Current opinion on risk assessment of cosmetics

References

• Ahlberg, E., A. Amberg, L. D. Beilke, D. Bower, K. P. Cross, L. Custer, K. A. Ford, J. Van Gompel, J. Harvey, M. Honma, et al. 2016. Extending (Q)SARs to incorporate proprietary knowledge for regulatory purposes: A case study using aromatic amine mutagenicity. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 77:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, U., Z. Ahmad, A. A. Khan, J. Akhtar, S. P. Singh, and F. J. Ahmad. 2018. Strategies in development and delivery of nanotechnology based cosmetic products. Drug Research 68 (10):545–52. doi:10.1055/a-0582-9372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alajlouni, A. M., A. J. Al Malahmeh, R. Kiwamoto, S. Wesseling, A. E. Soffers, A. A. Al-Subeihi, J. Vervoort, and I. M. Rietjens. 2016. Mode of action based risk assessment of the botanical food-borne alkenylbenzene apiol from parsley using physiologically based kinetic (PBK) modelling and read-across from safrole. Food Chem. Toxicol. 89:138–50. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2016.01.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, M. E., P. D. McMullen, M. B. Phillips, M. Yoon, S. N. Pendse, H. J. Clewell, J. K. Hartman, M. Moreau, R. A. Becker, and R. A. Clewell. 2019. Developing context appropriate toxicity testing approaches using new alternative methods (NAMs). ALTEX 36 (4):523–34. doi:10.14573/altex.1906261.
   Google Scholar
• Avila, A. M., I. Bebenek, J. A. Bonzo, T. Bourcier, K. L. Davis Bruno, D. B. Carlson, J. Dubinion, I. Elayan, W. Harrouk, S. L. Lee, et al. 2020. An FDA/CDER perspective on nonclinical testing strategies: Classical toxicology approaches and new approach methodologies (NAMs). Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 114:104662. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhaus, T., R. Altenburger, M. Faust, D. Frein, T. Frische, P. Johansson, A. Kehrer, and T. Porsbring. 2013. Proposal for environmental mixture risk assessment in the context of the biocidal product authorization in the EU. Environ. Sci. Eur. 25 (1):1–9. doi:10.1186/2190-4715-25-4.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, N., J. Madden, A. Paini, M. Mathea, A. D. Palmer, S. Sperber, T. Hartung, and B. Van Ravenzwaay. 2020. Key read across framework components and biology based improvements. Mutat. Res. 853:503172. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2020.503172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltazar, M., S. Cable, P. Carmichael, R. Cubberley, T. Cull, M. Delagrange, M. Dent, S. Hatherell, J. Houghton, and P. Kukic. 2020. A Next-Generation Risk Assessment Case Study for Coumarin in Cosmetic Products. Toxicol. Sci. 176 (1):236–52. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfaa048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, J., M. Wang, X. Ning, Y. Zhou, Y. He, J. Yang, X. Gao, S. Li, Z. Ding, and B. Chen. 2015. Phthalate concentrations in personal care products and the cumulative exposure to female adults and infants in shanghai. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 78 (5):325–41. doi:10.1080/15287394.2014.968696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartosova, L., and J. Bajgar. 2012. Transdermal drug delivery in vitro using diffusion cells. Curr. Med. Chem. 19 (27):4671–77. doi:10.2174/092986712803306358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berggren, E., P. Amcoff, R. Benigni, K. Blackburn, E. Carney, M. Cronin, H. Deluyker, F. Gautier, R. S. Judson, G. E. Kass, et al. 2015. Chemical safety assessment using read-across: Assessing the use of novel testing methods to strengthen the evidence base for decision making. Environ. Health Perspect. 123 (12):1232–40. doi:10.1289/ehp.1409342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bopp, S. K., A. Kienzler, A.-N. Richarz, S. C. van der Linden, A. Paini, N. Parissis, and A. P. Worth. 2019. Regulatory assessment and risk management of chemical mixtures: Challenges and ways forward. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 49 (2):174–89. doi:10.1080/10408444.2019.1579169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouwman, T., M. T. Cronin, J. G. Bessems, and J. J. van de Sandt. 2008. Improving the applicability of (Q)SARs for percutaneous penetration in regulatory risk assessment. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 27 (4):269–76. doi:10.1177/0960327107085829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, I., C. L. Burnett, W. F. Bergfeld, D. V. Belsito, R. A. Hill, C. D. Klaassen, D. C. Liebler, J. G. Marks Jr, R. C. Shank, T. J. Slaga, et al. 2018. Safety assessment of PEGs cocamine and related ingredients as used in cosmetics. Int. J. Toxicol. 37 (2_suppl):10S–60S. doi:10.1177/1091581818794417.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brockmeier, E. K., G. Hodges, T. H. Hutchinson, E. Butler, M. Hecker, K. E. Tollefsen, N. Garcia-Reyero, P. Kille, D. Becker, K. Chipman, et al. 2017. The role of omics in the application of adverse outcome pathways for chemical risk assessment. Toxicol. Sci 158 (2):252–62. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfx097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronaugh, R. L., R. F. Stewart, and E. R. Congdon. 1982. Methods for in vitro percutaneous absorption studies. II. Animal models for human skin. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 62 (3):481–88. doi:10.1016/0041-008x(82)90149-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaudhuri, I., C. Fruijtier-Pölloth, Y. Ngiewih, and L. Levy. 2018. Evaluating the evidence on genotoxicity and reproductive toxicity of carbon black: A critical review. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 48 (2):143–69. doi:10.1080/10408444.2017.1391746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R. J., Y. Y. Chen, M. Y. Liao, Y. H. Lee, Z. Y. Chen, S. J. Yan, Y. L. Yeh, L. X. Yang, Y. L. Lee, Y. H. Wu, et al. 2020a. The current understanding of autophagy in nanomaterial toxicity and its implementation in safety assessment-related alternative testing strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci 21. doi: E2387[pii]. doi:10.3390/ijms21072387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., Y. Liu, F. A. Wright, W. A. Chiu, and I. Rusyn. 2020b. Rapid hazard characterization of environmental chemicals using a compendium of human cell lines from different organs. ALTEX 37 (4):623–38. doi:10.14573/altex.2002291.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chuberre, B., E. Araviiskaia, T. Bieber, and A. Barbaud. 2019. Mineral oils and waxes in cosmetics: An overview mainly based on the current european regulations and the safety profile of these compounds. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 33 (Suppl 7):5–14. doi:10.1111/jdv.15946.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciallella, H. L., and H. Zhu. 2019. Advancing computational toxicology in the big data era by artificial intelligence: Data-driven and mechanism-driven modeling for chemical toxicity. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 32 (4):536–47. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coelho, C. C., L. Grenho, P. S. Gomes, P. A. Quadros, and M. H. Fernandes. 2019. Nano-hydroxyapatite in oral care cosmetics: Characterization and cytotoxicity assessment. Sci Rep 9 (1):1–10. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47491-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Couteau, C., E. Paparis, C. Chauvet, and L. Coiffard. 2015. Tris-biphenyl triazine, a new ultraviolet filter studied in terms of photoprotective efficacy. Int. J. Pharm. 487 (1–2):120–23. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.03.077.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cramer, G. M., R. A. Ford, and R. L. Hall. 1978. Estimation of toxic hazard: A decision tree approach. Food Cosmet. Toxicol 16 (3):255–76. doi:10.1016/S0015-6264(76)80522-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cronin, M. T. D., A. N. Richarz, and T. W. Schultz. 2019. Identification and description of the uncertainty, variability, bias and influence in quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for toxicity prediction. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 106:90–104. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.04.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darbre, P. D., and A. K. Charles. 2010. Environmental oestrogens and breast cancer: Evidence for combined involvement of dietary, household and cosmetic xenoestrogens. Anticancer Res 30 (3):815–27. 30/3/815 [pii].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dréno, B., A. Alexis, B. Chuberre, and M. Marinovich. 2019. Safety of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in cosmetics. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 33 (S7):34–46. doi:10.1111/jdv.15943.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dudzina, T., C. J. Delmaar, J. W. Biesterbos, M. I. Bakker, B. G. Bokkers, P. T. Scheepers, J. G. van Engelen, K. Hungerbuehler, and N. von Goetz. 2015. The probabilistic aggregate consumer exposure model (PACEM): Validation and comparison to a lower-tier assessment for the cyclic siloxane D5. Environ. Int. 79:8–16. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2009. Regulation No 1223/2009 of The European parliament and of the council on cosmetic products. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/endocrine_disruptors/docs/cosmetic_1223_2009_regulation_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2019. Catalogue of nanomaterials used in cosmetic products on the EU market, as notified to the European Commission by responsible persons. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/38284
   Google Scholar
• ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2008. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.6: QSAR and grouping chemicals. Accessed 30 March. 2021. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/information_requirements_r6_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2014. European Chemical Agency. Transitional guidance on mixture toxicity assessment for biocidal products for the environment. Transitional guidance on mixture toxicity assessment for biocidal products for the environment. Volume 45. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/23492134/tg_mixture±toxicity_superseded_en.pdf/de8eede9-45f0-4be3-538e-8e922d21e8dd
   Google Scholar
• ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2017. Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF). Accessed August 20, 2020. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13628/raaf_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, C. M., P. Piechota, J. C. Madden, S. J. Enoch, and M. T. D. Cronin. 2016. Adverse outcome pathway (AOP) informed modeling of aquatic toxicology: QSARs, read-across, and interspecies verification of modes of action. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (7):3995–4007. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escher, S. E., H. Kamp, S. H. Bennekou, A. Bitsch, C. Fisher, R. Graepel, J. G. Hengstler, M. Herzler, D. Knight, M. Leist, et al. 2019. Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: The read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project. Arch. Toxicol 93 (12):3643–67. doi:10.1007/s00204-019-02591-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhravar, Z., P. Ebrahimnejad, H. Daraee, and A. Akbarzadeh. 2016. Nanoliposomes: Synthesis methods and applications in cosmetics. J. Cosmet. Laser Ther. 18 (3):174–81. doi:10.3109/14764172.2015.1039040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 2014. Guidance for industry: Safety of nanomaterials in cosmetic products. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-industry-safety-nanomaterials-cosmetic-products
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, I., C. Milton, and H. Wallace. 2020. Toxicity testing is evolving! Toxicol. Res. (Camb) 9 (2):67–80. doi:10.1093/toxres/tfaa011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friend, D. R. 1992. In vitro skin permeation techniques. J. Control Release 18 (3):235–48. doi:10.1016/0168-3659(92)90169-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadaleta, D., A. Golbamaki Bakhtyari, G. J. Lavado, A. Roncaglioni, and E. Benfenati. 2020. Automated integration of structural, biological and metabolic similarities to improve read-across. ALTEX 37 (3):469–81. doi:10.14573/altex.2002281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gajbhiye, S., and S. Sakharwade. 2016. Silver nanoparticles in cosmetics. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. Sci. Applications 6:48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Garthoff, B. 2005. Alternatives to animal experimentation: The regulatory background. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 207 (2):388–92. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2005.02.024.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerberick, G. F., J. A. Troutman, L. M. Foertsch, J. D. Vassallo, M. Quijano, R. L. Dobson, C. Goebel, and J. Lepoittevin. 2009. Investigation of peptide reactivity of pro-hapten skin sensitizers using a peroxidase-peroxide oxidation system. Toxicol. Sci 112 (1):164–74. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfp192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gironde, C., C. Dufour, and C. Furger. 2020. Use of LUCS (light-up cell system) as an alternative live cell method to predict human acute oral toxicity. Toxicol. Rep. 7:403–12. doi:10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., L. Zhao, X. Zhang, and H. Zhu. 2019. Using a hybrid read-across method to evaluate chemical toxicity based on chemical structure and biological data. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 178:178–87. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.04.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatherell, S., M. T. Baltazar, J. Reynolds, P. L. Carmichael, M. Dent, H. Li, S. Ryder, A. White, P. Walker, and A. M. Middleton. 2020. Identifying and characterizing stress pathways of concern for consumer safety in next-generation risk assessment. Toxicol. Sci. 176 (1):11–33. doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfaa054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, A. L., C. Baduel, L. M. Toms, A. M. Calafat, X. Ye, P. Hobson, S. Broomhall, and J. F. Mueller. 2015. Use of pooled samples to assess human exposure to parabens, benzophenone-3 and triclosan in Queensland, Australia. Environ. Int. 85:77–83. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helguera, A. M., M. N. Cordeiro, M. A. Perez, R. D. Combes, and M. P. Gonzalez. 2008. Quantitative structure carcinogenicity relationship for detecting structural alerts in nitroso-compounds: Species: rat; sex: male; route of administration: water. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 231 (2):197–207. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2008.04.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henkler, F., T. Tralau, J. Tentschert, C. Kneuer, A. Haase, T. Platzek, A. Luch, and M. E. Gotz. 2012. Risk assessment of nanomaterials in cosmetics: A European Union perspective. Arch. Toxicol. 86 (11):1641–46. doi:10.1007/s00204-012-0944-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzog, B., S. Mongiat, C. Deshayes, M. Neuhaus, K. Sommer, and A. Mantler. 2002. In vivo and in vitro assessment of UVA protection by sunscreen formulations containing either butyl methoxy dibenzoyl methane, methylene bis‐benzotriazolyl tetramethylbutylphenol, or microfine ZnO. Int. J. Cosmetic Sci 24 (3):170–85. doi:10.1046/j.1467-2494.2002.00137.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirota, M., S. Fukui, K. Okamoto, S. Kurotani, N. Imai, M. Fujishiro, D. Kyotani, Y. Kato, T. Kasahara, and M. Fujita. 2015. Evaluation of combinations of in vitro sensitization test descriptors for the artificial neural network-based risk assessment model of skin sensitization. J. Appl Toxicol 35 (11):1333–47. doi:10.1002/jat.3105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirota, M., T. Ashikaga, and H. Kouzuki. 2018. Development of an artificial neural network model for risk assessment of skin sensitization using human cell line activation test, direct peptide reactivity assay, Keratinosensâ and in silico structure alert parameter. J. Appl Toxicol 38 (4):514–26. doi:10.1002/jat.3558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, B., and J. Burfeindt. 2019. “Nanotechnology in Cosmetics.„ In Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Jean Cornier, Cornelia M. Keck, Marcel Van de Voorde (Editors). Nanocosmetics, 17–25. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Husoy, T., M. Andreassen, H. Hjertholm, M. H. Carlsen, N. Norberg, C. Sprong, E. Papadopoulou, A. K. Sakhi, A. Sabaredzovic, and H. A. A. M. Dirven. 2019. The norwegian biomonitoring study from the EU project EuroMix: Levels of phenols and phthalates in 24-hour urine samples and exposure sources from food and personal care products. Environ. Int. 132:105103. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarabek, A. M., and W. H. Farland. 1990. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Risk Assessment Guidelines. Toxicol. Ind. Health 6 (5):199–216. doi:10.1177/074823379000600516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, H., M. Lindstedt, A. S. Albrekt, and C. A. Borrebaeck. 2011. A genomic biomarker signature can predict skin sensitizers using a cell-based in vitro alternative to animal tests. BMC Genomics 12 (1):399,2164–12-399. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kar, S., K. Roy, and J. Leszczynski. 2018. Applicability domain: A step toward confident predictions and decidability for QSAR modeling. Meth Mol. Biol. 1800:141–69. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-7899-1_6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz, L. M., K. Dewan, and R. L. Bronaugh. 2015. Nanotechnology in cosmetics. Food Chem. Toxicol. 85:127–37. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2015.06.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, D., and S. Kumar. 2018. Niosomes: Present scenario and future aspects. J. Drug Delivery Ther. 8 (5):35–43. doi:10.22270/jddt.v8i5.1886.
   Google Scholar
• Kesharwani, P., K. Jain, and N. K. Jain. 2014. Dendrimer as nanocarrier for drug delivery. Prog. Polymer Sci. 39:268–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. Y., M. K. Kim, K. B. Kim, H. S. Kim, and B. M. Lee. 2019a. Quantitative structure-activity and quantitative structure-property relationship approaches as alternative skin sensitization risk assessment methods. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 82 (7):447–72. doi:10.1080/15287394.2019.1616437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Y. W. Kim, S. K. Lim, T. H. Roh, D. Y. Bang, S. M. Choi, D. S. Lim, Y. J. Kim, S. Baek, M. Kim, et al. 2017. Risk assessment of zinc oxide, a cosmetic ingredient used as a UV filter of sunscreens. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 20 (3):155–82. doi:10.1080/10937404.2017.1290516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., K. B. Kim, H. S. Kim, and B. M. Lee. 2019c. Alternative skin sensitization prediction and risk assessment using proinflammatory biomarkers, interleukin-1 beta (IL-1beta) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 82 (5):361–78. doi:10.1080/15287394.2019.1609183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., K. B. Kim, J. Y. Lee, S. J. Kwack, Y. C. Kwon, J. S. Kang, H. S. Kim, and B. M. Lee. 2019b. Risk assessment of 5-chloro-2-methylisothiazol-3(2H)-one/2-methylisothiazol-3(2H)-one (CMIT/MIT) used as a preservative in cosmetics. Toxicol. Res. 35 (2):103–17. doi:10.5487/TR.2019.35.2.103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., K. B. Kim, K. Yoon, S. Kacew, H. S. Kim, and B. M. Lee. 2018. IL-1alpha and IL-1beta as alternative biomarkers for risk assessment and the prediction of skin sensitization potency. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 81 (17):830–43. doi:10.1080/15287394.2018.1494474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. W., M. J. Kim, B. Y. Chung, Y. Bang Du, S. K. Lim, S. M. Choi, D. S. Lim, M. C. Cho, K. Yoon, H. S. Kim, et al. 2013. Safety evaluation and risk assessment of d-limonene. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 16 (1):17–38. doi:10.1080/10937404.2013.769418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewski, D., D. Acosta Jr, M. Andersen, H. Anderson, J. C. Bailar 3rd, K. Boekelheide, R. Brent, G. Charnley, V. G. Cheung, S. Green Jr, et al. 2010. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: A vision and a strategy. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 13 (2–4):51–138. doi:10.1080/10937404.2010.483176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krewski, D., M. E. Andersen, M. G. Tyshenko, K. Krishnan, T. Hartung, K. Boekelheide, J. F. Wambaugh, D. Jones, M. Whelan, R. Thomas, et al. 2020. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: Progress in the past decade and future perspectives. Arch. Toxicol. 94:1–58. doi:10.1007/s00204-019-02613-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuseva, C., T. W. Schultz, D. Yordanova, K. Tankova, S. Kutsarova, T. Pavlov, A. Chapkanov, M. Georgiev, A. Gissi, T. Sobanski, et al. 2019. The implementation of RAAF in the OECD QSAR toolbox. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 105:51–61. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.03.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, C., M. T. Kim, N. L. Kruhlak, K. P. Cross, R. Saiakhov, S. Chakravarti, and L. Stavitskaya. 2019. Transitioning to composite bacterial mutagenicity models in ICH M7 (Q)SAR analyses. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 109:104488. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B. M., M. Choi, I. Shin, J. Kim, Z. Choi, K. Kim, K. Choi, S. Yang, D. Y. So, S. Tae Ju, et al. 2020a. Risk communication for labeling all ingredients in consumer products. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 83 (13–14):509–24. doi:10.1080/15287394.2020.1780174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., H. Y. Kim, K. Kang, H. G. Jeong, M. K. Song, I. H. Tae, S. H. Lee, H. R. Kim, K. Lee, S. Chae, et al. 2020b. Integration of transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics identifies biomarkers for pulmonary injury by polyhexamethylene guanidine phosphate (PHMG-p), a humidifier disinfectant, in rats. Arch. Toxicol 94 (3):887–909. doi:10.1007/s00204-020-02657-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. D., J. Y. Lee, S. J. Kwack, C. Y. Shin, H. J. Jang, H. Y. Kim, M. K. Kim, D. W. Seo, B. M. Lee, and K. B. Kim. 2019a. Risk assessment of triclosan, a cosmetic preservative. Toxicol. Res. 35 (2):137–54. doi:10.5487/TR.2019.35.2.137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. K., K. B. Kim, J. D. Lee, C. Y. Shin, S. J. Kwack, B. M. Lee, and J. Y. Lee. 2019b. Risk assessment of drometrizole, a cosmetic ingredient used as an ultraviolet light absorber. Toxicol. Res. 35 (2):119–29. doi:10.5487/TR.2019.35.2.119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., N. C. Kleinstreuer, and D. Fourches. 2020. Hierarchical quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling approach for integrating binary, multiclass, and regression models of acute oral systemic toxicity. Chem.Res.Toxicol 33 (2):353–66. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, D. S., S. M. Choi, K. B. Kim, K. Yoon, S. Kacew, H. Sik Kim, and B. M. Lee. 2018. Determination of fragrance allergens and their dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) in 107 spray perfumes. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 81 (22):1173–85. doi:10.1080/15287394.2018.1543232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, M., and K. Lee. 2020. Aggregate exposure assessment using cosmetic co-use scenarios: I. Establishment of aggregate exposure scenarios. Food Chem. Toxicol. 142:111486. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2020.111486.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell, G., P. Aeby, T. Ashikaga, S. Bessou-Touya, W. Diembeck, F. Gerberick, P. Kern, M. Marrec-Fairley, J. M. Ovigne, H. Sakaguchi, et al. 2011. Skin sensitisation: The colipa strategy for developing and evaluating non-animal test methods for risk assessment. ALTEX 28 (1):50–55. doi:10.14573/altex.2011.1.050.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McClellan, R. O. 1994. A commentary on the NRC report “science and judgment in risk assessment”. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 20 (3 Pt 2):S142–S168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meybeck, A. 1992. Past, oresent and future of liposome cosmetics, “Liposome dermatics.” Springer, 341–45.
   Google Scholar
• MFDS (Ministry of Food and Drug Safety). 2017. Guideline of Risk Assessment of Cosmetic Ingredients. Accessed February 15, 2021. http://nifds.go.kr/brd/m_15/view.do?seq=10872&srchFr=&srchTo=&srchWord=&srchTp=&itm_seq_1=0&itm_seq_2=0&multi_itm_seq=0&company_cd=&company_nm=&page=22
   Google Scholar
• Morganti, P. 2010. Use and potential of nanotechnology in cosmetic dermatology. Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dermatol. 3:5–13. doi:10.2147/ccid.s4506.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mu, L., and R. L. Sprando. 2010. Application of nanotechnology in cosmetics. Pharm. Res. 27 (8):1746–49. doi:10.1007/s11095-010-0139-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, R., R. Petersen, A. Hommoss, and J. Pardeike. 2007. Nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic dermal products. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 59 (6):522–30. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.04.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, R. H., M. Radtke, and S. A. Wissing. 2002. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) in cosmetic and dermatological preparations. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 54:S131–55. doi:10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00118-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, I. C., R. A. Ford, E. Kennepohl, and J. G. Sprenger. 1996. Correlation of structural class with no-observed-effect levels: A proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. Food Chem. Toxicol. 34:829–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 2007. Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A vision and a strategy. Accessed August 20, 2020. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11970/toxicity-testing-in-the-21st-century-a-vision-and-a
   Google Scholar
• Nepal, M. R., G. H. Kim, D. H. Cha, and T. C. Jeong. 2019. Assessment of skin sensitizing potential of metals with β-galactosidase-expressing E. coli culture system. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 82 (15):879–89. doi:10.1080/15287394.2019.1664958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nepal, M. R., Y. Kang, M. J. Kang, D. H. Nam, and T. C. Jeong. 2018. A β-galactosidase-expressing E. coli culture as an alternative test to identify skin sensitizers and non-sensitizers. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 81 (9):288–301. doi:10.1080/15287394.2018.1440187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohynek, G. J., and E. K. Dufour. 2012. Nano-sized cosmetic formulations or solid nanoparticles in sunscreens: A risk to human health? Arch. Toxicol 86 (7):1063–75. doi:10.1007/s00204-012-0831-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC (National Research Council). 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government: Managing the process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 129: Guidance document on using cytotoxicity tests to estimate starting doses for acute oral systemic toxicity tests. Accessed February 15, 2021. http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2010)20&doclanguage=en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) Test No. 427: Skin absorption: In vivo method. Accessed 15 February, 2021. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-427-skin-absorption-in-vivo-method_9789264071063-en#page1
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 428: Skin absorption: In vitro method. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-428-skin-absorption-in-vitro-method_9789264071087-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 430: In vitro skin corrosion: Transcutaneous electrical resistance test method (ter). Accessed February 15, 2021. doi:10.1787/9789264071124-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 431: In vitro skin corrosion: Reconstructed human epidermis (rhe) test method. Accessed February 15, 2021. doi:10.1787/9789264264618-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 432: In vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. Accessed February 15, 2021. doi:10.1787/9789264071162-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 437: Bovine corneal opacity and permeablility test method for identifying i) chemicals inducing serious eye damage and ii) chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-437-bovine-corneal-opacity-and-permeability-test-method-for-identifying-i-chemicals-inducing-serious-eye-damage-and-ii-chemicals-not-requiring-classification-for-eye-irritation-or-serious-eye-damage_9789264203846-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 438: Isolated chicken eys test methods for identifying ocular corrosive and severe irritants. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-438-isolated-chicken-eye-test-method-for-identifying-ocular-corrosives-and-severe-irritants_9789264076310-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 442B: Skin sensitization: Local lymph node assay: BrdU-ELISA or –FCM. Accessed February 15, 2021. doi:10.1787/9789264090996-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 442C: In chemico skin sensitisation: Direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA). Accessed February 15, 2021. doi:10.1787/9789264229709-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 442D: In vitro skin sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase Test Method. Accessed February 15, 2021. doi:10.1787/9789264229822-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 442E: In vitro skin sensitisation: Human cell line activation test (H-CLAT). Accessed February 15, 2021. doi:10.1787/9789264264359-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 460: Fluorescein leakage test method for identifying ocular corrosive and severe irritants. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-460-fluorescein-leakage-test-method-for-identifying-ocular-corrosives-and-severe-irritants_9789264185401-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 471: Bacterial reverse mutation test. Accessed August 20, 2020. doi:10.1787/9789264071247-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 476: In vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the HPRT and XPRT genes. Accessed February 15, 2021. doi:10.1787/9789264243088-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 487: In vitro mammalian cell micronucleus test. Accessed February 15, 2021. doi:10.1787/9789264264861-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 491: Short time exposure in vitro test method for identifying i) chemicals inducing serious eye damage and ii) chemicals not requiring classification for eye irritation or serious eye damage. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-491-short-time-exposure-in-vitro-test-method-for-identifying-i-chemicals-inducing-serious-eye-damage-and-ii-chemicals-not-requiring-classification-for-eye-irritation-or-serious-eye-damage_9789264242432-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 492: Reconstructed human cornea-like epithelium (rhce) test method for identifying chemicals not requiring classification and labelling for eye irritation or serious eye damage. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/test-no-492-reconstructed-human-cornea-like-epithelium-rhce-test-method-for-identifying-chemicals-not-requiring-classification-and-labelling-for-eye-irritation-or-serious-eye-damage_9789264242548-en#page1
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 494: Vitrigel-eye irritancy test method for identifying chemicals not requiring classification and labelling for eye irritation or serious eye damage. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/tg-494-vitrigel-eye-irritancy-test-method-for-identifying-chemicals-not-requiring-classification-and-labelling-for-eye-irritation-or-serious-eye-damage_9f20068a-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Test No. 495: ROS (Reactive Oxygen Species) assay for photoreactivity. Accessed August 20, 2020. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/environment/tg-495-ros-reactive-oxygen-species-assay-for-photoreactivity_915e00ac-en
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2014. Guidance document on the validation of (quantitative) structure-activity relationship [(Q)SAR] models. Accessed August 20, 2020. https://www.oecd.org/env/guidance-document-on-the-validation-of-quantitative-structure-activity-relationship-q-sar-models-9789264085442-en.htm
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). 2015. In vitro Bhas 42 cell transformation assay. Accessed August 20, 2020. https://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/testing/Bhas%2042%20CTA%20GD%20after%203rd%20comments-F_CLEAN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pant, K., S. W. Bruce, J. E. Sly, T. Kunkelmann, S. Kunz-Bohnenberger, A. Poth, G. Engelhardt, M. Schulz, and K. R. Schwind. 2012. Prevalidation study of the Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell transformation assay at pH 6.7 for assessment of carcinogenic potential of chemicals. Mutat. Res. 744 (1):54–63. doi:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.12.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pardeike, J., A. Hommoss, and R. H. Müller. 2009. Lipid nanoparticles (SLN, NLC) in cosmetic and pharmaceutical dermal products. Int. J. Pharm. 366 (1–2):170–84. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardeike, J., K. Schwabe, and R. H. Müller. 2010. Influence of nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) on the physical properties of the cutanova nanorepair Q10 cream and the in vivo skin hydration effect. Int. J. Pharm. 396 (1–2):166–73. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.06.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patlewicz, G., G. Helman, P. Pradeep, and I. Shah. 2017. Navigating through the minefield of read-across tools: A review of in silico tools for grouping. Comput. Toxicol. 3:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2017.05.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patlewicz, G., M. T. Cronin, G. Helman, J. C. Lambert, L. E. Lizarraga, and I. Shah. 2018. Navigating through the minefield of read-across frameworks: A commentary perspective. Comput. Toxicol. 6:39–54. doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2018.04.002.
   Google Scholar
• Patlewicz, G., N. Ball, E. D. Booth, E. Hulzebos, E. Zvinavashe, and C. Hennes. 2013. Use of category approaches, read-across and (Q)SAR: General considerations. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 67 (1):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirih, N., and T. Kunej. 2017. Toward a taxonomy for multi-omics science? Terminology development for whole genome study approaches by omics technology and hierarchy. Omics 21 (1):1–16. doi:10.1089/omi.2016.0144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto, P., T. Cole, R. Curren, R. M. Gibson, M. Liebsch, H. Raabe, A. M. Tuomainen, M. Whelan, and A. Kinsner-Ovaskainen. 2013. Assessment of the predictive capacity of the 3T3 Neutral Red Uptake cytotoxicity test method to identify substances not classified for acute oral toxicity (LD50>2000mg/kg): Results of an ECVAM validation study. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 65 (3):344–65. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.11.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puglia, C., and D. Santonocito. 2019. Cosmeceuticals: Nanotechnology-based strategies for the delivery of phytocompounds. Curr. Pharm. Des. 25 (21):2314–22. doi:10.2174/1381612825666190709211101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Punt, A., H. Bouwmeester, B. J. Blaauboer, S. Coecke, B. Hakkert, D. F. G. Hendriks, P. Jennings, N. I. Kramer, S. Neuhoff, R. Masereeuw, et al. 2020. New approach methodologies (NAMs) for human-relevant biokinetics predictions: Meeting the paradigm shift in toxicology towards an animal-free chemical risk assessment. ALTEX. doi:10.14573/altex.2003242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Russo, D. P., M. T. Kim, W. Wang, D. Pinolini, S. Shende, J. Strickland, T. Hartung, and H. Zhu. 2017. CIIPro: A new read-across portal to fill data gaps using public large-scale chemical and biological data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 33 (3):464–66. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safford, B., A. M. Api, C. Barratt, D. Comiskey, E. J. Daly, G. Ellis, C. McNamara, C. O’Mahony, S. Robison, B. Smith, et al. 2015. Use of an aggregate exposure model to estimate consumer exposure to fragrance ingredients in personal care and cosmetic products. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 72 (3):673–82. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2010a. The SCCS’s Notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation. 7th Revision. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_s_004.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2010b. Opinion on Cyclomethicone, Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (D4) and Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5). Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_029.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2011a. Clarification on opinion SCCS/1348/10 in the light of the Danish clause of safeguard banning the use of parabens in cosmetic products intended for children under three years of age. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_069.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2011b. Opinion on Triclosan (Colipa no P32). Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_054.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2011c. Opinion on 1,3,5-triazine, 2,4,6-tris[1,1ʹ-biphenyl]-4-yl-. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_070.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2012. Opinion on Zinc Oxide (Nano Form). Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_103.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2013. Opinion on 3-Benzylidene camphor. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_134.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (ScientificCommittee on Consumer Safety). 2014 Opinion on Titanium Dioxide (Nano Form). Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_136.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2015a. Opinion on 2,2ʹ-methylene-bis-(6-(2H-benzotriazol-2-yl)-4-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenol (Nano Form). Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_168.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2015b. Opinion on silica, hydrated silica, and silica surface modified with alkyl silicates (Nano Form). Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_175.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2020a. Opinion on titanium dioxide (TiO2) used in cosmetic products that lead to exposure by inhalation. Accessed March 26, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_238.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety). 2020b. The scientific advice on the safety of nanomaterials in cosmetics. Accessed February 15, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_239.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, T. W., P. Amcoff, E. Berggren, F. Gautier, M. Klaric, D. J. Knight, C. Mahony, M. Schwarz, A. White, and M. T. Cronin. 2015. A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 72 (3):586–601. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, R. P., M. Schuhmacher, and V. Kumar. 2018. Development of a human physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for phthalate (DEHP) and its metabolites: A bottom up modeling approach. Toxicol. Lett. 296:152–62. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.06.1217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souto, E., and R. Müller. 2008. Cosmetic features and applications of lipid nanoparticles (SLN®, NLC). Int. J. Cosmet Sci. 30 (3):157–65. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2494.2008.00433.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sperber, S., M. Wahl, F. Berger, H. Kamp, O. Lemke, V. Starck, T. Walk, M. Spitzer, and B. V. Ravenzwaay. 2019. Metabolomics as read-across tool: An example with 3-aminopropanol and 2-aminoethanol. Reg. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 108:104442. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoiala, A., M. Albu, A. Ficai, A. Andronescu, G. Voicu, and C. Ungurean. 2014. The SiO2/ZnO composite materials for cosmetic creams. Dig. J. Nanomater. Bios. 9:1729–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statista. 2021. Annual growth of the global cosmetics market from 2004 to 2019. Accessed 2020 March 26, 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/297070/growth-rate-of-the-global-cosmetics-market
   Google Scholar
• Sung, C. R., K. B. Kim, J. Y. Lee, B. M. Lee, and S. J. Kwack. 2019. Risk assessment of ethylhexyl dimethyl PABA in cosmetics. Toxicol. Res. 35 (2):131–36. doi:10.5487/TR.2019.35.2.131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinto-Moliner, A., and M. Martin. 2020. Quantitative weight of evidence method for combining predictions of quantitative structure-activity relationship models. SAR QSAR Environ. Res 31 (4):261–79. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2020.1725116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tozer, S., C. O’Mahony, J. Hannah, J. O’Brien, S. Kelly, K. Kosemund-Meynen, and C. Alexander-White. 2019. Aggregate exposure modelling of vitamin A from cosmetic products, diet and food supplements. Food Chem.Toxicol. 131:110549. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2019.05.057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tung, C.-W., -C.-C. Wang, and -S.-S. Wang. 2018. Mechanism-informed read-across assessment of skin sensitizers based on SkinSensDB. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 94:276–82. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.02.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turley, A. E., K. K. Isaacs, B. A. Wetmore, A. L. Karmaus, M. R. Embry, and M. Krishan. 2019. Incorporating new approach methodologies in toxicity testing and exposure assessment for tiered risk assessment using the RISK21 approach: Case studies on food contact chemicals. Food Chem. Toxicol. 134:110819. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2019.110819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbisch, D., N. Honarvar, S. N. Kolle, A. Mehling, T. Ramirez, W. Teubner, and R. Landsiedel. 2016. Peptide reactivity associated with skin sensitization: The QSAR toolbox and TIMES compared to the DPRA. Toxicol. in Vitro 34:194–203. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2016.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1987. The risk assessment guidelines of 1986. Office of Health and Environmental Assessment. US Environmental Protection Agency EPA/600/8-87/045, August 1987, 81.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2004. Supplementary guidance for conducting health risk assessment of chemical mixtures. Risk Assessment Forum Office of Research and development. Washington DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wilm, A., C. Stork, C. Bauer, A. Schepky, J. Kühnl, and J. Kirchmair. 2019. Skin doctor: Machine learning models for skin sensitization prediction that provide estimates and indicators of prediction reliability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (19):4833. doi:10.3390/ijms20194833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissing, S. A., and R. H. Müller. 2003. Cosmetic applications for solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN). Int. J. Pharm. 254 (1):65–68. doi:10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00684-1
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., and G. Wang. 2018. Machine learning based toxicity prediction: From chemical structural description to transcriptome analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci 19(8):2358. doi: E2358[pii]. doi:10.3390/ijms19082358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, C., S. M. Barlow, K. L. M. Jacobs, V. Vitcheva, A. R. Boobis, S. P. Felter, K. B. Arvidson, D. Keller, M. T. D. Cronin, S. Enoch, et al. 2017. Thresholds of toxicological concern for cosmetics-related substances: New database, thresholds, and enrichment of chemical space. Food Chem. Toxicol. 109:170–93. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2017.08.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., C. Lou, W. Li, G. Liu, and Y. Tang. 2020. Computational approaches to identify structural alerts and their applications in environmental toxicology and drug discovery. Chem. Res. Toxicol 33 (6):1312–22. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdimamaghani, M., Moos, P. J., Dobrovolskaia, M. A., and H. Ghandehari. 2019. Genotoxicity of amorphous silica nanoparticles: Status and prospects. Nanomed. 16: 106–25. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2018.11.013
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., M. Bouhifd, E. Donley, L. Egnash, N. Kleinstreuer, E. D. Kroese, Z. Liu, T. Luechtefeld, J. Palmer, D. Pamies, et al. 2016. Supporting read-across using biological data. ALTEX 33:167–82. doi:10.14573/altex.1601252.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar