Study on the effect of total dissolved solids (TDS) on the performance of an SBR for COD and nutrients removal

References

• Wang, Y.; Guo, G.; Wang, H.; Stephenson, T.; Guo, J.; Ye, L. Long-term impact of anaerobic reaction time on the performance and granular characteristics of granular denitrifying biological phosphorus removal systems. Water Res. 2013, 47, 14, 5326–5337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J.; Zhang, Z.; Miller, C. A laboratory scale sequencing batch reactor with the addition of acetate to remove nutrient and organic matter in pig slurry. Biosystems Eng. 2006, 93, 4, 437–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohseni-Bandpi, A.; Bazari, H. Biological treatment of dairy wastewater by sequencing batch reactor. J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng. 2004, 1, 2, 65–69.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, J. A.; Pavlostathis, S. G. Real-time monitoring and control of sequencing batch reactors for secondary treatment of a poultry processing wastewater. Water Environ. Res. 2000, 72, 5, 585–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoutberg, G. R.; Eker, Z. Anaerobic treatment of potato processing wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 40, 1, 297–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franta, J.; Wilderer, P. Biological treatment of papermill wastewater by sequencing batch reactor technology to reduce residual organics. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 35, 1, 129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neczaj, E.; Kacprzak, M.; Kamizela, T.; Lach, J.; Okoniewska, E. Sequencing batch reactor system for the co-treatment of landfill leachate and dairy wastewater. Desalination 2008, 222, 1, 404–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolard, C.; Irvine, R. Treatment of hypersaline wastewater in the sequencing batch reactor. Water Res. 1995, 29, 4, 1159–1168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C. H.; Hao, O. J. Sequencing batch reactor system for nutrient removal: Orp and ph profiles. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 1996, 67, 1, 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obaja, D.; Mace, S.; Costa, J.; Sans, C.; Mata-Alvarez, J. Nitrification, denitrification and biological phosphorus removal in piggery wastewater using a sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 87, 1, 103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, O.; Vasudevan, N.; Torrijos, M.; Thanasekaran, K.; Moletta, R. Halophilic biological treatment of tannery soak liquor in a sequencing batch reactor. Water Res. 2005, 39, 8, 1471–1480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, O.; Vasudevan, N.; Torrijos, M.; Thanasekaran, K.; Moletta, R. Anaerobic digestion of tannery soak liquor with an aerobic post-treatment. Water Res. 2006, 40, 7, 1492–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, X.; Lefebvre, O.; Ng, K. K.; Ng, H. Y. Sequential anaerobic–aerobic treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater with high salinity. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 153, 79–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akan, J. C.; Abdulrahman, F. I.; Yusuf, E. Physical and chemical parameters in abattoir wastewater sample, maiduguri metropolis, Nigeria. Pacific J. Sci. Technol. 2010, 11, 1, 640–648.
   Google Scholar
• Pendashteh, A. R.; Abdullah, L. C.; Fakhru'l-Razi, A.; Madaeni, S. S.; Abidin, Z. Z.; Biak, D. R. A. Evaluation of membrane bioreactor for hypersaline oily wastewater treatment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2012, 90, 1, 45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moussavi, G.; Barikbin, B.; Mahmoudi, M. The removal of high concentrations of phenol from saline wastewater using aerobic granular sbr. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 158, 3, 498–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pophali, G.; Kaul, S.; Mathur, S. Influence of hydraulic shock loads and tds on the performance of large-scale cetps treating textile effluents in india. Water Res. 2003, 37, 2, 353–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y.; Song, X.; Wang, Y.; Yan, D. Effects of dissolved oxygen and influent cod/n ratios on nitrogen removal in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland. Ecol. Eng. 2012, 46, 107–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grey, G.; Schillinger, G.; Anderson, K. Investigation of the impact of a high salt wastewater on biological nitrification. Proc. Water Environ. Fed. 2008, 2008, 17, 239–252.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, I.; Sliekers, O.; Schmid, M.; Bock, E.; Fuerst, J.; Kuenen, J. G.; Jetten, M. S.; Strous, M. New concepts of microbial treatment processes for the nitrogen removal in wastewater. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003, 27, 4, 481–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, C. P. L.; Daigger, G. T.; Lim, H. C. Biological nutrient removal. In Biological Wastewater Treatment; New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc., 1999, pp 489–491.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. L.; Zeng, R. J.; Giugliano, V.; Blackall, L. L. Challenges for simultaneous nitrification, denitrification, and phosphorus removal in microbial aggregates: Mass transfer limitation and nitrous oxide production. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2005, 52, 3, 329–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, Z.; Yang, F.; An, Y.; Xue, Y. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification coupled with phosphorus removal in an modified anoxic/oxic-membrane bioreactor (a/o-mbr). Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 43, 2, 191–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gieseke, A.; Arnz, P.; Amann, R.; Schramm, A. Simultaneous p and n removal in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor: Insights from reactor-and microscale investigations. Water Res. 2002, 36, 2, 501–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surmacz-Gorska, J.; Gernaey, K.; Demuynck, C.; Vanrolleghem, P.; Verstraete, W. Nitrification monitoring in activated sludge by oxygen uptake rate (our) measurements. Water Res. 1996, 30, 5, 1228–1236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Ochoa, F.; Gomez, E.; Santos, V. E.; Merchuk, J. C. Oxygen uptake rate in microbial processes: An overview. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 49, 3, 289–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremier, A.; De Guardia, A.; Massiani, C.; Paul, E.; Martel, J. A respirometric method for characterising the organic composition and biodegradation kinetics and the temperature influence on the biodegradation kinetics, for a mixture of sludge and bulking agent to be co-composted. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 2, 169–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar