Evaluating Al-based coagulants for drinking water facilities using Jar test and CCD/RSM analysis

References

• Ewerts, H.; Swanepoel, A.; Du Preez, H. Efficacy of Conventional Drinking Water Treatment Processes in Removing Problem-Causing Phytoplankton and Associated Organic Compounds. WSA 2013, 39, 739–750. DOI: 10.4314/wsa.v39i5.19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui, H.; Huang, X.; Yu, Z.; Chen, P.; Cao, X. Application Progress of Enhanced Coagulation in Water Treatment. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 20231–20244. DOI: 10.1039/d0ra02979c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeon, W. R.; Muldowney, J. J. Evaluating Alternative Coagulants to Determine Efficiency and Cost Effectiveness. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1987, 79, 71–75. DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1987.tb02946.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, P.; Sharp, E.; Pidou, M.; Molinder, R.; Parsons, S. A.; Jefferson, B. Comparison of Coagulation Performance and Floc Properties Using a Novel Zirconium Coagulant against Traditional Ferric and Alum Coagulants. Water Res. 2012, 46, 4179–4187. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.04.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Gao, B.; Zhao, Q. Enhanced Algae Removal by ti-Based Coagulant: Comparison with Conventional al-and fe-Based Coagulants. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 13147–13158. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1482-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur, A. K.; Kumar, R.; Chaudhari, P.; Shankar, R. Removal of Heavy Metals Using Bentonite Clay and Inorganic Coagulants. In Removal of Emerging Contaminants Through Microbial Processes; Singapore: Springer, 2021; pp. 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J.-Q. The Role of Coagulation in Water Treatment. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2015, 8, 36–44. DOI: 10.1016/j.coche.2015.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suquet, J.; Godo-Pla, L.; Valentí, M.; Verdaguer, M.; Martin, M. J.; Poch, M.; Monclús, H. Development of an Environmental Decision Support System for Enhanced Coagulation in Drinking Water Production. Water 2020, 12, 2115. DOI: 10.3390/w12082115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya, S. Central Composite Design for Response Surface Methodology and its Application in Pharmacy. In Response Surface Methodology in Engineering Science; London: IntechOpen, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, M.; Liana, A. E.; Liu, S.; Lim, M.; Chow, C. W.; Wang, D.; Drikas, M.; Amal, R. Preparation and Characterisation of New-Polyaluminum Chloride-Chitosan Composite Coagulant. Water Res. 2012, 46, 4614–4620. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCurdy, K.; Carlson, K.; Gregory, D. Floc Morphology and Cyclic Shearing Recovery: Comparison of Alum and Polyaluminum Chloride Coagulants. Water Res. 2004, 38, 486–494. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2003.10.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, F.; Chen, Y.; Kuschk, P.; Wang, X. Regulation of Aerobic Granular Sludge Reformulation after Granular Sludge Broken: Effect of Poly Aluminum Chloride (Pac). Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 158, 201–208. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epa, E. P. A. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Long Term 1 Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule. Final Rule. Fed. Regist. 2002, 67, 1811–1844.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann, E. L.; Romano, J. P. Testing Statistical Hypotheses; New York: Springer, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Moorthy, I. G.; Maran, J. P.; Muneeswari, S.; Naganyashree, S.; Shivamathi, C. Response Surface Optimization of Ultrasound Assisted Extraction of Pectin from Pomegranate Peel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 72, 1323–1328. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.10.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper, N. R.; Smith, H. Applied Regression Analysis, 3rd ed., New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Stagni, L.; Lizzio, R. Shape Effects in the Interaction between an Edge Dislocation and an Elliptical Inhomogeneity. Appl. Phys. A. 1983, 30, 217–221. DOI: 10.1007/BF00614769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairul Zaman, N.; Rohani, R.; Izni Yusoff, I.; Kamsol, M. A.; Basiron, S. A.; Abd. Rashid, A. I. Eco-Friendly Coagulant versus Industrially Used Coagulants: Identification of Their Coagulation Performance, Mechanism and Optimization in Water Treatment Process. IJERPH 2021, 18, 9164. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18179164.
   Google Scholar
• Fard, M. B.; Hamidi, D.; Yetilmezsoy, K.; Alavi, J.; Hosseinpour, F. Utilization of Alyssum Mucilage as a Natural Coagulant in Oily-Saline Wastewater Treatment. J. Water Process Eng. 2021, 40, 101763. DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arruda, P. M.; Pereira-Filho, E. R.; Libânio, M.; Fagnani, E. Response Surface Methodology Applied to Tropical Freshwater Treatment. Environ. Technol. 2020, 41, 901–911. DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2018.1514072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foroughi, M.; Chavoshi, S.; Bagheri, M.; Yetilmezsoy, K.; Samadi, M. T. Alum-Based Sludge (Abs) Recycling for Turbidity Removal in Drinking Water Treatment: An Insight into Statistical, Technical, and Health-Related Standpoints. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2018, 20, 1999–2017. DOI: 10.1007/s10163-018-0746-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berube, D.; Dorea, C. Optimizing Alum Coagulation for Turbidity, Organics, and Residual al Reductions. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2008, 8, 505–511. DOI: 10.2166/ws.2008.090.
   Google Scholar
• Ghernaout, D.; Alghamdi, A.; Aichouni, M.; Touahmia, M. The Lethal Water Tri-Therapy: Chlorine, Alum, and Polyelectrolyte. WJAC 2018, 3, 65–71. DOI: 10.11648/j.wjac.20180302.14.
   Google Scholar
• Zouboulis, A.; Traskas, G.; Samaras, P. Comparison of Efficiency between Poly‐Aluminium Chloride and Aluminium Sulphate Coagulants during Full‐Scale Experiments in a Drinking Water Treatment Plant. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2008, 43, 1507–1519. DOI: 10.1080/01496390801940903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar