Sexually Abusive Youth with Low Intellectual Functioning: Contemporary Risk Assessment Findings from MEGA^♪ Studies

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2013a). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013b). Intellectual disability. file:///C:/Users/Owner/Downloads/APA_DSM-5-Intellectual-Disability.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA). (2017). Practice guidelines for the assessment, treatment, and intervention with adolescents who have engaged in sexually abusive behavior. Beaverton, OR: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Blasingame, G. D. (2005). Developmentally disabled persons with sexual behavior problems: Treatment, management, and supervision. Oklahoma City, OK: Wood ‘N’ Barnes.
   Google Scholar
• Blasingame, G. D. (2018). Risk assessment of adolescents with intellectual disabilities who exhibit sexual behavior problems or sexual offending behavior. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Special Issue on Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth, 27, 955–971. doi:10.1080/10538712.2018.1452324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caldwell, M. (2019, June 13). Redemption of juveniles adjudicated for sexual offenses. Presentation at the Conference of the Wisconsin Chapter of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (Wi ATSA), Madison
   Google Scholar
• Epperson, D. L., & Ralston, C. A. (2015). Development and validation of the Juvenile sexual offender recidivism risk assessment Tool -II. Sexual Abuse, 27(6), 529–558. doi:10.1177/1079063213514452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epperson, W. I., Ralston, D. L., Fowers, C. A., DeWitt, D. J., & Gore, K. S. (2006). Actuarial risk assessment with juveniles who offend sexually: Development of the Juvenile sexual offense recidivism risk assessment tool-II (JSORRAT-II). In D. Prescott (Ed.), Risk assessment of youth who have sexually abused: Theory, controversy, and emerging strategies (pp. 118–169). Oklahoma City, OK: Woods ‘N’ Barnes.
   Google Scholar
• Fyson, R. (2007). Young people with learning disabilities who sexually abuse: Understanding, identifying and responding from within generic education and welfare services. In M. Calder (Ed.), Working with children and young people who sexually abuse: Taking the field forward (pp. 110–122). Dorset, UK: RHP.
   Google Scholar
• Fyson, R. (2009). The assessment of young people with learning disabilities who sexually abuse. In M. Calder (Ed.), Sexual abuse assessments: Using and developing frameworks for practice (pp. 180–195). Dorset, UK: RHP.
   Google Scholar
• Gilby, R., Wolf, L., & Goldberg, B. (1989). Mentally retarded adolescent sex offenders: A survey and pilot study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 34(6), 542–548. doi:10.1177/070674378903400611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, H. L., Beech, A., Print, B., Bradshaw, H., & Quayle, J. (2008). The development and initial testing of the AIM2 framework to assess risk and strengths in young people who sexually offend. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 14(3), 211–225. doi:10.1080/13552600802366593
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, H. L., & Vettor, S. (2012). Predicting sexual re-offending in a UK sample of adolescents with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 18(1), 64–80. doi:10.1080/13552600.2011.617013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, T.M, & Dempsey, R. (2018). Neuropsycholoical risk factors to consider when assessing for sexually abusive youth. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10538712.2018.1542419
   Google Scholar
• Lane, S. (1997). Special populations: Children, females, the developmentally disabled and violent youth. In G. Ryan & S. Lane (Eds.), Juvenile sexual offending: Causes, consequences, and correction (Rev ed., pp. 322–359). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, R. J., Cumming, G. F., Burchard, B. L., Zeoli, S., & Ellerby, L. (2010). Current practices and trends in sex offender management: The safer society 2009 North American survey. Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (1996). Research report: On sex offenders, victims and their families. Special edition. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 23(3/4), 71–83. doi:10.1300/J076v23n03_05
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2000). Adult and adolescent female sex offenders: Experiences compared to other females and male sex offenders. Special edition. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11(3), 75–88. doi:10.1300/J056v11n03_08
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2001). Somatic and mental symptoms of male sex offenders, A comparison among offenders, victims, and their families. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 13(3–4), 103–114. doi:10.1300/J056v13n03_08
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2009). MEGA♪: A new paradigm in protocol assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 2, 124–141. doi:10.1080/19361520902922434
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2010). MEGA♪: An ecological risk assessment tool of risk and protective factors for assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, and Trauma, 19, 734–756. doi:10.1080/10926771.2010.515542
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2012). Multiplex empirically guided inventory of ecological aggregates for assessing sexually abusive children and adolescents (Ages 4-19) – MEGA^♪ manual. San Diego, CA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2013). MEGA♪: A new paradigm in risk assessment tools for sexually abusive youth. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 623–634. doi:10.1007/s10896-013-9527-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2014). Family Lovemap, intimacies and sexually related abuse risk variables. Journal of Forensic Practice, 16(1), 3–17. doi:10.1108/JFP-03-2013-0019
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2016a). MEGA♪: Cross-validation findings on sexually abusive females: Implications for risk assessment and clinical practice. Journal of Family Violence, 31, 903–911. doi:10.1007/s10896-016-9845-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2016b, May). MEGA♪: Second cross-validation findings on sexually abusive youth. Presentation given at the Annual conference of the California Coalition on Sexual Offending (CCOSO), San Diego, CA. To request PowerPoint slides, https://www.mega-miccio-fonseca.com/
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2018a). Family Lovemap and erotically related protective factors. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Special Issue on Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth. doi:10.1080/10538712.2018.1494655
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2018b). MEGA♪: Empirical findings on the preternatural: Sexually violent and predatory sexually violent youth. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma. doi:10.1007/s40653-018-0242-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2018c, Spring). Sexually abusive youth who are transgender. Perspectives: California Coalition on Sexual Offending (CCOSO) Quarterly Newsletter, 1, 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2019a). Contemporary risk assessment tools: Should we usethem for sexually abusive children ages 4 to 12 years? Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 1–11. doi: 10.1007/s40653-019-00267-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C. (2019b). Family Lovemap, protective factors: Sex, intimacy, and sexually abusive youth. In J. L. Ireland, C. A. Ireland, & P. Birch (Eds.), Violent and sex offenders handbook (2nd ed., pp. 114–127). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2009a). Advancement in risk assessment of sexually abusive youth: Applicability of MEGA♪ to low intellectual functioning youth. Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 2(3), 161–178. doi:10.1080/19361520903120186
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2009b). New nomenclature for sexually abusive youth: Naming and assessing sexually violent and predatory offenders. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18, 106–128. doi:10.1080/10926770802616431
   Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2013). Applicability of MEGA♪: Cross-validation study to youth with low intellectual functioning. Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 6, 42–59. doi:10.1080/19315864.2011.650788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. (2014). MEGA♪: Empirical support for nomenclature on the anomalies: Sexually violent and predatory youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 1–17. doi:10.1177/030624X14533265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L. C., & Rasmussen, L. A. L. (2018). Scientific evolution of clinical and risk assessment of sexually abusive youth: A comprehensive review of empirical tools, Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Special Issue on Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth, 27, 871–900. doi:10.1080/10538712.2018.1537337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyaguchi, K., & Shirataki, S. (2014). Executive functioning problems of juvenile sex offenders with low levels of measured intelligence. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 39(3), 253–260. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.925103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentky, R., Harris, B., Frizzell, K., & Righthand, S. (2000). An actuarial procedure for assessing risk with juvenile sex offenders. Sexual Abuse, 12(2), 71–93. doi:10.1177/107906320001200201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prentky, R., & Righthand, S. (2003). Juvenile sex offender assessment Protocol-II (J-SOAP-II) manual (NCJ 202316). Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Juvenile Justice Clearinghouse. Retrieved from www.csom.org/pugs/J-SOAP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Print, B., Griffin, H., Beech, A. R., Quayle, J., Bradshaw, H., Henniker, J., & Morrison, T. (2007). AIM2: An initial assessment model for young people who display sexually harmful behaviour. Available from: J. Henniker. The AIM Project, 14 Carolina Way, Quays Reach, Salford, Manchester, M50 2ZY; E-mail: [email protected].
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, L. A. L. (2018, February). Assessing high risk sexually abusive youth: Implications for treatment, supervision, and management. Presentation at the Correctional Management Institute of Texas’ 13th Annual Conference on Managing, Galveston, Texas: Juveniles With Sexual Behavior Problems.
   Google Scholar
• Regan, K. V., Spidel, A., Gretton, H. M., Catchpole, R. E. H., & Douglas, K. S. (2007). Special needs adolescent sex offenders: Characteristics and treatment outcome. In M. Calder (Ed.), Working with children and young people who sexually abuse: Taking the field forward (pp. 123–133). Dorset, UK: RHP.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dyke, D., McBrien, D., & Sherbondy, A. (1995). Issues of sexuality in down syndrome. Down Syndrome Research and Practice, 3(2). The Down Syndrome Educational Trust. doi:10.3104/reviews.53
   Google Scholar