References
- Mao, C.; Feng, Y.; Wang, X.; Ren, G. Review on Research Achievements of Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy. Rev. 2015, 45, 540–555. [Database] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032.
- IBGE. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Municipal Livestock Production. 2019. https://agenciadenoticias.ibge.gov.br/agencia-noticias/2012-agencia-de-noticias/noticias/24826-aquisicao-de-leite-atinge-6-2-bilhoes-de-litros-e-tem-melhor-1-tri-desde-1997 (accessed Jan 7, 2020).
- Mendonça, H. V.; Ometto, J. P. H. B.; Otenio, M. H.; Dos Reis, A. J. D.; Marques, I. P. R. Bioenergy Recovery from Cattle Wastewater in an UASB-AF Hybrid Reactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2017, 76, 2268–2279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2017.325.
- Correa, J. V.; Khanal, S.; Manandhar, A.; Shah, A. Anaerobic Digestion for Bioenergy Production: Global Status, Environmental and Techno-Economic Implications, and Government Policies. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 247, 1015–1026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.004.
- Iwasaki, M.; Qi, G.; Endo, Y.; Pan, Z.; Yamashiro, T.; Andriamanohiarisoamanana, F. J.; Ihara, I.; Umetsu, K. Quantity Changes in Pseudomonas Species in Dairy Manure during Anaerobic Digestion at Mesophilic and Thermophilic Temperatures. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2019, 21, 423–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-018-0800-z.
- Zealand, A. M.; Mei, R.; Papachristodoulou, P.; Roskilly, A. P.; Liu, W. T.; Graham, D. W. Microbial Community Composition and Diversity in Rice Straw Digestion Bioreactors with and without Dairy Manure. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 8599–8612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9243-7.
- Hidalgo, D.; Martín-Marroquín, J. M. Effects of Inoculum Source and Co-Digestion Strategies on Anaerobic Digestion of Residues Generated in the Treatment of Waste Vegetable Oils. J. Environ. Manage. 2014, 142, 17–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.004.
- Zamanzadeh, M.; Hagen, L. H.; Svensson, K.; Linjordet, R.; Horn, S. J. Biogas Production from Food Waste via Co-Digestion and Digestion - Effects on Performance and Microbial Ecology. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15784-w.
- Khalid, Z. B.; Siddique, M. N. I.; Nasrullah, M.; Singh, L.; Wahid, Z. B. A.; Ahmad, M. F. Application of Solar Assisted Bioreactor for Biogas Production from Palm Oil Mill Effluent Co-Digested with Cattle Manure. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2019, 16, 100446. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2019.100446.
- Tallou, A.; Salcedo, F. P.; Haouas, A.; Jamali, M. Y.; Atif, K.; Aziz, F.; Amir, S. Assessment of Biogas and Biofertilizer Produced from Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Olive Mill Wastewater with Municipal Wastewater and Cow Dung. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 20, 101152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2020.101152.
- Qin, X.; Ji, M.; Wu, X.; Li, C.; Gao, Y.; Li, J.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Z. Response of Treatment Performance and Microbial Community Structure to the Temporary Suspension of an Industrial Anaerobic bioreactor. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 646, 229–237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.309.
- Resende, J. A.; Silva, V. L.; Oliveira, T. L. R.; Fortunato, S. O.; Carneiro, J. C.; Otenio, M. H.; Diniz, C. G. Prevalence and Persistence of Potentially Pathogenic and Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria during Anaerobic Digestion Treatment of Cattle Manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 153, 284–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.007.
- Rosa, P. R. F.; Santos, S. C.; Sakamoto, I. K.; Varesche, M. B. A.; Silva, E. L. Hydrogen Production from Cheese Whey with Ethanol-Type Fermentation: Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on the Microbial Community Composition. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 161, 10–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.020.
- Antonelli, J.; Lindino, C. A.; Azevedo, J. C. R.; Souza, S. N. M.; Cremonez, P. A.; Rossi, E. Biogas Production by the Anaerobic Digestion of Whey. Rev. Cien. Agric. 2017, 39, 463–467. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19084/RCA15087.
- Ghasemi, M.; Ahmad, A.; Jafary, T.; Azad, A. K.; Kakooei, S.; Wan Daud, W. R.; Sedighi, M. Assessment of Immobilized Cell Reactor and Microbial Fuel Cell for Simultaneous Cheese Whey Treatment and Lactic Acid/Electricity Production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 9107–9155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.136.
- Thien, V. N. T.; Hung, D. V.; Hoa, N. T. T. An A2O-MBR System for Simultaneous Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal from Brewery Wastewater. Sci. Tech. Dev. J. Sci. Earth Environ. 2019, 3, 12–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjsee.v3i1.507.
- Silva, A. C. F. M. Tratamento de resíduos líquidos de laticínios em reator anaeróbio compartimentado seguido de leitos cultivados. State University of Campinas: Campinas, 2010. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/bitstream/REPOSIP/256905/1/Silva_AnaCristinaFerreiraMoreirada_D.pdf (accessed Nov 27, 2019).
- Corsino, S. F.; Biase, A.; Devlin, T. R.; Munz, G.; Torregrossa, M.; Oleszkiewicz, J. A. Effect of Extended Famine Conditions on Aerobic Granular Sludge Stability in the Treatment of Brewery Wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 226, 150–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.12.026.
- Arantes, M. K. Produção de Biohidrogênio em reator anaeróbio operado em bateladas sequenciais com biomassa imobilizada (AnSBBR) a partir de água residuária de cervejaria. State University of Western Paraná: Toledo, 2018. http://tede.unioeste.br/bitstream/tede/3965/2/Mabel_Arantes_2018.pdf (accessed Jan 7, 2020).
- Bi, S.; Hong, X.; Yang, H.; Yu, X.; Fang, S.; Bai, Y.; Liu, J.; Gao, Y.; Yan, L.; Wang, W.; Wang, Y. Effect of Hydraulic Retention Time on Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cattle Manure and Food Waste. Renew. Energy 2020, 150, 213–220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.091.
- Wei, Y.; Yuan, H.; Wachemo, A.; Li, X. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Cattle Manure and Liquid Fraction of Digestate (LFD) Pretreated Corn Stover: Pretreatment Process Optimization and Evolution of Microbial Community Structure. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 296, 122282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122282.
- Choi, H.; Kim, J.; Lee, C. Enhancement of Methanogenic Biodegradation of Tetramethylammonium Hydroxide Wastewater by co-Digestion with Ethyl Lactate Wastewater. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 21, 101372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2021.101372.
- Resende, J. A.; Godon, J. J.; Bonnafous, A.; Arcuri, P. B.; Silva, V. L.; Otenio, M. H.; Diniz, C. G. Seasonal Variation on Microbial Community and Methane Production during Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle Manure in Brazil. Microb. Ecol. 2016, 71, 735–746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-015-0647-y.
- Fernandes, A. J. Variáveis microbiológicas e físico-químicas em biodigestores anaeróbios escala piloto alimentados com dejetos de bovinos leiteiros e suínos. Graduate Program in Science and Technology of Milk and Derivatives. Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil: Federal University of Juiz de Fora, 2016. http://www.ufjf.br/mestradoleite/files/2016/12/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o-Final3.pdf (accessed Jan 30, 2020).
- Moura, S. C. N. Identificação e perfil de susceptibilidade a antimicrobianos de bactérias isoladas de biodigestores anaeróbios operados com dejetos suínos e com dejetos bovinos. Graduate Program in Science and Technology of Milk and Derivatives. Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil: Federal University of Juiz de Fora, 2017. http://www.ufjf.br/mestradoleite/files/2017/06/Disserta%C3%A7%C3%A3o-Final1.pdf (accessed Jan 30, 2020).
- Tufaner, F.; Avşar, Y. Effects of Co-Substrate on Biogas Production from Cattle Manure: A Review. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 13, 2303–2312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-016-1069-1.
- Johnson, S. A. Culturability of Potential Pathogenic Bacteria in a Co-Digestion Anaerobic Digester System. University of Wisconsin Oshkosh: Oshkosh, 2017. http://digital.library.wisc.edu/1793/77922 (accessed Jan 7, 2020).
- Appels, L.; Baeyens, J.; Degrève, J.; Dewil, R. Principles and Potential of the Anaerobic Digestion of Waste-Activated Sludge. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2008, 34, 755–781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002.
- Collins, C. H.; Braga, G. L.; Bonato, P. S. Introdução a Métodos Cromatográficos. Ed. Unicamp, Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil. 1997; Vol. 7, pp 279. https://pt.scribd.com/document/363716263/Introducao-a-Metodos-Cromatograficos-7%C2%AA-edicao-1997-Carol-H-Collins-Gilberto-L-Braga-Pierina-S-Bonato-pdf (accessed Jan 7, 2020).
- Anvisa. Descrição dos Meios de Cultura Empregados nos Exames Microbiológicos, 2004. http://www.anvisa.gov.br/servicosaude/microbiologia/mod_4_2004.pdf (accessed Aug 21, 2019).
- Divya, D.; Gopinath, L. R.; Christy, P. M. A Review on Current Aspects and Diverse Prospects for Enhancing Biogas Production in Sustainable Means. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 690–699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.055.
- Manyi-Loh, C.; Mamphweli, S.; Meyer, E.; Okoh, A. Characterizing Bacteria and Methanogens in a Balloon-Type Digester Fed with Dairy Cattle Manure for Anaerobic Mono-Digestion. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2019, 28, 1287–1293. DOI.org/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/76180.
- Guillaume, S.; Lendormi, T. Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Dairy Cattle Slurry and Agro‐Industrial Fats: Effect of Fat Ratio on the Digester Efficiency. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2015, 93, 304–308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.22118.
- Alkaya, E.; Demirer, G. N. Anaerobic Acidification of Sugar-Beet Processing Wastes: Effect of Operational Parameters. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 32–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.002.
- Zuo, Z.; Wu, S.; Zhang, W.; Dong, R. Effects of Organic Loading Rate and Effluent Recirculation on the Performance of Two-Stage Anaerobic Digestion of Vegetable Waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 146, 556–561. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.128.
- Zeshan, Karthikeyan, O. P.; Visvanathan, C. Effect of C/N Ratio and Ammonia-N Accumulation in a Pilot-Scale Thermophilic Dry Anaerobic Digester. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113, 294–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.028.
- Naik, L.; Gebreegziabher, Z.; Tumwesige, V.; Balana, B. B.; Mwirigi, J.; Austin, G. Factors Determining the Stability and Productivity of Small Scale Anaerobic Digesters. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 70, 51–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.055.
- Karlsson, T.; Konrad, O.; Lumi, M.; Schmeier, N. P.; Marder, M.; Casaril, C. E.; Koch, F. F.; Pedroso, A. G. Manual Básico, P. de Biogás. Ed. Univates: Lajeado, 2014. https://www.univates.br/editora-univates/media/publicacoes/71/pdf_71.pdf (accessed Jan 7, 2020).
- Piñas, J. A. V.; Venturini, O. J.; Lora, E. E. S.; Roalcaba, O. D. C. R. Technical Assessment of Mono-Digestion and Co-Digestion Systems for the Production of Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion in Brazil. Renew. Energy 2018, 117, 447–458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.10.085.
- Wagner, A. O.; Lins, P.; Malin, C.; Reitschuler, C.; Illmer, P. Impact of Protein-, Lipid- and Cellulose-Containing Complex Substrates on Biogas Production and Microbial Communities in Batch Experiments. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 458–460, 256–266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.034.
- Kallistova, A. Y.; Goel, G.; Nozhevnikova, A. N. Microbial Diversity of Methanogenic Communities in the Systems for Anaerobic Treatment of Organic Waste. Microbiol 2014, 83, 462–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261714050142.
- Kim, W.; Hwang, K.; Shin, S. G.; Lee, S.; Hwang, S. Effect of High Temperature on Bacterial Community Dynamics in Anaerobic Acidogenesis Using Mesophilic Sludge Inoculum. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, S17–S22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.029.
- Hagos, K.; Zong, J.; Li, D.; Liu, C.; Lu, X. Anaerobic Co-Digestion Process for Biogas Production: Progress, Challenges and Perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 76, 1485–1496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.184.
- Li, Y. F.; Abraham, C.; Nelson, M. C.; Chen, P. H.; Graf, J.; Yu, Z. Effect of Organic Loading on the Microbiota in a Temperature-Phased Anaerobic Digestion (TPAD) System Co-Digesting Dairy Manure and Waste Whey. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 8777–8792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6738-3.
- Toumi, J.; Miladi, B.; Farhat, A.; Nouira, S.; Hamdi, M.; Gtari, M.; Bouallagui, H. Microbial Ecology Overview during Anaerobic Codigestion of Dairy Wastewater and Cattle Manure and Use in Agriculture of Obtained Bio-Fertilisers. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 198, 141–149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.004.
- Treu, L.; Tsapekos, P.; Peprah, M.; Campanaro, S.; Giacomini, A.; Corich, V.; Kougias, P. G.; Angelidaki, I. Microbial Profiling during Anaerobic Digestion of Cheese Whey in Reactors Operated at Different Conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 275, 375–385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.084.
- Vindis, P.; Stajnko, D.; Lakota, M. Options for Reduction of Maize Silage in Biogas Plant Drazenci. In DAAAM International Scientific Book; Katalinic, B. Ed. 2014; Chap 9, pp 121–130. Vienna, Austria: DAAAM International DOI: https://doi.org/10.2507/daaam.scibook.2014.09. ISBN 978-3-901509-98-8, ISSN 1726- 9687
- Rabii, A.; Aldin, S.; Dahman, Y.; Elbeshbishy, E. A Review on Anaerobic Co-Digestion with a Focus on the Microbial Populations and the Effect of Multi-Stage Digester Configuration. Energies 2019, 12, 1106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12061106.
- Vanwonterghem, I.; Jensen, P. D.; Dennis, P. G.; Hugenholtz, P.; Rabaey, K.; Tyson, G. W. Deterministic Processes Guide Long-Term Synchronised Population Dynamics in Replicate Anaerobic Digesters. ISME J. 2014, 8, 2015–2028. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.50.
- Sun, C.; Cao, W. X.; Banks, C. J.; Heaven, S.; Liu, R. H. Biogas Production from Undiluted Chicken Manure and Maize Silage: A Study of Ammonia Inhibition in High Solids Anaerobic Digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 218, 1215–1223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.082
- Hagen, L. H.; Frank, J. A.; Zamanzadeh, M.; Eijsink, V. G.; Pope, P. B.; Horn, S. J.; Arntzen, M. O. Quantitative Metaproteomics Highlight the Metabolic Contributions of Uncultured Phylotypes in a Thermophilic Anaerobic Digester. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2017, 83 (2). e01955–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01955-16.