References
- Abe, A., T. Sezaki, and K. Kinoshita. 2019. Development of a read-across workflow for skin irritation and corrosion predictions. SAR QSAR Environ. Res 30:279–98. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2019.1595136.
- Alfonso, A. Y. C., L. Mora Lagares, M. Novic, E. Benfenati, A. Kumar, and C. Chayawan. 2022. Exploration of structural requirements for azole chemicals towards human aromatase CYP19A1 activity: Classification modeling, structure-activity relationships and read-across study. Toxicol. In Vitro 81:105332. doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2022.105332.
- ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1989. Toxicological Profile for N-Nitrosodimethylamine. Public Health Service, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
- ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). 1999. ToxFAQs for n-nitrosodimethylamine CAS #62-75-9. US Department of Health and Human Services.
- Benigni, R., R. Serafimova, J. M. Parra Morte, C. L. Battistelli, C. Bossa, A. Giuliani, E. Fioravanzo, A. Bassan, G. A.m. F, J. Rathman, et al. 2020. Evaluation of the applicability of existing (Q)SAR models for predicting the genotoxicity of pesticides and similarity analysis related with genotoxicity of pesticides for facilitating of grouping and read across: An EFSA funded project. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 114:104658. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104658.
- Blackburn, K., and S. B. Stuard. 2014. A framework to facilitate consistent characterization of read across uncertainty. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 68:353–62. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.01.004.
- Bouwman, T., M. T. Cronin, J. G. Bessems, and J. J. van de Sandt. 2008. Improving the applicability of (Q)SARs for percutaneous penetration in regulatory risk assessment. Human Exp. Toxicol 27:269–76. doi:10.1177/0960327107085829.
- Chartes, N., L. A. Bero, and S. L. Norris. 2019. A review of methods used for hazard identification and risk assessment of environmental hazards. Environ. Int 123:231–39. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.060.
- Chesnut, M., T. Yamada, T. Adams, D. Knight, N. Kleinstreuer, G. Kass, T. Luechtefeld, and T. Hartung. 2018. Regulatory acceptance of read-across. ALTEX 35:413–19. doi:10.14573/altex.1805081.
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2008. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17224/information_requirements_r6_en.pdf
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2012. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17224/information_requirements_r8_en.pdf
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2017. Read-Across Assessment Framework (RAAF). ECHA-17-R-01-EN, March. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13628/raaf_en.pdf
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2020. The use of alternatives to testing on animals for REACH. The fourth report under Article 117(3) of REACH, June. Available at: https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13639/alternatives_test_nimals_2020_en.pdf/b9af7cf7-4ce0-f3a1-1bcb-8de3fd84a1fb
- EMA (European Medicines Agency). 2020. Procedure under article 5(3) of regulation EC (No) 726/2004: Nitrosamine impurities in human medicinal products. Procedure number: EMA/H/A-5(3)/1490. EMA/369136/2020.
- Escher, S. E., H. Kamp, S. H. Bennekou, A. Bitsch, C. Fisher, P. Graepel, J. G. Hengstler, M. Herzler, D. Knight, M. Leist, et al. 2019. Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: The read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project. Arch. Toxicol 93:3643–67. doi:10.1007/s00204-019-02591-7.
- Felter, S. P., C. A. Ryan, D. A. Basketter, N. J. Gilmour, and G. F. Gerberick. 2003. Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 37:1–10. doi:10.1016/S0273-2300(02)00021-1.
- Floris, M., A. Manganaro, O. Nicolotti, R. Medda, G. F. Mangiatordi, and E. Benfenati. 2014. A generalizable definition of chemical similarity for read-across. J. Cheminformatics 6:1–7. doi:10.1186/s13321-014-0039-1.
- Gallegos-Saliner, A., A. Poater, N. Jeliazkova, G. Patlewicz, and A. P. Worth. 2008. Toxmatch-A chemical classification and activity prediction tool based on similarity measures. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 52:77–84. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2008.05.012.
- Gerberick, G. F., M. K. Robinson, S. P. Felter, I. R. White, and D. A. Basketter. 2001. Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Contact Dermatitis 45:333–40. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0536.2001.450603.x.
- Gini, G., A. M. Franchi, A. Manganaro, A. Golbamaki, and E. Benfenati. 2014. ToxRead: A tool to assist in read across and its use to assess mutagenicity of chemicals. SAR QSAR Environ. Res 25:999–1011. doi:10.1080/1062936X.2014.976267.
- Hubesch, B., N. Jeliazkova, and Q. Li. 2017. LRI AMBIT chemoinformatic system with IUCLID6 substance database to support read-across of substance endpoint data and category formation. Toxicol. Lett 280:S289. Available at. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2017.07.811.
- ICH (International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use). 2017. Assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) Impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk M7(R1).
- Iscan, M. 2004. Hazard identification for contaminants. Toxicology 205:195–99. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.051.
- Jardine, C., S. Hrudey, J. Shortreed, L. Craig, D. Krewski, C. Furgal, and S. McColl. 2003. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 6:569–720. doi:10.1080/10937400390208608.
- Kim, K. B., S. J. Kwack, J. Y. Lee, S. Kacew, and B. M. Lee. 2021. Current opinion on risk assessment of cosmetics. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 24:137–61. doi:10.1080/10937404.2021.1907264.
- Kirman, C. R., A. A. Lee, P. J. Sheehan, J. S. Bus, R. C. Lewis, and S. M. Hays. 2021. Ethylene oxide review: Characterization of total exposure via endogenous and exogenous pathways and their implications to risk assessment and risk management. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B 24:1–29. doi:10.1080/10937404.2020.1852988.
- Kwon, S., D. Holland, and P. Kern. 2009. Skin safety evaluation of laundry detergent products. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 72:1369–79. doi:10.1080/15287390903212675.
- Lee, B. M., S. H. Lee, T. Yamada, S. Park, Y. Wang, K. B. Kim, and S. Kwon. 2022. Read-across approaches: Current applications and regulatory acceptance in Korea, Japan, and China. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 85:184–97. doi:10.1080/15287394.2021.1992323.
- Lester, C. C., and G. Yan. 2021. A matched molecular pair (MMP) approach for selecting analogs suitable for structure activity relationship (SAR)-based read across. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 124:104966. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104966.
- Li, X., X. He, Y. Le, X. Guo, M. S. Bryant, A. H. Atrakchi, T. J. McGovern, K. L. Davis-Bruno, D. D. A. AKeire, R. H. Heflich, et al. 2022. Genotoxicity evaluation of nitrosamine impurities using human TK6 cells transduced with cytochrome P450s. Arch. Toxicol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-022-03347-6.
- Liteplo, R. G., and M. E. Meek. 2002. Concise international chemical assessment document (CICAD) 38:N-Nitrosodimethylamine. Published under Joint Sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Program and the World Health Organization.
- Manganelli, S., and E. Benfenati. 2016. Use of read-across tools. Meth. Mol. Biol 1425:305–22.
- MOE (Ministry of Environment). 2019. Enforcement decree of the act on registration, evaluation, etc. of chemicals. Available at: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=17&tabMenuId=93&eventGubun=060101&query=%ED%99%94%ED%95%99%EB%AC%BC%EC%A7%88%EA%B4%80%EB%A6%AC%EB%B2%95#undefined
- MOE (Ministry of Environment). 2021a. The act on registration, evaluation, etc. of chemicals No. 18034. Available at: http://www.law.go.kr/령/화학물질의등록및평가등에관한법률
- MOE (Ministry of Environment). 2021b. The act on the safety management of household chemicals and biocides. Available at: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=17&tabMenuId=93&eventGubun=060101&query=%ED%99%94%ED%95%99%EB%AC%BC%EC%A7%88%EC%9D%98+%EB%93%B1%EB%A1%9D+%EB%B0%8F+%ED%8F%89%EA%B0%80+%EB%93%B1%EC%97%90+%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C+%EB%B2%95%EB%A5%A0#liBgcolor0
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2017. An application guideline for read-across. Available at: https://ecolibrary.me.go.kr/nier/#/search/detail/5667028.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2019. The research to improve the chemical evaluation system. Available at: https://ecolibrary.me.go.kr/nier/#/search/detail/5708375.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2020. The study on adapting weight of evidence matrix to assess the hazards of chemicals. Available at: https://ecolibrary.me.go.kr/nier/#/search/detail/5705515
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2021. The guidance to prepare dossier with QSAR information for industry. Available at: https://ncis.nier.go.kr/bbs/bbsDataTabList.do.
- NIER (National Institute of Environmental Research). 2022. Guidance and check list for the use of the weight of evidence approach in genotoxicity assessment. Available at: https://ncis.nier.go.kr/bbs/bbsDataView.do;jsessionid=Als2wqAtJq4WoBdUzJVy+yUB.ncis20
- NRC (National Research Council). 1983. Risk assessment in the Federal government: Managing the process. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
- OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). Series on testing and assessment, number 194. guidance on grouping of chemicals, Second Edition. ENV/JM/MONO (2014) 4, 14-Apr-2014. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/publications/guidance-on-grouping-of-chemicals-second-edition-9789264274679-en.htm
- OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2021. The OECD QSAR Toolbox. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/risk-assessment/oecd-qsar-toolbox.htm
- Patlewicz, G., M. T. D. Cronin, G. Herman, J. C. Lambert, L. E. Lizarraga, and I. Shah. 2018. Navigating through the minefield of read-across frameworks: A commentary perspective. Comput. Toxicol 6:39–54. doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2018.04.002.
- Patlewicz, G., G. Helman, P. Pradeep, and I. Shah. 2017. Navigating through the minefield of read-across tools: A review of in silico tools for grouping. Comput. Toxicol 3:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2017.05.003.
- Patlewicz, G., L. E. Lizarraga, D. Rua, D. G. Allen, A. B. Daniel, S. C. Fitzpatrick, N. Garcia-Reyero, J. Gordon, P. Hakkinen, A. S. Howard, et al. 2019. Exploring current read-across applications and needs among selected U.S. federal agencies. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 106:197–209. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.05.011.
- Pawar, G., J. C. Madden, D. Ebbrell, J. W. Firman, M. T. D, Cronin, and Cronin. 2019. 2019. In silico toxicology data resources to support read-across and (Q)SAR. Front. Pharmacol 10:561. doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00561.
- Stuard, S. B., and T. Heinonen. 2018. Relevance and application of read-across - mini review of European consensus platform for alternatives and Scandinavian society for cell toxicology 2017 workshop session. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol 123 (5):37–41. doi:10.1111/bcpt.13006.
- Tate, T., J. Wambaugh, G. Patlewicz, and I. Shah. 2021. Repeat-dose toxicity prediction with generalized read-across (GenRA) using targeted transcriptomic data: A proof-of-concept case study. Comput. Toxicol 19:100171. Available at. doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2021.100171.
- Taylor, K. 2018. Ten years of REACH - An animal protection perspective. Altern. Lab. Animal 46:347–73. doi:10.1177/026119291804600610.
- Thresher, A., R. Foster, D. J. Ponting, S. A. Stalford, R. E. Tennant, and R. Thomas. 2020. Are all nitrosamines concerning? A review of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 116:104749. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104749.
- Tricker, A. R., and R. Preussmannv. 1991. Carcinogenic N-nitrosamines in the diet: Occurrence, formation, mechanisms and carcinogenic potential. Mut. Res./Genet. Toxicol 259:277–89. doi:10.1016/0165-1218(91)90123-4.
- Tuesuwan, B., and V. Vongsutilers. 2021. Nitrosamine contamination in pharmaceuticals: Threat, impact, and control. J. Pharm. Sci 110:3118–28. doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2021.04.021.
- US FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). 2019. FDA updates and press announcements on angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) recalls (Valsartan, Losartan, and Irbesartan). Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-angiotensin-ii-receptor-blocker-arb-recalls-valsartan-losartan
- US FDA (U.S. Food and Drug Administration). 2022. FDA Updates and Press Announcements on Nitrosamine in Varenicline(Chantix). Available at: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcements-nitrosamine-varenicline-chantix
- Varsou, D. D., and H. Sarimveis. 2021. Apellis: An online tool for read-across model development. Comput. Toxicol 17:1–22. Available at https://apellis.jaqpot.org.
- VEGA HUB Platform. 2017. ToxRead. Available at: https://www.vegahub.eu/portfolio-item/toxread
- Watford, S., L. Ly Pham, J. Wignall, R. Shin, M. T. Martin, and K. P. Friedman. 2019. ToxRefDB version 2.0: Improved utility for predictive and retrospective toxicology analyses. Reprod. Toxicol 89:145–58. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.07.012.
- WHO (World Health Organization). 2008. N-nitrosodimethylamine in drinking-water. background document for preparation of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO/HSE/AMR/08.03/8. Geneva, Switzerland.
- Wu, S., K. Blackburn, J. Amburgey, J. Jaworska, and T. Federle. 2010. A framework for using structural, reactivity, metabolic and physicochemical similarity to evaluate the suitability of analogs for SAR-based toxicological assessments. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol 56:67–81. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2009.09.006.