Additive Manufacturing for Occupational Hygiene: A Comprehensive Review of Processes, Emissions, & Exposures

References

• Afshar-Mohajer, N., C. Y. Wu, T. Ladun, D. A. Rajon, and Y. Huang. 2015. Characterization of particulate matters and total VOC emissions from a binder jetting 3D printer. Build. Environ. 93:293–301. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts, E., M. Ballentine, E. Barnes, and A. Kennedy. 2021. Impact of metal additives on particle emission profiles from a fused filament fabrication 3D printer. Atmos. Environ. 244:117956. Article. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aluri, M., B. Monami, B. S. Raj, and R. S. Mamilla. 2021. Review on particle emissions during fused deposition modeling of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene and polylactic acid polymers. Materials Today: Proceedings (E-print).
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International, Standards under the jurisdiction of D22. ASTM International 2021 [ cited February 2, 2021]. Available from https://www.astm.org/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/D22.htm
   Google Scholar
• Bau, S., D. Rousset, R. Payet, and F. X. Keller. 2020. Characterizing particle emissions from a direct energy deposition additive manufacturing process and associated occupational exposure to airborne particles. J Occup Environ Hyg 17 (2–3):59–72. doi:10.1080/15459624.2019.1696969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beisser, R., M. Buxtrup, D. Fendler, L. Hohenberger, V. Kazda, Y. Von Mering, H. Niemann, K. Pitzke, and R. Weiß. 2017. Inhalation exposure to metals during additive processes (3D printing). Gefahrstoffe Reinhaltung der Luft 77:487–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernatikova, S., A. Dudacec, R. Prichystalova, V. Klecka, and L. Kocurkova. 2021. Characterization of ultrafine particles and VOCs emitted from a 3D printer. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article. 18 (3):929. doi:10.3390/ijerph18030929.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharti, N., and S. Singh. 2017. Three-dimensional (3D) printers in libraries: Perspective and preliminary safety analysis. J. Chem. Educ. 94 (7):879–85. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourell, D. L. 2016. Perspectives on additive manufacturing. Annu Rev Mater Res 46 (1):1–18. doi:10.1146/annurev-matsci-070115-031606.
   Google Scholar
• Bours, J., B. Adzima, S. Gladwin, J. Cabral, and S. Mau. 2017. Addressing hazardous implications of additive manufacturing: Complementing life cycle assessment with a framework for evaluating direct human health and environmental impacts. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (S1):S25–S36. doi:10.1111/jiec.12587.
   Google Scholar
• Bravi, L., F. Murmura, and G. Santos. 2019. Additive manufacturing: Possible problems with indoor air quality. Procedia Manufacturing 41:952–59. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2019.10.020.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, F. L., C. Y. Hon, S. M. Tarlo, N. Rajaram, and R. House. 2020. Emissions and health risks from the use of 3D printers in an occupational setting. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health Part A 83 (7):279–87. doi:10.1080/15287394.2020.1751758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, T. Y., L. J. Lee, J. D. Wang, R. H. Shie, and C. C. Chan. 2004. Occupational risk assessment on allergic contact dermatitis in a resin model making process. Journal of Occuppational Health 46 (2):148–52. doi:10.1539/joh.46.148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., H. Yin, I. S. Cole, S. Shen, X. Zhou, Y. Wang, and S. Tang. 2020. Exposure, assessment and health hazards of particulate matter in metal additive manufacturing: A review. Chemosphere 259:127452. Article. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chýlek, R., L. Kudela, J. Pospíšil, and L. Šnajdárek. 2019. Fine particle emission during fused deposition modelling and thermogravimetric analysis for various filaments. J. Clean. Prod. 237:117790. Article. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanhuri, A. A. M., A. Hariri, M. R. Alkahari, M. H. F. M. Fauadi, and S. F. Z. Bakri. 2019a. Indoor air concentration from selective laser sintering 3D printer using virgin polyamide nylon (PA12) powder: A pilot study. International Journal of Integrated Engineering 11 (5 Special):140–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damanhuri, A. A. M., A. S. A. Subki, A. Hariri, B. T. Tee, M. H. F. M. Fauadi, M. S. F. Hussin, and M. S. S. Mustafa. 2019b. Comparative study of selected indoor concentration from selective laser sintering process using virgin and recycled polyamide nylon (PA12). IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 373 Article 012014, Malacca, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. Y., Q. Zhang, J. P. S. Wong, R. J. Weber, and M. S. Black. 2019. Characterization of volatile organic compound emissions from consumer level material extrusion 3D printers. Build. Environ. 160:106209. Article. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deak, S. M. 1999. Safe work practices for rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyping Journal 5 (4):161–63. doi:10.1108/13552549910295479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Y., S. J. Cao, A. Chen, and Y. Guo. 2016. The impact of manufacturing parameters on submicron particle emissions from a desktop 3D printer in the perspective of emission reduction. Build. Environ. 104:311–19. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, S., B. F. Ng, X. Shang, H. Liu, X. Lu, and M. P. Wan. 2019. The characteristics and formation mechanisms of emissions from thermal decomposition of 3D printer polymer filaments. Science of the Total Environment 692:984–94. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, S., M. P. Wan, and B. F. Ng. 2020. Dynamic analysis of particle emissions from FDM 3D printers through a comparative study of chamber and flow tunnel measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54 (22):14568–77. doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c05309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DOL. Sampling and Analytical Methods. Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management/Salt Lake Technical Center [ cited February 2, 2021]. Available from https://www.osha.gov/dts/sltc/methods/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Du Preez, S., A. Johnson, R. F. LeBouf, S. J. L. Linde, A. B. Stefaniak, and J. Du Plessis. 2018b. Exposures during industrial 3-D printing and post-processing tasks. Rapid Prototyping Journal 24 (5):865–71. doi:10.1108/RPJ-03-2017-0050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Preez, S., D. J. de Beer, and J. L. Du Plessis. 2018a. Titanium powders used in powder bed fusion: Their relevance to respiratory health. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering 29 (4):94–102. doi:10.7166/29-4-1975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. L., D. Hammond, K. Menchaca, G. Roth, and K. H. Dunn. 2020b. Reducing ultrafine particulate emission from multiple 3D printers in an office environment using a prototype engineering control. Journal of Nanoparticle Research Article. 22 (5):112. doi:10.1007/s11051-020-04844-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, K. L., K. H. Dunn, D. Hammond, and S. Lo. 2020a. Three-dimensional printer emissions and employee exposures to ultrafine particles during the printing of thermoplastic filaments containing carbon nanotubes or carbon nanofibers. Journal of Nanoparticle Research Article. 22 (2):46. doi:10.1007/s11051-020-4750-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder, A., and G. Oberdörster. 2006. Translocation and effects of ultrafine particles outside of the lung. Clin Occup Environ Med 5 (4):785–96. doi:10.1016/j.coem.2006.07.003.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• EPA. SW-846: Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods. US EPA Office of Solid Waste; Economic, Methods, and Risk Analysis Division 2014 [ cited February 2, 2021]. Available from https://www.epa.gov/hw-sw846
   Google Scholar
• Fierz, M., A. Keller, and H. Burtscher. 2009. Charge-based personal aerosol samplers. Inhal Toxicol 21 (Suppl sup1):30–34. doi:10.1080/08958370902942632.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fierz, M., S. Weimer, and H. Burtscher. 2009. Design and performance of an optimized electrical diffusion battery. J Aerosol Sci 40 (2):152–63. doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, S. 2014. Additive Manufacturing technology: Potential implications for U.S. manufacturing competitiveness. Journal of International Commerce and Economics. http://www.usitc.gov/journals.
   Google Scholar
• Freiser, M. E., A. Ghodadra, L. Hart, C. Griffith, and N. Jabbour. 2018. Safety of drilling 3-dimensional-printed temporal bones. Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery 144:797–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, J. F., R. M. Miranda, J. P. Oliveira, H. M. Esteves, and P. C. Albuquerque. 2019. Evaluation of the amount of nanoparticles emitted in LASER additive manufacture/welding. Inhal Toxicol 31 (3):125–30. doi:10.1080/08958378.2019.1621965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graff, P., B. Ståhlbom, E. Nordenberg, A. Graichen, P. Johansson, and H. Karlsson. 2017. Evaluating measuring techniques for occupational exposure during additive manufacturing of metals: A pilot study. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (S1):S120–S129. doi:10.1111/jiec.12498.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, J., M. Wensing, E. Uhde, and T. Salthammer. 2019. Characterization of particulate and gaseous pollutants emitted during operation of a desktop 3D printer. Environmental International 123:476–85. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, C., L. Morawska, and L. Taplin. 2007. Particle emission characteristics of office printers. Environmental Science & Technology 41 (17):6039–45. doi:10.1021/es063049z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO/ASTM. 2015. 52900: Additive manufacturing — General principles — Terminology Geneva. Switzerland: ISO.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, O., C. Williams, and T. Campbell. 2013. Additive manufacturing (AM) and nanotechnology: Promises and challenges. Rapid Prototyping Journal 19 (5):353–64. doi:10.1108/RPJ-12-2011-0127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, A. C. O., H. Harboe, A. Brostrøm, K. A. Jensen, and A. S. Fonseca. 2020. Nanoparticle exposure and workplace measurements during processes related to 3D printing of a metal object. Frontiers in Public Health 8 (Article):608718. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.608718.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz, E. F., J. D. Goetz, C. Wang, J. L. Hart, B. Terranova, M. L. Taheri, M. S. Waring, and P. F. DeCarlo. 2020. Chemical and physical characterization of 3D printer aerosol emissions with and without a filter attachment. Environmental Science & Technology 54 (2):947–54. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b04012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolb, T., P. Schmidt, R. Beisser, J. Tremel, and M. Schmidt. 2017. Safety in additive manufacturing: Fine dust measurements for a process chain in laser beam melting of metals. RTeJournal: Fachforum Fur Rapid Technologie2017.
   Google Scholar
• LeBouf, R. F., B. Hawley, and K. J. Cummings. 2019. Potential hazards not communicated in safety data sheets of flavoring formulations, including diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione. Annals of Work Exposure and Health 63 (1):124–30. doi:10.1093/annweh/wxy093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leso, V., M. L. Ercolano, I. Mazzotta, M. Romano, F. Cannavacciuolo, and I. Iavicoli. 2021. Three-dimensional (3D) printing: Implications for risk assessment and management in occupational settings. Annals of Work Exposure and Health (E-print). doi:10.1093/annweh/wxaa146.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lewinski, N. A., L. E. Secondo, and J. K. Ferri. 2019. On-site three-dimensional printer aerosol hazard assessment: Pilot study of a portable in vitro exposure cassette. Process Safety Progress 38 (3), 6. doi: 10.1002/prs.12030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljunggren, S. A., H. Karlsson, B. Ståhlbom, B. Krapi, L. Fornander, L. E. Karlsson, B. Bergström, E. Nordenberg, T. K. Ervik, and P. Graff. 2019. Biomonitoring of Metal Exposure During Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing). Saf Health Work 10 (4):518–26. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2019.07.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., J. Liu, W. Zhu, M. Tang, N. Lawrence, C. Yu, M. Gou, and S. Chen. 2018. 3D bioprinting of functional tissue models for personalized drug screening and in vitro disease modeling. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 132:235–51. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2018.06.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell, B., X. J. Guzman, M. Dolack, T. W. Simpson, and J. M. Cimbala. 2016. 3D printing in the wild: A preliminary investigation of air quality in college maker spaces. Paper read at Solid Freeform Fabrication 2016 – An Additive Manufacturing Conference, at Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Mellin, P., C. Jönsson, M. Åkermo, P. Fernberg, E. Nordenberg, H. Brodin, and A. Strondl. 2016. Nano-sized by-products from metal 3D printing, composite manufacturing and fabric production. J. Clean. Prod. 139:1224–33. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, L., A. Kangas, K. Kukko, B. Mølgaard, A. Säämänen, T. Kanerva, I. Flores Ituarte, M. Huhtiniemi, H. Stockmann-Juvala, J. Partanen, et al.. 2017. Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer. Journal of Industrial Ecology 21 (S1):S94–S106. doi:10.1111/jiec.12569.
   Google Scholar
• Nagarajan, H. P. N., S. Panicker, H. Mokhtarian, E. Coatanéa, and K. R. Haapala. 2020. Improving worker health and safety in wire arc additive manufacturing: A graph-based approach. Procedia CIRP 90:461–66. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.116.
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH. 2007. NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards. In DHHS (NIOSH) Publication 2005-149 ed, Cincinnati, OH: DHHS (NIOSH). [Cited February 2, 2021]. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npg/default.html
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM), 5th Edition U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 2020 [ cited February 2, 2021]. Available from https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam/default.html
   Google Scholar
• Oberbek, P., P. Kozikowski, K. Czarnecka, P. Sobiech, S. Jakubiak, and T. Jankowski. 2019. Inhalation exposure to various nanoparticles in work environment—contextual information and results of measurements. Journal of Nanoparticle Research Article. 21 (11):222. doi:10.1007/s11051-019-4651-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelley, J. 2018. Safety Standards Aim to Rein in 3-D Printer Emissions. ACS Central Science 4 (2):134–36. doi:10.1021/acscentsci.8b00090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petretta, M., G. Desando, B. Grigolo, and L. Roseti. 2019. 3D printing of musculoskeletal tissues: Impact on safety and health at work. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A 82 (16):891–912. doi:10.1080/15287394.2019.1663458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippot, C., C. L’Allain, S. Artous, D. Locatelli, S. Jacquinot, S. Derrough, L. Aixala, P. Mougenel, and Y. Gallet. 2020. Potential workers exposure measurement in metal additive manufacturing and how to manage it. Proceedings of Euro Powder Metallurgy, Bilbao, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, N. D., R. T. Freire, J. Aparecida, M. Conrado, A. D. Batista, and J. F. Da S Petruci. 2021. Paper-based optoelectronic nose for identification of indoor air pollution caused by 3D printing thermoplastic filaments. Anal. Chim. Acta 1143:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2020.11.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, P. M., S. R. Al-Abed, D. Lay, and S. M. Lomnicki. 2019. VOC emissions and formation mechanisms from carbon nanotube composites during 3D printing. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (8):4364–70. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b00765.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ra, K., S. M. Teimouri Sendesi, M. Nuruddin, N. N. Zyaykina, E. N. Conkling, B. E. Boor, C. T. Jafvert, J. A. Howarter, J. P. Youngblood, and A. J. Whelton. 2019. Considerations for emission monitoring and liner analysis of thermally manufactured sewer cured-in-place-pipes (CIPP). J. Hazard. Mater. 371:540–49. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.02.097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, G. A., C. L. Geraci, A. Stefaniak, V. Murashov, and J. Howard. 2019. Potential occupational hazards of additive manufacturing. J Occup Environ Hyg 16 (5):321–28. doi:10.1080/15459624.2019.1591627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, T., and D. Hubbard. 2016. 3-D printing hazards: Literature review & preliminary hazard assessment. Prof Saf 61:56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Shahin-Shamsabadi, A., and P. R. Selvaganapathy. 2019. ExCeL: Combining extrusion printing on cellulose scaffolds with lamination to create in vitro biological models. Biofabrication Article. 11 (3):035002. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab0798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Short, D. B., A. Sirinterlikci, P. Badger, and B. Artieri. 2015. Environmental, health, and safety issues in rapid prototyping. Rapid Prototyping Journal 21 (1):105–10. doi:10.1108/RPJ-11-2012-0111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, T. R., G. A. Aguilera, and F. Zhao. 2017. Characterization of particle emission from fuse deposition modeling printers. Paper read at Proceedings of the ASME 2017 12th International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Los Angeles, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, M., P. Arezes, and F. Silva. 2019. Nanomaterials exposure as an occupational risk in metal additive manufacturing. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1323 Article 012013, Minatec-Grenoble, France.
   Google Scholar
• Stabile, L., M. Scungio, G. Buonanno, F. Arpino, and G. Ficco. 2017. Airborne particle emission of a commercial 3D printer: The effect of filament material and printing temperature. Indoor Air 27 (2):398–408. doi:10.1111/ina.12310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A. B., A. R. Johnson, S. Du Preez, D. R. Hammond, J. R. Wells, J. E. Ham, R. F. LeBouf, K. W. Menchaca, S. B. Martin Jr., M. G. Duling, et al.. 2019c. Evaluation of emissions and exposures at workplaces using desktop 3-dimensional printers. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 26 (2):19–30. doi:10.1016/j.jchas.2018.11.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A. B., A. R. Johnson, S. Du Preez, D. R. Hammond, J. R. Wells, J. E. Ham, R. F. LeBouf, S. B. Martin Jr., M. G. Duling, L. N. Bowers, et al.. 2019b. Insights into emissions and exposures from use of industrial-scale additive manufacturing machines. Saf Health Work 10 (2):229–36. doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2018.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A. B., L. N. Bowers, A. K. Knepp, M. A. Virji, E. M. Birch, J. E. Ham, J. R. Wells, C. Qi, D. Schwegler-Berry, S. Friend, et al.. 2018. Three-dimensional printing with nano-enabled filaments releases polymer particles containing carbon nanotubes into air. Indoor Air 28 (6):840–51. doi:10.1111/ina.12499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, A. B., L. N. Bowers, A. K. Knepp, T. P. Luxton, D. M. Peloquin, E. J. Baumann, J. E. Ham, J. R. Wells, A. R. Johnson, R. F. LeBouf, et al.. 2019a. Particle and vapor emissions from vat polymerization desktop-scale 3-dimensional printers. J Occup Environ Hyg 16 (8):519–31. doi:10.1080/15459624.2019.1612068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinle, P. 2016. Characterization of emissions from a desktop 3D printer and indoor air measurements in office settings. J Occup Environ Hyg 13 (2):121–32. doi:10.1080/15459624.2015.1091957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, B., P. Azimi, Z. El Orch, and T. Ramos. 2013. Ultrafine particle emissions from desktop 3D printers. Atmos. Environ. 79:334–39. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, A. T., C. S. Kriewall, S. Karnati, M. C. Leu, and J. W. Newkirk. 2020. Characterization of AISI 304L stainless steel powder recycled in the laser powder-bed fusion process. Additive Manufacturing 32 (Article):100981. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2019.100981.
   Google Scholar
• Todea, A. M., S. Beckmann, H. Kaminski, D. Bard, S. Bau, S. Clavaguera, D. Dahmann, H. Dozol, N. Dziurowitz, K. Elihn, et al.. 2017. Inter-comparison of personal monitors for nanoparticles exposure at workplaces and in the environment. Science of the Total Environment 605-606:929–45. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Väisänen, A. J. K., M. Hyttinen, S. Ylönen, and L. Alonen. 2019. Occupational exposure to gaseous and particulate contaminants originating from additive manufacturing of liquid, powdered, and filament plastic materials and related post-processes. J Occup Environ Hyg 16 (3):258–71. doi:10.1080/15459624.2018.1557784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, M. E., V. Pegues, S. Van Montfrans, W. Leng, and L. C. Marr. 2017. Aerosol emissions from fuse-deposition modeling 3D printers in a chamber and in real indoor environments. Environmental Science & Technology 51 (17):9516–23. doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, J., A. Baumgärtel, M. Hustedt, R. Hebisch, and S. Kaierle. 2018. Inhalation exposure to hazardous substances during powder-bed processes. Procedia CIRP 74:295–99. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.114.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Z., X. Liu, M. Ooka, L. Zhang, M. J. Song, R. Huang, N. C. Kleinstreuer, A. Simeonov, M. Xia, and M. Ferrer. 2020. Two-dimensional cellular and three-dimensional bio-printed skin models to screen topical-use compounds for irritation potential. Frontiers in Bioengineering Biotechnology 8:109. 8 Article. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2020.00109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtyła, S., P. Klama, K. Śpiewak, and T. Baran. 2020. 3D printer as a potential source of indoor air pollution. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 17 (1):207–18. doi:10.1007/s13762-019-02444-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., W. P. Fahy, S. Kim, H. Kim, N. Zhao, L. Pilato, A. Kafi, S. Bateman, and J. H. Koo. 2020. Recent developments in polymers/polymer nanocomposites for additive manufacturing. Prog Mater Sci 111:1–47. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., and L. Li. 2018. Total volatile organic compound emission evaluation and control for stereolithography additive manufacturing process. J. Clean. Prod. 170:1268–78. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi, J., R. F. LeBouf, M. G. Duling, T. R. Nurkiewicz, B. T. Chen, D. Schwegler-Berry, M. A. Virji, and A. B. Stefaniak. 2016. Emission of particulate matter from a desktop three-dimensional (3-D) printer. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A 79 (11):453–65. doi:10.1080/15287394.2016.1166467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, J. S., J. W. Seo, S. Han, and K. J. Jeon. 2019. Characteristics of nanoparticle formation and hazardous air pollutants emitted by 3D printer operations: From emission to inhalation. RSC Adv 9 (34):19606–12. doi:10.1039/C9RA03248G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., W. Jarosinski, Y.-G. Jung, and J. Zhang. 2018. 2 - Additive manufacturing processes and equipment. In Additive Manufacturing, ed. J. Zhang, and Y.-G. Jung. (pp. 39-51). Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford, United Kingdom.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., X. Kong, A. Chen, and S. Cao. 2015. Investigation of ultrafine particle emissions of desktop 3D printers in the clean room. Procedia Engineering 121:506–12. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1099.
   Google Scholar
• Zisook, R. E., B. D. Simmons, M. Vater, A. Perez, E. P. Donovan, D. J. Paustenbach, and W. D. Cyrs. 2020. Emissions associated with operations of four different additive manufacturing or 3D printing technologies. J Occup Environ Hyg 17 (10):464–79. doi:10.1080/15459624.2020.1798012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zontek, T. L., B. R. Ogle, J. T. Jankovic, and S. M. Hollenbeck. 2017. An exposure assessment of desktop 3D printing. Journal of Chemical Health and Safety 24 (2):15–25. doi:10.1016/j.jchas.2016.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zontek, T. L., S. Hollenbeck, J. Jankovic, and B. R. Ogle. 2019. Modeling particle emissions from three-dimensional printing with acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene polymer filament. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53 (16):9656–63. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b02818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar