Is There a Protection Order to Prison Pipeline? Gendered Dimensions of Cross-Petitions

References

• Arizona Judicial Branch. (2013). Plaintiff’s guide sheet for protective orders. Phoenix: Arizona Office of the Courts. Retrieved from https://www.azcourts.gov/Portals/33/DV/AOCDVPO.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arizona Revised Statutes. (2019). §13-1202 - §13-2613; §13-3601; §13-3602.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaneo, L. B., Grossmann, J., & Chapman, A. R. (2015). The goals of IPV survivors receiving orders of protection: An application of the empowerment process model. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(17), 2889–2911. doi:10.1177/0886260515581905
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coker, D., & Macquoid, A. (2015). Why opposing hyperincarceration should be central to the work of the anti-domestic violence movement. University of Miami Race & Social Justice Law Review, 5(2), 585–618.
   Google Scholar
• Crager, M., Cousin, M., & Hardy, T. (2003). Victim-defendants: An emerging challenge in responding to domestic violence in Seattle and the King County Region. Seattle, WA: King County Coalition Against Domestic Violence.
   Google Scholar
• D.C. Coalition Against Domestic Violence. (2007). DC court watch: Fiscal year 2006 report. Washington, D.C.: author.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. (2018). Legal system abuse and coercive control. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 84–99. doi:10.1177/1748895817728380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H., & Fitzgerald, R. (2013). Legal processes and gendered violence: Cross-applications for domestic violence protection orders. UNSW Law Journal, 36(1), 56–87.
   Google Scholar
• Durfee, A. (2011). “I’m not a victim, she’s an abuser”: Masculinity, victimization, and protection orders. Gender & Society, 25(3), 316–334. doi:10.1177/0891243211404889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durfee, A. (2012). Situational ambiguity and gendered patterns of arrest for intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18, 64–84. doi:10.1177/1077801212437017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durfee, A. (2013). Mandatory arrest and intimate partner violence. In S. Mallicoat & C. Gardiner (Eds.), Criminal Justice Policy (pp. 101–120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fleury-Steiner, R. E., Fleury-Steiner, B. D., & Miller, S. L. (2011). More than a piece of paper? Protection orders as a resource for battered women. Sociology Compass, 5(7), 512–524. doi:10.1111/soco.2011.5.issue-7
   Google Scholar
• Goodmark, L. (2012). A troubled marriage: Domestic violence and the legal system. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodmark, L. (2018). Decriminalizing domestic violence: A balanced policy approach to intimate partner violence. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschel, D., Buzawa, E., Pattavina, A., & Faggiani, D. (2007). Domestic violence and mandatory arrest laws: To what extent do they influence police arrest decisions? Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 98, 254–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iovanni, L., & Miller, S. L. (2001). Criminal justice system responses to domestic violence: Law enforcement and the courts. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 303–327). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Judicial Council of California Advisory Committee on Gender Bias in the Courts. (1996). Achieving equal justice for women and men in the California courts. San Francisco: Judicial Council of California. Retrieved from http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/f-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. (2014). The mainstreaming of the criminalization critique: Reflections on VAWA 20 years later. CUNY Law Review Footnote Forum, 18(1), 52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, C. F. (1995). Full faith and credit: Interstate enforcement of protection orders under the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. Family Law Quarterly, 29(2), 253–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2009). Civil protective order outcomes: Violations and perceptions of effectiveness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(4), 675–692. doi:10.1177/0886260508317186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New evidence from the spouse assault replication program. Washington, D.C: National Institute of Justice Research in Brief. NCJ 188199.
   Google Scholar
• Messing, J. T., Ward-Lasher, A., Thaller, J., & Bagwell-Gray, M. (2015). The state of intimate partner violence intervention: Progress and continuing challenges. Social Work, 60(4), 305–313. doi:10.1093/sw/swv027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliaccio, T. A. (2001). Marginalizing the battered male. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 9(2), 205–226. doi:10.3149/jms.0902.205
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. L. (2005). Victims as offenders: The paradox of women’s violence in relationships. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S. L., & Smolter, N. L. (2011). “Paper abuse”: When all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking. Violence Against Women, 17(5), 637–650. doi:10.1177/1077801211407290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. (2018, December 15). Family of domestic violence victim resists efforts to reduce murder charge. Chicago Sun Times. Retrieved from https://chicago.suntimes.com/2018/12/15/18314819/family-of-domestic-violence-victim-resists-efforts-to-reduce-murder-charge.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy v. Okeke, 951 A.2d 783. (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Postmus, J. L., Severson, M., Berry, M., & Yoo, J. A. (2009). Women’s experiences of violence and seeking help. Violence Against Women, 15(7), 852–868. doi:10.1177/1077801209334445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renzetti, C. M. (1999). The challenges to feminism posed by women’s use of violence in intimate relationships. In S. Lamb (Ed.), New versions of victims (pp. 42–56). New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richie, B. (2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America’s prison nation. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, A. (2014). “It’s all about women when it comes to the courts”: Assessing domestic violence batterer attitudes towards protection orders and manipulation of related legal processes as a tactic of abuse. (Unpublished thesis). University of Delaware.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984). The Minneapolis domestic violence experiment. Washington, DC: Police Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.policefoundation.org/pdf/minneapolisdve.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. G., Zhang, X., Basile, K. C., Merrick, M. T., Wang, J., Kresnow, M., & Chen, J. (2018). The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2015 data brief – Updated release. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, E. (2016). Policing partner abuse and the new crime of coercive control in the United Kingdom. Family & Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly, 8(4), 345–353.
   Google Scholar
• Wangmann, J. (2009). ‘She said … ’ ‘He said … ’: Cross-applications in NSW apprehended domestic violence order proceedings. (Unpublished dissertation). University of Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Wangmann, J. (2010). Gender and intimate partner violence: A case study from NSW. UNSW Law Journal, 33(3), 945–969.
   Google Scholar
• Zorza, J. (1998). Batterer manipulation and retaliation in the courts: A largely unrecognized phenomenon sometimes encouraged by court practices. Domestic Assault Report, 3, 67.
   Google Scholar