Physicochemical properties of mango (Amropali cultivar) powder and its reconstituted product as affected by drying methods

References

• Zotarelli, M. F.; da Silva, V. M.; Durigon, A.; Hubinger, M. D.; Laurindo, J. B. Production of Mango Powder by Spray Drying and Cast-tape Drying. Powder Technol. 2017, 305, 447–454. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.10.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid, M.; Khatun, H.; Rayhan, M.; Plabon, M.; Hossain, M.; Mozid, M.; Kamal, M.; Hasan, M.; El Sabagh, A.; Islam, M. Comparative Study on Physicochemical Properties of Selected Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) Varieties in Northern Bangladesh. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova (Agronomic Research in Moldavia). 2019, 52(1), 54–65.
   Google Scholar
• Ali, S. Y.; Hossain, M.; Zakaria, M.; Haque, M.; Ahiduzzaman, M. Physio-chemical Characteristics of Seven Cultivars Mango (Mangifera Indica L.)” In Bangladesh. Int. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. Res. 2019, 7(4), 01–08.
   Google Scholar
• Akin-Idowu, P. E.; Adebo, G. U.; Egbekunle, K. O.; Olagunju, Y. O.; Aderonmu, O. I.; Aduloju, A. O. Diversity of Mango (Mangifera Indica L.) Cultivars Based on Physicochemical, Nutritional, Antioxidant, and Phytochemical Traits in South West Nigeria. Int. J. Fruit Sci. 2020, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1735601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, M.; Islam, M.; Uddin, M.; Barman, J.; Quamruzzaman, A. Effect of Age of Seedling and Variety of Scion in Stone Grafting of Mango. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 2006, 1(2), 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• BBS. Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh; Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Ministry of Planning: Bangladesh, 2017; pp 203–204.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkar, K.; Alam, M.; Rahman, A.; Bhuiyan, M. Post-harvest Losses in Mango Value Chain. Int J. Biores. 2011, 10(5), 25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Mahendran, T.;. Physico-chemical Properties and Sensory Characteristics of Dehydrated Guava Concentrate: Effect of Drying Method and Maltodextrin Concentration. Trop. Agric. Res. Ext. 2011, 13(2), 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Caparino, O.; Tang, J.; Nindo, C.; Sablani, S.; Powers, J.; Fellman, J. Effect of Drying Methods on the Physical Properties and Microstructures of Mango (Philippine ‘Carabao’var.) Powder. J. Food Eng. 2012, 111(1), 135–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, E. H. J.; Chen, X. D.; Pearce, D. Surface Composition of Industrial Spray-dried Milk Powders, 2, Effects of Spray Drying Conditions on the Surface Composition. J. Food Eng. 2009, 94(2), 169–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzaffar, K.; Dar, B.; Kumar, P. Assessment of Nutritional, Physicochemical, Antioxidant, Structural and Rheological Properties of Spray Dried Tamarind Pulp Powder. J. Food Measurem. Charact. 2017, 11(2), 746–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari, B. R.; Datta, N.; Howes, T. Problems Associated with Spray Drying of Sugar-rich Foods. Dry. Technol. 1997, 15(2), 671–684. DOI: 10.1080/07373939708917253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krokida, M.; Maroulis, Z. Effect of Drying Method on Shrinkage and Porosity. Dry. Technol. 1997, 15(10), 2441–2458. DOI: 10.1080/07373939708917369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pap, L.;. Production of Pure Vegetable Juice Powders of Full Biological Value. Fruit Process. 1995, 3, 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mujumdar, A. S.;. Handbook of Industrial Drying, 3rd ed.; CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, J. E.; Drying Cabinet, United States Patent: US1752797A, 1930.
   Google Scholar
• Chua, K.; Hawlader, M.; Chou, S.; Ho, J. On the Study of Time-varying Temperature drying—Effect on Drying Kinetics and Product Quality. Dry. Technol. 2002, 20(8), 1559–1577. DOI: 10.1081/DRT-120014052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, R.; Charters, W. Performance of a Solar Tunnel Dryer with Microcomputer Control. Solar Energy. 1997, 59(4–6), 151–154. DOI: 10.1016/S0038-092X(96)00143-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mujumdar, A. S.; Menon, A. S. Drying of Solids: Principles, Classification, and Selection of Dryers, Handbook of Industrial Drying;3rd; Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, USA, 1995; pp 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Kruse, O. O.;.Drying Oven Control, United States Patent: US2412990A, 1946.
   Google Scholar
• Dorta, E.; Lobo, M. G.; González, M. Using Drying Treatments to Stabilise Mango Peel and Seed: Effect on Antioxidant Activity. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2012, 45(2), 261–268. DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2011.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Official Methods of Analysis, 20th ed.; AOAC International, Rockville, Maryland, USA, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Goula, A. M.; Adamopoulos, K. G.; Kazakis, N. A. Influence of Spray Drying Conditions on Tomato Powder Properties. Dry. Technol. 2004, 22(5), 1129–1151. DOI: 10.1081/DRT-120038584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Y.; Corke, H. Production and Properties of Spray‐dried Amaranthus Betacyanin Pigments. J. Food Sci. 2000, 65(7), 1248–1252. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2000.tb10273.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastman, J. E.; Moore, C. O. Cold-water-soluble Granular Starch for Gelled Food Compositions, United States Patent: US4465702A, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Cano-Chauca, M.; Stringheta, P.; Ramos, A.; Cal-Vidal, J. Effect of the Carriers on the Microstructure of Mango Powder Obtained by Spray Drying and Its Functional Characterization. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2005, 6(4), 420–428. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2005.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, M.; Yusof, Y.; Aziz, M.; Chin, N.; Amin, N. M. Characterisation of Fast Dispersible Fruit Tablets Made from Green and Ripe Mango Fruit Powders. J. Food Eng. 2014, 125, 17–23. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jinapong, N.; Suphantharika, M.; Jamnong, P. Production of Instant Soymilk Powders by Ultrafiltration, Spray Drying and Fluidized Bed Agglomeration. J. Food Eng. 2008, 84(2), 194–205. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2007.04.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beuchat, L. R.;. Functional and Electrophoretic Characteristics of Succinylated Peanut Flour Protein. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1977, 25(2), 258–261. DOI: 10.1021/jf60210a044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, G. D.; Murphy, P. A. pH and Titratable Acidity, In: Food Analysis. Food Analysis; Springer: Boston, 2010; pp 219–238.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C.;. Measuring Density and Porosity of Grain Kernels Using a Gas Pycnometer. Cereal Chem. 1988, 65(1), 13–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, G.; Shahabuddin, M. To Determine the Specific Heat of a Liquid by the Method, Practical Physics for Degree Students, 1st ed.; Hafiz Book Centre: Dhaka, 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Bon, J.; Vaquiro, H.; Benedito, J.; Telis-Romero, J. Thermophysical Properties of Mango Pulp (Mangifera Indica L. Cv. Tommy Atkins). J. Food Eng. 2010, 97(4), 563–568. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundurao, A.; Ramaswamy, H. S.; Ahmed, J. Effect of Soluble Solids Concentration and Temperature on Thermo-physical and Rheological Properties of Mango Puree. Int. J. Food Prop. 2011, 14(5), 1018–1036. DOI: 10.1080/10942910903580876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka, M.; Kimiagar, M.; Lee, T. C.; Chichester, C. O. Effect of Maillard Browning Reaction on Nutritional Quality of Protein. In Protein Crosslinking, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology; Friedman, M., Ed.; Springer: Boston, MA, 1977; pp 321–341.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, M. A.; Adhikari, B. Drying and Denaturation of Proteins in Spray Drying Process. In Handbook of Industrial Drying; Mujumdar, A. S., Ed.; Taylor and Francis Group: Boca Raton, USA, 2006; pp 971–981.
   Google Scholar
• Afolabi, I. S.;. Moisture Migration and Bulk Nutrients Interaction in a Drying Food Systems: A Review. Food Nutri. Sci. 2014, 58(8), 692–714.
   Google Scholar
• Burova, N.; Kislitsina, N.; Gryazina, F.; Pashkova, G.; Kuzminykh, A. A Review of Techniques for Drying Food Products in Vacuum Drying Plants and Methods for Quality Control of Dried Samples (Technical Note). Revista Espacios. 2017, 38, 35.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M.; Kitamura, Y.; Yamano, Y.; Kitamura, M. Effect of Vacuum Spray Drying on the Physicochemical Properties, Water Sorption and Glass Transition Phenomenon of Orange Juice Powder. J. Food Eng. 2016, 169, 131–140. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2015.08.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha, A. K.; Ua-Arak, T.; Adhikari, B. P.; Howes, T.; Bhandari, B. R. Glass Transition Behavior of Spray Dried Orange Juice Powder Measured by Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) and Thermal Mechanical Compression Test (TMCT). Int. J. Food Prop. 2007, 10(3), 661–673. DOI: 10.1080/10942910601109218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roongruangsri, W.; Bronlund, J. Effect of Air-drying Temperature on Physico-chemical, Powder Properties and Sorption Characteristics of Pumpkin Powders. Int. Food Res. J. 2016, 23(3), 962–972.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manickavasagan, A.; Thangavel, K.; Dev, S. R.; Delfiya, D. A.; Nambi, E.; Orsat, V.; Raghavan, G. Physicochemical Characteristics of Date Powder Produced in a Pilot-scale Spray Dryer. Dry. Technol. 2015, 33(9), 1114–1123. DOI: 10.1080/07373937.2015.1014045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Hernandez, G.; Gonzalez-Garcia, R.; Grajales-Lagunes, A.; Ruiz-Cabrera, M.; Abud-Archila, M. Spray-drying of Cactus Pear Juice (Opuntia Streptacantha): Effect on the Physicochemical Properties of Powder and Reconstituted Product. Dry. Technol. 2005, 23(4), 955–973. DOI: 10.1080/DRT-200054251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, M.; Kitamura, Y.; Kokawa, M.; Monalisa, K.; Tsai, F.-H.; Miyamura, S. Effects of Micro Wet Milling and Vacuum Spray Drying on the Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Orange (Citrus Unshiu) Juice with Pulp Powder. Food Bioprod. Process. 2017, 101, 132–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.fbp.2016.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manjunatha, S. S.; Raju, P. S.; Bawa, A. S. Modelling the Rheological Behaviour of Enzyme Clarified Lime (Citrus Aurantifolia L.) Juice Concentrate. Czech. J. Food Sci. 2012, 30(5), 456–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar