Poet and Psychologist: A Conversation

References

• Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Smallwood, J., & Spreng, R. N. (2014). The default network and self-generated thought: Component processes, dynamic control, and clinical relevance. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316(1), 29–52. doi:10.1111/nyas.12360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain networks dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(2), 87–95. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2013). Metaphorically speaking: Cognitive abilities and the production of figurative language. Memory & Cognition, 41(2), 255–267. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0258-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., & Benedek, M. (2017). Brain networks underlying novel metaphor production. Brain and Cognition, 111, 163–170. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2016.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeman, M. (1998). Coarse coding and discourse comprehension. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 255–284). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M., & Desai, R. H. (2016). Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33(3–4), 130–174. doi:10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, M. (1962). Metaphor. In M. Black (Ed.), Models and metaphors (pp. 38–47). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. (2004). The art of reading poetry. In H. Bloom (Ed.), The best poems of the English language: From Chaucer through Frost (pp. 1–29). New York, NY: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, H. (2011). The anatomy of influence: Literature as a way of life. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012a). Looking at the brains behind figurative language—A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom, and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 50(11), 2669–2683. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohrn, I. C., Altmann, U., Lubrich, O., Menninghaus, W., & Jacobs, A. M. (2012b). Old proverbs in new skins—an fMRI study on defamiliarization. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 204. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, H. H., Simpson, T. L., Bihrle, A. M., Potter, H. H., & Gardner, H. (1990). Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients. Neuropsychologia, 28(4), 375–383. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(90)90063-T
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardillo, E. R., Schmidt, G. L., Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2010). Stimulus design is an obstacle course: 560 matched literal and metaphorical sentences for testing neural hypotheses about metaphor. Behavioral Research Methods, 42, 651–664. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.3.651
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappe, D. L., & Chiappe, P. (2007). The role of working memory in metaphor production and comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(2), 172–188. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, M., Lee, S., Choi, E., Park, H., Lee, J., Lee, D., & Lee, J. (2021). MelBERT: Metaphor detection via contextualized late interaction using metaphorical identification theories. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics Human Language Technologies (pp. 1763–1773). DOI:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.141
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• de Barros, D. P., Primi, R., Miguel, F. K., Almeida, L. S., & Oliveira, E. P. (2010). Metaphor creation: A measure of creativity or intelligence? European Journal of Education and Psychology, 3(1), 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• de Heer, W. A., Huth, A. G., Griffiths, T. L., Gallant, J. L., & Theunissen, F. E. (2017). The hierarchical cortical organization of human speech proceesing. Journal of Neuroscience, 37(27), 6539–6557. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3267-16.2017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In J. Bustein, C. Doran, & T. Solorio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (vol. 1, pp. 4171–4186), Minneapolis, MN.
   Google Scholar
• Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (1946/2007). The constant symbol. In M. Richardson (Ed.), The collected prose of Robert Frost. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., Jr., & Bogdonovich, J. (1999). Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(1), 37–54. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms1401_4
   Google Scholar
• Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12(3), 306–355. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glicksohn, J., & Goodblatt, C. (2021). Empirical studies of poetic metaphor. In D. Kuiken & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Handbook of empirical literary studies (pp. 121–143). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110645958-006
   Google Scholar
• Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97, 3–18. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019). Vector-space models of semantic representation from a cognitive perspective: A discussion of common misconceptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 1006–1033. doi:10.1177/1745691619861372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobeika, L., Diard-Detoeuf, C., Garcin, B., Levy, R., & Volle, E. (2016). General and specialized brain correlates for analogical reasoning: A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 37(5), 1953–1969. doi:10.1002/hbm.23149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, G., & Westbury, C. (2016). The principals of meaning: Extracting semantic dimensions from co-occurrence models of semantics. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(6), 1744–1756. doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1053-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollis, G., Westbury, C., & Lefsrud, L. (2017). Extrapolating human judgments from skip-gram vector representations of word meaning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(8), 1603–1619. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1195417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J. (1982). An analogical framework for literary interpretation. Poetics, 11(2), 105–126. doi:10.1016/0304-422X(82)90028-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J. (2019). The spider’s thread: Metaphor in mind, brain, and poetry. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J., & Stamenković, D. (2018). Metaphor comprehension: A critical review of theories and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 144(6), 641–671. doi:10.1037/bul0000145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussey, K. A., & Katz, A. N. (2006). Metaphor production in online conversation: Gender and friendship status. Discourse Processes, 42(1), 75–98. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp4201_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 186. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., & Kinder, A. (2017). “The brain is the prisoner of thought”: A machine-learning assisted quantitative narrative analysis of literary metaphors for use in neurocognitive poetics. Metaphor and Symbol, 32(3), 139–160. doi:10.1080/10926488.2017.1338015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., & Kinder, A. (2018). What makes a metaphor literary? Answers from two computational studies. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(2), 85–100. doi:10.1080/10926488.2018.1434943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, A. N., Paivio, A., Marschark, M., & Clark, J. M. (1988). Norms for 204 literary and 260 nonliterary metaphors on 10 psychological dimensions. Metaphor and Symbol, 3(4), 191–214. doi:10.1207/s15327868ms0304_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennet, Y. N., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2014).Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 407.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 257–266. doi:10.3758/BF03212981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbis, N., & Mossink, L. D. (2021). Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, Article 106553. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, H. D. (1946). On poetic truth. Philosophy, 21(79), 147–166. doi:10.1017/S0031819100005325
   Google Scholar
• Liu, S., Erkkinen, M. G., Healey, M. L., Xu, Y., Swett, K. E., Chow, H. M., & Braun, A. R. (2015). Brain activity and connectivity during poetry composition: Toward a multidimensional model of the creative process. Human Brain Mapping, 36(9), 3351–3372. doi:10.1002/hbm.22849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowell, A. 1930/1952. The process of making poetry. In Reprinted B. Ghiselin (Ed.). The creative process. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Chen, D., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Bayesian analogy with relational transformations. Psychological Review, 119(3), 617–648. doi:10.1037/a0028719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Ichien, N., & Holyoak, K. J. (in press). Probabilistic analogical mapping with semantic relation networks. Psychological Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Wu, Y. N., & Holyoak, K. J. (2019). Emergence of analogy from relation learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 116(10), 4176–4181. doi:10.1073/pnas.1814779116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, L. E. (1982). Synesthetic perception and poetic metaphor. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 8(1), 15–23. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.8.1.15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menache, S., Leshem, R., Heruti, V., Kasirer, A., Yair, T., & Mashal, N. (2020). Elucidating the role of selective attention, divergent thinking, language abilities, and executive functions in metaphor generation. Neuropsychologica, 142, Article 107458. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, R. S., & Chiappe, D. L. (2008). The roles of aptness, conventionality, and working memory in the production of metaphors and similes. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(1), 1–19. doi:10.1080/10926480802568422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, I. A. (1936). The philosophy of rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, I. A. (1948). Principles of literary criticism (3rd ed, first edition 1924). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Shklovsky, V. (1917/1988). Art as technique. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and theory (pp. 16–30). London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence, 40(4), 343–351. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spender, S. (1946/1952). The making of a poem. In B. Ghiselin (Ed.), The creative process (Reprint ed.). Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stamenković, D., Ichien, N., & Holyoak, K. J. (2019). Metaphor comprehension: An individual-differences approach. Journal of Memory and Language, 105, 108–118. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2018.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamenković, D., Ichien, N., & Holyoak, K. J. (2020). Individual differences in comprehension of contextualized metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 35(4), 285–301. doi:10.1080/10926488.2020.1821203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamenković, D., Milenković, K., & Dinčić, J. (2019). Studija normiranјa knјiževnih i neknјiževnih metafora iz srpskog jezika [A norming study of Serbian literary and nonliterary metaphors]. Matica Srpska Journal of Philology and Linguistics, 62(2), 89–104.
   Google Scholar
• Stamenković, D., Milenković, K., Ichien, N., & Holyoak, K. J. (this issue). An individual-differences approach to poetic metaphor: Impact of aptness and familiarity. Metaphor and Symbol.
   Google Scholar
• Stemmer, B. (2017). Neuropragmatics. In Y. Huang (Ed.), Oxford handbook of pragmatics (pp. 362–379). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson-Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94, 14792–14797. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792
   Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Rips, L. (1991). Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(4), 452–472. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90016-D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition, 11(3), 203–244. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(82)90016-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, F., & Pöppel, E. (1983). The neural lyre: Poetic meter, the brain, and time. Poetry, 12, 277–309.
   Google Scholar
• Utsumi, A. (2020). Exploring what is encoded in distributional word vectors: A neurobiologically motivated analysis. Cognitive Science, 44(6), e12844. doi:10.1111/cogs.12844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valéry, P. (1958). The art of poetry ( D. Folliot, translator). New York, NY: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vartanian, O. (2012). Dissociable neural systems for analogy and metaphor: Implications for the neuroscience of creativity. British Journal of Psychology, 103(3), 302–316. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02073.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wassiliwizky, E., Koelsch, S., Wagner, V., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2017). The emotional power of poetry: Neural circuitry, psychophysiology and compositional principles. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(8), 1229–1240. doi:10.1093/scan/nsx069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheelwright, P. (1968). The burning fountain: A study in the language of symbolism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Xue, S., Lüdtke, J., Sylvester, T., & Jacobs, A. M. (2019). Reading Shakespeare sonnets : Combining quantitative narrative analysis and predictive modeling—an eye tracking study. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 12(5). doi:10.16910/jemr.12.5.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar