Online Construction of Multimodal Metaphors In Murnau’s Movie Faust (1926)

References

• Atkinson, P. (2004). Turning away: Embodied movement in the perception of shot duration. Image & Narrative, 15(1), 89–101.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. (2009). Variety is the spice of life: A psychological construction approach to understanding variability in emotion. Cognition & Emotion, 23(7), 1284–1306. doi:10.1080/02699930902985894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordwell, D. (2005). Figures traced in light: On cinematic staging. Berkeley: California University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bordwell, D. (2010). The part-time cognitivist: A view from film studies. Projections, 4(2), 1–18. doi:10.3167/proj.2010.040202
   Google Scholar
• Bordwell, D. (2013). The Viewer’s Share: Models of Mind in Explaining Film. In Arthur Shimamura (ed.), Psychocinematics. Exploring Cognition at the Movies, pp. 29–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, W. (2000). The cognitive semiotics of film. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunick, K., Cutting, J., & DeLong, J. (2013). Low-level features of film: What they are and why we would be lost without them. In Arthur Shimamura (ed.), Psychocinematics. Exploring Cognition at the Movies, pp. 133–148. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, N., & Seeley, W. (2013). Cognitivism, psychology, and neuroscience: Movies as attentional engines. In A. Shimamura (Ed.), Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the Movies (pp. 53–75). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elsaesser, T. (2000). Weimar cinema and after: Germany’s historical imaginary. London, UK and New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forceville, C., & Renckens, T. (2013). The good is light and bad is darkness metaphors in feature films. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(2), 160–179. doi:10.1075/msw.3.2.03for
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goethe, J. (1808). Faust. Eine Tragödie. Tübingen: Cotta Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Kappelhoff, H., & Müller, C. (2011). Embodied meaning construction. Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and feature film. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(2), 121–153. doi:10.1075/msw.1.2.02kap
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Le Meur, O., Le Callet, P., & Barba, D. (2007). Predicting visual fixations on video based on low-level visual features. Vision Research, 47(19), 2483–2498. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loschky, L., Larson, A., Magliano, J., & Smith, T. (2015). What would Jaws do? The tyranny of film and the relationship between gaze and higher-level narrative film comprehension. PLoS ONE, 10(11), e0142474. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mital, P., Smith, T., Hill, R., & Henderson, J. (2011). Clustering of gaze during dynamic scene viewing is predicted by motion. Cognitive Computation, 3(1), 5–24. doi:10.1007/s12559-010-9074-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mounce, R. (1998). The book of revelation. Grand Rapids, MI and Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans.
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. (2013). How cues on the screen prompt emotions in the mind. In A. Shimamura (Ed.), Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies (pp. 269–284). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, M. J. (2014). Visual manifestations of primary metaphors through mise-en-scène techniques. Image & Narrative, 15(1), 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Pessoa, L., & Adolphs, R. (2010). Emotion processing and the amygdala: From a “low road” to “many roads” of evaluating biological significance. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(1), 773–783. doi:10.1038/nrn2920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raz, G., Hagin, B., & Hendler, T. (2013). E-motion pictures of the brain: Recursive paths between affective neuroscience and film studies. In A. Shimamura (Ed.), Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies (pp. 285–313). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rohmer, E. (2000). L’organisation de l’espace dans le “Faust” de Murnau Paris: Cahiers du cinema.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C., & Greifenstein, S. (2014). Cinematic communication and embodiment. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body–language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 2061–2070). Berlin/NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, C., Greifenstein, S., & Kappelhoff, H. (2014). Expressive movement and metaphoric meaning making. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, & S. Tessendorf (Eds.), Body–language–communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (pp. 2092–2111). Berlin, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Shimamura, A. (2013a). Experiencing art in the brain of the beholder. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shimamura, A. (2013b). Psychocinematics: Issues and directions. In A. Shimamura (Ed.), Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies (pp. 1–26). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, P., Henson, R., & Templin, J. (2009). Are the sources of interest the same for everyone? Using multilevel mixture models to explore individual differences in appraisal structures. Cognition & Emotion, 23(7), 1389–1406. doi:10.1080/02699930902850528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, T. (2013). Watching you watch movies: Using eye tracking to inform film theory. In A. Shimamura (Ed.), Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies (pp. 165–190). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suckfüll, M. (2004). Modes of reception. An integrative construct for media effects research. Munich, Germany: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Suckfüll, M. (2013). Emotion regulation by switching between modes of reception. In A. Shimamura (Ed.), Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies (pp. 314–336). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, K., & Bordwell, D. (2002). Film history: An introduction. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. (2013). Sensing motion in movies. In A. Shimamura (Ed.), Psychocinematics: Exploring cognition at the movies (pp. 115–132). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, P., Carmi, R., Cameron, I., Munoz, D., & Itti, L. (2009). Quantifying centre bias of observers in free viewing of dynamic natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 9(7), 1–16. doi:10.1167/9.7.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urios-Aparisi, E. (2010). The body of love in Almodovar’s cinema: Metaphor and metonymy of the body and body parts. Metaphor & Symbol, 25(3), 181–203. doi:10.1080/10926488.2010.489395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ommen, M. (2014). The visual representation of time in the Œuvre of Kore-eda Hirokazu. Image & Narrative, 15(1), 17–29.
   Google Scholar
• Veale, T., Feyaerts, K., & Forceville, C. (2013). E unis pluribum: Using mental agility to achieve creative duality in word, image and sound. In T. Veale, K. Feyaerts, & C. Forceville (Eds.), Creativity and the Agile Mind (pp. 36–57). Berlin, Germany: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, B. (2014). Horror movies and the cognitive ecology of primary metaphors. Metaphor & Symbol, 29, 151–170. doi:10.1080/10926488.2014.924280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar