Assessing Attitudes Indirectly Through Conceptual Metaphors of Size and Distance in an Interactive Software

References

• Bailey, K. G., Caffrey, J. V., & Hartnett, J. J. (1976). Body size as implied threat: effects on personal space and person perception. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 43(1), 223–230. doi:10.2466/pms.1976.43.1.223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcetis, E. (2016). Approach and avoidance as organizing structures for motivated distance perception. Emotion Review, 8(2), 115–128. doi:10.1177/1754073915586225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boller, P. F. (1984). Presidential campaigns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coulter, K. S., & Coulter, R. A. (2005). Size does matter: The effects of magnitude representation congruency on price perceptions and purchase likelihood. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(1), 64–76. doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dancygier, B., & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Day, R. H., & McKenzie, B. E. (1981). Infant perception of the invariant size of approaching and receding objects. Developmental Psychology, 17(5), 670–677. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.17.5.670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, M., Guinote, A., Li, L., Cui, L., & Shi, W. (2021). When abstract concepts rely on multiple metaphors: Metaphor selection in the case of power. Social Cognition, 39(3), 408–435. doi:10.1521/soco.2021.39.3.408
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Paola, S., Domaneschi, F., & Pouscoulous, N. (2020). Metaphorical developing minds: The role of multiple factors in the development of metaphor comprehension. Journal of Pragmatics, 156, 235–251. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granrud, C. E. (2006). Size constancy in infants: 4-month-olds´ responses to physical versus retinal image size. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 32(6), 1398–1404. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasha, A. F., & Homan, M. (1995). Psychological size and distance in the relationships of adult children of alcoholics with their parents. Psychological Reports, 76(2), 595–606. doi:10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa, K. (2020). The size-value compatibility effect. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 5383. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62419-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326(5958), 1410–1412. doi:10.1126/science.1177067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundrát, J., & Rojková, Z. (2021). Psychological distance as a means of evaluation. New Ideas in Psychology, 63, 100900. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1988). A view of linguistic semantics. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Ed.), current issues in linguistic theory (pp. 49–90). John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/cilt.50.04lan
   Google Scholar
• Lavrijsen, J., Tracey, T. J. G., Verachtert, P., De Vroede, T., Soenens, B., & Verschueren, K. (2021). Understanding school subject preferences: The role of trait interests, cognitive abilities and perceived engaging teaching. Personality & Individual Differences, 174, 110685. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. (2020). Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
   Google Scholar
• Marmolejo-Ramos, F., Arshamian, A., Tirado, C., Ospina, R., & Larsson, M. (2019). The allocation of valenced percepts onto 3D space. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 352. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, B. P., & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. Psychological Science, 15(4), 243–247. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00659.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouscoulous, N. (2011). Metaphor: For adults only? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 25(1), 51–79. doi:10.1075/bjl.25.04pou
   Google Scholar
• Quatto, P., & Ripamonti, E. (2014). Raters: A modification of Fleiss’ kappa in case of nominal and ordinal variables. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raters
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
   Google Scholar
• Salzmann, J., & Grasha, A. F. (1991). Psychological size and psychological distance in manager-subordinate relationships. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(5), 629–646. doi:10.1080/00224545.1991.9924647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvera, D. H., Josephs, R. A., & Giesler, R. B. (2002). Bigger is better: The influence of physical size on aesthetic preference judgments. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15(3), 189–202. doi:10.1002/bdm.410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solarz, A. K. (1960). Latency of instrumental responses as a function of compatibility with the meaning of eliciting verbal signs. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 239–245. doi:10.1037/h0047274
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang, P., Ye, H., & Du, J. (2015). The spatial size metaphor of power concepts: A perspective from embodied cognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(4), 514. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00514
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., & Yao, W. (2016). So near, so good: Does near-distance perception reduce interpersonal psychological distance? Social Behavior & Personality: An International Journal, 44(6), 889–898. doi:10.2224/sbp.2016.44.6.889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wark, C., & Galliher, J. (2007). Emory Bogardus and the origins of the social distance scale. The American Sociologist, 38(4), 383–395. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-007-9023-9
   Google Scholar
• Wickham, H., Averick, M., Bryan, J., Chang, W., McGowan, L., François, R. … Spinu, V. (2019). Welcome to the tidyverse. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1686. doi:10.21105/joss.01686
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Keeping one’s distance: The influence of spatial distance cues on affect and evaluation. Psychological Science, 19(3), 302–308. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02084.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. P., Hugenberg, K., & Rule, N. O. (2017). Racial bias in judgments of physical size and formidability: From size to threat. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 113(1), 59–80. doi:10.1037/pspi0000092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiaoling, H., & Jun, C. (2020). Cognitive development of multiple metaphors of power concepts in 3–5 year-old children. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52(2), 149. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00149
   Google Scholar