The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Strategic Plan for Evaluating the Toxicity of Chemicals

REFERENCES

• Coecke , S. , Goldberg , A. M. , Allen , S. , Buzanska , L. , Calamandrei , G. , Crofton , K. , Hareng , L. , Hartung , T. , Knaut , H. , Honegger , P. , Jacobs , M. , Lein , P. , Li , A. , Mundy , W. , Owen , D. , Schneider , S. , Silbergeld , E. , Reum , T. , Trnovec , T. , Monnet-Tschudi , F. and Bal-Price , A. 2007 . Workgroup report: Incorporating in vitro alternative methods for developmental neurotoxicity into international hazard and risk assessment strategies . Environ. Health Perspect. , 115 : 924 – 931 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins , F. S. , Gray , G. M. and Bucher , J. R. 2008 . Transforming environmental health protection . Science , 319 : 906 – 907 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dix , D. J. , Houck , K. A. , Martin , M. T. , Richard , A. M. , Setzer , R. W. and Kavlock , R. J. 2007 . The ToxCast program for prioritizing toxicity testing of environmental chemicals . Toxicol. Sci. , 95 : 5 – 12 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards , S. W. and Preston , R. J. 2008 . Systems biology and mode of action based risk assessment . Toxicol. Sci. , 106 : 312 – 318 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyton , K. Z. , Kyle , A. D. , Aubrecht , J. , Cogliano , V. J. , Eastmond , D. A. , Jackson , M. , Keshava , N. , Sandy , M. S. , Sonawane , B. , Zhang , L. , Waters , M. D. and Smith , M. T. 2009 . Improving prediction of chemical carcinogenicity by considering multiple mechanisms and applying toxicogenomic approaches . Mutat. Res. , 681 : 230 – 240 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). 1997. Integrated Risk Information System [online] http://www.epa.gov/ncea/iris/index.html (Accessed: 13 January 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• Judson , R. , Richard , A. , Dix , D. , Houck , K. , Elloumi , F. , Martin , M. , Cathey , T. , Transue , T. R. , Spencer , R. and Wolf , M. 2008 . ACToR—Aggregated Computational Toxicology Resource . Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. , 233 : 7 – 13 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavlock , R. J. , Dix , D. J. , Houck , K. A. , Judson , R. S. , Martin , M. T. and Richard , A. M. 2008a . ToxCastTM: Developing predictive signatures for chemical toxicity . Altern. Anim. Test. Exp. , 14 : 623 – 627 .
   Google Scholar
• Kavlock , R. J. , Ankley , G. , Blancato , J. , Breen , M. , Conolly , R. , Dix , D. , Houck , K. , Hubal , E. , Judson , R. , Rabinowitz , J. , Richard , A. , Setzer , R. W. , Shah , I. , Villeneuve , D. and Weber , E. 2008b . Computational toxicology—A state of the science mini review . Toxicol. Sci. , 103 : 14 – 27 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudsen , T. B. and Kavlock , R. J. 2008 . “ Comparative bioinformatics and computational toxicology ” . In Developmental toxicology , Edited by: Hansen , D. K. and Abbot , B. D. 311 – 360 . New York : Informa Healthcare USA .
   Google Scholar
• Lein , P. , Locke , P. and Goldberg , A. 2007 . Meeting report: Alternatives for developmental neurotoxicity testing . Environ. Health Perspect. , 115 : 764 – 768 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council . 2006 . Toxicity testing for assessment of environmental agents: Interim report , Washington, DC : National Academies Press .
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council . 2007 . Toxicity testing in the 21st century: A vision and a strategy , Washington, DC : National Academies Press .
   Google Scholar
• Shi , L. , Reid , L. H. , Jones , W. D. , Shippy , R. , Warrington , J. A. , Baker , S. C. , Collins , P. J. , De , L. F. , Kawasaki , E. S. , Lee , K. Y. , Luo , Y. , Sun , Y. A. , Willey , J. C. , Setterquist , R. A. , Fischer , G. M. , Tong , W. , Dragan , Y. P. , Dix , D. J. , Frueh , F. W. , Goodsaid , F. M. , Herman , D. , Jensen , R. V. , Johnson , C. D. , Lobenhofer , E. K. , Puri , R. K. , Schrf , U. , Thierry-Mieg , J. , Wang , C. , Wilson , M. , Wolber , P. K. , Zhang , L. , Amur , S. , Bao , W. , Barbacioru , C. C. , Lucas , A. B. , Bertholet , V. , Boysen , C. , Bromley , B. , Brown , D. , Brunner , A. , Canales , R. , Cao , X. M. , Cebula , T. A. , Chen , J. J. , Cheng , J. , Chu , T. M. , Chudin , E. , Corson , J. , Corton , J. C. , Croner , L. J. , Davies , C. , Davison , T. S. , Delenstarr , G. , Deng , X. , Dorris , D. , Eklund , A. C. , Fan , X. H. , Fang , H. , Fulmer-Smentek , S. , Fuscoe , J. C. , Gallagher , K. , Ge , W. , Guo , L. , Guo , X. , Hager , J. , Haje , P. K. , Han , J. , Han , T. , Harbottle , H. C. , Harris , S. C. , Hatchwell , E. , Hauser , C. A. , Hester , S. , Hong , H. , Hurban , P. , Jackson , S. A. , Ji , H. , Knight , C. R. , Kuo , W. P. , LeClerc , J. E. , Levy , S. , Li , Q. Z. , Liu , C. , Liu , Y. , Lombardi , M. J. , Ma , Y. , Magnuson , S. R. , Maqsodi , B. , McDaniel , T. , Mei , N. , Myklebost , O. , Ning , B. , Novoradovskaya , N. , Orr , M. S. , Osborn , T. W. , Papallo , A. , Patterson , T. A. , Perkins , R. G. , Peters , E. H. , Peterson , R. , Philips , K. L. , Pine , P. S. , Pusztai , L. , Qian , F. , Ren , H. , Rosen , M. , Rosenzweig , B. A. , Samaha , R. R. , Schena , M. , Schroth , G. P. , Shchegrova , S. , Smith , D. D. , Staedtler , F. , Su , Z. , Sun , H. , Szallasi , Z. , Tezak , Z. , Thierry-Mieg , D. , Thompson , K. L. , Tikhonova , I. , Turpaz , Y. , Vallanat , B. , Van , C. , Walker , S. J. , Wang , S. J. , Wang , Y. , Wolfinger , R. , Wong , A. , Wu , J. , Xiao , C. , Xie , Q. , Xu , J. , Yang , W. , Zhang , L. , Zhong , S. , Zong , Y. and Slikker , W. Jr. 2006 . The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements . Nat. Biotechnol. , 24 : 1151 – 1161 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1995a. Memorandum: EPA risk characterization program. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www. epa.gov/oswer/riskassessment/pdf/1995_0521_ risk_characterization_program.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1995b. Ecological risk: A primer for risk managers. EPA/734/R-95/001. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/nscep
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=12460
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1999. Policy and procedures on protection of human research subjects in EPA conducted or supported research. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/oamrtpnc/forms/1000_17a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002a. A review of the reference dose and reference concentration processes. EPA/630/P-02/002F. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa. gov/ncea/iris/RFD_FINAL[1].pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002b. Interim policy on genomics. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/osa/spc/genomics.htm
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2002c. Guidelines for ensuring and maximizing the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity, osf information disseminated by the Environmental Protection Agency. EPA/260R-02-008. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/quality/informationguidelines/documents/EPA_InfoQualityGuidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. A framework for a computational toxicology research program. EPA 600/R-03/065. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa. gov/comptox/publications/comptoxframe work06_02_04.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2004. Potential implications of genomics for regulatory and risk assessment applications at EPA. EPA 100/B-04/002. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/osa/pdfs/EPA-Genomics- White-Paper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2005. National Center for Computational Toxicology (NCCT) [online] http://www.epa.gov/comptox (Accessed: 13 January 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006a. Protections for subjects in human research. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-GENERAL/2006/February/Day-06/g1045.htm
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2006b. Peer review handbook, 3rd ed. EPA/100/B-06/002. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www. epa.gov/peerreview/pdfs/Peer%20Review%20 HandbookMay06.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007a. Interim guidance for microarray-based assays: Data submission, quality, analysis, management, and training considerations. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency http://www.epa. gov/osa/spc/pdfs/epa_interim_guidance_for_microarray-based_assays-external-review_draft.pdf (www.epa.gov/osa/spc/pdfs/epa_interim_guidance_for_microarray-based_assays-external-review_draft.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2007b. ToxCast™ program [online] http://www.epa.gov/ncct/toxcast (Accessed: 13 January 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Memorandum of understanding [online] http://www.epa. gov/comptox/articles/comptox_mou.html (Accessed: 13 January 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2009. Sustainable futures [online] http://www.epa.gov/oppt/sf (Accessed: 13 January 2010 ).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2010. Guidance and tools [online] http://www.epa.gov/risk/guidance.htm (Accessed: 13 January 2010 ).
   Google Scholar