5,456
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Characterization of sensory profile by the CATA method of Mexican coffee brew considering two preparation methods: espresso and French press

, , , , , & show all
Pages 967-973 | Received 24 Jan 2019, Accepted 10 May 2019, Published online: 24 May 2019

References

  • Gloess, A.; Schönbächler, N.; Klopprogge, B.; D‘Ambrosio, B.; Chatelain, L.; Bongartz, K.; Strittmatter, A.; Rast, M., A.; Yeretzian, C. Comparison of Nine Common Coffee Extraction Methods: Instrumental and Sensory Analysis. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2013, 236, 607–627. DOI: 10.1007/s00217-013-1917-x.
  • NMX-F-195-SCFI-2016. Café verde de especialidad – especificaciones, clasificación y evaluación sensorial. Speciality green coffee – specifications, preparations and sensory evaluation. Norma Oficial Mexicana. Mexico: Dirección general de normas.
  • ISO 13299 2003. Analyse Sensorielle – Méthodologie – Directives Générales Pour L’établissement D’un Profil Sensorial. In Analyse Sensorielle. AFNOR: Paris; 2003, pp. 475–506.
  • Stone, H.; Sidel, J.; Oliviers, S.; Woosley, A.; Singleton, R. C. Sensory Evaluation by Quantitative Descriptive Analysis. Food Technol. Nov 1974, 24–28. doi:10.1002/9780470385036.ch1c.
  • Jaeger, S. R.; Beresford, M. K.; Paisley, A. G.; Antúnez, L.; Vidal, L.; Silva-Cadena, R.; Giménez, A.; Ares, G. Check-All-That-Apply (CATA) Questions for Sensory Product Characterization by Consumers: Investigations into the Number of Terms Used in CATA Questions. Food Qual. Preference. 2015, 42, 154–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.003.
  • Meyners, M.; Castura, J. C.; Carr, B. T. Existing and New Approaches for the Analysis of CATA Data. Food Qual. Preference. 2013, 30, 309–319. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.06.010.
  • Worch, T.; Piqueras-Fiszman, B. Contributions to Assess the Reproducibility and the Agreement of Respondents in CATA Tasks. Food Qual. Preference. 2015, 40, 137–146. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.007.
  • Nguyen, T.; Kuchera, M.; Smoot, K.; Diako, C.; Vixie, B.; Ross, C. F. Consumer Acceptance of a Polyphenolic Coffee Beverage. J. Food Sci. 2016, 81(11), S2817–S2823. DOI: 10.1111/jfds.2016.81.issue-11.
  • Donfrancesco, B. D.; Gutierrez-Guzman, N.; Chambers IV, E. Comparison of Results from Cupping and Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Colombian Brewed Coffee. J. Sens. Stud. 2014, 29, 301–311. DOI: 10.1111/joss.2014.29.issue-4.
  • Lika-Kobayashi, M.; de Toledo-Benassi, M. Sensory Characterization of Commercial Soluble Coffees by Flash Profile. Semina: Ciências Agrárias. Londrina. 2012, 33(2), 3081–3092. DOI: 10.5433/1679-0359.2012v33n6Supl2p3081.
  • Kobayashi, M. L.; De Toledo-Benassi, M. Impact of Packaging Characteristics on Consumer Purchase Intention: Instant Coffee in Refill Packs and Glass Jars. J. Sens. Stud. 2015, 30, 169–180. DOI: 10.1111/joss.12142.
  • Sanchez, K.; Chambers IV, E. How Does Product Preparation Affect Sensory Properties? an Example with Coffee. J. Sens. Stud. 2015, 30, 499–511. DOI: 10.1111/joss.12184.
  • Rosas-Arellano, J.; Escamilla-Prado, E.; Ruiz-Rosado, O. Relación De Los Nutrimentos Del Suelo Con Las Características Físicas Y Sensoriales Del Café Orgánico. Terra Latinoam. 2008, 26, 375–384. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0187-57792008000400010.
  • Varela, P.; Ares, G. Sensory Profiling, the Blurred Line between Sensory and Consumer Science: A Review of Novel Methods for Product Characterization. Food Res. Int. 2012, 48, 893–908. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2012.06.037.
  • NOM-149-SCFI-2000. Café Veracruz. Especificaciones Y Métodos De Prueba; Secretaría de Economía: México, D. F. 2000.
  • Bhumiratana, N.; Adhikari, K.; Chambers, I. V. E. Evolution of Sensory Aroma Attributes from Coffee Beans to Brewed Coffee. LWT - Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 44(2185–2192). DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.07.001.
  • Chambers, E.; Sanchez, K.; Phan Uyen, X. T.; Mille, R. R.; Civille, G. V.; Donfrancesco, B. D. Development of a “Living” Lexicon for Descriptive Sensory Analysis of Brewed Coffee. J. Sens. Stud. 2016, 31, 465–480. DOI: 10.1111/joss.12237.
  • Maeztu, L.; Andueza, S.; Ibañez, C.; de Peña, M. P.; Bello, J.; Cid, C. Multivariate Methods for Characterization and Classification of Espresso Coffees from Different Botanical Varieties and Types of Roast by Foam, Taste, and Mouthfeel. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 4743–4747. DOI: 10.1021/jf010314l.
  • Labbe, D.; Sudre, J.; Dugas, V.; Folmer, B. Impact of Crema on Expected and Actual Espresso Coffee Experience. Food Res. Int. 2016, 82, 53–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.01.020.
  • Abdi, H.; Valentin, D. Multiple Correspondence Analysis. In Encyclopedia of Measurement and Statistics, Ed., Salkind, N. J., California, USA: SAGE Publications. 2007; pp. 1–13. doi:10.4135/9781412952644.n299.
  • Salamanca, C. A.; Núria, F.; González, C.; Saez, M.; Villaescusa, I. Extraction of Espresso Coffee by Using Gradient of Temperature: Effect on Physicochemical and Sensorial Characteristics of Espresso. Food Chem. 2017, 214, 622–630. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.07.120.
  • Jervis, S. M.; Lopetcharat, K.; Drake, M. A. Application of Ethnography and Conjoint Analysis to Determine Key Consumer Attributes for Latte-Style Coffee Beverages. J. Sens. Stud. 2012, 27, 48–58. DOI: 10.1111/jss.2012.27.issue-1.
  • Doorn, G. V.; Colonna-Dashwood, M.; Hudd-Baillie, R.; Spence, C. Latté Art Influences Both the Expected and Rated Value of Milk-Based Coffee Drinks. J. Sens. Stud. 2015, 30, 305–315. DOI: 10.1111/joss.2015.30.issue-4.