Comparison of five wastewater COD fractionation methods for dynamic simulation of MBR systems

References

• Gatti, N.M.; García-Usach, F.; Seco, A.; Ferrer, J. Wastewater COD characterization: analysis of respirometric and physical-chemical methods for determining biodegradable organic matter fractions. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 536–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henze, M.; Gujer, W.; van Loosdrecht, M.; Mino, T. Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. Scientific and Technical Report No. 9; IWA Publishing: London (UK), 2000; 121 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Boursier, H.; Béline, F.; Paul, E. Activated Sludge Model No. 1 calibration for piggery wastewater treatment using respirometry. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 49(5–6), 389–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, S.; Hultman, B. Experiences in wastewater characterization and model calibration for the activated sludge process. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 33(12), 89–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dold, P.L.; Ekama, G.A.; Marais, G.v.R. A general model for the activated sludge process. Prog. Water Technol. 1980, 12(6), 47–77.
   Google Scholar
• Hedegard, M.; Wik, T. An online method for estimation of degradable substrate and biomass in an aerated activated sludge process. Water Res. 2011, 45, 6308–6320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeleveld, P.J.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. Experience with guidelines for wastewater characterization in The Netherlands. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45(6), 77–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delrue, F.; Choubert, J.M.; Stricker, A.E.; Spérandio, M.; Mietton-Peuchot, M.; Racault, Y. Modelling a full scale membrane bioreactor using activated sludge model No. 1: Challenges and solutions. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62(10), 2205–2217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekama, G.A.; Dold, P.; Marais, G.v.R. Procedures for determining COD fractions and the maximum specific growth rate of heterotrophs in activated sludge systems. Water Sci. Technol. 1986, 18(6), 91–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginestet, P.; Maisonnier, A.; Spérandio, M. Wastewater COD characterization: biodegradability of physicochemical fractions. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45(6), 89–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, T.; Liu, X.; Kennedy, M.D.; Schippers, J.C.; Vanrolleghem, P.A. Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No.1. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 52(10–11), 359–367.
   Google Scholar
• Sperandio, M.; Espinosa, M.C. Modelling an aerobic submerged membrane bioreactor with ASM models on a large range of sludge retention time. Desalination 2008, 231, 82–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, D. An integrated system for wastewater COD characterization: a case study. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62(4), 866–874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, H.; Klapwijk, A.; Keesman, K.J. Identification of activated sludge and wastewater characteristics using respirometric batch experiments. Water Res. 1998, 32(4), 1240–1254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekama, G.A.; Marais, G.v.R. The activated sludge process. Part II. Dynamic behaviour. Water SA 1970, 1, 18–50.
   Google Scholar
• Sollfrank, U.; Kappeler, J.; Gujer, W. Temperature effects on wastewater characterization and the release of soluble inert organic material. Water Sci. Technol. 1992, 25(6), 33–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperandio, M.; Urbain, V.; Ginestet, P.; Audic, M.J.; Paul, E. Application of COD fractionation by a new combined technique: comparison of various wastewaters and sources of variability. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43(1), 181–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henze, M. Characterization of wastewater for modeling of activated sludge processes. Water Sci. Technol. 1992, 25(6), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E.; Ginestet, P.; Sperandio, M.; Paul, E. Influence of pre-treatments and recycled flows on the COD fractions of a wastewater: a case study. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43(11), 99–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulsbeek, J.J.W.; Kruit, J.; Roeleveld, P.J.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. A practical protocol for dynamic modelling of activated sludge systems. Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45(6), 127–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basaran, S.T.; Aysel, M.; Kurt, H.; Ergal, I.; Kumru, M.; Akarsubas, A.; Sözen, S.; Orhon, D. Removal of readily biodegradable substrate in super fast membrane bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 423–424, 477–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weijers, S.R. On BOD tests for the determination of biodegradable COD calibrating activated sludge model Nº 1. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39(4), 177–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronzano, E.; Dapena, J.L. Tratamiento Biológico de las Aguas Residuales; Diaz de Santos: Madrid, 1995; 511 pp.
   Google Scholar
• APHA-AWWA-WPCF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 22nd edition; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, 2012; 1360 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Strotmann, U.J.; Geldern, A.; Kuhn, A.; Gendig, C.; Klein, S. Evaluation of a respirometric test method to determine the heterotrophic yield coefficient of activated sludge bacteria. Chemosphere 1998, 38, 3555–3570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhooren, H.; Meirlaen, J.; Amerlinck, Y.; Claeys, F.; Vangheluwe, H.; Vanrolleghem, P. A. WEST: Modelling biological wastewater treatment. J. Hydroinform. 2003, 5(1), 27–49.
   Google Scholar
• Guglielmi, G.; Andreottola, G.; Foladori, P.; Ziglio, G. Membrane bioreactors for winery wastewater treatment: case-studies at full scale. Water Sci. Technol. 2009, 60(5), 1201–1207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melcer, H.; Dold, P.L.; Jones, R.M.; Bye, C.M.; Takacs, I.; Stensel, H.D.; Wilson, A.W.; Sun, P.; Bury, S. Methods for Wastewater Characterization in Activated Sludge Modeling; Water Environment Research Foundation (WERF): Alexandria, VA, USA, 2003; 596 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sollfrank, U.; Gujer, W. Characterization of domestic wastewater for mathematical modeling of the activated sludge process. Water Sci. Technol. 1991, 23, 1057–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanjers, H.; Vanrolleghem, P.A. Respirometry as a tool for rapid characterization of wastewater and activated sludge. Water Sci. Technol. 1995, 31(2), 105–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillot, S.; Choubert, J.M. Biodegradable organic matter in domestic wastewaters: comparison of selected fractionation techniques. Water Sci. Technol. 2010, 62(3), 630–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fall, C.; Flores, N.A.; Espinoza, M.A.; Vazquez, G.; Loaiza-Návia, J.; van Loosdrecht, M.C.M.; Hooijmans, C.M. Divergence between respirometry and physicochemical methods in the fractionation of the chemical oxygen demand in municipal wastewater. Water Environ. Res. 2011, 83(2), 162–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masse, A.; Spérandio, M.; Cabassud, C. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Water Res. 2006, 40, 2405–2415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shariati, F.P.; Mehrnia, M.R.; Sarrafzadeh, M.H.; Rezaee, S.; Grasmick, A.; Heran, M. Fouling in a novel airlift oxidation ditch membrane bioreactor (AOXMBR) at different high organic loading rate. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 105, 69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Bella, G.; Mannina, G.; Viviani, G. An integrated model for physical-biological wastewater organic removal in a sMBR: Model development and parameter estimation. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 322, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuthi, M.F.R.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W.S.; Zhang, J., Liang, S. A review towards finding a simplified approach for modeling the kinetics of the soluble microbial products (SMP) in an integrated mathematical model of membrane bioreactor (MBR). Int. Biodeter. Biodegr. 2013, 85, 466–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanner, O.; Panagiotidis, V.; Clavadetscher, P.; Siegrist, H. Effect of heat recovery from raw wastewater on nitrification and nitrogen removal in activated sludge plants. Water Res. 2005, 39, 4725–4724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knerr, H.; Rechenburg, A.; Kistemann, T.; Schmitt, T.G. Performance of a MBR for the treatment of blackwater. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63(6), 1247–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar