.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazauskas, V., B. L. Jones, and R. Zitikis. 2009. Robust fitting of claim severity distributions and the method of trimmed moments. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139 (6):2028–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2008.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazauskas, V., and A. Kleefeld. 2016. Modeling severity and measuring tail risk of Norwegian fire claims. North American Actuarial Journal 20 (1):1–16. doi: 10.1080/10920277.2015.1062784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernoff, H., J. L. Gastwirth, and M. V. Johns, Jr. 1967. Asymptotic distribution of linear combinations of functions of order statistics with applications to estimation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 38 (1):52–72. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177699058.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. C., Jr. 1950. Estimating the mean and variance of normal populations from singly truncated and doubly truncated samples. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 21 (4):557–69. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177729751.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. C., Jr. 1951. On estimating the mean and variance of singly truncated normal frequency distributions from the first three sample moments. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 3:37–44. doi: 10.1007/BF02949774.
   Google Scholar
• Cooray, K., and M. M. A. Ananda. 2005. Modeling actuarial data with a composite lognormal-Pareto model. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2005 (5):321–34. doi: 10.1080/03461230510009763.
   Google Scholar
• Delong, L., M. Lindholm, and M. V. Wüthrich. 2021. Gamma mixture density networks and their application to modelling insurance claim amounts. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 101:240–61. doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efromovich, S. 2021. Nonparametric curve estimation for truncated and censored data without product-limit. Variance 14 (2):16.
   Google Scholar
• Fabián, Z. 2008. New measures of central tendency and variability of continuous distributions. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 37 (1-2):159–74. doi: 10.1080/03610920701648987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frees, E. W., and E. A. Valdez. 1998. Understanding relationships using copulas. North American Actuarial Journal 2 (1):1–25. doi: 10.1080/10920277.1998.10595667.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, T. C. 2022. Maximum weighted likelihood estimator for robust heavy-tail modelling of finite mixture models. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 107:180–98. doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2022.08.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffard, P. O., and P. J. Laub. 2021. Approximate Bayesian computations to fit and compare insurance loss models. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 100:350–71. doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, C. C., Jr., and B. Lefkowitz. 1979. Methods for fitting distributions to insurance loss data. In Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, vol. LXVI, 139–60. Arlington County, VA: Casualty Actuarial Society. https://www.casact.org/sites/default/files/database/proceed_proceed79_1979.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Klugman, S. A., H. H. Panjer, and G. E. Willmot. 2019. Loss models: From data to decisions. 5th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kojadinovic, I., and J. Yan. 2010. Modeling multivariate distributions with continuous margins using the copula R package. Journal of Statistical Software 34 (9):1–20. doi: 10.18637/jss.v034.i09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael, S., T. Miljkovic, and V. Melnykov. 2020. Mixture modeling of data with multiple partial right-censoring levels. Advances in Data Analysis and Classification 14 (2):355–78. doi: 10.1007/s11634-020-00391-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miljkovic, T., and B. Grün. 2016. Modeling loss data using mixtures of distributions. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 70:387–96. doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2016.06.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadarajah, S., and S. A. A. Bakar. 2014. New composite models for the Danish fire insurance data. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2014 (2):180–87. doi: 10.1080/03461238.2012.695748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poudyal, C. 2021a. Robust estimation of loss models for lognormal insurance payment severity data. ASTIN Bulletin 51 (2):475–507. doi: 10.1017/asb.2021.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poudyal, C. 2021b. Truncated, censored, and actuarial payment-type moments for robust fitting of a single-parameter Pareto distribution. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 388:113310, 18. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poudyal, C., and V. Brazauskas. 2022a. Finite-sample performance of the T- and W-estimators for the Pareto tail index under data truncation and censoring. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation 1–21. doi: 10.1080/00949655.2022.2146114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poudyal, C., and V. Brazauskas. 2022b. Robust estimation of loss models for truncated and censored severity data. Variance 15 (2):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Punzo, A., L. Bagnato, and A. Maruotti. 2018. Compound unimodal distributions for insurance losses. Insurance: Mathematics & Economics 81:95–107. doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2017.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollnik, D. P. M. 2007. On composite lognormal-Pareto models. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal 2007 (1):20–33. doi: 10.1080/03461230601110447.
   Google Scholar
• Serfling, R. J. 1980. Approximation theorems of mathematical statistics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Serfling, R. 2002. Efficient and robust fitting of lognormal distributions. North American Actuarial Journal 6 (4):95–109. doi: 10.1080/10920277.2002.10596067.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S. M., and M. C. Jaiswal. 1966. Estimation of parameters of doubly truncated normal distribution from first four sample moments. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 18:107–11. doi: 10.1007/BF02869520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehlík, M., R. Potocký, H. Waldl, and Z. Fabián. 2010. On the favorable estimation for fitting heavy tailed data. Computational Statistics 25 (3):485–503. doi: 10.1007/s00180-010-0189-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomarchio, S. D., and A. Punzo. 2020. Dichotomous unimodal compound models: Application to the distribution of insurance losses. Journal of Applied Statistics 47 (13–15):2328–53. doi: 10.1080/02664763.2020.1789076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukey, J. W. 1960. A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions. In Contributions to probability and statistics, ed. Ingram Olkin, 448–85. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Vaart, A. W. 1998. Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q., V. Brazauskas, and J. Ghorai. 2018. Robust and efficient fitting of severity models and the method of winsorized moments. ASTIN Bulletin 48 (1):275–309. doi: 10.1017/asb.2017.30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar