Perceiving Metaphors: An Approach From Developmental Ecological Psychology

References

• Adolph, E., & Kretch, K.S. (2015). Gibson's theory of perceptual learning. In J.D. Wright (ed-in-Chief). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Amsterdam, ND: Elsevier, 10, 127–134.
   Google Scholar
• Bahrick, L. E., & Hollich, G. (2008). Intermodal perception. Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development, 2, 164–176.
   Google Scholar
• Billow, R. M. (1975). A cognitive developmental study of metaphor comprehension. Developmental Psychology, 11, 415–423. doi:10.1037/h0076668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In N. Eisenberg, R. A. Fabes, & T. L. Spinrad (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 795–827). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (1999). An iconoclast’s triptych: Edward reed’s ecological philosophy. Theory & Psychology, 9, 411–416. doi:10.1177/0959354399093011
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (2004). From direct perception to the primacy of action: A closer look at James Gibson’s ecological approach to psychology. In G. Bremner & A. Slater (Eds.), Theories of infant development (pp. 70–89). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. Avant, 3(2), 85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Costall, A., & Richards, A. (2013). Canonical affordances: The psychology of everyday things. In P. Graves-Brown, R. Harrison, & A. Piccini (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the archaeology of the contemporary world (pp. 82–93). Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, T., & French, C. (2017). The problem of perception. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition). Retrived from. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/perception-problem/>
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers Rader, N., & Zukow-Goldring, P. (2012). Caregivers' gestures direct infant attention during early word learning: The importance of dynamic synchrony. Language Sciences, 34(5), 559–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, C. H. (1984). The developmental importance of motion information in perceiving and describing metaphoric similarity. Child Development, 55(4), 1607–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, C. H. (1987). Developmental studies of perception and metaphor: The Twain shall meet. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 2, 53–57. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms0201_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent, C. H. (1990). An ecological approach to language development: An alternative functionalism. Developmental Psychobiology, 23(7), 679–703. doi:10.1002/dev.420230710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent-Read, C. H. (1997). A naturalistic study of metaphor development: Seeing and seeing as. In C. E. Dent-Read & P. E. Zukow-Goldring (Eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism–Environment systems (pp. 255–296). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dent-Read, C. H., Klein, G., & Eggleston, R. (1994). Metaphor in visual displays designed to guide action. Metaphor and Symbol, 9(3), 211–232. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms0903_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dent-Read, C. H., & Szokolszky, A. (1993). Where do metaphors come from? Metaphor and Symbol, 8(3), 227–242. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms0803_8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey, J., & Bentley, A. (1949). Knowing and the known. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fusaroli, R., Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2014). Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 147–157. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions: Rethinking the mind. Oxford University Press, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S., & Lindgren, R. (2015). Enactive metaphors: Learning through full-body engagement. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 391–404. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9327-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, H., Kirchner, M., Winner, E., & Perkins, D. (1975). Children’s metaphoric productions and preferences. Journal of Child Language, 2, 125–141. doi:10.1017/S0305000900000921
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (1999). Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Sciences Series, 4, 145–166.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2008). Metaphor The state of the art. In R. W. Gibbs Jr (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 3–16). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Cameron, L. (2008). The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1), 64–75. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2007.06.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York, NY: AppletonCentury Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J. (1988). Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting, and the acquiring of knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 39(1), 1–42. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.39.020188.000245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J. (1997). An ecological psychologist’s prolegomena for perceptual development: A functional approach. In C. Dent-Read & P. Zukow-Goldring (Eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism-environment systems (pp. 23–45). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J., & Pick, A. D. (2000). An ecological approach to perceptual learning and development. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, E. J., & Walker, A. S. (1984). Development of knowledge of visual-tactual affordances of substance. Child Development, 55, 453–460. doi:10.2307/1129956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Co.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2001). Ecological psychology in context: James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Heft, H. (2013). An ecological approach to psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 162–167. doi:10.1037/a0032928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, T. (1992). Culture and the perception of the environment. In E. Croll & D. Parkion (Eds.), Bush base: Forest farm. Culture, environment and development (pp. 39–56). London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2014). Evolution in four dimensions, revised edition: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Boston, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. W. (2016). Doing metaphor. In B. Hampe (ed.). Metaphor: From embodied cognition to discourse. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, T. W., & Cuffari, E. (2014). Doubleness in experience: Toward a distributed enactive approach to metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol, 29(4), 278–297. doi:10.1080/10926488.2014.948798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, S. (2013). Evolution beyond Newton, Darwin and entailing law. In B. G. Henning & A. C. Scarfe (Eds.), Beyond mechanism: Putting life back into biology (pp. 1–24). Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford. UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones? Review of cognitive linguistics. Published under the Auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 9(1), 11–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2013). The metaphor - metonymy relationship: Correlation metaphors are based on metonymy. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(2), 75–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.94.4.412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillard, A. S. (1993). Young children’s conceptualization of pretense: Action or mental representational state? Child Development, 64, 372–386. doi:10.2307/1131256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, W. M. (2005). James J. Gibson’s ecological approach: Perceiving what exists. Ethics & the Environment, 10(2), 195–216. doi:10.2979/ETE.2005.10.2.195
   Google Scholar
• Marjanovic-Shane, A. (1989). "You are a pig". For Real or Just Pretend? Different Orientations in Play and Metaphor. Play and Culture, 2(3), 225–234.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh, K. L., Johnston, L., Richardson, M. J., & Schmidt, R. C. (2009). Toward a radically embodied, embedded social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1217–1225. doi:10.1002/ejsp.v39:7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menary, R. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on 4E cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 459–463. doi:10.1007/s11097-010-9187-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, C. F., & Palatinus, Z. (2014). A ten commandments for ecological psychology. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 19–28). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories: New foundations for realism. Boston, MA: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, C., & Tag, S. (2010). The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activationg metaphoricity in conversational interaction. Cognitive Semiotics, 10(6), 85–120. doi:10.3726/81610_85
   Google Scholar
• Newen, A., DeBruin, L., Gallagher, S. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noë, A. (2009). Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. London, UK: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Piaget, J, & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pick, A. D. (1997). Perceptual learning, categorizing and cognitive development. In C. Dent-Read & P. Zukow-Goldring (Eds.), Evolving explanations of development: Ecological approaches to organism–Environment systems (pp. 335–370). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Raczaszek-Leonardi, J. (2016). How does a word become a message? An illustration on a developmental time-scale. New Ideas in Psychology, 42, 46–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rączaszek-Leonardi, J. (2010). Multiple time-scales of language dynamics: An example from psycholinguistics. Ecological Psychology, 22(4), 269–285. doi:10.1080/10407413.2010.517111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rączaszek-Leonardi, J., Nomikou, I., Rohlfing, K. J., & Deacon, T. W. (2018). Language development from an ecological perspective: Ecologically valid ways to abstract symbols. Ecological Psychology, 30(1), 39–73. doi:10.1080/10407413.2017.1410387
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, C., & Szokolszky, A. (2016). A developmental, ecological study of novel metaphoric language use. Language Sciences, 53, 86–98. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Read, C., & Szokolszky, A. (2018). An emerging developmental ecological psychology: Future directions and potentials. Ecological Psychology, Special Issue Part II, 30(2), 174–194. doi:10.1080/10407413.2018.1439141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, R. E., & Ortony, A. (1980). Some issues in the measurement of children’s comprehension of metaphorical language. Child Development, 51, 1110–1119. doi:10.2307/1129551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, M. J., Shockley, K., Fajen, B. R., Riley, M. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2009). Ecological psychology: Six principles for an embodied–Embedded approach to behavior. In A. G. Calvo (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive science: An embodied approach (pp. 159–187). Amsterdam, ND: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E., Denys, D., & Van Westen, M. (2018). Ecological-enactive cognition as engaging with a field of relevant affordances: The skilled intentionality framework (SIF). In A. Newen, L. DeBruin, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp.41-70), Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352. doi:10.1080/10407413.2014.958035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie Bronfenbrenner’s theory of human development: Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(4), 243–258. doi:10.1111/jftr.12022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Dent, C. (1990). Visual and verbal metaphors: developmental interactions. Child Development, 61(4), 983-994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucinska, Z. (2014). Basic pretending as sensorimotor engagement?. In J. M. Bishop & A. O. Martin (Eds.), Contemporary sensorimotor theory: A brief introduction (pp. 175–187). Switzerland, Springer International Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Rucinska, Z. (2016). What guides pretence? Towards the interactive and the narrative approaches. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 117–133. doi:10.1007/s11097-014-9381-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rucinska, Z., & Reijmers, E. (2015). Enactive account of pretend play and its application to therapy. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 175. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R., Turvey, M. T., & Mace, W. (1982). Ecological psychology: The consequence of a commitment to realism. Cognition and the Symbolic Processes, 2, 159–226.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J., Stewart, J. R., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A. (2010). Enaction: Toward a new paradigm for cognitive science. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Still, A., & Costall, A. (Eds.). (1992). Against cognitivism. Birmingham, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Still, A., & Good, J. (1998). The ontology of mutualism. Ecological Psychology, 10(1), 39–63. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco1001_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Still, A., & Good, J. M. (1992). Mutualism in the human sciences: Towards the implementation of a theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 22(2), 105–128. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00212.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szokolszky, A. (1996). Using an object as if it were another: The perception and use of affordances in pretend object play. CT, USA: University of Connecticut. UNI order number: AAM9605501 Dissertation Abstract International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Szokolszky, A. (2004). A tárgy mint cselekvési lehetőség./The object as possibility for action. In Á. Kapitány & G. Kapitány (Eds.), Termékszemantika (pp. 78–87). Budapest, Hungary: Magyar Iparművészeti Egyetem.
   Google Scholar
• Szokolszky, A. (2006). Object use in pretend play: Symbolic or functional? In A. Costall & O. Dreier (Eds.), Doing things with things: The design and use of everyday objects (pp. 67–86). London, UK: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Szokolszky, A., & Read, C. (2018). Developmental ecological psychology and a coalition of ecological–relational developmental approaches. Ecological Psychology, 30(1), 6–38. doi:10.1080/10407413.2018.1410409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szokolszky, A., & Szalkai, A. (in progress). A dialogue study of metaphor use by children.
   Google Scholar
• Thibault, P. J. (2011). First-order languaging dynamics and second-order language: The distributed language view. Ecological Psychology, 23(3), 210–245. doi:10.1080/10407413.2011.591274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology, and the sciences of mind. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turvey, M. T., Shaw, R. E., Reed, E. S., & Mace, W. M. (1981). Ecological laws of perceiving and acting: In reply to Fodor and Pylyshyn (1981). Cognition, 9(3), 237–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Herik, J. C. (2018). Attentional actions–An ecological-enactive account of utterances of concrete words. Psychology of Language and Communication, 22(1), 90–123. doi:10.2478/plc-2018-0005
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, L., & Rietveld, E. (2017). Foregrounding sociomaterial practice in our understanding of affordances: The skilled intentionality framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1969. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy, L. (1938). A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries on growth laws. II). Human Biology, 10(2), 181–213.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S. (1987). Children and metaphors. Child Development, 58, 870–885. doi:10.2307/1130223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Ortony, A. (1983). The emergence of the literal-metaphorical-anomalous distinction in young children. Child Development, 54(4), 154–161.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., Ortony, A., Reynolds, R. E., & Wilson, P. T. (1984). Sources of difficulty in the young child’s understanding of metaphorical language. In Child Development 55(4), 1588–1606.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions.In: J.V. Wetsch (ed). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp.144-188). Minnesota: M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, R., & Wertheim, A. H. (2014). Perception and control of self-motion. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winner, E. (1979). New names for old things: The emergence of metaphoric language. Journal of Child Language, 6(3), 469–491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witherington, D. C., & Heying, S. (2013). Embodiment and agency: Toward a holistic synthesis for developmental science. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 44, 161–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukow-Goldring, P. (2012). Assisted imitation: First steps in the seed model of language development. Language Sciences, 34(5), 569–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukow-Goldring, P., & de Villiers Rader, N. (2013). Seed framework of early language development. The Dynamic Coupling of Infant-caregiver Perceiving and Acting Forms a Continuous Loop during Interaction. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, 5(3), 249–257.
   Google Scholar
• Zukow-Goldring, P., & Rader, N.D. (2001). Perceiving referring actions. Developmental Science, 4(1), 28–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar