Metaphor in the Academic Mentoring of International Undergraduate Students: The Erasmus Experience

References

• Aitchison, J. (2003). Metaphors, models and language change. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Motives for language change (pp. 39–53). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alejo, R. (2010). Where does the money go? An analysis of the container metaphor in economics: The market and the economy. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(4), 1137–1150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arleo, A. (2000). Life cycles, chaos and zoom lenses: A comparative analysis of some conceptual metaphors in the discourse of entrepreneurship theory. AnglaisScientifique, 27/30, 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• Beger, A. (2011a). Deliberate metaphors? An exploration of the choice and functions of metaphors in US-American college lectures. Metaphorik.de, 20, 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Beger, A. (2011b). differences in the use of emotion metaphors in expert-lay communication. Converging evidence from two complementary studies. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Converging evidence. Methodological and theoretical issues for linguistic research (pp. 319–347). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Beger, A. (2019). The role of (deliberate) metaphor in communicating knowledge in academic discourse. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Berber Sardinha, T. (2015). Register variation and metaphor use: A multi-dimensional perspective. In J. B. Herrmann & T. Berber Sardinha (Eds.), Metaphor in specialist discourse: Investigating metaphor use in technical, scientific and popularized discourse contexts (pp. 17–52). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boers, F. (1999). When a bodily source domain becomes prominent: The joy of counting metaphors in the socio-economic domain. In R. W. Gibbs & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 47–56). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Bowden, D. (1993). The limits of containment: Text-as-container in compositionstudies. College Composition and Communication, 44(3), 364–379. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/358989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brezina, V. (2018). Statistics for corpus linguistics: A practical guide. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero, R. (2003). Metaphor and genre: The presence and role of metaphor in the building review. Applied Linguistics, 24(2), 145–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.2.145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caballero, R. (2006). Re-viewing space: Figurative language in architects’ assessment of built space. Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L. (2007). Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926507073376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., Maslen, R., & Low, G. (2010). Finding systematicity in metaphor use. In L. Cameron & R. Maslen (Eds.), Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., & Deignan, A. (2003). Combining large and small corpora to investigate tuning devices around metaphor in spoken discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 18(3), 149–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1803_02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., & Low, G. (2004). Figurative variation in episodes of educational talk and text. European Journal of English Studies, 8(3), 355–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1382557042000277430
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, L., & Stelma, J. H. (2004). Metaphor clusters in discourse. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 7–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.2004.1.2.107
   Google Scholar
• Chiang, S.-Y. (2011). Pursuing a response in office hour interactions between US college students and international teaching assistants. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(14), 3316–3330. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. A. (2006). English-medium teaching in European higher education. Language Teaching, 39(1), 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480600320X
   Google Scholar
• Corts, D. P. (2006). Factors characterizing bursts of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Discourse Studies, 8(2), 211–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corts, D. P., & Pollio, H. R. (1999). Spontaneous production of figurative language and gesture in college lectures. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(2), 81–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1402_1
   Google Scholar
• Deignan, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Deignan, A., Littlemore, J., & Semino, E. (2013). Figurative language, genre and register. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, A. G. (2011). Metaphor in fiction: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, cognitive representations. BOXpress.
   Google Scholar
• Farr, F. (2003). Engaged listenership in spoken academic discourse: The case of student-tutor meetings. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(1), 67–85. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00035-8
   Google Scholar
• Firth, A. (1996). The discursive accomplishment of normality: On ‘lingua franca’ English and conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 26(2), 237–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(96)00014-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, J. (1998). The ‘conduit metaphor’ revisited: A reassessment of metaphors for communication. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 205–218). CSLI.
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, J. B. (2013). Metaphor in academic discourse: Linguistic forms, conceptual structures, communicative functions and cognitive representations. LOT.
   Google Scholar
• House, J. (1999). Misunderstanding in intercultural communication: Interactions in English as a lingua franca and the myth of mutual intelligibility. In C. Gnutzmann (Ed.), Teaching and learning English as a global language (pp. 73–89). Stauffenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Kaal, A. A. (2012). Metaphor in conversation (Doctoral dissertation). Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Koller, V. (2003). Metaphor clusters in business media discourse: A social cognition approach (PhD thesis). Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Krennmayr, T. (2011). Metaphor in newspapers. LOT.
   Google Scholar
• Krennmayr, T. (2017). Metaphor and parts-of-speech. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 165–177). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Limberg, H. (2010). The interactional organization of academic talk. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstromberg, S. (1996/2010). English prepositions explained (2nd ed.). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J. (2001). The use of metaphor in university lectures and the problems that it causes for overseas students. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(3), 333–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510120061205
   Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J., Chen, P. T., Koester, A., & Barnden, J. (2011). Difficulties in metaphor comprehension faced by international students whose first language is not English. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 408–429. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amr009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J., Krennmayr, T., Turner, J., Turner, S. (2014). An investigation into Metaphor Use at Different Levels of Second Language Writing. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 117–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J., & Low, G. (2006). Figurative thinking and foreign language learning. Palgrave/ Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J., MacArthur, F., Cienki, A., & Holloway, J. (2012). How to make yourself understood by international students: The role of metaphor in academic tutorials. ELT Research Papers: British Council Publications, 12(6), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Littlemore, J., MacArthur, F., Rubineska, A., & Turner, S. (2013). Communicating academic content to international students: Interplay and variations in the use of verbal and gestural metaphor. Revista Española De Lingüística Aplicada, 1, 23–50.
   Google Scholar
• Low, G., Littlemore, J., & Koester, A. (2008). Metaphor use in three UK university lectures. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 428–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, F. (2011a). On the use of metaphor in office hours’ consultations carried out in English between lecturers and students with different first languages. International Journal of Innovation and Leadership in the Teaching of the Humanities, 1(1), 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, F. (2016a). Overt and covert uses of metaphor in the academic mentoring in English of Spanish undergraduate students at five European universities. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 14(1), 23–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.14.1.02mac
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, F. (2016b). Beyond engaged listenership: Assessing Spanish undergraduates’ active participation in academic mentoring sessions in English as academic lingua franca. In Yearbook of corpus linguistics and pragmatics 2016: Global implications for culture and society in the networked age (pp. 153–178).
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, F., Krennmayr, T., & Littlemore, J. (2015). How basic is understanding is seeing when reasoning about knowledge? Asymmetric uses of sight metaphors in office hours’ consultations in English as academic lingua franca. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(3), 184–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1049507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacArthur, F., & Littlemore, J. (2011). On the repetition of words with the potential for metaphoric extension in conversations between native and non-native speakers of English. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(2), 210–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.1.2.05mac
   Google Scholar
• Mauranen, A. (2012). Exploring ELF. Academic English shaped by non-native speakers. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mio, J. S. (1996). Metaphor, politics and persuasion. In J. S. Mio & A. N. Katz (Eds.), Metaphor:Implicationsand applications (pp. 127–146). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G. (1996). Images of organization. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nacey, S. (2013). Metaphor in learner English. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, W. (1990). Introduction: The stuff these people write. In W. Nash (Ed.), The writing scholar: Studies in academic discourse (pp. 8–30). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Neff-van Aertselaer, J., & Bunce, C. (2010). Having many meanings: A corpus study of Spanish EFL writers’ construals with have. In S. De Knop, F. Boers, & A. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 119–136). Mouton De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Niederhoffer, K. G., & Pennerbaker, J. W. (2002). Linguistic style matching in social interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21(4), 337–360. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/026192702237953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy, M. (1979/1993). The conduit metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 164–201). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semino, E. (2005). The metaphorical construction of complex domains: The case of speech activity in English. Metaphor and Symbol, 20(1), 35–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2001_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skorczynska, H., & Deignan, A. (2006). Readership and purpose in the choice of economics metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(2), 87–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skyrme, G. (2010). Is this a stupid question? International undergraduate students seeking help from teachers during office hours. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 211–221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480802426753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J. (2011). From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik.de, 21, 83–110.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, G. J., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, B., & Kaal, A. A. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tottie, G. (1991). Conversational style in British and American English: The case of backchannels. In K. Aijmer& & B. Altenberg (Eds.), English corpus linguistics (pp. 254–271). Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Waring, H. Z. (2002). Displaying substantive recipiency in seminar discussion. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 35(4), 453–479. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327973RLSI3504_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, R. F. (2013). Learning to talk the talk and walk the walk: Interactional competence in academic spoken English. Ibérica, 25, 15–38.
   Google Scholar