Source Domain Verification Using Corpus-based Tools

References

• Ahrens, K. (2015). Corpus of political speeches. Hong Kong Baptist University Library. Retrieved from http://digital.lib.hkbu.edu.hk/corpus/
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, K., Chung, S. F., & Huang, C. R. (2003). Conceptual Metaphors: Ontology-based representation and corpora driven Mapping Principles. In Proceedings of the ACL 2003 workshop on Lexicon and figurative language-Volume 14. Association for Computational Linguistics, Sapporo, Japan (pp. 36–42).
   Google Scholar
• Ahrens, K., Chung, S. F., & Huang, C. R. (2004). From lexical semantics to conceptual metaphors: Mapping principle verification with WordNet and sumo. In Recent Advancement in Chinese Lexical Semantics: Proceedings of 5th Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop (CLSW), Singapore (pp. 99–106).
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. F. (2007). A corpus-driven approach to source domain determination (Ph.D. Dissertation). Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Taiwan University.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. F., & Ahrens, K. (2006). Source domain determination: WordNet-SUMO and collocation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, München, Germany (pp. 1–4).
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. F., Ahrens, K., Cheng, C.-P., Huang, C. R., & Šimon, P. (2007). Computing thresholds of linguistic saliency. In Proceedings of the 21st Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (PACLIC), Seoul, Korea, (pp. 126–135).
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. F., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C. R. (2005). Source domains as concept domains in metaphorical expressions. International Journal of Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language Processing, Special Issue on Selected Papers from CLSW-5, 10(4), 553–570.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. F., Huang, C. R., & Ahrens, K. (2003). Economy is a transportation-device: Contrastive representation of source domain knowledge in English and Chinese. In International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Knowledge Engineering Proceedings, Beijing, China (pp. 790–796).
   Google Scholar
• Chung, S. F., & Huang, C.-R. (2010). Using collocations to establish the source domain of conceptual metaphors. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 38(2), 183–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deignan, A. (1999a). Corpus-based research into metaphor. In Cameron & Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 177–199). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deignan, A. (1999b). Metaphorical polysemy and paradigmatic relations: A corpus study. Word, 50(3), 319–338. doi:10.1080/00437956.1999.11432491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deignan, A. (2006). The grammar of linguistic metaphors. In Stefanowitsch & Gries (Eds.), Trends in linguistics studies and monographs, 171 (pp. 106). Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Fellbaum, C. (1998). WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, S. P., Ahrens, K., & Huang, C. R. (2008). Chinese word sketch and mapping principles: A corpus-based study of conceptual metaphors using the building source domain. International Journal of Computer Processing of Languages, 21(01), 3–17. doi:10.1142/S1793840608001755
   Google Scholar
• Handian. (2004). Handian online dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.zdic.net/
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. R., Chung, S. F., & Ahrens, K. (2007). An ontology-based exploration of knowledge systems for metaphor. In R. Kishore, R. Ramesh, & R. Sharman (Eds.), Ontologies: A handbook of principles, concepts and applications in information systems (Vol. 14, pp. 489–517). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C. R., Chang, R. Y., & Lee, H. P. (2004). Sinica BOW (Bilingual Ontological Wordnet): Integration of Bilingual WordNet and SUMO. In The International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Lisbon, Portugal (pp. 1553–1557).
   Google Scholar
• Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., … Suchomel, V. (2014). The sketch engine: Ten years on. Lexicography, 1(1), 7–36. ISSN 2197-4292. doi:10.1007/s40607014-0009-9
   Google Scholar
• Kilgarriff, A., Huang, C.-R., Rychly, P., Smith, S., & Tugwell, D. (2005). Chinese word sketches. In Proceedings of the 4th Asialex Conference, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgarriff, A., Kovář, V., Krek, S., Srdanovič, I., & Tiberius, C. (2010). A quantitative evaluation of word sketches. Proceedings of the 14th EURALEX International Congress, 372–79, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A. (1995). WordNet: A lexical database for English. Communications of the ACM (Association for Computing Machinery), 38(11), 39–41. doi:10.1145/219717.219748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., & Miller, K. J. (1990). Introduction to WordNet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3(4), 235–244. doi:10.1093/ijl/3.4.235
   Google Scholar
• Niles, I., & Pease, A. (2001). Towards a standard upper ontology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems. Ogunquit, ME (pp. 2–9).
   Google Scholar
• Partington, A. (1998). Patterns and meanings: Using corpora for English language research and teaching (Vol. 2). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Partington, A. (2003). The linguistics of political argument: The spin-doctor and the wolf-pack at the White House. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Partington, A. (2006). Metaphors, motifs and similes across discourse types: Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS) at work. In Stefanowitsch & Gries (Eds.), Trends in linguistics studies and monographs, 171 (pp. 267). Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Pease, A., & Niles, I. (2002). IEEE standard upper ontology: A progress report (Vol. 17). Knowledge Engineering Review, Special Issue on Ontology and Agents, 17(1), 65–70.
   Google Scholar
• Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi:10.1080/10926480709336752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevcenko, M. (2003, February). Online presentation of an upper ontology. In Proceedings of Znalosti 2003, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Shutova, E., & Teufel, S. (2010). Metaphor corpus annotated for source-target domain mappings. In The International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Malta (pp. 3255–3262).
   Google Scholar
• Steen, G. (Ed.). (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU (Vol. 14). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanowitsch, A. (2006). Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. In Stefanowitsch & Gries (Eds.), Trends in linguistics studies and monographs, 171 (pp. 1–16). Berlin, Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar